Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers

The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory care 2023-10, Vol.68 (10), p.1400-1405
Hauptverfasser: Gonzalez, Ivan, Dominguez, Camila B, Di Salvo, Emanuel, Loustau, Malena P, Acevedo, Valeria S, Celano, Melisa D, Melero, Juan C, Bianchini, Facundo Jf, Gutierrez, Facundo J, Mariani, Javier, Murias, Gastón, Plotnikow, Gustavo A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1405
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1400
container_title Respiratory care
container_volume 68
creator Gonzalez, Ivan
Dominguez, Camila B
Di Salvo, Emanuel
Loustau, Malena P
Acevedo, Valeria S
Celano, Melisa D
Melero, Juan C
Bianchini, Facundo Jf
Gutierrez, Facundo J
Mariani, Javier
Murias, Gastón
Plotnikow, Gustavo A
description The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers. A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT. A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H O from the initial pressure (P ) ( < .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H O was lost during connection (difference between P and P ). The P value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H O (difference between P and P ) ( < .001). The P mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs. Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.
doi_str_mv 10.4187/respcare.10865
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10506646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A786212501</galeid><sourcerecordid>A786212501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-de68da7b7318a15015e91c8e0e1e9c8d2dad2b41036fa7ab0882d427181a0cc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUl1rFDEUDaLYtfrqowQE8WXWJJOZyTxJ3dYPqChS8TFkkpudyEyyTTIL_nuz_aKFkoeQe885yT05CL2mZM2p6D5ESDutIqwpEW3zBK1oz-uqbhv-FK0IYaSiNeNH6EVKf8ux5U3_HB3VHWOFwFZo-wlGtXch4mDxmTchR6VHUBO-WAbAm8Va_LNckpYI-HSJzm-xwr_Ckp0v7eBzDBP-rjwse4j4j8sjPnXWQgSfD_UwQ4aYXqJnVk0JXt3sx-j357OLzdfq_MeXb5uT80pzwnNloBVGdUNXU6FoQ2gDPdUCCFDotTDMKMMGTkndWtWpgQjBDGcdFVQRrUV9jD5e6-6WYQajyyuimuQuulnFfzIoJx92vBvlNuwlJQ1pW94Whfc3CjFcLpCynF3SME1lxrAkyUTxnfdd3RTo22voVk0gnbdX7h3g8qQTLaOsTFBQ60dQZRmYnQ4erCv1B4R39wiHz8hjClOxPPj0qLKOIaUI9m5OSuQhHvI2HvIqHoXw5r47d_DbPNT_AQ3rt1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2818749735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gonzalez, Ivan ; Dominguez, Camila B ; Di Salvo, Emanuel ; Loustau, Malena P ; Acevedo, Valeria S ; Celano, Melisa D ; Melero, Juan C ; Bianchini, Facundo Jf ; Gutierrez, Facundo J ; Mariani, Javier ; Murias, Gastón ; Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Ivan ; Dominguez, Camila B ; Di Salvo, Emanuel ; Loustau, Malena P ; Acevedo, Valeria S ; Celano, Melisa D ; Melero, Juan C ; Bianchini, Facundo Jf ; Gutierrez, Facundo J ; Mariani, Javier ; Murias, Gastón ; Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><description>The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers. A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT. A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H O from the initial pressure (P ) ( &lt; .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H O was lost during connection (difference between P and P ). The P value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H O (difference between P and P ) ( &lt; .001). The P mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs. Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1324</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1943-3654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10865</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37221082</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</publisher><subject>Artificial respiration ; Humans ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Methods ; Original Research ; Pressure ; Trachea</subject><ispartof>Respiratory care, 2023-10, Vol.68 (10), p.1400-1405</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 by Daedalus Enterprises.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 by Daedalus Enterprises 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-de68da7b7318a15015e91c8e0e1e9c8d2dad2b41036fa7ab0882d427181a0cc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506646/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10506646/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221082$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez, Camila B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Salvo, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loustau, Malena P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo, Valeria S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celano, Melisa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melero, Juan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchini, Facundo Jf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Facundo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murias, Gastón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><title>Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers</title><title>Respiratory care</title><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><description>The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers. A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT. A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H O from the initial pressure (P ) ( &lt; .