Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align
BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e45220-e45220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e45220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e45220 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Nikolla, Dhimitri A Mudrakola, Vishnu Feronti, Charles J Bilski, Sarah C Bowers, Kaitlin M |
description | BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to their minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores.ObjectiveOur objective was to examine the variation of relative within-program differences between minimum USMLE Step and COMLEX-USA Level scores required for consideration by United States residency programs.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA) database from April 2023, including the 10 specialties with the most training spots in 2022. These specialties were internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, emergency medicine, psychiatry, surgery, anesthesiology, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and neurology. Within-program differences were calculated by subtracting the minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores from the converted minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores calculated from the minimum COMLEX-USA Level 1 and 2 scores using two conversion tools. We present differences as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Additionally, we report the proportion of programs with greater than 10-point differences for each step (1 and 2).ResultsOf the 3,364 accredited programs from the examined specialties, we included 1,477 in the Step 1 analysis and 1,227 in the Step 2 analysis with complete data. The median within-program difference between the minimum Step 1 score and the predicted Step 1 score was 12.0 (IQR 2.0, 17.0) using the Barnum and colleagues’ conversion tool and -1.7 (IQR -6.2, 6.3) using the Smith and colleagues’ tool. The median differences for Step 2 were 2.0 (IQR -8.0, 12.0) and -6.5 (IQR -13.9, -1.5) for each tool, respectively. Using the Barnum and Smith conversion tools, 937 (63%) and 435 (29%) programs had a greater than 10-point Step 1 score difference, respectively. Similarly, for Step 2, 564 (46%) and 515 (42%) programs had a greater than 10-point difference with each conversion tool.ConclusionThere is wide variation in the within-program differences between minimum USMLE and predicted minimum USMLE (from COMLEX-USA) scores. Many programs have greater than 10-point differences, which may be a source of bias in osteopathic applicant selection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.45220 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10576438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2884524601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-42d8b94b085275f17f8d7054590e6854b6e26ca9dd214507ea6f2366cee0b3233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9O3DAQxqOKSkWUWx_AUi89sHTs-F9OFVooIC3dA-VsOc5k1yixF9tB9BH61g0sqtpeepqR5jfffKOvqj5QOFVKNJ_dlHDKp1wwBm-qQ0alXmiq-cEf_bvqOOd7AKCgGCg4rH7e-ODHaSR3wRfsyG2xBTO5wc47O5CVdxiyDxty8WRHH2zxMRAbOrKM4y7h9nn6iGSdC8adLVvv_rN762KaD6z7goGcR_ItFnI2-E14X73t7ZDx-LUeVXdfL74vrxar9eX18my1cEypsuCs023DW9CCKdFT1etOgeCiAZRa8FYik842XccoF6DQyp7VUjpEaGtW10fVl73ubmpH7GaPJdnB7JIfbfphovXm70nwW7OJj4aCUJLXelb49KqQ4sOEuZjRZ4fDYAPGKRumlQbacCVn9OM_6H2cUpj_myk9Z8Ul0Jk62VMuxZwT9r_dUDDP4Zp9uOYl3PoXkUOatw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2884524601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nikolla, Dhimitri A ; Mudrakola, Vishnu ; Feronti, Charles J ; Bilski, Sarah C ; Bowers, Kaitlin M</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikolla, Dhimitri A ; Mudrakola, Vishnu ; Feronti, Charles J ; Bilski, Sarah C ; Bowers, Kaitlin M</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to their minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores.ObjectiveOur objective was to examine the variation of relative within-program differences between minimum USMLE Step and COMLEX-USA Level scores required for consideration by United States residency programs.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA) database from April 2023, including the 10 specialties with the most training spots in 2022. These specialties were internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, emergency medicine, psychiatry, surgery, anesthesiology, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and neurology. Within-program differences were calculated by subtracting the minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores from the converted minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores calculated from the minimum COMLEX-USA Level 1 and 2 scores using two conversion tools. We present differences as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Additionally, we