Concordance in prediction body fat percentage of Brazilian women in reproductive age between different methods of evaluation of skinfolds thickness
To assess the utility of bioimpedance (BIA) and skinfolds thickness (SF) in body fat percentage measuring (%BF) compared to the reference method dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Brazilian reproductive age women, as well as to estimate of inter- and intra-observer precision for SF. 170 women...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2020-05, Vol.64 (3), p.257-268 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 268 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 257 |
| container_title | Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Kogure, Gislaine Satyko Silva, Rafael Costa Ribeiro, Victor Barbosa Mendes, Maria Célia Menezes-Reis, Rafael Ferriani, Rui Alberto Furtado, Cristiana Libardi Miranda Reis, Rosana Maria Dos |
| description | To assess the utility of bioimpedance (BIA) and skinfolds thickness (SF) in body fat percentage measuring (%BF) compared to the reference method dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Brazilian reproductive age women, as well as to estimate of inter- and intra-observer precision for SF.
170 women aged 18-37 years with BMI between 18 and 39.9 kg/m2 were selected for this cross-sectional study. Body density was evaluated through equations proposed by Jackson, Pollock and Ward (1980) (EqJPW) and Petroski (1995) (EqPET), and %BF was estimated by BIA, DXA and Siri's formula (1961). The SF were measured by two separate observers: A and B (to determine inter-observer variability), who measured the folds at three times with 10-minute interval between them (to determine intra-observer variability - we used only observer A).
The %BF by DXA was higher than those measured by SF and BIA (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.20945/2359-3997000000246 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10522213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_a1e4e85ee2aa4f70ba4ba42cd02776b0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>32555992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-f943acd7b58afb8105c7dc63566c0a9e8be6adbe0a4085f5598d1db79e534c363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtuEzEQhlcIRKvSJ0BCfoGAj7vrKwQRh0qVuIFra2yPE7cbO_JuUpXX4IXxbkpFLEu2Z-b_xvbfNG8Zfc-pluoDF0qvhNYdXQaX7YvmcglKrvnLp_1ccNFcj-NdrWGKMSbV6-ZCcKWU1vyy-bPOyeXiITkkMZF9QR_dFHMiNvtHEmAieywO0wQbJDmQzwV-xyFCIg95h2kWFdyX7A9VdkQyl1mcHrDmfAwBS9WSHU7b7McZgEcYDrC0qKfxPqaQh5qattHdJxzHN82rAMOI10_rVfPr65ef6--r2x_fbtafbleuPmRaBS0FON9Z1UOwPaPKdd61QrWto6Cxt9iCt0hB0l6F-uDeM287jUpIJ1px1dycuD7DndmXuIPyaDJEswRy2RgoU3QDGmAosVeIHECGjlqQdXLnKe-61tLK-nhi7Q92h37-rwLDGfQ8k-LWbPLR1GtzzpmoBHEiuJLHsWB4FjNqFs_NbKk587yq3v3f91nzz2HxFwCirGY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concordance in prediction body fat percentage of Brazilian women in reproductive age between different methods of evaluation of skinfolds thickness</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kogure, Gislaine Satyko ; Silva, Rafael Costa ; Ribeiro, Victor Barbosa ; Mendes, Maria Célia ; Menezes-Reis, Rafael ; Ferriani, Rui Alberto ; Furtado, Cristiana Libardi Miranda ; Reis, Rosana Maria Dos</creator><creatorcontrib>Kogure, Gislaine Satyko ; Silva, Rafael Costa ; Ribeiro, Victor Barbosa ; Mendes, Maria Célia ; Menezes-Reis, Rafael ; Ferriani, Rui Alberto ; Furtado, Cristiana Libardi Miranda ; Reis, Rosana Maria Dos</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the utility of bioimpedance (BIA) and skinfolds thickness (SF) in body fat percentage measuring (%BF) compared to the reference method dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Brazilian reproductive age women, as well as to estimate of inter- and intra-observer precision for SF.
170 women aged 18-37 years with BMI between 18 and 39.9 kg/m2 were selected for this cross-sectional study. Body density was evaluated through equations proposed by Jackson, Pollock and Ward (1980) (EqJPW) and Petroski (1995) (EqPET), and %BF was estimated by BIA, DXA and Siri's formula (1961). The SF were measured by two separate observers: A and B (to determine inter-observer variability), who measured the folds at three times with 10-minute interval between them (to determine intra-observer variability - we used only observer A).
The %BF by DXA was higher than those measured by SF and BIA (p<0.01, for all) of 90 volunteers. The Lin coefficient of agreement was considered satisfactory for %BF values obtained by EqJPW and BIA (0.55) and moderate (0.76) for sum of SF (ΣSF) values obtained by EqJPW and EqPET. No agreement was observed for the values obtained by SF (EqJPW and EqPET), BIA and DXA. Analysis of inter- and intra-observer of 59 volunteers showed that different measures of SF thickness met acceptability standards, as well as the % BF.