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H O was lost during connection (difference between P and P ). The P value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H O (difference between P and P ) ( &lt; .001). The P mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs. Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.</description><subject>Artificial respiration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Trachea</subject><issn>0020-1324</issn><issn>1943-3654</issn><issn>1943-3654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptUl1rFDEUDaLYtfrqowQE8WXWJJOZyTxJ3dYPqChS8TFkkpudyEyyTTIL_nuz_aKFkoeQe885yT05CL2mZM2p6D5ESDutIqwpEW3zBK1oz-uqbhv-FK0IYaSiNeNH6EVKf8ux5U3_HB3VHWOFwFZo-wlGtXch4mDxmTchR6VHUBO-WAbAm8Va_LNckpYI-HSJzm-xwr_Ckp0v7eBzDBP-rjwse4j4j8sjPnXWQgSfD_UwQ4aYXqJnVk0JXt3sx-j357OLzdfq_MeXb5uT80pzwnNloBVGdUNXU6FoQ2gDPdUCCFDotTDMKMMGTkndWtWpgQjBDGcdFVQRrUV9jD5e6-6WYQajyyuimuQuulnFfzIoJx92vBvlNuwlJQ1pW94Whfc3CjFcLpCynF3SME1lxrAkyUTxnfdd3RTo22voVk0gnbdX7h3g8qQTLaOsTFBQ60dQZRmYnQ4erCv1B4R39wiHz8hjClOxPPj0qLKOIaUI9m5OSuQhHvI2HvIqHoXw5r47d_DbPNT_AQ3rt1g</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Gonzalez, Ivan</creator><creator>Dominguez, Camila B</creator><creator>Di Salvo, Emanuel</creator><creator>Loustau, Malena P</creator><creator>Acevedo, Valeria S</creator><creator>Celano, Melisa D</creator><creator>Melero, Juan C</creator><creator>Bianchini, Facundo Jf</creator><creator>Gutierrez, Facundo J</creator><creator>Mariani, Javier</creator><creator>Murias, Gastón</creator><creator>Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creator><general>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</general><general>Daedalus Enterprises Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers</title><author>Gonzalez, Ivan ; Dominguez, Camila B ; Di Salvo, Emanuel ; Loustau, Malena P ; Acevedo, Valeria S ; Celano, Melisa D ; Melero, Juan C ; Bianchini, Facundo Jf ; Gutierrez, Facundo J ; Mariani, Javier ; Murias, Gastón ; Plotnikow, Gustavo A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-de68da7b7318a15015e91c8e0e1e9c8d2dad2b41036fa7ab0882d427181a0cc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial respiration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Trachea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dominguez, Camila B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Salvo, Emanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loustau, Malena P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo, Valeria S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Celano, Melisa D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melero, Juan C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchini, Facundo Jf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez, Facundo J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariani, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murias, Gastón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plotnikow, Gustavo A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzalez, Ivan</au><au>Dominguez, Camila B</au><au>Di Salvo, Emanuel</au><au>Loustau, Malena P</au><au>Acevedo, Valeria S</au><au>Celano, Melisa D</au><au>Melero, Juan C</au><au>Bianchini, Facundo Jf</au><au>Gutierrez, Facundo J</au><au>Mariani, Javier</au><au>Murias, Gastón</au><au>Plotnikow, Gustavo A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1400</spage><epage>1405</epage><pages>1400-1405</pages><issn>0020-1324</issn><issn>1943-3654</issn><eissn>1943-3654</eissn><abstract>The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers. A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT. A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H O from the initial pressure (P ) ( &lt; .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H O was lost during connection (difference between P and P ). The P value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H O (difference between P and P ) ( &lt; .001). The P mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs. Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</pub><pmid>37221082</pmid><doi>10.4187/respcare.10865</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1324
ispartof Respiratory care, 2023-10, Vol.68 (10), p.1400-1405
issn 0020-1324
1943-3654
1943-3654
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10506646
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Artificial respiration
Humans
Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal - methods
Methods
Original Research
Pressure
Trachea
title Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T09%3A48%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Behavior%20of%20Endotracheal%20Tube%20Cuff%20Pressure%20During%20a%20Routine%20Control%20Maneuver%20With%20Different%20Manometers&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20care&rft.au=Gonzalez,%20Ivan&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1400&rft.epage=1405&rft.pages=1400-1405&rft.issn=0020-1324&rft.eissn=1943-3654&rft_id=info:doi/10.4187/respcare.10865&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA786212501%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2818749735&rft_id=info:pmid/37221082&rft_galeid=A786212501&rfr_iscdi=true