Using high-frequency monitoring data to quantify city-wide suspended-sediment load and evaluate TMDL goals

Excess sediment is a common reason water bodies in the USA become listed as impaired resulting in total maximum daily loads (TMDL) that require municipalities to invest millions of dollars annually on management practices aimed at reducing suspended-sediment loads (SSLs), yet monitoring data are rar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 2023-11, Vol.195 (11), p.1372-1372, Article 1372
Hauptverfasser: Miller, Samuel A., Webber, James S., Jastram, John D., Aguilar, Marcus F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1372
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1372
container_title Environmental monitoring and assessment
container_volume 195
creator Miller, Samuel A.
Webber, James S.
Jastram, John D.
Aguilar, Marcus F.
description Excess sediment is a common reason water bodies in the USA become listed as impaired resulting in total maximum daily loads (TMDL) that require municipalities to invest millions of dollars annually on management practices aimed at reducing suspended-sediment loads (SSLs), yet monitoring data are rarely used to quantify SSLs and track TMDL progress. A monitoring network was created to quantify the SSL from the City of Roanoke, Virginia, USA (CoR), to the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek and help guide TMDL assessment and implementation. Suspended-sediment concentrations were estimated between 2020 and 2022 from high-frequency turbidity data using surrogate linear-regression models. Sixty-one percent of the total three-year SSL resulted from five large storm events. The average suspended-sediment yield from the CoR (58.1 metric tons/km 2 /year) was similar to other urban watersheds in the Eastern United States; however, the yield was nearly five times larger than the TMDL allocation (12.2 metric tons/km 2 /year). The TMDL allocated load was modeled based on a predominantly forested reference watershed and may not be a practical target for highly impervious watersheds within the CoR. The TMDL model used daily input data which likely does not capture the full range of SSLs during storm events, particularly from flashy urban streams. The average SSL following the five large storm events doubled that of the CoR’s annual allocated load from the TMDL. The results of this study highlight the importance of using high-frequency monitoring data to accurately estimate SSLs and evaluate TMDLs in urban areas.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10661-023-11905-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10600285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2881542497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9d3a87508128a184dddfcedf471a3c89d2906ab88e20f3d42e1847b9a36fa5a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtvFDEUhS0EIkuSP0BliYbG4Md4bFcIhae0iCaprbtjz65XM_bGnkm0_x4PG4GgSKpb3O8cHZ2D0GtG3zFK1fvCaNsyQrkgjBkqiXiGVkwqQbiR5jlaUdYq0orWnKFXpewppUY15iU6E0prKpleof1NCXGLd2G7I332t7OP3RGPKYYp5eXjYAI8JXw7Q5xCf8RdmI7kPjiPy1wOPjrvSPEujD5OeEjgMESH_R0MM0weX__4tMbbBEO5QC_6evzlwz1HN18-X199I-ufX79ffVyTrhHtRIwToJWkmnENTDfOub7zrm8UA9Fp47ihLWy09pz2wjXcV0htDIi2BwlanKMPJ9_DvBm962quDIM95DBCPtoEwf77iWFnt-nO1jop5VpWh7cPDjnVRspkx1A6PwwQfZqLFUwK2WilxZMo15oLLhq25HrzH7pPc461ioVisuGNUZXiJ6rLqZTs-z_BGbXL7PY0u62z29-z2yWFOInKYRnN57_Wj6h-Ac5rr6k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2881542497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using high-frequency monitoring data to quantify city-wide suspended-sediment load and evaluate TMDL goals</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Miller, Samuel A. ; Webber, James S. ; Jastram, John D. ; Aguilar, Marcus F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, Samuel A. ; Webber, James S. ; Jastram, John D. ; Aguilar, Marcus F.</creatorcontrib><description>Excess sediment is a common reason water bodies in the USA become listed as impaired resulting in total maximum daily loads (TMDL) that require municipalities to invest millions of dollars annually on management practices aimed at reducing suspended-sediment loads (SSLs), yet monitoring data are rarely used to quantify SSLs and track TMDL progress. A monitoring network was created to quantify the SSL from the City of Roanoke, Virginia, USA (CoR), to the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek and help guide TMDL assessment and implementation. Suspended-sediment concentrations were estimated between 2020 and 2022 from high-frequency turbidity data using surrogate linear-regression models. Sixty-one percent of the total three-year SSL resulted from five large storm events. The average suspended-sediment yield from the CoR (58.1 metric tons/km 2 /year) was similar to other urban watersheds in the Eastern United States; however, the yield was nearly five times larger than the TMDL allocation (12.2 metric tons/km 2 /year). The TMDL allocated load was modeled based on a predominantly forested reference watershed and may not be a practical target for highly impervious watersheds within the CoR. The TMDL model used daily input data which likely does not capture the full range of SSLs during storm events, particularly from flashy urban streams. The average SSL following the five large storm events doubled that of the CoR’s annual allocated load from the TMDL. The results of this study highlight the importance of using high-frequency monitoring data to accurately estimate SSLs and evaluate TMDLs in urban areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11905-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37880518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Coastal inlets ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Loads (forces) ; Monitoring ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; rivers ; Sediment ; Sediment concentration ; Sediment load ; Sediment yield ; Sediments ; Storms ; Streams ; Suspended load ; suspended sediment ; Suspended sediments ; Turbidity ; Urban areas ; Urban watersheds ; Virginia ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-11, Vol.195 (11), p.1372-1372, Article 1372</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023</rights><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9d3a87508128a184dddfcedf471a3c89d2906ab88e20f3d42e1847b9a36fa5a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6636-1368 ; 0000-0002-4431-9596 ; 0000-0002-9416-3358 ; 0000-0003-4225-1601</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-023-11905-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-023-11905-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, Samuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webber, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jastram, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar, Marcus F.</creatorcontrib><title>Using high-frequency monitoring data to quantify city-wide suspended-sediment load and evaluate TMDL goals</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Excess sediment is a common reason water bodies in the USA become listed as impaired resulting in total maximum daily loads (TMDL) that require municipalities to invest millions of dollars annually on management practices aimed at reducing suspended-sediment loads (SSLs), yet monitoring data are rarely used to quantify SSLs and track TMDL progress. A monitoring network was created to quantify the SSL from the City of Roanoke, Virginia, USA (CoR), to the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek and help guide TMDL assessment and implementation. Suspended-sediment concentrations were estimated between 2020 and 2022 from high-frequency turbidity data using surrogate linear-regression models. Sixty-one percent of the total three-year SSL resulted from five large storm events. The average suspended-sediment yield from the CoR (58.1 metric tons/km 2 /year) was similar to other urban watersheds in the Eastern United States; however, the yield was nearly five times larger than the TMDL allocation (12.2 metric tons/km 2 /year). The TMDL allocated load was modeled based on a predominantly forested reference watershed and may not be a practical target for highly impervious watersheds within the CoR. The TMDL model used daily input data which likely does not capture the full range of SSLs during storm events, particularly from flashy urban streams. The average SSL following the five large storm events doubled that of the CoR’s annual allocated load from the TMDL. The results of this study highlight the importance of using high-frequency monitoring data to accurately estimate SSLs and evaluate TMDLs in urban areas.</description><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Coastal inlets</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment concentration</subject><subject>Sediment load</subject><subject>Sediment yield</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Suspended load</subject><subject>suspended sediment</subject><subject>Suspended sediments</subject><subject>Turbidity</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban watersheds</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTtvFDEUhS0EIkuSP0BliYbG4Md4bFcIhae0iCaprbtjz65XM_bGnkm0_x4PG4GgSKpb3O8cHZ2D0GtG3zFK1fvCaNsyQrkgjBkqiXiGVkwqQbiR5jlaUdYq0orWnKFXpewppUY15iU6E0prKpleof1NCXGLd2G7I332t7OP3RGPKYYp5eXjYAI8JXw7Q5xCf8RdmI7kPjiPy1wOPjrvSPEujD5OeEjgMESH_R0MM0weX__4tMbbBEO5QC_6evzlwz1HN18-X199I-ufX79ffVyTrhHtRIwToJWkmnENTDfOub7zrm8UA9Fp47ihLWy09pz2wjXcV0htDIi2BwlanKMPJ9_DvBm962quDIM95DBCPtoEwf77iWFnt-nO1jop5VpWh7cPDjnVRspkx1A6PwwQfZqLFUwK2WilxZMo15oLLhq25HrzH7pPc461ioVisuGNUZXiJ6rLqZTs-z_BGbXL7PY0u62z29-z2yWFOInKYRnN57_Wj6h-Ac5rr6k</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Miller, Samuel A.</creator><creator>Webber, James S.</creator><creator>Jastram, John D.</creator><creator>Aguilar, Marcus F.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6636-1368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-9596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9416-3358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4225-1601</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Using high-frequency monitoring data to quantify city-wide suspended-sediment load and evaluate TMDL goals</title><author>Miller, Samuel A. ; Webber, James S. ; Jastram, John D. ; Aguilar, Marcus F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-9d3a87508128a184dddfcedf471a3c89d2906ab88e20f3d42e1847b9a36fa5a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Coastal inlets</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment concentration</topic><topic>Sediment load</topic><topic>Sediment yield</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Suspended load</topic><topic>suspended sediment</topic><topic>Suspended sediments</topic><topic>Turbidity</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban watersheds</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Samuel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webber, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jastram, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar, Marcus F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Samuel A.</au><au>Webber, James S.</au><au>Jastram, John D.</au><au>Aguilar, Marcus F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using high-frequency monitoring data to quantify city-wide suspended-sediment load and evaluate TMDL goals</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1372</spage><epage>1372</epage><pages>1372-1372</pages><artnum>1372</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Excess sediment is a common reason water bodies in the USA become listed as impaired resulting in total maximum daily loads (TMDL) that require municipalities to invest millions of dollars annually on management practices aimed at reducing suspended-sediment loads (SSLs), yet monitoring data are rarely used to quantify SSLs and track TMDL progress. A monitoring network was created to quantify the SSL from the City of Roanoke, Virginia, USA (CoR), to the Roanoke River and Tinker Creek and help guide TMDL assessment and implementation. Suspended-sediment concentrations were estimated between 2020 and 2022 from high-frequency turbidity data using surrogate linear-regression models. Sixty-one percent of the total three-year SSL resulted from five large storm events. The average suspended-sediment yield from the CoR (58.1 metric tons/km 2 /year) was similar to other urban watersheds in the Eastern United States; however, the yield was nearly five times larger than the TMDL allocation (12.2 metric tons/km 2 /year). The TMDL allocated load was modeled based on a predominantly forested reference watershed and may not be a practical target for highly impervious watersheds within the CoR. The TMDL model used daily input data which likely does not capture the full range of SSLs during storm events, particularly from flashy urban streams. The average SSL following the five large storm events doubled that of the CoR’s annual allocated load from the TMDL. The results of this study highlight the importance of using high-frequency monitoring data to accurately estimate SSLs and evaluate TMDLs in urban areas.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37880518</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-023-11905-3</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6636-1368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-9596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9416-3358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4225-1601</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6369
ispartof Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-11, Vol.195 (11), p.1372-1372, Article 1372
issn 0167-6369
1573-2959
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10600285
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Coastal inlets
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental Management
Environmental monitoring
Loads (forces)
Monitoring
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
Regression analysis
Regression models
rivers
Sediment
Sediment concentration
Sediment load
Sediment yield
Sediments
Storms
Streams
Suspended load
suspended sediment
Suspended sediments
Turbidity
Urban areas
Urban watersheds
Virginia
Watersheds
title Using high-frequency monitoring data to quantify city-wide suspended-sediment load and evaluate TMDL goals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A17%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20high-frequency%20monitoring%20data%20to%20quantify%20city-wide%20suspended-sediment%20load%20and%20evaluate%20TMDL%20goals&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Miller,%20Samuel%20A.&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1372&rft.epage=1372&rft.pages=1372-1372&rft.artnum=1372&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-023-11905-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2881542497%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2881542497&rft_id=info:pmid/37880518&rfr_iscdi=true