Evaluation of Blood Cultures from SARS-CoV-2-Positive and Negative Adult Patients

Bacteremia and fungemia are significant causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently occur as co-infections with viral respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microorganisms that were isolated from the blood cultures of SARS-CoV-2-positive and neg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Healthcare (Basel) 2023-09, Vol.11 (18), p.2581
Hauptverfasser: Akgün Karapınar, Bahar, Çaklovica Küçükkaya, İlvana, Bölükbaşı, Yasemin, Küçükkaya, Sertaç, Erköse Genç, Gonca, Erturan, Zayre, Ağaçfidan, Ali, Öngen, Betigül
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 18
container_start_page 2581
container_title Healthcare (Basel)
container_volume 11
creator Akgün Karapınar, Bahar
Çaklovica Küçükkaya, İlvana
Bölükbaşı, Yasemin
Küçükkaya, Sertaç
Erköse Genç, Gonca
Erturan, Zayre
Ağaçfidan, Ali
Öngen, Betigül
description Bacteremia and fungemia are significant causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently occur as co-infections with viral respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microorganisms that were isolated from the blood cultures of SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients and investigate their antimicrobial resistance patterns. A retrospective analysis was performed of 22,944 blood cultures sent to the laboratory between November 2020 and December 2021. Blood culture analyses were performed using the BD Bactec FX automated system. Identification was carried out using conventional methods, namely, VITEK-2 and MALDI-TOF MS. Antibacterial/antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to EUCAST/CLSI recommendations. SARS-CoV-2 tests were performed with RT-PCR. Culture positivity was detected in 1630 samples from 652 patients. Of these 652 patients, 633 were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 118 (18.6%) were positive and 515 (81.3%) were negative. The bacteria and fungi that were isolated at the highest rate in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) (21.5%), (12.4%), (12.4%), (1.65%), and complex (1.65%), while in the negative patients, the highest rates were for (21.3%), MR-CoNS (13.5%), (12.05%), (2.1%), (1.1%), and (0.9%). No statistically significant difference was determined between COVID-19-positive and negative patients in terms of detection, such as with the spp., spp., and methicillin-resistant isolated from the blood cultures ( > 0.05). The most common isolate was MR-CoNS in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients ( = 0.028). was more frequent ( = 0.004) and carbapenem-resistant was isolated at a higher rate (60% vs. 43%) in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative patients ( > 0.05). These findings highlight the fact that isolation procedures should not be disregarded and the distribution of bacterial/fungal agents of bloodstream infections and their antibiotic resistance should be followed up during a pandemic, such as in the case of COVID-19.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/healthcare11182581
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10531227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A779737503</galeid><sourcerecordid>A779737503</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-4c5fabd0323ff245720818305ea4477a75ad6aa7b168dfe21b35682c0091e74b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUktv1DAQthCIVqV_gAOKxIVLih9x7JzQsioPqYJCgas1cca7rpy42MlK_Hu8tJQWsA-esb_vG8-DkKeMngjR0ZdbhDBvLSRkjGkuNXtADjnnqu6o4A_v2AfkOOdLWlbHhBbyMTkQSrVMKX1IPp3uICww-zhV0VWvQ4xDtV7CvCTMlUtxrC5Wny_qdfxW8_o8Zj_7HVYwDdUH3MAvZzUUfHVeHJzm_IQ8chAyHt-cR-Trm9Mv63f12ce379ers9o2TTfXjZUO-qH8TzjHG6k41UwLKhGaRilQEoYWQPWs1YNDznohW83tPgtUTS-OyKtr3aulH3GwJXaCYK6SHyH9MBG8uf8y-a3ZxJ1hVApWilMUXtwopPh9wTyb0WeLIcCEccmGa0WZUJ2kBfr8L-hlXNJU8iuotisd0ZL9QW0goPGTiyWw3YualVKdEqpIFdTJf1BlDzh6Gyd0vtzfI_Brgk0x54TuNklGzX4YzL_DUEjP7pbnlvK79eInvMyvmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869339851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Blood Cultures from SARS-CoV-2-Positive and Negative Adult Patients</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Akgün Karapınar, Bahar ; Çaklovica Küçükkaya, İlvana ; Bölükbaşı, Yasemin ; Küçükkaya, Sertaç ; Erköse Genç, Gonca ; Erturan, Zayre ; Ağaçfidan, Ali ; Öngen, Betigül</creator><creatorcontrib>Akgün Karapınar, Bahar ; Çaklovica Küçükkaya, İlvana ; Bölükbaşı, Yasemin ; Küçükkaya, Sertaç ; Erköse Genç, Gonca ; Erturan, Zayre ; Ağaçfidan, Ali ; Öngen, Betigül</creatorcontrib><description>Bacteremia and fungemia are significant causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently occur as co-infections with viral respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microorganisms that were isolated from the blood cultures of SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients and investigate their antimicrobial resistance patterns. A retrospective