BIA and SF measurements may underestimate %BF compared with DXA. In addition, BIA and SF measurements are not interchangeable with DXA. However, our results suggest the equation proposed by Jackson, Pollock and Ward (three skinfolds) compared to BIA are interchangeable to quantify the %BF in Brazilian women in reproductive age. Furthermore, our results show acceptable accuracy for intra- and inter-observer skinfold measurements. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(3):257-68.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2359-3997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2359-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000246</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32555992</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Anthropometry - methods ; Body Composition ; Body fat ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry ; Electric Impedance ; Female ; Humans ; Observer Variation ; Original ; Reproducibility of Results ; Skinfold Thickness ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2020-05, Vol.64 (3), p.257-268</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-f943acd7b58afb8105c7dc63566c0a9e8be6adbe0a4085f5598d1db79e534c363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-f943acd7b58afb8105c7dc63566c0a9e8be6adbe0a4085f5598d1db79e534c363</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9308-8344 ; 0000-0002-8496-5939 ; 0000-0002-8711-8225 ; 0000-0002-2860-846X ; 0000-0003-0312-9574 ; 0000-0001-8753-7975 ; 0000-0002-2710-629X ; 0000-0001-9631-4167</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522213/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522213/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32555992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kogure, Gislaine Satyko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Rafael Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Victor Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Maria Célia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes-Reis, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferriani, Rui Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furtado, Cristiana Libardi Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Rosana Maria Dos</creatorcontrib><title>Concordance in prediction body fat percentage of Brazilian women in reproductive age between different methods of evaluation of skinfolds thickness</title><title>Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism</title><addtitle>Arch Endocrinol Metab</addtitle><description>To assess the utility of bioimpedance (BIA) and skinfolds thickness (SF) in body fat percentage measuring (%BF) compared to the reference method dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Brazilian reproductive age women, as well as to estimate of inter- and intra-observer precision for SF.
170 women aged 18-37 years with BMI between 18 and 39.9 kg/m2 were selected for this cross-sectional study. Body density was evaluated through equations proposed by Jackson, Pollock and Ward (1980) (EqJPW) and Petroski (1995) (EqPET), and %BF was estimated by BIA, DXA and Siri's formula (1961). The SF were measured by two separate observers: A and B (to determine inter-observer variability), who measured the folds at three times with 10-minute interval between them (to determine intra-observer variability - we used only observer A).
The %BF by DXA was higher than those measured by SF and BIA (p<0.01, for all) of 90 volunteers. The Lin coefficient of agreement was considered satisfactory for %BF values obtained by EqJPW and BIA (0.55) and moderate (0.76) for sum of SF (ΣSF) values obtained by EqJPW and EqPET. No agreement was observed for the values obtained by SF (EqJPW and EqPET), BIA and DXA. Analysis of inter- and intra-observer of 59 volunteers showed that different measures of SF thickness met acceptability standards, as well as the % BF.
BIA and SF measurements may underestimate %BF compared with DXA. In addition, BIA and SF measurements are not interchangeable with DXA. However, our results suggest the equation proposed by Jackson, Pollock and Ward (three skinfolds) compared to BIA are interchangeable to quantify the %BF in Brazilian women in reproductive age. Furthermore, our results show acceptable accuracy for intra- and inter-observer skinfold measurements. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(3):257-68.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Anthropometry - methods</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body fat</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry</subject><subject>Electric Impedance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Skinfold Thickness</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2359-3997</issn><issn>2359-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdtuEzEQhlcIRKvSJ0BCfoGAj7vrKwQRh0qVuIFra2yPE7cbO_JuUpXX4IXxbkpFLEu2Z-b_xvbfNG8Zfc-pluoDF0qvhNYdXQaX7YvmcglKrvnLp_1ccNFcj-NdrWGKMSbV6-ZCcKWU1vyy-bPOyeXiITkkMZF9QR_dFHMiNvtHEmAieywO0wQbJDmQzwV-xyFCIg95h2kWFdyX7A9VdkQyl1mcHrDmfAwBS9WSHU7b7McZgEcYDrC0qKfxPqaQh5qattHdJxzHN82rAMOI10_rVfPr65ef6--r2x_fbtafbleuPmRaBS0FON9Z1UOwPaPKdd61QrWto6Cxt9iCt0hB0l6F-uDeM287jUpIJ1px1dycuD7DndmXuIPyaDJEswRy2RgoU3QDGmAosVeIHECGjlqQdXLnKe-61tLK-nhi7Q92h37-rwLDGfQ8k-LWbPLR1GtzzpmoBHEiuJLHsWB4FjNqFs_NbKk587yq3v3f91nzz2HxFwCirGY</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Kogure, Gislaine Satyko</creator><creator>Silva, Rafael Costa</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Victor Barbosa</creator><creator>Mendes, Maria Célia</creator><creator>Menezes-Reis, Rafael</creator><creator>Ferriani, Rui Alberto</creator><creator>Furtado, Cristiana Libardi Miranda</creator><creator>Reis, Rosana Maria Dos</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia</general><general>Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9308-8344</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-5939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-8225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-846X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0312-9574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8753-7975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2710-629X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-4167</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Concordance