Does fetal size affect maternal perception of fetal movements? Evidence from an individual participant data meta‐analysis
Introduction Maternal perception of fetal movements during pregnancy are reassuring; however, the perception of a reduction in movements are concerning to women and known to be associated with increased odds of late stillbirth. Prior to full term, little evidence exists to provide guidelines on how...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2023-11, Vol.102 (11), p.1586-1592 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1592 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1586 |
container_title | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Thompson, John M. D. Heazell, Alexander E. P. Cronin, Robin S. Wilson, Jessica Li, Minglan Gordon, Adrienne Askie, Lisa M. O'Brien, Louise M. Raynes‐Greenow, Camille Stacey, Tomasina Mitchell, Edwin A. McCowan, Lesley M. E. Bradford, Billie F. |
description | Introduction
Maternal perception of fetal movements during pregnancy are reassuring; however, the perception of a reduction in movements are concerning to women and known to be associated with increased odds of late stillbirth. Prior to full term, little evidence exists to provide guidelines on how to proceed unless there is an immediate risk to the fetus. Increased strength of movement is the most commonly reported perception of women through to full term, but perception of movement is also hypothesized to be influenced by fetal size. The study aimed to assess the pattern of maternal perception of strength and frequency of fetal movement by gestation and customized birthweight quartile in ongoing pregnancies. A further aim was to assess the association of stillbirth to perception of fetal movements stratified by customized birthweight quartile.
Material and methods
This analysis was an individual participant data meta‐analyses of five case–control studies investigating factors associated with stillbirth. The dataset included 851 cases of women with late stillbirth (>28 weeks' gestation) and 2257 women with ongoing pregnancies who then had a liveborn infant.
Results
The frequency of prioritized fetal movement from 28 weeks' gestation showed a similar pattern for each quartile of birthweight with increased strength being the predominant perception of fetal movement through to full term. The odds of stillbirth associated with reduced fetal movements was increased in all quartiles of customized birthweight centiles but was notably greater in babies in the lowest two quartiles (Q1: adjusted OR: 9.34, 95% CI: 5.43, 16.06 and Q2: adjusted OR: 6.11, 95% CI: 3.11, 11.99). The decreased odds associated with increased strength of movement was present for all customized birthweight quartiles (adjusted OR range: 0.25–0.56).
Conclusions
Increased strength of fetal movements in late pregnancy is a positive finding irrespective of fetal size. However, reduced fetal movements are associated with stillbirth, and more so when the fetus is small.
Odds of stillbirth are increased for lower birthweight centiles, but are relatively greater for women not experiencing increased strength of movement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aogs.14652 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10577624</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2877286081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4492-c9b255987b949f9af6224db7cff3f61bf0976b8d7169250431bffd890a2733413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1qFTEcxYNY7LW68QEk4EaEqfmafKxKaWtbKHShrkMmk9SUmcmYzNxy7cZH8Bl9EjPe26IuzCIhJ7__4ZADwCuMDnFZ7028yYeY8Zo8ASvMEaoQw-QpWCGEcMUpU_vgec635UYEk8_APhV1TWVNV-D-NLoMvZtMB3P45qDx3tkJ9mZyaSji6JJ14xTiAKPfgX1cu94NUz6CZ-vQusE66FPsoRlgGNpQtHkZNWkKNoxmmGBrJgP7Mv3z-w9TfDc55Bdgz5suu5e78wB8_nD26eSiuro-vzw5vqosY4pUVjWkrpUUjWLKK-M5IaxthPWeeo4bj5TgjWwF5orUiNEi-VYqZIiglGF6AI62vuPc9K61JXkynR5T6E3a6GiC_vtlCF_0TVxrjGohOGHF4e3OIcWvs8uT7kO2ruvM4OKcNZFMkrJxXtA3_6C3cV5-cqGEIJIjuUR6t6Vsijkn5x_TYKSXUvVSqv5daoFf_5n_EX1osQB4C9yFzm3-Y6WPr88_bk1_AWDBr40</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2877286081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does fetal size affect maternal perception of fetal movements? Evidence from an individual participant data meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Thompson, John M. D. ; Heazell, Alexander E. P. ; Cronin, Robin S. ; Wilson, Jessica ; Li, Minglan ; Gordon, Adrienne ; Askie, Lisa M. ; O'Brien, Louise M. ; Raynes‐Greenow, Camille ; Stacey, Tomasina ; Mitchell, Edwin A. ; McCowan, Lesley M. E. ; Bradford, Billie F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Thompson, John M. D. ; Heazell, Alexander E. P. ; Cronin, Robin S. ; Wilson, Jessica ; Li, Minglan ; Gordon, Adrienne ; Askie, Lisa M. ; O'Brien, Louise M. ; Raynes‐Greenow, Camille ; Stacey, Tomasina ; Mitchell, Edwin A. ; McCowan, Lesley M. E. ; Bradford, Billie F.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Maternal perception of fetal movements during pregnancy are reassuring; however, the perception of a reduction in movements are concerning to women and known to be associated with increased odds of late stillbirth. Prior to full term, little evidence exists to provide guidelines on how to proceed unless there is an immediate risk to the fetus. Increased strength of movement is the most commonly reported perception of women through to full term, but perception of movement is also hypothesized to be influenced by fetal size. The study aimed to assess the pattern of maternal perception of strength and frequency of fetal movement by gestation and customized birthweight quartile in ongoing pregnancies. A further aim was to assess the association of stillbirth to perception of fetal movements stratified by customized birthweight quartile.
