Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves
All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejecto...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 1980-03, Vol.34 (1), p.19-22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Hobbs, P Smith, A George, W D Sellwood, R A |
description | All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejectors), and 50 self-referred women enabled comparisons to be made of personal and social characteristics, previous health behaviour, and beliefs about cancer in the three groups. Self-referral was associated with lower age, higher social class, and higher educational levels. Women accepting invitations included more who had previously used other screening procedures, for example, cervical smears and chest x rays, than those rejecting invitations. Previous use of screening was even more among self-referred women. Acceptance of screening was associated with belief in the possibilities of curing cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/jech.34.1.19 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1052034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25566145</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25566145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b528t-3f3c22fc0aa923a219e1654b742b152ed9a698dbb13fc45717f149d6102317f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuP0zAUhSMEGsrAji2SJSTYkOLrR5xskEYVL6kahHiIneU4N01KEgfb7cC_x6VVeSxY-fqeT0fHPln2EOgSgBfPt2i7JRdLWEJ1K1uAUDRnipe3swUFwXNK5Ze72b0QtjSNilUX2YXiheQVLLL5ylqco_OBmKkhHpPbr5tr04L0076PJvZuItGR3dSg3zhSezQhkmA94tRPG2LdOBuPDbnpY0di5wKSm84luxb9YR87HAMOewz3szutGQI-OJ2X2adXLz-u3uTrd6_frq7WeS1ZGXPecstYa6kxFeOGQYVQSFErwWqQDJvKFFXZ1DXw1gqpQLUgqqYAyniaOb_MXhx95109YmNxit4Mevb9aPwP7Uyv_1amvtMbt9dAJaNcJIMnJwPvvu0wRD32weIwmAndLmglqQJZlgl8_A-4dTs_pcdpUEoUEqQ8UM-OlPUuhPQx5yhA9aFHfehRc6FBQ5XwR3_GP8On4n7r25DqOstMyqIAIZOeH_U-RPx-1o3_qgvFldTXn1easvWq_MCu9fvEPz3y9bj9f7KfiCvAuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774651558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central database</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hobbs, P ; Smith, A ; George, W D ; Sellwood, R A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, P ; Smith, A ; George, W D ; Sellwood, R A</creatorcontrib><description>All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejectors), and 50 self-referred women enabled comparisons to be made of personal and social characteristics, previous health behaviour, and beliefs about cancer in the three groups. Self-referral was associated with lower age, higher social class, and higher educational levels. Women accepting invitations included more who had previously used other screening procedures, for example, cervical smears and chest x rays, than those rejecting invitations. Previous use of screening was even more among self-referred women. Acceptance of screening was associated with belief in the possibilities of curing cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech.34.1.19</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7365391</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECHDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Age groups ; Aged ; Attitude to Health ; Breast cancer ; Breast diseases ; Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Breast Neoplasms - psychology ; Cancer screening ; Cytology ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening ; Middle Aged ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Referral and Consultation ; Screening questions ; Screening tests ; Social Class ; Solar X rays ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 1980-03, Vol.34 (1), p.19-22</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1979 The Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health</rights><rights>Copyright BMJ Publishing Group LTD Mar 1980</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b528t-3f3c22fc0aa923a219e1654b742b152ed9a698dbb13fc45717f149d6102317f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b528t-3f3c22fc0aa923a219e1654b742b152ed9a698dbb13fc45717f149d6102317f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25566145$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25566145$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7365391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, W D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellwood, R A</creatorcontrib><title>Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejectors), and 50 self-referred women enabled comparisons to be made of personal and social characteristics, previous health behaviour, and beliefs about cancer in the three groups. Self-referral was associated with lower age, higher social class, and higher educational levels. Women accepting invitations included more who had previously used other screening procedures, for example, cervical smears and chest x rays, than those rejecting invitations. Previous use of screening was even more among self-referred women. Acceptance of screening was associated with belief in the possibilities of curing cancer.