Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align

BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2023-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e45220-e45220
Hauptverfasser: Nikolla, Dhimitri A, Mudrakola, Vishnu, Feronti, Charles J, Bilski, Sarah C, Bowers, Kaitlin M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e45220
container_issue 9
container_start_page e45220
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 15
creator Nikolla, Dhimitri A
Mudrakola, Vishnu
Feronti, Charles J
Bilski, Sarah C
Bowers, Kaitlin M
description BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to their minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores.ObjectiveOur objective was to examine the variation of relative within-program differences between minimum USMLE Step and COMLEX-USA Level scores required for consideration by United States residency programs.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA) database from April 2023, including the 10 specialties with the most training spots in 2022. These specialties were internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, emergency medicine, psychiatry, surgery, anesthesiology, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and neurology. Within-program differences were calculated by subtracting the minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores from the converted minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores calculated from the minimum COMLEX-USA Level 1 and 2 scores using two conversion tools. We present differences as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Additionally, we report the proportion of programs with greater than 10-point differences for each step (1 and 2).ResultsOf the 3,364 accredited programs from the examined specialties, we included 1,477 in the Step 1 analysis and 1,227 in the Step 2 analysis with complete data. The median within-program difference between the minimum Step 1 score and the predicted Step 1 score was 12.0 (IQR 2.0, 17.0) using the Barnum and colleagues’ conversion tool and -1.7 (IQR -6.2, 6.3) using the Smith and colleagues’ tool. The median differences for Step 2 were 2.0 (IQR -8.0, 12.0) and -6.5 (IQR -13.9, -1.5) for each tool, respectively. Using the Barnum and Smith conversion tools, 937 (63%) and 435 (29%) programs had a greater than 10-point Step 1 score difference, respectively. Similarly, for Step 2, 564 (46%) and 515 (42%) programs had a greater than 10-point difference with each conversion tool.ConclusionThere is wide variation in the within-program differences between minimum USMLE and predicted minimum USMLE (from COMLEX-USA) scores. Many programs have greater than 10-point differences, which may be a source of bias in osteopathic applicant selection.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.45220
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10576438</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2884524601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-42d8b94b085275f17f8d7054590e6854b6e26ca9dd214507ea6f2366cee0b3233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9O3DAQxqOKSkWUWx_AUi89sHTs-F9OFVooIC3dA-VsOc5k1yixF9tB9BH61g0sqtpeepqR5jfffKOvqj5QOFVKNJ_dlHDKp1wwBm-qQ0alXmiq-cEf_bvqOOd7AKCgGCg4rH7e-ODHaSR3wRfsyG2xBTO5wc47O5CVdxiyDxty8WRHH2zxMRAbOrKM4y7h9nn6iGSdC8adLVvv_rN762KaD6z7goGcR_ItFnI2-E14X73t7ZDx-LUeVXdfL74vrxar9eX18my1cEypsuCs023DW9CCKdFT1etOgeCiAZRa8FYik842XccoF6DQyp7VUjpEaGtW10fVl73ubmpH7GaPJdnB7JIfbfphovXm70nwW7OJj4aCUJLXelb49KqQ4sOEuZjRZ4fDYAPGKRumlQbacCVn9OM_6H2cUpj_myk9Z8Ul0Jk62VMuxZwT9r_dUDDP4Zp9uOYl3PoXkUOatw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2884524601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nikolla, Dhimitri A ; Mudrakola, Vishnu ; Feronti, Charles J ; Bilski, Sarah C ; Bowers, Kaitlin M</creator><creatorcontrib>Nikolla, Dhimitri A ; Mudrakola, Vishnu ; Feronti, Charles J ; Bilski, Sarah C ; Bowers, Kaitlin M</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to their minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores.ObjectiveOur objective was to examine the variation of relative within-program differences between minimum USMLE Step and COMLEX-USA Level scores required for consideration by United States residency programs.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA) database from April 2023, including the 10 specialties with the most training spots in 2022. These specialties were internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, emergency medicine, psychiatry, surgery, anesthesiology, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and neurology. Within-program differences were calculated by subtracting the minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores from the converted minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores calculated from the minimum COMLEX-USA Level 1 and 2 scores using two conversion tools. We present differences as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Additionally, we report the proportion of programs with greater than 10-point differences for each step (1 