Transcatheter aortic valve implantation results are not superimposable to surgery in patients with aortic stenosis at low surgical risk

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the impact of transcatheter aortic valveimplantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic valvestenosis (AS) at low surgical risk. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiology journal 2023-08, Vol.30 (4), p.595-605
Hauptverfasser: Acconcia, Maria Cristina, Perrone, Marco Alfonso, Sergi, Domenico, Di Luozzo, Marco, Marchei, Massimo, De Vico, Pasquale, Sili Scavalli, Antonio, Pannarale, Giuseppe, Chiocchi, Marcello, Gaudio, Carlo, Romeo, Francesco, Caretta, Quintilio, Barillà, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 605
container_issue 4
container_start_page 595
container_title Cardiology journal
container_volume 30
creator Acconcia, Maria Cristina
Perrone, Marco Alfonso
Sergi, Domenico
Di Luozzo, Marco
Marchei, Massimo
De Vico, Pasquale
Sili Scavalli, Antonio
Pannarale, Giuseppe
Chiocchi, Marcello
Gaudio, Carlo
Romeo, Francesco
Caretta, Quintilio
Barillà, Francesco
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the impact of transcatheter aortic valveimplantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic valvestenosis (AS) at low surgical risk. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (Obs) published fromJanuary 2014 until March 31st, 2020 were retrieved through the PubMed computerized database and at thesite https://www.clinicaltrials.com. The relative risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was usedto evaluate the effect of the intervention under comparison. The primary endpoints were all-cause 30-daymortality and 1-year mortality. The 30-day safety endpoints were: stroke, acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3,major bleeding, moderate/severe paravalvular leak, need for new permanent pacemaker (PM) implantation. RESULTS: After detailed review 9 studies, related to 4 RCTs and 5 Obs, were selected. The overallanalysis of RCTs plus Obs showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality for TAVI (RR = 0.55; 95% CI0.45–0.68, p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). However, an increased risk of new PM implantation (RR = 2.87;95% CI 2.01–3.67, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and of paravalvular leak (RR = 7.28; 95% CI 3.83–13.81,p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) was observed in TAVI compared to SAVR. On the contrary, a lower incidenceof major bleeding (RR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.27–0.54, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and of acute kidney injurywas observed (RR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.19–0.56, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) in TAVI. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI and SVAR in the treatment of AS in the patients at low surgical risk are not superimposable.In particular, if 30-day and 1-year mortality, major bleeding and acute kidney injury weresignificantly lower for TAVI, the need of new PM implantation and paravalvular leak were significantlylower in SAVR. Consequently, we suggest the need of more trials to evaluate the effectiveness of TAVI asroutine therapeutic procedure in the treatment of patients with low surgical risk AS.
doi_str_mv 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0114
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10508068</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2863170826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-28cf54bbdc576950ed15ef0e757f7f6021e618251cf3eaa3f7a669e2df1e81143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9vVCEUxYnR2Nq6dE_ixs0b-fPg8VbGTKq2aeKmJt0Rhrl0qAw8gTdNP4Ffu8y0NakrCPfHyT3nIPSBkoWQhH9eXiwMI4wuCKX9K3RM1ag6QtX168N96IQY-RF6V8otIXIUgr1FR7yXjPV8OEZ_r7KJxZq6gQoZm5Srt3hnwg6w307BxGqqTxFnKHOoBZsMOKaKyzxBbkQqZhUA19Re8g3ke-wjntofiI2-83XzLFoqxFR8k6g4pLsD760JOPvy-xS9cSYUeP90nqBf386ulj-6y5_fz5dfLzvL-7F2TFkn-tVqbcXQzBBYUwGOwCAGNzjZcgBJFRPUOg7GcDcYKUdga0dBtYD4CfryqDvNqy2sbdsym6CnZsXke52M1y8n0W_0TdppSgRRRKqm8OlJIac_M5Sqt75YCC0qSHPRTDRslILv0Y__obdpzrH500xJTgeimGxU90jZnErJ4P5tQ4ned6yXF_rQsd53zB8AdbOckg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2863170826</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation results are not superimposable to surgery in patients with aortic stenosis at low surgical risk</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Acconcia, Maria Cristina ; Perrone, Marco Alfonso ; Sergi, Domenico ; Di Luozzo, Marco ; Marchei, Massimo ; De Vico, Pasquale ; Sili Scavalli, Antonio ; Pannarale, Giuseppe ; Chiocchi, Marcello ; Gaudio, Carlo ; Romeo, Francesco ; Caretta, Quintilio ; Barillà, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Acconcia, Maria Cristina ; Perrone, Marco Alfonso ; Sergi, Domenico ; Di Luozzo, Marco ; Marchei, Massimo ; De Vico, Pasquale ; Sili Scavalli, Antonio ; Pannarale, Giuseppe ; Chiocchi, Marcello ; Gaudio, Carlo ; Romeo, Francesco ; Caretta, Quintilio ; Barillà, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the impact of transcatheter aortic valveimplantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic valvestenosis (AS) at low surgical risk. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (Obs) published fromJanuary 2014 until March 31st, 2020 were retrieved through the PubMed computerized database and at thesite https://www.clinicaltrials.com. The relative risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was usedto evaluate the effect of the intervention under comparison. The primary endpoints were all-cause 30-daymortality and 1-year mortality. The 30-day safety endpoints were: stroke, acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3,major bleeding, moderate/severe paravalvular leak, need for new permanent pacemaker (PM) implantation. RESULTS: After detailed review 9 studies, related to 4 RCTs and 5 Obs, were selected. The overallanalysis of RCTs plus Obs showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality for TAVI (RR = 0.55; 95% CI0.45–0.68, p &lt; 0.00001; I2 = 0%). However, an increased risk of new PM implantation (RR = 2.87;95% CI 2.01–3.67, p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and of paravalvular leak (RR = 7.28; 95% CI 3.83–13.81,p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%) was observed in TAVI compared to SAVR. On the contrary, a lower incidenceof major bleeding (RR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.27–0.54, p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and of acute kidney injurywas observed (RR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.19–0.56, p &lt; 0.0001, I2 = 0%) in TAVI. