Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin for Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in pregnancies affected by pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM) has generated mixed outcome data worthy of further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes associated wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of diabetes science and technology 2023-09, Vol.17 (5), p.1337-1363
Hauptverfasser: Fisher, Stephanie A., Huang, Jingtong, DuBord, Ashley Y., Xu, Nicole Y., Beestrum, Molly, Niznik, Charlotte, Yeung, Andrea M., Nguyen, Kevin T., Klonoff, David C., Yee, Lynn M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1363
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1337
container_title Journal of diabetes science and technology
container_volume 17
creator Fisher, Stephanie A.
Huang, Jingtong
DuBord, Ashley Y.
Xu, Nicole Y.
Beestrum, Molly
Niznik, Charlotte
Yeung, Andrea M.
Nguyen, Kevin T.
Klonoff, David C.
Yee, Lynn M.
description Background: The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in pregnancies affected by pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM) has generated mixed outcome data worthy of further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with CSII versus multiple daily injections (MDIs) in pregnant persons with pregestational DM. Methods: A predefined, systematic, librarian-assisted search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (published from 2010 to 2022) yielded 3003 studies describing pregnancy outcomes associated with CSII and/or MDI for pregestational DM. The primary exposure was mode of insulin administration, with cesarean delivery and neonatal hypoglycemia as the primary maternal and neonatal outcomes, respectively. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, first and third-trimester glycemic control, large-for-gestational age (LGA) neonate, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, need for respiratory support, hyperbilirubinemia, 5-minute Apgar
doi_str_mv 10.1177/19322968231186626
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10563519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_19322968231186626</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2846930012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8aef95e7aa14403331b24ee9091adfe9122ff98d4a648371c8f77c8af6a6df613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UctuFDEQHCEQCQsfwAX5yGXC2J6xZ7ig1YZHpEQgAlytXm978WrWXvwImn_hY_FoQxSExMnurupqu6qqntPmjFIpX9GBMzaInnFKeyGYeFCdzr16bj68dz-pnsS4a5qu7aV8XJ1w2bWMC3la_Vp5l6zLPkdyndc6J3A4FxfO5Gi9I98wxFJf5THZw4jkHOw4FXiHOhU8Em9KFfNoHTE-kE8BtxgTzCCM5NzCGhNGUuAZcuD09JosyfUUE-4LTZPPeGPxJwG3IVeYoF6WwSna-LR6ZGCM-Oz2XFRf3739svpQX358f7FaXtaaDzTVPaAZOpQAtG0bzjldsxZxaAYKG4MDZcyYod-0INqeS6p7I6XuwQgQGyMoX1RvjrqHvN7jRqNLAUZ1CHYPYVIerPobcfa72vobRZtO8K7YvKhe3ioE_yOX76u9jRrH8eimYn0rBt40lBUqPVJ18DEGNHd7aKPmWNU_sZaZF_cfeDfxJ8dCODsSImxR7XwOxcL4H8Xf4L6vHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2846930012</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin for Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fisher, Stephanie A. ; Huang, Jingtong ; DuBord, Ashley Y. ; Xu, Nicole Y. ; Beestrum, Molly ; Niznik, Charlotte ; Yeung, Andrea M. ; Nguyen, Kevin T. ; Klonoff, David C. ; Yee, Lynn M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Stephanie A. ; Huang, Jingtong ; DuBord, Ashley Y. ; Xu, Nicole Y. ; Beestrum, Molly ; Niznik, Charlotte ; Yeung, Andrea M. ; Nguyen, Kevin T. ; Klonoff, David C. ; Yee, Lynn M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in pregnancies affected by pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM) has generated mixed outcome data worthy of further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with CSII versus multiple daily injections (MDIs) in pregnant persons with pregestational DM. Methods: A predefined, systematic, librarian-assisted search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (published from 2010 to 2022) yielded 3003 studies describing pregnancy outcomes associated with CSII and/or MDI for pregestational DM. The primary exposure was mode of insulin administration, with cesarean delivery and neonatal hypoglycemia as the primary maternal and neonatal outcomes, respectively. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, first and third-trimester glycemic control, large-for-gestational age (LGA) neonate, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, need for respiratory support, hyperbilirubinemia, 5-minute Apgar &lt;7, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal mortality. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Results: Among 39 eligible studies, 39% of the 5518 pregnancies included were exposed to CSII. Odds of cesarean delivery were higher with CSII (20 studies: 63% vs 56%, odds ratio [OR] 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5]), but we did not identify a difference in the odds of neonatal hypoglycemia (23 studies: 31% vs 34%, OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9-1.5]). Among secondary outcomes, only the odds of LGA (20 studies: 47% vs 38%, OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2-1.6]) were higher in individuals using CSII versus MDI. Conclusions: Use of CSII (vs MDI) for pregestational DM in pregnancy is associated with higher odds of cesarean delivery and delivery of an LGA neonate. Further evaluation of how CSII use may influence neonatal size and delivery route is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-2968</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-2968</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-3107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/19322968231186626</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37542367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy ; Female ; Glycated Hemoglobin ; Humans ; Hypoglycemia - chemically induced ; Hypoglycemia - drug therapy ; Hypoglycemia - epidemiology ; Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use ; Infant, Newborn ; Infusions, Subcutaneous ; Injections, Subcutaneous ; Insulin - therapeutic use ; Insulin Infusion Systems ; Insulin, Regular, Human - therapeutic use ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy in Diabetics - drug therapy ; Premature Birth - drug therapy ; Review</subject><ispartof>Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2023-09, Vol.17 (5), p.1337-1363</ispartof><rights>2023 Diabetes Technology Society</rights><rights>2023 Diabetes Technology Society 2023 Diabetes Technology Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8aef95e7aa14403331b24ee9091adfe9122ff98d4a648371c8f77c8af6a6df613</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1478-7065 ; 0000-0001-9353-8819 ; 0000-0001-9102-6537 ; 0000-0002-6274-0544 ; 0000-0002-5592-453X ; 0000-0002-3119-9361 ; 0000-0001-6394-6862</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563519/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10563519/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,21823,27928,27929,43625,43626,53795,53797</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37542367$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jingtong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuBord, Ashley Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Nicole Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beestrum, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niznik, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Kevin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonoff, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Lynn M.</creatorcontrib><title>Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin for Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Journal of diabetes science and technology</title><addtitle>J Diabetes Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Background: The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in pregnancies affected by pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM) has generated mixed outcome data worthy of further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with CSII versus multiple daily injections (MDIs) in pregnant persons with pregestational DM. Methods: A predefined, systematic, librarian-assisted search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (published from 2010 to 2022) yielded 3003 studies describing pregnancy outcomes associated with CSII and/or MDI for pregestational DM. The primary exposure was mode of insulin administration, with cesarean delivery and neonatal hypoglycemia as the primary maternal and neonatal outcomes, respectively. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, first and third-trimester glycemic control, large-for-gestational age (LGA) neonate, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, need for respiratory support, hyperbilirubinemia, 5-minute Apgar &lt;7, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal mortality. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Results: Among 39 eligible studies, 39% of the 5518 pregnancies included were exposed to CSII. Odds of cesarean delivery were higher with CSII (20 studies: 63% vs 56%, odds ratio [OR] 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5]), but we did not identify a difference in the odds of neonatal hypoglycemia (23 studies: 31% vs 34%, OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9-1.5]). Among secondary outcomes, only the odds of LGA (20 studies: 47% vs 38%, OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2-1.6]) were higher in individuals using CSII versus MDI. Conclusions: Use of CSII (vs MDI) for pregestational DM in pregnancy is associated with higher odds of cesarean delivery and delivery of an LGA neonate. Further evaluation of how CSII use may influence neonatal size and delivery route is warranted.</description><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - chemically induced</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infusions, Subcutaneous</subject><subject>Injections, Subcutaneous</subject><subject>Insulin - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Insulin Infusion Systems</subject><subject>Insulin, Regular, Human - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy in Diabetics - drug therapy</subject><subject>Premature Birth - drug therapy</subject><subject>Review</subject><issn>1932-2968</issn><issn>1932-2968</issn><issn>1932-3107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UctuFDEQHCEQCQsfwAX5yGXC2J6xZ7ig1YZHpEQgAlytXm978WrWXvwImn_hY_FoQxSExMnurupqu6qqntPmjFIpX9GBMzaInnFKeyGYeFCdzr16bj68dz-pnsS4a5qu7aV8XJ1w2bWMC3la_Vp5l6zLPkdyndc6J3A4FxfO5Gi9I98wxFJf5THZw4jkHOw4FXiHOhU8Em9KFfNoHTE-kE8BtxgTzCCM5NzCGhNGUuAZcuD09JosyfUUE-4LTZPPeGPxJwG3IVeYoF6WwSna-LR6ZGCM-Oz2XFRf3739svpQX358f7FaXtaaDzTVPaAZOpQAtG0bzjldsxZxaAYKG4MDZcyYod-0INqeS6p7I6XuwQgQGyMoX1RvjrqHvN7jRqNLAUZ1CHYPYVIerPobcfa72vobRZtO8K7YvKhe3ioE_yOX76u9jRrH8eimYn0rBt40lBUqPVJ18DEGNHd7aKPmWNU_sZaZF_cfeDfxJ8dCODsSImxR7XwOxcL4H8Xf4L6vHg</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Fisher, Stephanie A.</creator><creator>Huang, Jingtong</creator><creator>DuBord, Ashley Y.</creator><creator>Xu, Nicole Y.</creator><creator>Beestrum, Molly</creator><creator>Niznik, Charlotte</creator><creator>Yeung, Andrea M.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Kevin T.</creator><creator>Klonoff, David C.