Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing

Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression le...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gene therapy 2023-09, Vol.30 (9), p.698-705
Hauptverfasser: Donnelley, Martin, Cmielewski, Patricia, Knight, Emma, Carpentieri, Chantelle, McCarron, Alexandra, Rout-Pitt, Nathan, Parsons, David, Farrow, Nigel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 705
container_issue 9
container_start_page 698
container_title Gene therapy
container_volume 30
creator Donnelley, Martin
Cmielewski, Patricia
Knight, Emma
Carpentieri, Chantelle
McCarron, Alexandra
Rout-Pitt, Nathan
Parsons, David
Farrow, Nigel
description Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the luciferase reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (>1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10506910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2865943911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fb832681e8959ad05d19e091272e6c26ae170abedc9cc794c1dacbed7a06fb923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTtv6Ai4k4MZNNP9VWQ0y-DMwIIiuQyp1uyZDVdImqYbZ-Rq-nk9ixh7Hn4WrEO53Tu7JQegpoy8ZFf2rIpkUklAuCKWSCiLuoQ2TnSZKan4fbajRhnSM9yfoUSlXtFFdzx-iE9ExrahgGzR8hD24ilPGJcRpBjKmAniGWMMhZDfjA_japm5cQgylZldDirgmvKT1hlzjVE7xef3-9VvBbp6xG9Jacb0EXEPTTI_Rg52bCzy5Pbfo89s3n87ek4sP787PXl8QLztVyW7oBdc9g94o40aqRmaAGsY7Dtpz7YB11A0weuN9Z6Rno_Pt2jmqd4PhYotOj777dVga1iK0_e0-h8Xla5tcsH9PYri0UzpYRhXVpn3pFr24dcjpywql2iUUD_PsIrSwlveMK6qUMg19_g96ldYcW75GaWWkMIw1ih8pn1MpGXZ32zBqbzq0xw5t69D-7NCKJnr2Z447ya_SGiCOQGmjOEH-_fZ_bH8ACBiqEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2865943911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Donnelley, Martin ; Cmielewski, Patricia ; Knight, Emma ; Carpentieri, Chantelle ; McCarron, Alexandra ; Rout-Pitt, Nathan ; Parsons, David ; Farrow, Nigel</creator><creatorcontrib>Donnelley, Martin ; Cmielewski, Patricia ; Knight, Emma ; Carpentieri, Chantelle ; McCarron, Alexandra ; Rout-Pitt, Nathan ; Parsons, David ; Farrow, Nigel</creatorcontrib><description>Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the luciferase reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (&gt;1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-7128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5462</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37165031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>42 ; 42/44 ; 59 ; 59/5 ; 631/61/201 ; 692/699/1785 ; Bioluminescence ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cell Biology ; Cystic fibrosis ; Dosage ; Expression vectors ; Gene Expression ; Gene Therapy ; Genomes ; Human Genetics ; Immunogenicity ; Lungs ; Lysophosphatidylcholine ; Nanotechnology ; Reporter gene</subject><ispartof>Gene therapy, 2023-09, Vol.30 (9), p.698-705</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fb832681e8959ad05d19e091272e6c26ae170abedc9cc794c1dacbed7a06fb923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fb832681e8959ad05d19e091272e6c26ae170abedc9cc794c1dacbed7a06fb923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6045-3998 ; 0000-0002-2236-9410 ; 0000-0002-5320-7756 ; 0000-0003-1746-3290</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donnelley, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cmielewski, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpentieri, Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rout-Pitt, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrow, Nigel</creatorcontrib><title>Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing</title><title>Gene therapy</title><addtitle>Gene Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Gene Ther</addtitle><description>Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the luciferase reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (&gt;1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals.</description><subject>42</subject><subject>42/44</subject><subject>59</subject><subject>59/5</subject><subject>631/61/201</subject><subject>692/699/1785</subject><subject>Bioluminescence</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cystic fibrosis</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Expression vectors</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Gene Therapy</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Immunogenicity</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Lysophosphatidylcholine</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Reporter gene</subject><issn>0969-7128</issn><issn>1476-5462</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTtv6Ai4k4MZNNP9VWQ0y-DMwIIiuQyp1uyZDVdImqYbZ-Rq-nk9ixh7Hn4WrEO53Tu7JQegpoy8ZFf2rIpkUklAuCKWSCiLuoQ2TnSZKan4fbajRhnSM9yfoUSlXtFFdzx-iE9ExrahgGzR8hD24ilPGJcRpBjKmAniGWMMhZDfjA_japm5cQgylZldDirgmvKT1hlzjVE7xef3-9VvBbp6xG9Jacb0EXEPTTI_Rg52bCzy5Pbfo89s3n87ek4sP787PXl8QLztVyW7oBdc9g94o40aqRmaAGsY7Dtpz7YB11A0weuN9Z6Rno_Pt2jmqd4PhYotOj777dVga1iK0_e0-h8Xla5tcsH9PYri0UzpYRhXVpn3pFr24dcjpywql2iUUD_PsIrSwlveMK6qUMg19_g96ldYcW75GaWWkMIw1ih8pn1MpGXZ32zBqbzq0xw5t69D-7NCKJnr2Z447ya_SGiCOQGmjOEH-_fZ_bH8ACBiqEw</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Donnelley, Martin</creator><creator>Cmielewski, Patricia</creator><creator>Knight, Emma</creator><creator>Carpentieri, Chantelle</creator><creator>McCarron, Alexandra</creator><creator>Rout-Pitt, Nathan</creator><creator>Parsons, David</creator><creator>Farrow, Nigel</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-3998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-9410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-7756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-3290</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing</title><author>Donnelley, Martin ; Cmielewski, Patricia ; Knight, Emma ; Carpentieri, Chantelle ; McCarron, Alexandra ; Rout-Pitt, Nathan ; Parsons, David ; Farrow, Nigel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fb832681e8959ad05d19e091272e6c26ae170abedc9cc794c1dacbed7a06fb923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>42</topic><topic>42/44</topic><topic>59</topic><topic>59/5</topic><topic>631/61/201</topic><topic>692/699/1785</topic><topic>Bioluminescence</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cystic fibrosis</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Expression vectors</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Gene Therapy</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Immunogenicity</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Lysophosphatidylcholine</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Reporter gene</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donnelley, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cmielewski, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpentieri, Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rout-Pitt, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrow, Nigel</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gene therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donnelley, Martin</au><au>Cmielewski, Patricia</au><au>Knight, Emma</au><au>Carpentieri, Chantelle</au><au>McCarron, Alexandra</au><au>Rout-Pitt, Nathan</au><au>Parsons, David</au><au>Farrow, Nigel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing</atitle><jtitle>Gene therapy</jtitle><stitle>Gene Ther</stitle><addtitle>Gene Ther</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>698</spage><epage>705</epage><pages>698-705</pages><issn>0969-7128</issn><eissn>1476-5462</eissn><abstract>Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the luciferase reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (&gt;1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37165031</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-3998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-9410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-7756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-3290</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-7128
ispartof Gene therapy, 2023-09, Vol.30 (9), p.698-705
issn 0969-7128
1476-5462
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10506910
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects 42
42/44
59
59/5
631/61/201
692/699/1785
Bioluminescence
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Cell Biology
Cystic fibrosis
Dosage
Expression vectors
Gene Expression
Gene Therapy
Genomes
Human Genetics
Immunogenicity
Lungs
Lysophosphatidylcholine
Nanotechnology
Reporter gene
title Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A38%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repeat%20or%20single-dose%20lentiviral%20vector%20administration%20to%20mouse%20lungs?%20It%E2%80%99s%20all%20about%20the%20timing&rft.jtitle=Gene%20therapy&rft.au=Donnelley,%20Martin&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=698&rft.epage=705&rft.pages=698-705&rft.issn=0969-7128&rft.eissn=1476-5462&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2865943911%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2865943911&rft_id=info:pmid/37165031&rfr_iscdi=true