analysis was performed of 22,944 blood cultures sent to the laboratory between November 2020 and December 2021. Blood culture analyses were performed using the BD Bactec FX automated system. Identification was carried out using conventional methods, namely, VITEK-2 and MALDI-TOF MS. Antibacterial/antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to EUCAST/CLSI recommendations. SARS-CoV-2 tests were performed with RT-PCR. Culture positivity was detected in 1630 samples from 652 patients. Of these 652 patients, 633 were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 118 (18.6%) were positive and 515 (81.3%) were negative. The bacteria and fungi that were isolated at the highest rate in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) (21.5%), (12.4%), (12.4%), (1.65%), and complex (1.65%), while in the negative patients, the highest rates were for (21.3%), MR-CoNS (13.5%), (12.05%), (2.1%), (1.1%), and (0.9%). No statistically significant difference was determined between COVID-19-positive and negative patients in terms of detection, such as with the spp., spp., and methicillin-resistant isolated from the blood cultures ( &gt; 0.05). The most common isolate was MR-CoNS in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients ( = 0.028). was more frequent ( = 0.004) and carbapenem-resistant was isolated at a higher rate (60% vs. 43%) in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative patients ( &gt; 0.05). These findings highlight the fact that isolation procedures should not be disregarded and the distribution of bacterial/fungal agents of bloodstream infections and their antibiotic resistance should be followed up during a pandemic, such as in the case of COVID-19.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9032</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182581</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37761778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Antimicrobial agents ; Bacteremia ; Bacteria ; Bacterial infections ; Bacterial pneumonia ; Blood ; Campylobacter ; COVID-19 ; Diagnosis ; Drug resistance ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Escherichia coli ; Expected values ; Fungi ; Health aspects ; Imipenem ; Medical examination ; Medical laboratories ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Methicillin ; Microorganisms ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Mycoses ; Pandemics ; Pathogens ; Patients ; Pneumonia ; Posaconazole ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Staphylococcus aureus infections ; Staphylococcus infections ; Statistical analysis ; Viral infections</subject><ispartof>Healthcare (Basel), 2023-09, Vol.11 (18), p.2581</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-4c5fabd0323ff245720818305ea4477a75ad6aa7b168dfe21b35682c0091e74b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9320-590X ; 0000-0002-8983-9675 ; 0000-0001-7573-9027 ; 0000-0002-3470-5346 ; 0000-0002-6427-3046 ; 0000-0002-5309-0949 ; 0000-0002-0887-0284 ; 0000-0002-5470-296X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531227/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531227/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37761778$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akgün Karapınar, Bahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çaklovica Küçükkaya, İlvana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bölükbaşı, Yasemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Küçükkaya, Sertaç</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erköse Genç, Gonca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erturan, Zayre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ağaçfidan, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öngen, Betigül</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Blood Cultures from SARS-CoV-2-Positive and Negative Adult Patients</title><title>Healthcare (Basel)</title><addtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</addtitle><description>Bacteremia and fungemia are significant causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently occur as co-infections with viral respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microorganisms that were isolated from the blood cultures of SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients and investigate their antimicrobial resistance patterns. A retrospective analysis was performed of 22,944 blood cultures sent to the laboratory between November 2020 and December 2021. Blood culture analyses were performed using the BD Bactec FX automated system. Identification was carried out using conventional methods, namely, VITEK-2 and MALDI-TOF MS. Antibacterial/antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to EUCAST/CLSI recommendations. SARS-CoV-2 tests were performed with RT-PCR. Culture positivity was detected in 1630 samples from 652 patients. Of these 652 patients, 633 were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 