</creator><creator>Yee, Lynn M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-7065</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9353-8819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9102-6537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6274-0544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5592-453X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-9361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-6862</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin for Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Fisher, Stephanie A. ; Huang, Jingtong ; DuBord, Ashley Y. ; Xu, Nicole Y. ; Beestrum, Molly ; Niznik, Charlotte ; Yeung, Andrea M. ; Nguyen, Kevin T. ; Klonoff, David C. ; Yee, Lynn M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-8aef95e7aa14403331b24ee9091adfe9122ff98d4a648371c8f77c8af6a6df613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - chemically induced</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infusions, Subcutaneous</topic><topic>Injections, Subcutaneous</topic><topic>Insulin - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Insulin Infusion Systems</topic><topic>Insulin, Regular, Human - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy in Diabetics - drug therapy</topic><topic>Premature Birth - drug therapy</topic><topic>Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jingtong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DuBord, Ashley Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Nicole Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beestrum, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niznik, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, Andrea M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Kevin T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klonoff, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Lynn M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of diabetes science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fisher, Stephanie A.</au><au>Huang, Jingtong</au><au>DuBord, Ashley Y.</au><au>Xu, Nicole Y.</au><au>Beestrum, Molly</au><au>Niznik, Charlotte</au><au>Yeung, Andrea M.</au><au>Nguyen, Kevin T.</au><au>Klonoff, David C.</au><au>Yee, Lynn M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin for Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of diabetes science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>J Diabetes Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1337</spage><epage>1363</epage><pages>1337-1363</pages><issn>1932-2968</issn><eissn>1932-2968</eissn><eissn>1932-3107</eissn><abstract>Background: The use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in pregnancies affected by pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM) has generated mixed outcome data worthy of further investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with CSII versus multiple daily injections (MDIs) in pregnant persons with pregestational DM. Methods: A predefined, systematic, librarian-assisted search of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (published from 2010 to 2022) yielded 3003 studies describing pregnancy outcomes associated with CSII and/or MDI for pregestational DM. The primary exposure was mode of insulin administration, with cesarean delivery and neonatal hypoglycemia as the primary maternal and neonatal outcomes, respectively. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, first and third-trimester glycemic control, large-for-gestational age (LGA) neonate, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, need for respiratory support, hyperbilirubinemia, 5-minute Apgar &lt;7, shoulder dystocia, and perinatal mortality. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random-effects models. Results: Among 39 eligible studies, 39% of the 5518 pregnancies included were exposed to CSII. Odds of cesarean delivery were higher with CSII (20 studies: 63% vs 56%, odds ratio [OR] 1.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5]), but we did not identify a difference in the odds of neonatal hypoglycemia (23 studies: 31% vs 34%, OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.9-1.5]). Among secondary outcomes, only the odds of LGA (20 studies: 47% vs 38%, OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.2-1.6]) were higher in individuals using CSII versus MDI. Conclusions: Use of CSII (vs MDI) for pregestational DM in pregnancy is associated with higher odds of cesarean delivery and delivery of an LGA neonate. Further evaluation of how CSII use may influence neonatal size and delivery route is warranted.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>37542367</pmid><doi>10.1177/19322968231186626</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-7065</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9353-8819</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9102-6537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6274-0544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5592-453X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-9361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6394-6862</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-2968
ispartof Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2023-09, Vol.17 (5), p.1337-1363
issn 1932-2968
1932-2968
1932-3107
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10563519
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - drug therapy
Female
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Hypoglycemia - chemically induced
Hypoglycemia - drug therapy
Hypoglycemia - epidemiology
Hypoglycemic Agents - therapeutic use
Infant, Newborn
Infusions, Subcutaneous
Injections, Subcutaneous
Insulin - therapeutic use
Insulin Infusion Systems
Insulin, Regular, Human - therapeutic use
Pregnancy
Pregnancy in Diabetics - drug therapy
Premature Birth - drug therapy
Review
title Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion Versus Multiple Daily Injections of Insulin for Pregestational Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continuous%20Subcutaneous%20Infusion%20Versus%20Multiple%20Daily%20Injections%20of%20Insulin%20for%20Pregestational%20Diabetes%20in%20Pregnancy:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20diabetes%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Fisher,%20Stephanie%20A.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1337&rft.epage=1363&rft.pages=1337-1363&rft.issn=1932-2968&rft.eissn=1932-2968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/19322968231186626&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2846930012%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2846930012&rft_id=info:pmid/37542367&rft_sage_id=10.1177_19322968231186626&rfr_iscdi=true