Material and methods
This analysis was an individual participant data meta‐analyses of five case–control studies investigating factors associated with stillbirth. The dataset included 851 cases of women with late stillbirth (>28 weeks' gestation) and 2257 women with ongoing pregnancies who then had a liveborn infant.
Results
The frequency of prioritized fetal movement from 28 weeks' gestation showed a similar pattern for each quartile of birthweight with increased strength being the predominant perception of fetal movement through to full term. The odds of stillbirth associated with reduced fetal movements was increased in all quartiles of customized birthweight centiles but was notably greater in babies in the lowest two quartiles (Q1: adjusted OR: 9.34, 95% CI: 5.43, 16.06 and Q2: adjusted OR: 6.11, 95% CI: 3.11, 11.99). The decreased odds associated with increased strength of movement was present for all customized birthweight quartiles (adjusted OR range: 0.25–0.56).
Conclusions
Increased strength of fetal movements in late pregnancy is a positive finding irrespective of fetal size. However, reduced fetal movements are associated with stillbirth, and more so when the fetus is small.
Odds of stillbirth are increased for lower birthweight centiles, but are relatively greater for women not experiencing increased strength of movement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6349</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14652</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37553853</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Birth Weight ; Female ; Fetal Medicine ; Fetal Movement ; Fetuses ; Humans ; maternal‐fetal medicine epidemiology ; maternity care ; Meta-analysis ; Original ; Perception ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy complications ; Pregnancy Trimester, Third ; Sensory perception ; Stillbirth</subject><ispartof>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023-11, Vol.102 (11), p.1586-1592</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4492-c9b255987b949f9af6224db7cff3f61bf0976b8d7169250431bffd890a2733413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4492-c9b255987b949f9af6224db7cff3f61bf0976b8d7169250431bffd890a2733413</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6944-381X ; 0000-0002-4303-7845 ; 0000-0002-8304-8004</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577624/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10577624/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37553853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thompson, John M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heazell, Alexander E. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronin, Robin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Minglan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Askie, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Louise M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynes‐Greenow, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stacey, Tomasina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Edwin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCowan, Lesley M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Billie F.</creatorcontrib><title>Does fetal size affect maternal perception of fetal movements? Evidence from an individual participant data meta‐analysis</title><title>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><description>Introduction
Maternal perception of fetal movements during pregnancy are reassuring; however, the perception of a reduction in movements are concerning to women and known to be associated with increased odds of late stillbirth. Prior to full term, little evidence exists to provide guidelines on how to proceed unless there is an immediate risk to the fetus. Increased strength of movement is the most commonly reported perception of women through to full term, but perception of movement is also hypothesized to be influenced by fetal size. The study aimed to assess the pattern of maternal perception of strength and frequency of fetal movement by gestation and customized birthweight quartile in ongoing pregnancies. A further aim was to assess the association of stillbirth to perception of fetal movements stratified by customized birthweight quartile.