report the proportion of programs with greater than 10-point differences for each step (1 and 2).ResultsOf the 3,364 accredited programs from the examined specialties, we included 1,477 in the Step 1 analysis and 1,227 in the Step 2 analysis with complete data. The median within-program difference between the minimum Step 1 score and the predicted Step 1 score was 12.0 (IQR 2.0, 17.0) using the Barnum and colleagues’ conversion tool and -1.7 (IQR -6.2, 6.3) using the Smith and colleagues’ tool. The median differences for Step 2 were 2.0 (IQR -8.0, 12.0) and -6.5 (IQR -13.9, -1.5) for each tool, respectively. Using the Barnum and Smith conversion tools, 937 (63%) and 435 (29%) programs had a greater than 10-point Step 1 score difference, respectively. Similarly, for Step 2, 564 (46%) and 515 (42%) programs had a greater than 10-point difference with each conversion tool.ConclusionThere is wide variation in the within-program differences between minimum USMLE and predicted minimum USMLE (from COMLEX-USA) scores. Many programs have greater than 10-point differences, which may be a source of bias in osteopathic applicant selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Bone surgery ; Emergency medical care ; Gynecology ; Health Policy ; Hypothesis testing ; Internal medicine ; Licenses ; Licensing examinations ; Medical Education ; Medicine ; Obstetrics ; Other ; Pediatrics</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e45220-e45220</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Nikolla et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Nikolla et al. 2023 Nikolla et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-42d8b94b085275f17f8d7054590e6854b6e26ca9dd214507ea6f2366cee0b3233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576438/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576438/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikolla, Dhimitri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudrakola, Vishnu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feronti, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilski, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Kaitlin M</creatorcontrib><title>Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to their minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores.ObjectiveOur objective was to examine the variation of relative within-program differences between minimum USMLE Step and COMLEX-USA Level scores required for consideration by United States residency programs.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA) database from April 2023, including the 10 specialties with the most training spots in 2022. These specialties were internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, emergency medicine, psychiatry, surgery, anesthesiology, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and neurology. Within-program differences were calculated by subtracting the minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores from the converted minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores calculated from the minimum COMLEX-USA Level 1 and 2 scores using two conversion tools. We present differences as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Additionally, we report the proportion of programs with greater than 10-point differences for each step (1 and 2).ResultsOf the 3,364 accredited programs from the examined specialties, we included 1,477 in the Step 1 analysis and 1,227 in the Step 2 analysis with complete data. The median within-program difference between the minimum Step 1 score and the predicted Step 1 score was 12.0 (IQR 2.0, 17.0) using the Barnum and colleagues’ conversion tool and -1.7 (IQR -6.2, 6.3) using the Smith and colleagues’ tool. The median differences for Step 2 were 2.0 (IQR -8.0, 12.0) and -6.5 (IQR -13.9, -1.5) for each tool, respectively. Using the Barnum and Smith conversion tools, 937 (63%) and 435 (29%) programs had a greater than 10-point Step 1 score difference, respectively. Similarly, for Step 2, 564 (46%) and 515 (42%) programs had a greater than 10-point difference with each conversion tool.ConclusionThere is wide variation in the within-program differences between minimum USMLE and predicted minimum USMLE (from COMLEX-USA) scores. Many programs have greater than 10-point differences, which may be a source of bias in osteopathic applicant selection.