Variation in patient information and rehabilitation regimens after flexor tendon repair in the United Kingdom
Introduction There is clinical uncertainty regarding the optimal method of rehabilitation following flexor tendon repair. Many splint designs and rehabilitation regimens are reported in the literature; however, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any one regimen. The aim of this stu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hand therapy 2022-06, Vol.27 (2), p.49-57 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 57 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | Hand therapy |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Newington, Lisa Lane, Jennifer CE Holmes, David GW Gardiner, Matthew D |
description | Introduction
There is clinical uncertainty regarding the optimal method of rehabilitation following flexor tendon repair. Many splint designs and rehabilitation regimens are reported in the literature; however, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any one regimen. The aim of this study was to describe rehabilitation guidelines used in the United Kingdom (UK) following zone I/II flexor tendon repair.
Methods
Using a cross-sectional design, hand units in the UK were invited to complete a short survey and to upload their flexor tendon rehabilitation guidelines and patient information material. Approval was granted by the British Association of Hand Therapists. Data were extracted in duplicate, using a pre-piloted form, and analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results
Thirty-five hand units responded (21%), providing 52 treatment guidelines. Three splinting regimens were described, and all involved early active mobilisation: (i) long dorsal-blocking splint (DBS); (ii) short DBS; and (iii) relative motion flexion splint. Duration of full-time splint wear ranged from 4 to 6 weeks. There were variations in splint design and composition of home exercise programmes, particularly for the long DBS. Where reported, recommended return to driving ranged from 8 to 12 weeks, and return to light work activities ranged from 5 to 10 weeks.
Discussion
Treatment guidelines varied across UK hand therapy departments, suggesting that patients receive differing advice about how to protect, move and use their hand after zone I/II flexor tendon repair. The disparity in splint wear duration, home exercise frequency and prescribed functional restrictions raises potential financial and social implications for patients. Future research should explore rehabilitation burden in addition to clinical outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/17589983221089654 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10584046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17589983221089654</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_17589983221089654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b39051aceff4686550b4df53c2cea4e8a8137ea4072d813e978e4ec7103c550c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UF1LwzAUDaK4MfcDfJH-gWnSpE3yJDL8woEvzteQpjddpE1L2on-ezOrQxF8uodzzzmXexA6JficEM4vCM-ElIKmKcFC5hk7QNMdt5BSksM9FnSC5n3vCkwYYXmG6TGaUC4x45RMUfOsg9ODa33ifNJFBH6I0LahGWntyyTARheudsNIBahcA75PtB0gJLaGtzYkA_jyc9lpF3ZpwwaStXcDlMmD81XZNifoyOq6h_nXnKH1zfXT8m6xery9X16tFoZROSwKKnFGtAFrWS7yLMMFK21GTWpAMxBaEMojwjwtIwTJBTAwnGBqotjQGbocc7tt0UBp4k9B16oLrtHhXbXaqd8b7zaqal8VwZlgmOUxgYwJJrR9H8DuzQSrXf_qT__Rc_bz6t7x3XYUnI-CXlegXtpt8LGFfxI_AM-wkNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variation in patient information and rehabilitation regimens after flexor tendon repair in the United Kingdom</title><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Newington, Lisa ; Lane, Jennifer CE ; Holmes, David GW ; Gardiner, Matthew D</creator><creatorcontrib>Newington, Lisa ; Lane, Jennifer CE ; Holmes, David GW ; Gardiner, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
There is clinical uncertainty regarding the optimal method of rehabilitation following flexor tendon repair. Many splint designs and rehabilitation regimens are reported in the literature; however, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any one regimen. The aim of this study was to describe rehabilitation guidelines used in the United Kingdom (UK) following zone I/II flexor tendon repair.
Methods
Using a cross-sectional design, hand units in the UK were invited to complete a short survey and to upload their flexor tendon rehabilitation guidelines and patient information material. Approval was granted by the British Association of Hand Therapists. Data were extracted in duplicate, using a pre-piloted form, and analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results
Thirty-five hand units responded (21%), providing 52 treatment guidelines. Three splinting regimens were described, and all involved early active mobilisation: (i) long dorsal-blocking splint (DBS); (ii) short DBS; and (iii) relative motion flexion splint. Duration of full-time splint wear ranged from 4 to 6 weeks. There were variations in splint design and composition of home exercise programmes, particularly for the long DBS. Where reported, recommended return to driving ranged from 8 to 12 weeks, and return to light work activities ranged from 5 to 10 weeks.
Discussion
Treatment guidelines varied across UK hand therapy departments, suggesting that patients receive differing advice about how to protect, move and use their hand after zone I/II flexor tendon repair. The disparity in splint wear duration, home exercise frequency and prescribed functional restrictions raises potential financial and social implications for patients. Future research should explore rehabilitation burden in addition to clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-9983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-9991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17589983221089654</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37904731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Hand therapy, 2022-06, Vol.27 (2), p.49-57</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 The British Association of Hand Therapists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b39051aceff4686550b4df53c2cea4e8a8137ea4072d813e978e4ec7103c550c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b39051aceff4686550b4df53c2cea4e8a8137ea4072d813e978e4ec7103c550c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6954-2981</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584046/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10584046/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37904731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Newington, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Jennifer CE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David GW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><title>Variation in patient information and rehabilitation regimens after flexor tendon repair in the United Kingdom</title><title>Hand therapy</title><addtitle>Hand Ther</addtitle><description>Introduction
There is clinical uncertainty regarding the optimal method of rehabilitation following flexor tendon repair. Many splint designs and rehabilitation regimens are reported in the literature; however, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any one regimen. The aim of this study was to describe rehabilitation guidelines used in the United Kingdom (UK) following zone I/II flexor tendon repair.
