Behavior of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure During a Routine Control Maneuver With Different Manometers

The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory care 2023-10, Vol.68 (10), p.1400-1405
Hauptverfasser: Gonzalez, Ivan, Dominguez, Camila B, Di Salvo, Emanuel, Loustau, Malena P, Acevedo, Valeria S, Celano, Melisa D, Melero, Juan C, Bianchini, Facundo Jf, Gutierrez, Facundo J, Mariani, Javier, Murias, Gastón, Plotnikow, Gustavo A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The main functions of the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff are to prevent aspiration and to allow pressurization of the respiratory system. For this purpose, it is essential to maintain adequate pressure inside the cuff, thus reducing the risks for the patient. It is regularly checked using a manometer and is considered the best alternative. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cuff pressure behavior of different ETTs during the simulation of an inflation maneuver using different manometers. A bench study was performed. Four brands of 8-mm internal diameter single lumen with a Murphy eye ETT with cuff and 3 different brands of manometers were used. In addition, a pulmonary mechanics monitor was connected to the inside of the cuff through the body of the distal end of the ETT. A total of 528 measurements were made on the 4 ETTs. During the complete procedure (connection and disconnection), there was a significant pressure drop of 7 ± 1.4 cm H O from the initial pressure (P ) ( < .001), of which 6 ± 1.4 cm H O was lost during connection (difference between P and P ). The P value was 19.1 ± 1.6 cm H O, showing a significant total pressure drop of 11 ± 1.6 cm H O (difference between P and P ) ( < .001). The P mean was 29.6 ± 1.3 cm H O. Significant differences were found between manometers according to the time of measurement. A similar phenomenon was evidenced when analyzing different ETTs. Significant pressure changes occur secondary to ETT cuff measurement, which has important implications for patient safety.
ISSN:0020-1324
1943-3654
1943-3654
DOI:10.4187/respcare.10865