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI and SVAR in the treatment of AS in the patients at low surgical risk are not superimposable.In particular, if 30-day and 1-year mortality, major bleeding and acute kidney injury weresignificantly lower for TAVI, the need of new PM implantation and paravalvular leak were significantlylower in SAVR. Consequently, we suggest the need of more trials to evaluate the effectiveness of TAVI asroutine therapeutic procedure in the treatment of patients with low surgical risk AS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1897-5593</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1898-018X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0114</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34622437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gdansk: Wydawnictwo Via Medica</publisher><subject>Clinical Cardiology ; Kidneys ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality</subject><ispartof>Cardiology journal, 2023-08, Vol.30 (4), p.595-605</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Via Medica 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508068/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10508068/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Acconcia, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrone, Marco Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sergi, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Luozzo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchei, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vico, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sili Scavalli, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pannarale, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiocchi, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudio, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romeo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caretta, Quintilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barillà, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation results are not superimposable to surgery in patients with aortic stenosis at low surgical risk</title><title>Cardiology journal</title><description>BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the impact of transcatheter aortic valveimplantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic valvestenosis (AS) at low surgical risk. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (Obs) published fromJanuary 2014 until March 31st, 2020 were retrieved through the PubMed computerized database and at thesite https://www.clinicaltrials.com. The relative risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was usedto evaluate the effect of the intervention under comparison. The primary endpoints were all-cause 30-daymortality and 1-year mortality. The 30-day safety endpoints were: stroke, acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3,major bleeding, moderate/severe paravalvular leak, need for new permanent pacemaker (PM) implantation. RESULTS: After detailed review 9 studies, related to 4 RCTs and 5 Obs, were selected. The overallanalysis of RCTs plus Obs showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality for TAVI (RR = 0.55; 95% CI0.45–0.68, p &lt; 0.00001; I2 = 0%). However, an increased risk of new PM implantation (RR = 2.87;95% CI 2.01–3.67, p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and of paravalvular leak (RR = 7.28; 95% CI 3.83–13.81,p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%) was observed in TAVI compared to SAVR. On the contrary, a lower incidenceof major bleeding (RR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.27–0.54, p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and of acute kidney injurywas observed (RR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.19–0.56, p &lt; 0.0001, I2 = 0%) in TAVI. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI and SVAR in the treatment of AS in the patients at low surgical risk are not superimposable.In particular, if 30-day and 1-year mortality, major bleeding and acute kidney injury weresignificantly lower for TAVI, the need of new PM implantation and paravalvular leak were significantlylower in SAVR. Consequently, we suggest the need of more trials to evaluate the effectiveness of TAVI asroutine therapeutic procedure in the treatment of patients with low surgical risk AS.</description><subject>Clinical Cardiology</subject><subject>Kidneys</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><issn>1897-5593</issn><issn>1898-018X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9vVCEUxYnR2Nq6dE_ixs0b-fPg8VbGTKq2aeKmJt0Rhrl0qAw8gTdNP4Ffu8y0NakrCPfHyT3nIPSBkoWQhH9eXiwMI4wuCKX9K3RM1ag6QtX168N96IQY-RF6V8otIXIUgr1FR7yXjPV8OEZ_r7KJxZq6gQoZm5Srt3hnwg6w307BxGqqTxFnKHOoBZsMOKaKyzxBbkQqZhUA19Re8g3ke-wjntofiI2-83XzLFoqxFR8k6g4pLsD760JOPvy-xS9cSYUeP90nqBf386ulj-6y5_fz5dfLzvL-7F2TFkn-tVqbcXQzBBYUwGOwCAGNzjZcgBJFRPUOg7GcDcYKUdga0dBtYD4CfryqDvNqy2sbdsym6CnZsXke52M1y8n0W_0TdppSgRRRKqm8OlJIac_M5Sqt75YCC0qSHPRTDRslILv0Y__obdpzrH500xJTgeimGxU90jZnErJ4P5tQ4ned6yXF_rQsd53zB8AdbOckg</recordid><startdate>20230831</startdate><enddate>20230831</enddate><creator>Acconcia, Maria Cristina</creator><creator>Perrone, Marco Alfonso</creator><creator>Sergi, Domenico</creator><creator>Di Luozzo, Marco</creator><creator>Marchei, Massimo</creator><creator>De Vico, Pasquale</creator><creator>Sili