Methods
Using a cross-sectional design, hand units in the UK were invited to complete a short survey and to upload their flexor tendon rehabilitation guidelines and patient information material. Approval was granted by the British Association of Hand Therapists. Data were extracted in duplicate, using a pre-piloted form, and analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results
Thirty-five hand units responded (21%), providing 52 treatment guidelines. Three splinting regimens were described, and all involved early active mobilisation: (i) long dorsal-blocking splint (DBS); (ii) short DBS; and (iii) relative motion flexion splint. Duration of full-time splint wear ranged from 4 to 6 weeks. There were variations in splint design and composition of home exercise programmes, particularly for the long DBS. Where reported, recommended return to driving ranged from 8 to 12 weeks, and return to light work activities ranged from 5 to 10 weeks.
Discussion
Treatment guidelines varied across UK hand therapy departments, suggesting that patients receive differing advice about how to protect, move and use their hand after zone I/II flexor tendon repair. The disparity in splint wear duration, home exercise frequency and prescribed functional restrictions raises potential financial and social implications for patients. Future research should explore rehabilitation burden in addition to clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>1758-9983</issn><issn>1758-9991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UF1LwzAUDaK4MfcDfJH-gWnSpE3yJDL8woEvzteQpjddpE1L2on-ezOrQxF8uodzzzmXexA6JficEM4vCM-ElIKmKcFC5hk7QNMdt5BSksM9FnSC5n3vCkwYYXmG6TGaUC4x45RMUfOsg9ODa33ifNJFBH6I0LahGWntyyTARheudsNIBahcA75PtB0gJLaGtzYkA_jyc9lpF3ZpwwaStXcDlMmD81XZNifoyOq6h_nXnKH1zfXT8m6xery9X16tFoZROSwKKnFGtAFrWS7yLMMFK21GTWpAMxBaEMojwjwtIwTJBTAwnGBqotjQGbocc7tt0UBp4k9B16oLrtHhXbXaqd8b7zaqal8VwZlgmOUxgYwJJrR9H8DuzQSrXf_qT__Rc_bz6t7x3XYUnI-CXlegXtpt8LGFfxI_AM-wkNg</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Newington, Lisa</creator><creator>Lane, Jennifer CE</creator><creator>Holmes, David GW</creator><creator>Gardiner, Matthew D</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6954-2981</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Variation in patient information and rehabilitation regimens after flexor tendon repair in the United Kingdom</title><author>Newington, Lisa ; Lane, Jennifer CE ; Holmes, David GW ; Gardiner, Matthew D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b39051aceff4686550b4df53c2cea4e8a8137ea4072d813e978e4ec7103c550c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Newington, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, Jennifer CE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David GW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, Matthew D</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hand therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Newington, Lisa</au><au>Lane, Jennifer CE</au><au>Holmes, David GW</au><au>Gardiner, Matthew D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variation in patient information and rehabilitation regimens after flexor tendon repair in the United Kingdom</atitle><jtitle>Hand therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Hand Ther</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>49-57</pages><issn>1758-9983</issn><eissn>1758-9991</eissn><abstract>Introduction
There is clinical uncertainty regarding the optimal method of rehabilitation following flexor tendon repair. Many splint designs and rehabilitation regimens are reported in the literature; however, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of any one regimen. The aim of this study was to describe rehabilitation guidelines used in the United Kingdom (UK) following zone I/II flexor tendon repair.
Methods
Using a cross-sectional design, hand units in the UK were invited to complete a short survey and to upload their flexor tendon rehabilitation guidelines and patient information material. Approval was granted by the British Association of Hand Therapists. Data were extracted in duplicate, using a pre-piloted form, and analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results
Thirty-five hand units responded (21%), providing 52 treatment guidelines. Three splinting regimens were described, and all involved early active mobilisation: (i) long dorsal-blocking splint (DBS); (ii) short DBS; and (iii) relative motion flexion splint. Duration of full-time splint wear ranged from 4 to 6 weeks. There were variations in splint design and composition of home exercise programmes, particularly for the long DBS. Where reported, recommended return to driving ranged from 8 to 12 weeks, and return to light work activities ranged from 5 to 10 weeks.
Discussion
Treatment guidelines varied across UK hand therapy departments, suggesting that patients receive differing advice about how to protect, move and use their hand after zone I/II flexor tendon repair. The disparity in splint wear duration, home exercise frequency and prescribed functional restrictions raises potential financial and social implications for patients. Future research should explore rehabilitation burden in addition to clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>37904731</pmid><doi>10.1177/17589983221089654</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6954-2981</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-9983 |
ispartof | Hand therapy, 2022-06, Vol.27 (2), p.49-57 |
issn | 1758-9983 1758-9991 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10584046 |
source | SAGE Journals Online; PubMed Central |
subjects | Original |
title | Variation in patient information and rehabilitation regimens after flexor tendon repair in the United Kingdom |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T22%3A21%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variation%20in%20patient%20information%20and%20rehabilitation%20regimens%20after%20flexor%20tendon%20repair%20in%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.jtitle=Hand%20therapy&rft.au=Newington,%20Lisa&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=49-57&rft.issn=1758-9983&rft.eissn=1758-9991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17589983221089654&rft_dat=%3Csage_pubme%3E10.1177_17589983221089654%3C/sage_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/37904731&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17589983221089654&rfr_iscdi=true |