118 (18.6%) were positive and 515 (81.3%) were negative. The bacteria and fungi that were isolated at the highest rate in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) (21.5%), (12.4%), (12.4%), (1.65%), and complex (1.65%), while in the negative patients, the highest rates were for (21.3%), MR-CoNS (13.5%), (12.05%), (2.1%), (1.1%), and (0.9%). No statistically significant difference was determined between COVID-19-positive and negative patients in terms of detection, such as with the spp., spp., and methicillin-resistant isolated from the blood cultures ( &gt; 0.05). The most common isolate was MR-CoNS in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients ( = 0.028). was more frequent ( = 0.004) and carbapenem-resistant was isolated at a higher rate (60% vs. 43%) in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative patients ( &gt; 0.05). These findings highlight the fact that isolation procedures should not be disregarded and the distribution of bacterial/fungal agents of bloodstream infections and their antibiotic resistance should be followed up during a pandemic, such as in the case of COVID-19.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>Bacteremia</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Bacterial pneumonia</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Imipenem</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Medical laboratories</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Methicillin</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mycoses</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Posaconazole</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus infections</subject><subject>Staphylococcus infections</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Viral infections</subject><issn>2227-9032</issn><issn>2227-9032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptUktv1DAQthCIVqV_gAOKxIVLih9x7JzQsioPqYJCgas1cca7rpy42MlK_Hu8tJQWsA-esb_vG8-DkKeMngjR0ZdbhDBvLSRkjGkuNXtADjnnqu6o4A_v2AfkOOdLWlbHhBbyMTkQSrVMKX1IPp3uICww-zhV0VWvQ4xDtV7CvCTMlUtxrC5Wny_qdfxW8_o8Zj_7HVYwDdUH3MAvZzUUfHVeHJzm_IQ8chAyHt-cR-Trm9Mv63f12ce379ers9o2TTfXjZUO-qH8TzjHG6k41UwLKhGaRilQEoYWQPWs1YNDznohW83tPgtUTS-OyKtr3aulH3GwJXaCYK6SHyH9MBG8uf8y-a3ZxJ1hVApWilMUXtwopPh9wTyb0WeLIcCEccmGa0WZUJ2kBfr8L-hlXNJU8iuotisd0ZL9QW0goPGTiyWw3YualVKdEqpIFdTJf1BlDzh6Gyd0vtzfI_Brgk0x54TuNklGzX4YzL_DUEjP7pbnlvK79eInvMyvmw</recordid><startdate>20230919</startdate><enddate>20230919</enddate><creator>Akgün Karapınar, Bahar</creator><creator>Çaklovica Küçükkaya, İlvana</creator><creator>Bölükbaşı, Yasemin</creator><creator>Küçükkaya, Sertaç</creator><creator>Erköse Genç, Gonca</creator><creator>Erturan, Zayre</creator><creator>Ağaçfidan, Ali</creator><creator>Öngen, Betigül</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9320-590X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-9675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-9027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-5346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-3046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-0949</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-0284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-296X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230919</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Blood Cultures from SARS-CoV-2-Positive and Negative Adult Patients</title><author>Akgün Karapınar, Bahar ; Çaklovica Küçükkaya, İlvana ; Bölükbaşı, Yasemin ; Küçükkaya, Sertaç ; Erköse Genç, Gonca ; Erturan, Zayre ; Ağaçfidan, Ali ; Öngen, Betigül</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-4c5fabd0323ff245720818305ea4477a75ad6aa7b168dfe21b35682c0091e74b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>Bacteremia</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Bacterial pneumonia</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Imipenem</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Medical laboratories</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Methicillin</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mycoses</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Posaconazole</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus infections</topic><topic>Staphylococcus infections</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Viral infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akgün Karapınar, Bahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çaklovica Küçükkaya, İlvana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bölükbaşı, Yasemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Küçükkaya, Sertaç</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erköse Genç, Gonca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erturan, Zayre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ağaçfidan, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öngen, Betigül</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akgün