and 2).ResultsOf the 3,364 accredited programs from the examined specialties, we included 1,477 in the Step 1 analysis and 1,227 in the Step 2 analysis with complete data. The median within-program difference between the minimum Step 1 score and the predicted Step 1 score was 12.0 (IQR 2.0, 17.0) using the Barnum and colleagues’ conversion tool and -1.7 (IQR -6.2, 6.3) using the Smith and colleagues’ tool. The median differences for Step 2 were 2.0 (IQR -8.0, 12.0) and -6.5 (IQR -13.9, -1.5) for each tool, respectively. Using the Barnum and Smith conversion tools, 937 (63%) and 435 (29%) programs had a greater than 10-point Step 1 score difference, respectively. Similarly, for Step 2, 564 (46%) and 515 (42%) programs had a greater than 10-point difference with each conversion tool.ConclusionThere is wide variation in the within-program differences between minimum USMLE and predicted minimum USMLE (from COMLEX-USA) scores. Many programs have greater than 10-point differences, which may be a source of bias in osteopathic applicant selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45220</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Bone surgery ; Emergency medical care ; Gynecology ; Health Policy ; Hypothesis testing ; Internal medicine ; Licenses ; Licensing examinations ; Medical Education ; Medicine ; Obstetrics ; Other ; Pediatrics</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e45220-e45220</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Nikolla et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023, Nikolla et al. 2023 Nikolla et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-42d8b94b085275f17f8d7054590e6854b6e26ca9dd214507ea6f2366cee0b3233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576438/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10576438/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nikolla, Dhimitri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudrakola, Vishnu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feronti, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilski, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Kaitlin M</creatorcontrib><title>Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to their minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores.ObjectiveOur objective was to examine the variation of relative within-program differences between minimum USMLE Step and COMLEX-USA Level scores required for consideration by United States residency programs.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA) database from April 2023, including the 10 specialties with the most training spots in 2022. These specialties were internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, emergency medicine, psychiatry, surgery, anesthesiology, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and neurology. Within-program differences were calculated by subtracting the minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores from the converted minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores calculated from the minimum COMLEX-USA Level 1 and 2 scores using two conversion tools. We present differences as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Additionally, we report the proportion of programs with greater than 10-point differences for each step (1 and 2).ResultsOf the 3,364 accredited programs from the examined specialties, we included 1,477 in the Step 1 analysis and 1,227 in the Step 2 analysis with complete data. The median within-program difference between the minimum Step 1 score and the predicted Step 1 score was 12.0 (IQR 2.0, 17.0) using the Barnum and colleagues’ conversion tool and -1.7 (IQR -6.2, 6.3) using the Smith and colleagues’ tool. The median differences for Step 2 were 2.0 (IQR -8.0, 12.0) and -6.5 (IQR -13.9, -1.5) for each tool, respectively. Using the Barnum and Smith conversion tools, 937 (63%) and 435 (29%) programs had a greater than 10-point Step 1 score difference, respectively. Similarly, for Step 2, 564 (46%) and 515 (42%) programs had a greater than 10-point difference with each conversion tool.ConclusionThere is wide variation in the within-program differences between minimum USMLE and predicted minimum USMLE (from COMLEX-USA) scores. Many programs have greater than 10-point differences, which may be a source of bias in osteopathic applicant selection.