in prediction body fat percentage of Brazilian women in reproductive age between different methods of evaluation of skinfolds thickness</title><author>Kogure, Gislaine Satyko ; Silva, Rafael Costa ; Ribeiro, Victor Barbosa ; Mendes, Maria Célia ; Menezes-Reis, Rafael ; Ferriani, Rui Alberto ; Furtado, Cristiana Libardi Miranda ; Reis, Rosana Maria Dos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-f943acd7b58afb8105c7dc63566c0a9e8be6adbe0a4085f5598d1db79e534c363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Anthropometry - methods</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body fat</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry</topic><topic>Electric Impedance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Skinfold Thickness</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kogure, Gislaine Satyko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Rafael Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Victor Barbosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Maria Célia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes-Reis, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferriani, Rui Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furtado, Cristiana Libardi Miranda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Rosana Maria Dos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kogure, Gislaine Satyko</au><au>Silva, Rafael Costa</au><au>Ribeiro, Victor Barbosa</au><au>Mendes, Maria Célia</au><au>Menezes-Reis, Rafael</au><au>Ferriani, Rui Alberto</au><au>Furtado, Cristiana Libardi Miranda</au><au>Reis, Rosana Maria Dos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concordance in prediction body fat percentage of Brazilian women in reproductive age between different methods of evaluation of skinfolds thickness</atitle><jtitle>Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Endocrinol Metab</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>257-268</pages><issn>2359-3997</issn><eissn>2359-4292</eissn><abstract>To assess the utility of bioimpedance (BIA) and skinfolds thickness (SF) in body fat percentage measuring (%BF) compared to the reference method dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Brazilian reproductive age women, as well as to estimate of inter- and intra-observer precision for SF.
170 women aged 18-37 years with BMI between 18 and 39.9 kg/m2 were selected for this cross-sectional study. Body density was evaluated through equations proposed by Jackson, Pollock and Ward (1980) (EqJPW) and Petroski (1995) (EqPET), and %BF was estimated by BIA, DXA and Siri's formula (1961). The SF were measured by two separate observers: A and B (to determine inter-observer variability), who measured the folds at three times with 10-minute interval between them (to determine intra-observer variability - we used only observer A).
The %BF by DXA was higher than those measured by SF and BIA (p<0.01, for all) of 90 volunteers. The Lin coefficient of agreement was considered satisfactory for %BF values obtained by EqJPW and BIA (0.55) and moderate (0.76) for sum of SF (ΣSF) values obtained by EqJPW and EqPET. No agreement was observed for the values obtained by SF (EqJPW and EqPET), BIA and DXA. Analysis of inter- and intra-observer of 59 volunteers showed that different measures of SF thickness met acceptability standards, as well as the % BF.
BIA and SF measurements may underestimate %BF compared with DXA. In addition, BIA and SF measurements are not interchangeable with DXA. However, our results suggest the equation proposed by Jackson, Pollock and Ward (three skinfolds) compared to BIA are interchangeable to quantify the %BF in Brazilian women in reproductive age. Furthermore, our results show acceptable accuracy for intra- and inter-observer skinfold measurements. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(3):257-68.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Endocrinologia e Metabologia</pub><pmid>32555992</pmid><doi>10.20945/2359-3997000000246</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9308-8344</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-5939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-8225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-846X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0312-9574</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8753-7975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2710-629X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-4167</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2359-3997 |
| ispartof | Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2020-05, Vol.64 (3), p.257-268 |
| issn | 2359-3997 2359-4292 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10522213 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology Adolescent Adult Analysis of Variance Anthropometry - methods Body Composition Body fat Cross-Sectional Studies dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry Electric Impedance Female Humans Observer Variation Original Reproducibility of Results Skinfold Thickness Young Adult |
| title | Concordance in prediction body fat percentage of Brazilian women in reproductive age between different methods of evaluation of skinfolds thickness |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concordance%20in%20prediction%20body%20fat%20percentage%20of%20Brazilian%20women%20in%20reproductive%20age%20between%20different%20methods%20of%20evaluation%20of%20skinfolds%20thickness&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20Endocrinology%20and%20Metabolism&rft.au=Kogure,%20Gislaine%20Satyko&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=257-268&rft.issn=2359-3997&rft.eissn=2359-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.20945/2359-3997000000246&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_doaj_%3E32555992%3C/pubmed_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32555992&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_a1e4e85ee2aa4f70ba4ba42cd02776b0&rfr_iscdi=true |