Karapınar, Bahar</au><au>Çaklovica Küçükkaya, İlvana</au><au>Bölükbaşı, Yasemin</au><au>Küçükkaya, Sertaç</au><au>Erköse Genç, Gonca</au><au>Erturan, Zayre</au><au>Ağaçfidan, Ali</au><au>Öngen, Betigül</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Blood Cultures from SARS-CoV-2-Positive and Negative Adult Patients</atitle><jtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Healthcare (Basel)</addtitle><date>2023-09-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2581</spage><pages>2581-</pages><issn>2227-9032</issn><eissn>2227-9032</eissn><abstract>Bacteremia and fungemia are significant causes of morbidity and mortality that frequently occur as co-infections with viral respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microorganisms that were isolated from the blood cultures of SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients and investigate their antimicrobial resistance patterns. A retrospective analysis was performed of 22,944 blood cultures sent to the laboratory between November 2020 and December 2021. Blood culture analyses were performed using the BD Bactec FX automated system. Identification was carried out using conventional methods, namely, VITEK-2 and MALDI-TOF MS. Antibacterial/antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to EUCAST/CLSI recommendations. SARS-CoV-2 tests were performed with RT-PCR. Culture positivity was detected in 1630 samples from 652 patients. Of these 652 patients, 633 were tested for SARS-CoV-2; 118 (18.6%) were positive and 515 (81.3%) were negative. The bacteria and fungi that were isolated at the highest rate in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients were methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS) (21.5%), (12.4%), (12.4%), (1.65%), and complex (1.65%), while in the negative patients, the highest rates were for (21.3%), MR-CoNS (13.5%), (12.05%), (2.1%), (1.1%), and (0.9%). No statistically significant difference was determined between COVID-19-positive and negative patients in terms of detection, such as with the spp., spp., and methicillin-resistant isolated from the blood cultures ( &gt; 0.05). The most common isolate was MR-CoNS in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients ( = 0.028). was more frequent ( = 0.004) and carbapenem-resistant was isolated at a higher rate (60% vs. 43%) in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared to SARS-CoV-2-negative patients ( &gt; 0.05). These findings highlight the fact that isolation procedures should not be disregarded and the distribution of bacterial/fungal agents of bloodstream infections and their antibiotic resistance should be followed up during a pandemic, such as in the case of COVID-19.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37761778</pmid><doi>10.3390/healthcare11182581</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9320-590X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8983-9675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-9027</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-5346</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-3046</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-0949</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0887-0284</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5470-296X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2227-9032
ispartof Healthcare (Basel), 2023-09, Vol.11 (18), p.2581
issn 2227-9032
2227-9032
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10531227
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Analysis
Antimicrobial agents
Bacteremia
Bacteria
Bacterial infections
Bacterial pneumonia
Blood
Campylobacter
COVID-19
Diagnosis
Drug resistance
Drug resistance in microorganisms
Escherichia coli
Expected values
Fungi
Health aspects
Imipenem
Medical examination
Medical laboratories
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Methicillin
Microorganisms
Monte Carlo simulation
Morbidity
Mortality
Mycoses
Pandemics
Pathogens
Patients
Pneumonia
Posaconazole
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Staphylococcus aureus infections
Staphylococcus infections
Statistical analysis
Viral infections
title Evaluation of Blood Cultures from SARS-CoV-2-Positive and Negative Adult Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A06%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Blood%20Cultures%20from%20SARS-CoV-2-Positive%20and%20Negative%20Adult%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Healthcare%20(Basel)&rft.au=Akg%C3%BCn%20Karap%C4%B1nar,%20Bahar&rft.date=2023-09-19&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2581&rft.pages=2581-&rft.issn=2227-9032&rft.eissn=2227-9032&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/healthcare11182581&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA779737503%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869339851&rft_id=info:pmid/37761778&rft_galeid=A779737503&rfr_iscdi=true