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Age groups</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast diseases</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>Screening questions</subject><subject>Screening tests</subject><subject>Social Class</subject><subject>Solar X rays</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuP0zAUhSMEGsrAji2SJSTYkOLrR5xskEYVL6kahHiIneU4N01KEgfb7cC_x6VVeSxY-fqeT0fHPln2EOgSgBfPt2i7JRdLWEJ1K1uAUDRnipe3swUFwXNK5Ze72b0QtjSNilUX2YXiheQVLLL5ylqco_OBmKkhHpPbr5tr04L0076PJvZuItGR3dSg3zhSezQhkmA94tRPG2LdOBuPDbnpY0di5wKSm84luxb9YR87HAMOewz3szutGQI-OJ2X2adXLz-u3uTrd6_frq7WeS1ZGXPecstYa6kxFeOGQYVQSFErwWqQDJvKFFXZ1DXw1gqpQLUgqqYAyniaOb_MXhx95109YmNxit4Mevb9aPwP7Uyv_1amvtMbt9dAJaNcJIMnJwPvvu0wRD32weIwmAndLmglqQJZlgl8_A-4dTs_pcdpUEoUEqQ8UM-OlPUuhPQx5yhA9aFHfehRc6FBQ5XwR3_GP8On4n7r25DqOstMyqIAIZOeH_U-RPx-1o3_qgvFldTXn1easvWq_MCu9fvEPz3y9bj9f7KfiCvAuQ</recordid><startdate>19800301</startdate><enddate>19800301</enddate><creator>Hobbs, P</creator><creator>Smith, A</creator><creator>George, W D</creator><creator>Sellwood, R A</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>British Medical Association</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19800301</creationdate><title>Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves</title><author>Hobbs, P ; Smith, A ; George, W D ; Sellwood, R A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b528t-3f3c22fc0aa923a219e1654b742b152ed9a698dbb13fc45717f149d6102317f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Age groups</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast diseases</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>Screening questions</topic><topic>Screening tests</topic><topic>Social Class</topic><topic>Solar X rays</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hobbs, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, W D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sellwood, R A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hobbs, P</au><au>Smith, A</au><au>George, W D</au><au>Sellwood, R A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>1980-03-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>19-22</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><coden>JECHDR</coden><abstract>All women aged 50--79 were invited by two group practices to undergo screening and 57% accepted. Women of the same age range in other practices, who referred themselves, were also screened. Interview with random samples of 100 invited screened women (acceptors), 100 invited unscreened women (rejectors), and 50 self-referred women enabled comparisons to be made of personal and social characteristics, previous health behaviour, and beliefs about cancer in the three groups. Self-referral was associated with lower age, higher social class, and higher educational levels. Women accepting invitations included more who had previously used other screening procedures, for example, cervical smears and chest x rays, than those rejecting invitations. Previous use of screening was even more among self-referred women. Acceptance of screening was associated with belief in the possibilities of curing cancer.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>7365391</pmid><doi>10.1136/jech.34.1.19</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-005X |
ispartof | Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 1980-03, Vol.34 (1), p.19-22 |
issn | 0143-005X 1470-2738 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_1052034 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central database; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Age Factors Age groups Aged Attitude to Health Breast cancer Breast diseases Breast Neoplasms - epidemiology Breast Neoplasms - psychology Cancer screening Cytology Epidemiology Female Humans Mass Screening Middle Aged Patient Acceptance of Health Care Referral and Consultation Screening questions Screening tests Social Class Solar X rays Womens health |
title | Acceptors and rejectors of an invitation to undergo breast screening compared with those who referred themselves |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T23%3A37%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acceptors%20and%20rejectors%20of%20an%20invitation%20to%20undergo%20breast%20screening%20compared%20with%20those%20who%20referred%20themselves&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Hobbs,%20P&rft.date=1980-03-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=19-22&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft.coden=JECHDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech.34.1.19&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E25566145%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774651558&rft_id=info:pmid/7365391&rft_jstor_id=25566145&rfr_iscdi=true |