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Licensing examinations</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9O3DAQxqOKSkWUWx_AUi89sHTs-F9OFVooIC3dA-VsOc5k1yixF9tB9BH61g0sqtpeepqR5jfffKOvqj5QOFVKNJ_dlHDKp1wwBm-qQ0alXmiq-cEf_bvqOOd7AKCgGCg4rH7e-ODHaSR3wRfsyG2xBTO5wc47O5CVdxiyDxty8WRHH2zxMRAbOrKM4y7h9nn6iGSdC8adLVvv_rN762KaD6z7goGcR_ItFnI2-E14X73t7ZDx-LUeVXdfL74vrxar9eX18my1cEypsuCs023DW9CCKdFT1etOgeCiAZRa8FYik842XccoF6DQyp7VUjpEaGtW10fVl73ubmpH7GaPJdnB7JIfbfphovXm70nwW7OJj4aCUJLXelb49KqQ4sOEuZjRZ4fDYAPGKRumlQbacCVn9OM_6H2cUpj_myk9Z8Ul0Jk62VMuxZwT9r_dUDDP4Zp9uOYl3PoXkUOatw</recordid><startdate>20230914</startdate><enddate>20230914</enddate><creator>Nikolla, Dhimitri A</creator><creator>Mudrakola, Vishnu</creator><creator>Feronti, Charles J</creator><creator>Bilski, Sarah C</creator><creator>Bowers, Kaitlin M</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230914</creationdate><title>Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align</title><author>Nikolla, Dhimitri A ; Mudrakola, Vishnu ; Feronti, Charles J ; Bilski, Sarah C ; Bowers, Kaitlin M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-42d8b94b085275f17f8d7054590e6854b6e26ca9dd214507ea6f2366cee0b3233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Licensing examinations</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nikolla, Dhimitri A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mudrakola, Vishnu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feronti, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilski, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Kaitlin M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nikolla, Dhimitri A</au><au>Mudrakola, Vishnu</au><au>Feronti, Charles J</au><au>Bilski, Sarah C</au><au>Bowers, Kaitlin M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2023-09-14</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e45220</spage><epage>e45220</epage><pages>e45220-e45220</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>BackgroundMany residency programs do not accept the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination (COMLEX-USA) alone for osteopathic applicants. Furthermore, among those programs that do accept the COMLEX-USA, it is unknown how programs scale their minimum COMLEX-USA scores compared to their minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores.ObjectiveOur objective was to examine the variation of relative within-program differences between minimum USMLE Step and COMLEX-USA Level scores required for consideration by United States residency programs.MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access (FREIDA) database from April 2023, including the 10 specialties with the most training spots in 2022. These specialties were internal medicine, family medicine, pediatrics, emergency medicine, psychiatry, surgery, anesthesiology, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, and neurology. Within-program differences were calculated by subtracting the minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores from the converted minimum USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores calculated from the minimum COMLEX-USA Level 1 and 2 scores using two conversion tools. We present differences as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Additionally, we report the proportion of programs with greater than 10-point differences for each step (1 and 2).ResultsOf the 3,364 accredited programs from the examined specialties, we included 1,477 in the Step 1 analysis and 1,227 in the Step 2 analysis with complete data. The median within-program difference between the minimum Step 1 score and the predicted Step 1 score was 12.0 (IQR 2.0, 17.0) using the Barnum and colleagues’ conversion tool and -1.7 (IQR -6.2, 6.3) using the Smith and colleagues’ tool. The median differences for Step 2 were 2.0 (IQR -8.0, 12.0) and -6.5 (IQR -13.9, -1.5) for each tool, respectively. Using the Barnum and Smith conversion tools, 937 (63%) and 435 (29%) programs had a greater than 10-point Step 1 score difference, respectively. Similarly, for Step 2, 564 (46%) and 515 (42%) programs had a greater than 10-point difference with each conversion tool.ConclusionThere is wide variation in the within-program differences between minimum USMLE and predicted minimum USMLE (from COMLEX-USA) scores. Many programs have greater than 10-point differences, which may be a source of bias in osteopathic applicant selection.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><doi>10.7759/cureus.45220</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2023-09, Vol.15 (9), p.e45220-e45220
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10576438
source PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Anesthesiology
Bone surgery
Emergency medical care
Gynecology
Health Policy
Hypothesis testing
Internal medicine
Licenses
Licensing examinations
Medical Education
Medicine
Obstetrics
Other
Pediatrics
title Minimum United States Medical Licensing Examination and Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination Scores Often Do Not Align
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A31%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimum%20United%20States%20Medical%20Licensing%20Examination%20and%20Comprehensive%20Osteopathic%20Medical%20Licensing%20Examination%20Scores%20Often%20Do%20Not%20Align&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Nikolla,%20Dhimitri%20A&rft.date=2023-09-14&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e45220&rft.epage=e45220&rft.pages=e45220-e45220&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.45220&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2884524601%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2884524601&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true