Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves

All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejecto...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 1980-03, Vol.34 (1), p.19-22
Hauptverfasser: Hobbs, P, Smith, A, George, W D, Sellwood, R A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)
container_volume 34
creator Hobbs, P
Smith, A
George, W D
Sellwood, R A
description All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejectors), and 50 self-referred women enabled comparisons to be made of personal and social characteristics, previous health behaviour, and beliefs about cancer in the three groups. Self-referral was associated with lower age, higher social class, and higher educational levels. Women accepting invitations included more who had previously used other screening procedures, for example, cervical smears and chest x rays, than those rejecting invitations. Previous use of screening was even more among self-referred women. Acceptance of screening was associated with belief in the possibilities of curing cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jech.34.1.19
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1052034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25566145</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25566145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b528t-3f3c22fc0aa923a219e1654b742b152ed9a698dbb13fc45717f149d6102317f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuP0zAUhSMEGsrAji2SJSTYkOLrR5xskEYVL6kahHiIneU4N01KEgfb7cC_x6VVeSxY-fqeT0fHPln2EOgSgBfPt2i7JRdLWEJ1K1uAUDRnipe3swUFwXNK5Ze72b0QtjSNilUX2YXiheQVLLL5ylqco_OBmKkhHpPbr5tr04L0076PJvZuItGR3dSg3zhSezQhkmA94tRPG2LdOBuPDbnpY0di5wKSm84luxb9YR87HAMOewz3szutGQI-OJ2X2adXLz-u3uTrd6_frq7WeS1ZGXPecstYa6kxFeOGQYVQSFErwWqQDJvKFFXZ1DXw1gqpQLUgqqYAyniaOb_MXhx95109YmNxit4Mevb9aPwP7Uyv_1amvtMbt9dAJaNcJIMnJwPvvu0wRD32weIwmAndLmglqQJZlgl8_A-4dTs_pcdpUEoUEqQ8UM-OlPUuhPQx5yhA9aFHfehRc6FBQ5XwR3_GP8On4n7r25DqOstMyqIAIZOeH_U-RPx-1o3_qgvFldTXn1easvWq_MCu9fvEPz3y9bj9f7KfiCvAuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774651558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central database</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hobbs, P ; Smith, A ; George, W D ; Sellwood, R A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, P ; Smith, A ; George, W D ; Sellwood, R A</creatorcontrib><description>All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejectors), and 50 self-referred women enabled comparisons to be made of personal and social characteristics, previous health behaviour, and beliefs about cancer in the three groups. Self-referral was associated with lower age, higher social class, and higher educational levels. Women accepting invitations included more who had previously used other screening procedures, for example, cervical smears and chest x rays, than those rejecting invitations. Previous use of screening was even more among self-referred women. Acceptance of screening was associated with belief in the possibilities of curing cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech.34.1.19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7365391</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECHDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Age groups ; Aged ; Attitude to Health ; Breast cancer ; Breast diseases ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; Cancer screening ; Cytology ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Middle Aged ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Referral and Consultation ; Screening questions ; Screening tests ; Social Class ; Solar X rays ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 1980-03, Vol.34 (1), p.19-22</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1979 The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Mar 1980</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b528t-3f3c22fc0aa923a219e1654b742b152ed9a698dbb13fc45717f149d6102317f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b528t-3f3c22fc0aa923a219e1654b742b152ed9a698dbb13fc45717f149d6102317f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25566145$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25566145$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7365391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, W D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellwood, R A</creatorcontrib><title>Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejectors), and 50 self-referred women enabled comparisons to be made of personal and social characteristics, previous health behaviour, and beliefs about cancer in the three groups. Self-referral was associated with lower age, higher social class, and higher educational levels. Women accepting invitations included more who had previously used other screening procedures, for example, cervical smears and chest x rays, than those rejecting invitations. Previous use of screening was even more among self-referred women. Acceptance of screening was associated with belief in the possibilities of curing cancer.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast diseases</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Screening questions</subject><subject>Screening tests</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Solar X rays</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuP0zAUhSMEGsrAji2SJSTYkOLrR5xskEYVL6kahHiIneU4N01KEgfb7cC_x6VVeSxY-fqeT0fHPln2EOgSgBfPt2i7JRdLWEJ1K1uAUDRnipe3swUFwXNK5Ze72b0QtjSNilUX2YXiheQVLLL5ylqco_OBmKkhHpPbr5tr04L0076PJvZuItGR3dSg3zhSezQhkmA94tRPG2LdOBuPDbnpY0di5wKSm84luxb9YR87HAMOewz3szutGQI-OJ2X2adXLz-u3uTrd6_frq7WeS1ZGXPecstYa6kxFeOGQYVQSFErwWqQDJvKFFXZ1DXw1gqpQLUgqqYAyniaOb_MXhx95109YmNxit4Mevb9aPwP7Uyv_1amvtMbt9dAJaNcJIMnJwPvvu0wRD32weIwmAndLmglqQJZlgl8_A-4dTs_pcdpUEoUEqQ8UM-OlPUuhPQx5yhA9aFHfehRc6FBQ5XwR3_GP8On4n7r25DqOstMyqIAIZOeH_U-RPx-1o3_qgvFldTXn1easvWq_MCu9fvEPz3y9bj9f7KfiCvAuQ</recordid><startdate>19800301</startdate><enddate>19800301</enddate><creator>Hobbs, P</creator><creator>Smith, A</creator><creator>George, W D</creator><creator>Sellwood, R A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19800301</creationdate><title>Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves</title><author>Hobbs, P ; Smith, A ; George, W D ; Sellwood, R A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b528t-3f3c22fc0aa923a219e1654b742b152ed9a698dbb13fc45717f149d6102317f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast diseases</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Screening questions</topic><topic>Screening tests</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Solar X rays</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, W D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellwood, R A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hobbs, P</au><au>Smith, A</au><au>George, W D</au><au>Sellwood, R A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>1980-03-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>19-22</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><coden>JECHDR</coden><abstract>All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejectors), and 50 self-referred women enabled comparisons to be made of personal and social characteristics, previous health behaviour, and beliefs about cancer in the three groups. Self-referral was associated with lower age, higher social class, and higher educational levels. Women accepting invitations included more who had previously used other screening procedures, for example, cervical smears and chest x rays, than those rejecting invitations. Previous use of screening was even more among self-referred women. Acceptance of screening was associated with belief in the possibilities of curing cancer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>7365391</pmid><doi>10.1136/jech.34.1.19</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-005X
ispartof Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 1980-03, Vol.34 (1), p.19-22
issn 0143-005X
1470-2738
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1052034
source Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central database; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Age Factors
Age groups
Aged
Attitude to Health
Breast cancer
Breast diseases
Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology
Breast Neoplasms - psychology
Cancer screening
Cytology
Epidemiology
Female
Humans
Mass Screening
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Referral and Consultation
Screening questions
Screening tests
Social Class
Solar X rays
Womens health
title Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T23%3A37%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acceptors%20and%20rejectors%20of%20an%20invitation%20to%20undergo%20breast%20screening%20compared%20with%20those%20who%20referred%20themselves&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Hobbs,%20P&rft.date=1980-03-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=19-22&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft.coden=JECHDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech.34.1.19&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E25566145%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774651558&rft_id=info:pmid/7365391&rft_jstor_id=25566145&rfr_iscdi=true