Scavalli, Antonio</creator><creator>Pannarale, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Chiocchi, Marcello</creator><creator>Gaudio, Carlo</creator><creator>Romeo, Francesco</creator><creator>Caretta, Quintilio</creator><creator>Barillà, Francesco</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</general><general>Via Medica</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230831</creationdate><title>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation results are not superimposable to surgery in patients with aortic stenosis at low surgical risk</title><author>Acconcia, Maria Cristina ; Perrone, Marco Alfonso ; Sergi, Domenico ; Di Luozzo, Marco ; Marchei, Massimo ; De Vico, Pasquale ; Sili Scavalli, Antonio ; Pannarale, Giuseppe ; Chiocchi, Marcello ; Gaudio, Carlo ; Romeo, Francesco ; Caretta, Quintilio ; Barillà, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-28cf54bbdc576950ed15ef0e757f7f6021e618251cf3eaa3f7a669e2df1e81143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clinical Cardiology</topic><topic>Kidneys</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Acconcia, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrone, Marco Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sergi, Domenico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Luozzo, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchei, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vico, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sili Scavalli, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pannarale, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiocchi, Marcello</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudio, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romeo, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caretta, Quintilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barillà, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cardiology journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Acconcia, Maria Cristina</au><au>Perrone, Marco Alfonso</au><au>Sergi, Domenico</au><au>Di Luozzo, Marco</au><au>Marchei, Massimo</au><au>De Vico, Pasquale</au><au>Sili Scavalli, Antonio</au><au>Pannarale, Giuseppe</au><au>Chiocchi, Marcello</au><au>Gaudio, Carlo</au><au>Romeo, Francesco</au><au>Caretta, Quintilio</au><au>Barillà, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation results are not superimposable to surgery in patients with aortic stenosis at low surgical risk</atitle><jtitle>Cardiology journal</jtitle><date>2023-08-31</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>595</spage><epage>605</epage><pages>595-605</pages><issn>1897-5593</issn><eissn>1898-018X</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the impact of transcatheter aortic valveimplantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic valvestenosis (AS) at low surgical risk. METHODS: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (Obs) published fromJanuary 2014 until March 31st, 2020 were retrieved through the PubMed computerized database and at thesite https://www.clinicaltrials.com. The relative risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was usedto evaluate the effect of the intervention under comparison. The primary endpoints were all-cause 30-daymortality and 1-year mortality. The 30-day safety endpoints were: stroke, acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3,major bleeding, moderate/severe paravalvular leak, need for new permanent pacemaker (PM) implantation. RESULTS: After detailed review 9 studies, related to 4 RCTs and 5 Obs, were selected. The overallanalysis of RCTs plus Obs showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality for TAVI (RR = 0.55; 95% CI0.45–0.68, p &lt; 0.00001; I2 = 0%). However, an increased risk of new PM implantation (RR = 2.87;95% CI 2.01–3.67, p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and of paravalvular leak (RR = 7.28; 95% CI 3.83–13.81,p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%) was observed in TAVI compared to SAVR. On the contrary, a lower incidenceof major bleeding (RR = 0.38; 95% CI 0.27–0.54, p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 0%) and of acute kidney injurywas observed (RR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.19–0.56, p &lt; 0.0001, I2 = 0%) in TAVI. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI and SVAR in the treatment of AS in the patients at low surgical risk are not superimposable.In particular, if 30-day and 1-year mortality, major bleeding and acute kidney injury weresignificantly lower for TAVI, the need of new PM implantation and paravalvular leak were significantlylower in SAVR. Consequently, we suggest the need of more trials to evaluate the effectiveness of TAVI asroutine therapeutic procedure in the treatment of patients with low surgical risk AS.</abstract><cop>Gdansk</cop><pub>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</pub><pmid>34622437</pmid><doi>10.5603/CJ.a2021.0114</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1897-5593
ispartof Cardiology journal, 2023-08, Vol.30 (4), p.595-605
issn 1897-5593
1898-018X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10508068
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical Cardiology
Kidneys
Meta-analysis
Mortality
title Transcatheter aortic valve implantation results are not superimposable to surgery in patients with aortic stenosis at low surgical risk
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A00%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcatheter%20aortic%20valve%20implantation%20results%20are%20not%20superimposable%20to%20surgery%20in%20patients%20with%20aortic%20stenosis%20at%20low%20surgical%20risk&rft.jtitle=Cardiology%20journal&rft.au=Acconcia,%20Maria%20Cristina&rft.date=2023-08-31&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=595&rft.epage=605&rft.pages=595-605&rft.issn=1897-5593&rft.eissn=1898-018X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0114&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2863170826%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2863170826&rft_id=info:pmid/34622437&rfr_iscdi=true