Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers
The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Respiratory care 2023-10, Vol.68 (10), p.1400-1405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1405 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1400 |
container_title | Respiratory care |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Gonzalez, Ivan Dominguez, Camila B Di Salvo, Emanuel Loustau, Malena P Acevedo, Valeria S Celano, Melisa D Melero, Juan C Bianchini, Facundo Jf Gutierrez, Facundo J Mariani, Javier Murias, Gastón Plotnikow, Gustavo A |
description | The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers.
A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT.
A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H
O from the initial pressure (P
) (
< .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H
O was lost during connection (difference between P
and P
). The P
value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H
O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H
O (difference between P
and P
) (
< .001). The P
mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H
O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs.
Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4187/respcare.10865 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10506646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A786212501</galeid><sourcerecordid>A786212501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-de68da7b7318a15015e91c8e0e1e9c8d2dad2b41036fa7ab0882d427181a0cc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl1rFDEUDaLYtfrqowQE8WXWJJOZyTxJ3dYPqChS8TFkkpudyEyyTTIL_nuz_aKFkoeQe885yT05CL2mZM2p6D5ESDutIqwpEW3zBK1oz-uqbhv-FK0IYaSiNeNH6EVKf8ux5U3_HB3VHWOFwFZo-wlGtXch4mDxmTchR6VHUBO-WAbAm8Va_LNckpYI-HSJzm-xwr_Ckp0v7eBzDBP-rjwse4j4j8sjPnXWQgSfD_UwQ4aYXqJnVk0JXt3sx-j357OLzdfq_MeXb5uT80pzwnNloBVGdUNXU6FoQ2gDPdUCCFDotTDMKMMGTkndWtWpgQjBDGcdFVQRrUV9jD5e6-6WYQajyyuimuQuulnFfzIoJx92vBvlNuwlJQ1pW94Whfc3CjFcLpCynF3SME1lxrAkyUTxnfdd3RTo22voVk0gnbdX7h3g8qQTLaOsTFBQ60dQZRmYnQ4erCv1B4R39wiHz8hjClOxPPj0qLKOIaUI9m5OSuQhHvI2HvIqHoXw5r47d_DbPNT_AQ3rt1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2818749735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gonzalez, Ivan ; Dominguez, Camila B ; Di Salvo, Emanuel ; Loustau, Malena P ; Acevedo, Valeria S ; Celano, Melisa D ; Melero, Juan C ; Bianchini, Facundo Jf ; Gutierrez, Facundo J ; Mariani, Javier ; Murias, Gastón ; Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Ivan ; Dominguez, Camila B ; Di Salvo, Emanuel ; Loustau, Malena P ; Acevedo, Valeria S ; Celano, Melisa D ; Melero, Juan C ; Bianchini, Facundo Jf ; Gutierrez, Facundo J ; Mariani, Javier ; Murias, Gastón ; Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><description>The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers.
A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT.
A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H
O from the initial pressure (P
) (
< .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H
O was lost during connection (difference between P
and P
). The P
value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H
O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H
O (difference between P
and P
) (
< .001). The P
mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H
O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs.
Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1324</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10865</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37221082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</publisher><subject>Artificial respiration ; Humans ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Methods ; Original Research ; Pressure ; Trachea</subject><ispartof>Respiratory care, 2023-10, Vol.68 (10), p.1400-1405</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 by Daedalus Enterprises.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 by Daedalus Enterprises 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-de68da7b7318a15015e91c8e0e1e9c8d2dad2b41036fa7ab0882d427181a0cc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506646/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506646/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez, Camila B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Salvo, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loustau, Malena P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo, Valeria S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celano, Melisa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melero, Juan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchini, Facundo Jf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Facundo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murias, Gastón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><title>Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers</title><title>Respiratory care</title><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><description>The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers.
A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT.
A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H
O from the initial pressure (P
) (
< .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H
O was lost during connection (difference between P
and P
). The P
value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H
O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H
O (difference between P
and P
) (
< .001). The P
mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H
O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs.
Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.</description><subject>Artificial respiration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Trachea</subject><issn>0020-1324</issn><issn>1943-3654</issn><issn>1943-3654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl1rFDEUDaLYtfrqowQE8WXWJJOZyTxJ3dYPqChS8TFkkpudyEyyTTIL_nuz_aKFkoeQe885yT05CL2mZM2p6D5ESDutIqwpEW3zBK1oz-uqbhv-FK0IYaSiNeNH6EVKf8ux5U3_HB3VHWOFwFZo-wlGtXch4mDxmTchR6VHUBO-WAbAm8Va_LNckpYI-HSJzm-xwr_Ckp0v7eBzDBP-rjwse4j4j8sjPnXWQgSfD_UwQ4aYXqJnVk0JXt3sx-j357OLzdfq_MeXb5uT80pzwnNloBVGdUNXU6FoQ2gDPdUCCFDotTDMKMMGTkndWtWpgQjBDGcdFVQRrUV9jD5e6-6WYQajyyuimuQuulnFfzIoJx92vBvlNuwlJQ1pW94Whfc3CjFcLpCynF3SME1lxrAkyUTxnfdd3RTo22voVk0gnbdX7h3g8qQTLaOsTFBQ60dQZRmYnQ4erCv1B4R39wiHz8hjClOxPPj0qLKOIaUI9m5OSuQhHvI2HvIqHoXw5r47d_DbPNT_AQ3rt1g</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Gonzalez, Ivan</creator><creator>Dominguez, Camila B</creator><creator>Di Salvo, Emanuel</creator><creator>Loustau, Malena P</creator><creator>Acevedo, Valeria S</creator><creator>Celano, Melisa D</creator><creator>Melero, Juan C</creator><creator>Bianchini, Facundo Jf</creator><creator>Gutierrez, Facundo J</creator><creator>Mariani, Javier</creator><creator>Murias, Gastón</creator><creator>Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creator><general>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</general><general>Daedalus Enterprises Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers</title><author>Gonzalez, Ivan ; Dominguez, Camila B ; Di Salvo, Emanuel ; Loustau, Malena P ; Acevedo, Valeria S ; Celano, Melisa D ; Melero, Juan C ; Bianchini, Facundo Jf ; Gutierrez, Facundo J ; Mariani, Javier ; Murias, Gastón ; Plotnikow, Gustavo A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-de68da7b7318a15015e91c8e0e1e9c8d2dad2b41036fa7ab0882d427181a0cc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial respiration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Trachea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez, Camila B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Salvo, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loustau, Malena P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo, Valeria S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celano, Melisa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melero, Juan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchini, Facundo Jf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Facundo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murias, Gastón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzalez, Ivan</au><au>Dominguez, Camila B</au><au>Di Salvo, Emanuel</au><au>Loustau, Malena P</au><au>Acevedo, Valeria S</au><au>Celano, Melisa D</au><au>Melero, Juan C</au><au>Bianchini, Facundo Jf</au><au>Gutierrez, Facundo J</au><au>Mariani, Javier</au><au>Murias, Gastón</au><au>Plotnikow, Gustavo A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1400</spage><epage>1405</epage><pages>1400-1405</pages><issn>0020-1324</issn><issn>1943-3654</issn><eissn>1943-3654</eissn><abstract>The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers.
A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT.
A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H
O from the initial pressure (P
) (
< .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H
O was lost during connection (difference between P
and P
). The P
value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H
O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H
O (difference between P
and P
) (
< .001). The P
mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H
O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs.
Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</pub><pmid>37221082</pmid><doi>10.4187/respcare.10865</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-1324 |
ispartof | Respiratory care, 2023-10, Vol.68 (10), p.1400-1405 |
issn | 0020-1324 1943-3654 1943-3654 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10506646 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Artificial respiration Humans Intubation Intubation, Intratracheal - methods Methods Original Research Pressure Trachea |
title | Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T09%3A48%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavior%20of%20Endotracheal%20Tube%20Cuff%20Pressure%20During%20a%20Routine%20Control%20Maneuver%20With%20Different%20Manometers&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20care&rft.au=Gonzalez,%20Ivan&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1400&rft.epage=1405&rft.pages=1400-1405&rft.issn=0020-1324&rft.eissn=1943-3654&rft_id=info:doi/10.4187/respcare.10865&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA786212501%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2818749735&rft_id=info:pmid/37221082&rft_galeid=A786212501&rfr_iscdi=true |