Material and methods
This analysis was an individual participant data meta‐analyses of five case–control studies investigating factors associated with stillbirth. The dataset included 851 cases of women with late stillbirth (>28 weeks' gestation) and 2257 women with ongoing pregnancies who then had a liveborn infant.
Results
The frequency of prioritized fetal movement from 28 weeks' gestation showed a similar pattern for each quartile of birthweight with increased strength being the predominant perception of fetal movement through to full term. The odds of stillbirth associated with reduced fetal movements was increased in all quartiles of customized birthweight centiles but was notably greater in babies in the lowest two quartiles (Q1: adjusted OR: 9.34, 95% CI: 5.43, 16.06 and Q2: adjusted OR: 6.11, 95% CI: 3.11, 11.99). The decreased odds associated with increased strength of movement was present for all customized birthweight quartiles (adjusted OR range: 0.25–0.56).
Conclusions
Increased strength of fetal movements in late pregnancy is a positive finding irrespective of fetal size. However, reduced fetal movements are associated with stillbirth, and more so when the fetus is small.
Odds of stillbirth are increased for lower birthweight centiles, but are relatively greater for women not experiencing increased strength of movement.</description><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Medicine</subject><subject>Fetal Movement</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>maternal‐fetal medicine epidemiology</subject><subject>maternity care</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy complications</subject><subject>Pregnancy Trimester, Third</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Stillbirth</subject><issn>0001-6349</issn><issn>1600-0412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1qFTEcxYNY7LW68QEk4EaEqfmafKxKaWtbKHShrkMmk9SUmcmYzNxy7cZH8Bl9EjPe26IuzCIhJ7__4ZADwCuMDnFZ7028yYeY8Zo8ASvMEaoQw-QpWCGEcMUpU_vgec635UYEk8_APhV1TWVNV-D-NLoMvZtMB3P45qDx3tkJ9mZyaSji6JJ14xTiAKPfgX1cu94NUz6CZ-vQusE66FPsoRlgGNpQtHkZNWkKNoxmmGBrJgP7Mv3z-w9TfDc55Bdgz5suu5e78wB8_nD26eSiuro-vzw5vqosY4pUVjWkrpUUjWLKK-M5IaxthPWeeo4bj5TgjWwF5orUiNEi-VYqZIiglGF6AI62vuPc9K61JXkynR5T6E3a6GiC_vtlCF_0TVxrjGohOGHF4e3OIcWvs8uT7kO2ruvM4OKcNZFMkrJxXtA3_6C3cV5-cqGEIJIjuUR6t6Vsijkn5x_TYKSXUvVSqv5daoFf_5n_EX1osQB4C9yFzm3-Y6WPr88_bk1_AWDBr40</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Thompson, John M. D.</creator><creator>Heazell, Alexander E. P.</creator><creator>Cronin, Robin S.</creator><creator>Wilson, Jessica</creator><creator>Li, Minglan</creator><creator>Gordon, Adrienne</creator><creator>Askie, Lisa M.</creator><creator>O'Brien, Louise M.</creator><creator>Raynes‐Greenow, Camille</creator><creator>Stacey, Tomasina</creator><creator>Mitchell, Edwin A.</creator><creator>McCowan, Lesley M. E.</creator><creator>Bradford, Billie F.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6944-381X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-7845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-8004</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Does fetal size affect maternal perception of fetal movements? Evidence from an individual participant data meta‐analysis</title><author>Thompson, John M. D. ; Heazell, Alexander E. P. ; Cronin, Robin S. ; Wilson, Jessica ; Li, Minglan ; Gordon, Adrienne ; Askie, Lisa M. ; O'Brien, Louise M. ; Raynes‐Greenow, Camille ; Stacey, Tomasina ; Mitchell, Edwin A. ; McCowan, Lesley M. E. ; Bradford, Billie F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4492-c9b255987b949f9af6224db7cff3f61bf0976b8d7169250431bffd890a2733413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Medicine</topic><topic>Fetal Movement</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>maternal‐fetal medicine epidemiology</topic><topic>maternity care</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy complications</topic><topic>Pregnancy Trimester, Third</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Stillbirth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thompson, John M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heazell, Alexander E. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cronin, Robin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Minglan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Adrienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Askie, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Louise M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raynes‐Greenow, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stacey, Tomasina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Edwin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCowan, Lesley M. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Billie F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thompson, John M. D.</au><au>Heazell, Alexander E. P.</au><au>Cronin, Robin S.</au><au>Wilson, Jessica</au><au>Li, Minglan</au><au>Gordon, Adrienne</au><au>Askie, Lisa M.</au><au>O'Brien, Louise M.</au><au>Raynes‐Greenow, Camille</au><au>Stacey, Tomasina</au><au>Mitchell, Edwin A.</au><au>McCowan, Lesley M. E.</au><au>Bradford, Billie F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does fetal size affect maternal perception of fetal movements? Evidence from an individual participant data meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand</addtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1586</spage><epage>1592</epage><pages>1586-1592</pages><issn>0001-6349</issn><eissn>1600-0412</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Maternal perception of fetal movements during pregnancy are reassuring; however, the perception of a reduction in movements are concerning to women and known to be associated with increased odds of late stillbirth. Prior to full term, little evidence exists to provide guidelines on how to proceed unless there is an immediate risk to the fetus. Increased strength of movement is the most commonly reported perception of women through to full term, but perception of movement is also hypothesized to be influenced by fetal size. The study aimed to assess the pattern of maternal perception of strength and frequency of fetal movement by gestation and customized birthweight quartile in ongoing pregnancies. A further aim was to assess the association of stillbirth to perception of fetal movements stratified by customized birthweight quartile.
Material and methods
This analysis was an individual participant data meta‐analyses of five case–control studies investigating factors associated with stillbirth. The dataset included 851 cases of women with late stillbirth (>28 weeks' gestation) and 2257 women with ongoing pregnancies who then had a liveborn infant.
Results
The frequency of prioritized fetal movement from 28 weeks' gestation showed a similar pattern for each quartile of birthweight with increased strength being the predominant perception of fetal movement through to full term. The odds of stillbirth associated with reduced fetal movements was increased in all quartiles of customized birthweight centiles but was notably greater in babies in the lowest two quartiles (Q1: adjusted OR: 9.34, 95% CI: 5.43, 16.06 and Q2: adjusted OR: 6.11, 95% CI: 3.11, 11.99). The decreased odds associated with increased strength of movement was present for all customized birthweight quartiles (adjusted OR range: 0.25–0.56).
Conclusions
Increased strength of fetal movements in late pregnancy is a positive finding irrespective of fetal size. However, reduced fetal movements are associated with stillbirth, and more so when the fetus is small.
Odds of stillbirth are increased for lower birthweight centiles, but are relatively greater for women not experiencing increased strength of movement.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37553853</pmid><doi>10.1111/aogs.14652</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6944-381X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-7845</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-8004</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-6349 |
ispartof | Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023-11, Vol.102 (11), p.1586-1592 |
issn | 0001-6349 1600-0412 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10577624 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Birth Weight Female Fetal Medicine Fetal Movement Fetuses Humans maternal‐fetal medicine epidemiology maternity care Meta-analysis Original Perception Pregnancy Pregnancy complications Pregnancy Trimester, Third Sensory perception Stillbirth |
title | Does fetal size affect maternal perception of fetal movements? Evidence from an individual participant data meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T11%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20fetal%20size%20affect%20maternal%20perception%20of%20fetal%20movements?%20Evidence%20from%20an%20individual%20participant%20data%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Acta%20obstetricia%20et%20gynecologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Thompson,%20John%20M.%20D.&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1586&rft.epage=1592&rft.pages=1586-1592&rft.issn=0001-6349&rft.eissn=1600-0412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aogs.14652&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2877286081%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2877286081&rft_id=info:pmid/37553853&rfr_iscdi=true |