Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing
Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression le...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gene therapy 2023-09, Vol.30 (9), p.698-705 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 705 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 698 |
container_title | Gene therapy |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Donnelley, Martin Cmielewski, Patricia Knight, Emma Carpentieri, Chantelle McCarron, Alexandra Rout-Pitt, Nathan Parsons, David Farrow, Nigel |
description | Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the
luciferase
reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (>1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10506910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2865943911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fb832681e8959ad05d19e091272e6c26ae170abedc9cc794c1dacbed7a06fb923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTtv6Ai4k4MZNNP9VWQ0y-DMwIIiuQyp1uyZDVdImqYbZ-Rq-nk9ixh7Hn4WrEO53Tu7JQegpoy8ZFf2rIpkUklAuCKWSCiLuoQ2TnSZKan4fbajRhnSM9yfoUSlXtFFdzx-iE9ExrahgGzR8hD24ilPGJcRpBjKmAniGWMMhZDfjA_japm5cQgylZldDirgmvKT1hlzjVE7xef3-9VvBbp6xG9Jacb0EXEPTTI_Rg52bCzy5Pbfo89s3n87ek4sP787PXl8QLztVyW7oBdc9g94o40aqRmaAGsY7Dtpz7YB11A0weuN9Z6Rno_Pt2jmqd4PhYotOj777dVga1iK0_e0-h8Xla5tcsH9PYri0UzpYRhXVpn3pFr24dcjpywql2iUUD_PsIrSwlveMK6qUMg19_g96ldYcW75GaWWkMIw1ih8pn1MpGXZ32zBqbzq0xw5t69D-7NCKJnr2Z447ya_SGiCOQGmjOEH-_fZ_bH8ACBiqEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2865943911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Donnelley, Martin ; Cmielewski, Patricia ; Knight, Emma ; Carpentieri, Chantelle ; McCarron, Alexandra ; Rout-Pitt, Nathan ; Parsons, David ; Farrow, Nigel</creator><creatorcontrib>Donnelley, Martin ; Cmielewski, Patricia ; Knight, Emma ; Carpentieri, Chantelle ; McCarron, Alexandra ; Rout-Pitt, Nathan ; Parsons, David ; Farrow, Nigel</creatorcontrib><description>Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the
luciferase
reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (>1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-7128</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5462</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37165031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>42 ; 42/44 ; 59 ; 59/5 ; 631/61/201 ; 692/699/1785 ; Bioluminescence ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cell Biology ; Cystic fibrosis ; Dosage ; Expression vectors ; Gene Expression ; Gene Therapy ; Genomes ; Human Genetics ; Immunogenicity ; Lungs ; Lysophosphatidylcholine ; Nanotechnology ; Reporter gene</subject><ispartof>Gene therapy, 2023-09, Vol.30 (9), p.698-705</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fb832681e8959ad05d19e091272e6c26ae170abedc9cc794c1dacbed7a06fb923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fb832681e8959ad05d19e091272e6c26ae170abedc9cc794c1dacbed7a06fb923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6045-3998 ; 0000-0002-2236-9410 ; 0000-0002-5320-7756 ; 0000-0003-1746-3290</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37165031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donnelley, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cmielewski, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpentieri, Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rout-Pitt, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrow, Nigel</creatorcontrib><title>Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing</title><title>Gene therapy</title><addtitle>Gene Ther</addtitle><addtitle>Gene Ther</addtitle><description>Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the
luciferase
reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (>1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals.</description><subject>42</subject><subject>42/44</subject><subject>59</subject><subject>59/5</subject><subject>631/61/201</subject><subject>692/699/1785</subject><subject>Bioluminescence</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cell Biology</subject><subject>Cystic fibrosis</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Expression vectors</subject><subject>Gene Expression</subject><subject>Gene Therapy</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Immunogenicity</subject><subject>Lungs</subject><subject>Lysophosphatidylcholine</subject><subject>Nanotechnology</subject><subject>Reporter gene</subject><issn>0969-7128</issn><issn>1476-5462</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2KFDEUhYMoTtv6Ai4k4MZNNP9VWQ0y-DMwIIiuQyp1uyZDVdImqYbZ-Rq-nk9ixh7Hn4WrEO53Tu7JQegpoy8ZFf2rIpkUklAuCKWSCiLuoQ2TnSZKan4fbajRhnSM9yfoUSlXtFFdzx-iE9ExrahgGzR8hD24ilPGJcRpBjKmAniGWMMhZDfjA_japm5cQgylZldDirgmvKT1hlzjVE7xef3-9VvBbp6xG9Jacb0EXEPTTI_Rg52bCzy5Pbfo89s3n87ek4sP787PXl8QLztVyW7oBdc9g94o40aqRmaAGsY7Dtpz7YB11A0weuN9Z6Rno_Pt2jmqd4PhYotOj777dVga1iK0_e0-h8Xla5tcsH9PYri0UzpYRhXVpn3pFr24dcjpywql2iUUD_PsIrSwlveMK6qUMg19_g96ldYcW75GaWWkMIw1ih8pn1MpGXZ32zBqbzq0xw5t69D-7NCKJnr2Z447ya_SGiCOQGmjOEH-_fZ_bH8ACBiqEw</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Donnelley, Martin</creator><creator>Cmielewski, Patricia</creator><creator>Knight, Emma</creator><creator>Carpentieri, Chantelle</creator><creator>McCarron, Alexandra</creator><creator>Rout-Pitt, Nathan</creator><creator>Parsons, David</creator><creator>Farrow, Nigel</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-3998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-9410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-7756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-3290</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing</title><author>Donnelley, Martin ; Cmielewski, Patricia ; Knight, Emma ; Carpentieri, Chantelle ; McCarron, Alexandra ; Rout-Pitt, Nathan ; Parsons, David ; Farrow, Nigel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-fb832681e8959ad05d19e091272e6c26ae170abedc9cc794c1dacbed7a06fb923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>42</topic><topic>42/44</topic><topic>59</topic><topic>59/5</topic><topic>631/61/201</topic><topic>692/699/1785</topic><topic>Bioluminescence</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cell Biology</topic><topic>Cystic fibrosis</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Expression vectors</topic><topic>Gene Expression</topic><topic>Gene Therapy</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Immunogenicity</topic><topic>Lungs</topic><topic>Lysophosphatidylcholine</topic><topic>Nanotechnology</topic><topic>Reporter gene</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donnelley, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cmielewski, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Emma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpentieri, Chantelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rout-Pitt, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parsons, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrow, Nigel</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Gene therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donnelley, Martin</au><au>Cmielewski, Patricia</au><au>Knight, Emma</au><au>Carpentieri, Chantelle</au><au>McCarron, Alexandra</au><au>Rout-Pitt, Nathan</au><au>Parsons, David</au><au>Farrow, Nigel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing</atitle><jtitle>Gene therapy</jtitle><stitle>Gene Ther</stitle><addtitle>Gene Ther</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>698</spage><epage>705</epage><pages>698-705</pages><issn>0969-7128</issn><eissn>1476-5462</eissn><abstract>Lentiviral vectors are attractive delivery vehicles for cystic fibrosis gene therapy owing to their low immunogenicity and ability to integrate into the host cell genome, thereby producing long-term, stable gene expression. Nonetheless, repeat dosing may be required to increase initial expression levels, and/or boost levels when they wane. The primary aim of this study was to determine if repeat dosing of a VSV-G pseudotyped LV vector delivered into mouse lungs is more effective than a single dose. C57Bl/6 mouse lungs were conditioned with lysophosphatidylcholine, followed one-hour later by a LV vector carrying the
luciferase
reporter gene, using six different short-term (≤1 wk) and long-term (>1 wk) dosing schedules. Luciferase expression was quantified using bioluminescence imaging over 12 months. Most dosing schedules produced detectable bioluminescence over the 12-month period, but the shorter intervals (≤1 wk) produced higher levels of flux than the longest interval (five doses at least 1-month apart). Ex vivo lung analysis at 12 months showed that the estimated mean flux for the group that received two doses 1-week apart was significantly greater than the single dose group and the two groups that received doses over a period greater than 1-week. These results suggest that early consecutive multiple doses are more effective at improving gene expression in mouse lungs at 12 months, than longer repeat dosing intervals.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37165031</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6045-3998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-9410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5320-7756</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1746-3290</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-7128 |
ispartof | Gene therapy, 2023-09, Vol.30 (9), p.698-705 |
issn | 0969-7128 1476-5462 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10506910 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | 42 42/44 59 59/5 631/61/201 692/699/1785 Bioluminescence Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cell Biology Cystic fibrosis Dosage Expression vectors Gene Expression Gene Therapy Genomes Human Genetics Immunogenicity Lungs Lysophosphatidylcholine Nanotechnology Reporter gene |
title | Repeat or single-dose lentiviral vector administration to mouse lungs? It’s all about the timing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A38%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Repeat%20or%20single-dose%20lentiviral%20vector%20administration%20to%20mouse%20lungs?%20It%E2%80%99s%20all%20about%20the%20timing&rft.jtitle=Gene%20therapy&rft.au=Donnelley,%20Martin&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=698&rft.epage=705&rft.pages=698-705&rft.issn=0969-7128&rft.eissn=1476-5462&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41434-023-00403-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2865943911%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2865943911&rft_id=info:pmid/37165031&rfr_iscdi=true |