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Licensing examinations</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9O3DAQxqOKSkWUWx_AUi89sHTs-F9OFVooIC3dA-VsOc5k1yixF9tB9BH61g0sqtpeepqR5jfffKOvqj5QOFVKNJ_dlHDKp1wwBm-qQ0alXmiq-cEf_bvqOOd7AKCgGCg4rH7e-ODHaSR3wRfsyG2xBTO5wc47O5CVdxiyDxty8WRHH2zxMRAbOrKM4y7h9nn6iGSdC8adLVvv_rN762KaD6z7goGcR_ItFnI2-E14X73t7ZDx-LUeVXdfL74vrxar9eX18my1cEypsuCs023DW9CCKdFT1etOgeCiAZRa8FYik842XccoF6DQyp7VUjpEaGtW10fVl73ubmpH7GaPJdnB7JIfbfphovXm70nwW7OJj4aCUJLXelb49KqQ4sOEuZjRZ4fDYAPGKRumlQbacCVn9OM_6H2cUpj_myk9Z8Ul0Jk62VMuxZwT9r_dUDDP4Zp9uOYl3PoXkUOatw</recordid><startdate>20230914</startdate><enddate>20230914</enddate><creator>Nikolla, Dhimitri A</creator><creator>Mudrakola, Vishnu</creator><creator>Feronti, Charles J</creator><creator>Bilski, Sarah C</creator><creator>Bowers, Kaitlin M</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230914</creationdate><title>Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align</title><author>Nikolla, Dhimitri A ; Mudrakola, Vishnu ; Feronti, Charles J ; Bilski, Sarah C ; Bowers, Kaitlin M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-42d8b94b085275f17f8d7054590e6854b6e26ca9dd214507ea6f2366cee0b3233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Licensing examinations</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikolla, Dhimitri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudrakola, Vishnu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feronti, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilski, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Kaitlin M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikolla, Dhimitri A</au><au>Mudrakola, Vishnu</au><au>Feronti, Charles J</au><au>Bilski, Sarah C</au><au>Bowers, Kaitlin M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2023-09-14</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e45220</spage><epage>e45220</epage><pages>e45220-e45220</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to their minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores.ObjectiveOur objective was to examine the variation of relative within-program differences between minimum USMLE Step and COMLEX-USA Level scores required for consideration by United States residency programs.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA) database from April 2023, including the 10 specialties with the most training spots in 2022. These specialties were internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, emergency medicine, psychiatry, surgery, anesthesiology, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and neurology. Within-program differences were calculated by subtracting the minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores from the converted minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores calculated from the minimum COMLEX-USA Level 1 and 2 scores using two conversion tools. We present differences as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Additionally, we report the proportion of programs with greater than 10-point differences for each step (1 and 2).ResultsOf the 3,364 accredited programs from the examined specialties, we included 1,477 in the Step 1 analysis and 1,227 in the Step 2 analysis with complete data. The median within-program difference between the minimum Step 1 score and the predicted Step 1 score was 12.0 (IQR 2.0, 17.0) using the Barnum and colleagues’ conversion tool and -1.7 (IQR -6.2, 6.3) using the Smith and colleagues’ tool. The median differences for Step 2 were 2.0 (IQR -8.0, 12.0) and -6.5 (IQR -13.9, -1.5) for each tool, respectively. Using the Barnum and Smith conversion tools, 937 (63%) and 435 (29%) programs had a greater than 10-point Step 1 score difference, respectively. Similarly, for Step 2, 564 (46%) and 515 (42%) programs had a greater than 10-point difference with each conversion tool.ConclusionThere is wide variation in the within-program differences between minimum USMLE and predicted minimum USMLE (from COMLEX-USA) scores. Many programs have greater than 10-point differences, which may be a source of bias in osteopathic applicant selection.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><doi>10.7759/cureus.45220</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e45220-e45220 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10576438 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anesthesiology Bone surgery Emergency medical care Gynecology Health Policy Hypothesis testing Internal medicine Licenses Licensing examinations Medical Education Medicine Obstetrics Other Pediatrics |
title | Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A31%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimum%20United%20States%20Medical%20Licensing%20Examination%20and%20Comprehensive%20Osteopathic%20Medical%20Licensing%20Examination%20Scores%20Often%20Do%20Not%20Align&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Nikolla,%20Dhimitri%20A&rft.date=2023-09-14&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e45220&rft.epage=e45220&rft.pages=e45220-e45220&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.45220&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2884524601%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2884524601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |