TUMOUR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REAL-WORLD SURVIVAL DATA

Abstract AIMS Tumour Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes required for cancer cell viability and tumour progression. TTFields therapy gained FDA approval and CE accreditation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) following the EF-14 study (NCT00916409). We aimed t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2023-09, Vol.25 (Supplement_3), p.iii16-iii16
Hauptverfasser: Ballo, Matthew, Conlon, Patrick, Lavy-Shahaf, Gitit, Urman, Noa, Kinzel, Adrian, Vyamzal, Josef, Rulseh, Aaron
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page iii16
container_issue Supplement_3
container_start_page iii16
container_title Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 25
creator Ballo, Matthew
Conlon, Patrick
Lavy-Shahaf, Gitit
Urman, Noa
Kinzel, Adrian
Vyamzal, Josef
Rulseh, Aaron
description Abstract AIMS Tumour Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes required for cancer cell viability and tumour progression. TTFields therapy gained FDA approval and CE accreditation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) following the EF-14 study (NCT00916409). We aimed to determine the real-world survival benefit of TTFields therapy. METHOD Survival data from clinical studies in TTFields therapy-treated patients with ndGBM were identified using a literature search and analysed. The Cochran Q test and Higgins I2 statistic were used to assess and quantify inter-study heterogeneity. Survival curves were pooled using a distribution-free random-effects method. RESULTS Among studies evaluating the clinical effcacy of TTFields therapy in ndGBM, six studies were identified which compared the addition of TTFields therapy to standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in OS for TTFields therapy-treated patients vs SOC alone (P < 0.001). The pooled effect was robust and independent of any individual study. In post-approval studies, the pooled median OS was 22.2 months (95% CI, 17.3–42.6) and 17.3 months (95% CI, 13.6–22.0) for TTFields therapy-treated patients and SOC, respectively. Rates of gross total resection were generally higher in the real-world setting, irrespective of TTFields therapy use. Average device usage of ≥75% was associated with prolonged survival vs
doi_str_mv 10.1093/neuonc/noad147.067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10505004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/neuonc/noad147.067</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/neuonc/noad147.067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1817-1bbfe6d2629122fdb9eb4e80396e7596172c71c49a22b73bb247e546238f09803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9PgzAcxYnRxJ__gKce9cBsC7TgxdTRzSYdGOi27NQAKzqjsIAz8X_wj7aKMfFmvofvS957n8tznHMERwhG3lVjdm1TXTVtsUY-HUFC95wjFGDPDUJC9r81dsMA0UPnuO-fIMQoIOjI-VDzWTrPgMo4UyKZgongMs7BhVKDugTqjmfsfgVEAhK-lCsQCzZN0pzHYCpFeitZrtIZuwYMzLhiLkuYXOUiByyJQb7KFZ9Z9BhkfCH4EqQTq5h0l2kmrT_PFmLBJIiZYqfOQV089-bs55848wlX4ztXplMxtp0KhYi6qCxrQ9aY4AhhXK_LyJS-CaEXEUODiCCKK4oqPyowLqlXltinJvAJ9sIaRjZ34twM3O2ufDHryjSvXfGst93mpejedVts9F-n2Tzqh_ZNIxjYg74l4IFQdW3fd6b-LSOovxbRwyL6ZxFtF7Eldyi1u-1_8p-2_IcC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>TUMOUR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REAL-WORLD SURVIVAL DATA</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ballo, Matthew ; Conlon, Patrick ; Lavy-Shahaf, Gitit ; Urman, Noa ; Kinzel, Adrian ; Vyamzal, Josef ; Rulseh, Aaron</creator><creatorcontrib>Ballo, Matthew ; Conlon, Patrick ; Lavy-Shahaf, Gitit ; Urman, Noa ; Kinzel, Adrian ; Vyamzal, Josef ; Rulseh, Aaron</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract AIMS Tumour Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes required for cancer cell viability and tumour progression. TTFields therapy gained FDA approval and CE accreditation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) following the EF-14 study (NCT00916409). We aimed to determine the real-world survival benefit of TTFields therapy. METHOD Survival data from clinical studies in TTFields therapy-treated patients with ndGBM were identified using a literature search and analysed. The Cochran Q test and Higgins I2 statistic were used to assess and quantify inter-study heterogeneity. Survival curves were pooled using a distribution-free random-effects method. RESULTS Among studies evaluating the clinical effcacy of TTFields therapy in ndGBM, six studies were identified which compared the addition of TTFields therapy to standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in OS for TTFields therapy-treated patients vs SOC alone (P &lt; 0.001). The pooled effect was robust and independent of any individual study. In post-approval studies, the pooled median OS was 22.2 months (95% CI, 17.3–42.6) and 17.3 months (95% CI, 13.6–22.0) for TTFields therapy-treated patients and SOC, respectively. Rates of gross total resection were generally higher in the real-world setting, irrespective of TTFields therapy use. Average device usage of ≥75% was associated with prolonged survival vs &lt;75% usage (pooled HR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48–0.83; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Data suggest a significant survival benefit when TTFields therapy is added to SOC for patients with ndGBM. Usage of ≥75% may be meaningful in the real-world setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-8517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-5866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad147.067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>BNOS 2023 ABSTRACTS: POSTER PRESENTATIONS</subject><ispartof>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2023-09, Vol.25 (Supplement_3), p.iii16-iii16</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505004/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10505004/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ballo, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conlon, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavy-Shahaf, Gitit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urman, Noa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzel, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vyamzal, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rulseh, Aaron</creatorcontrib><title>TUMOUR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REAL-WORLD SURVIVAL DATA</title><title>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>Abstract AIMS Tumour Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes required for cancer cell viability and tumour progression. TTFields therapy gained FDA approval and CE accreditation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) following the EF-14 study (NCT00916409). We aimed to determine the real-world survival benefit of TTFields therapy. METHOD Survival data from clinical studies in TTFields therapy-treated patients with ndGBM were identified using a literature search and analysed. The Cochran Q test and Higgins I2 statistic were used to assess and quantify inter-study heterogeneity. Survival curves were pooled using a distribution-free random-effects method. RESULTS Among studies evaluating the clinical effcacy of TTFields therapy in ndGBM, six studies were identified which compared the addition of TTFields therapy to standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in OS for TTFields therapy-treated patients vs SOC alone (P &lt; 0.001). The pooled effect was robust and independent of any individual study. In post-approval studies, the pooled median OS was 22.2 months (95% CI, 17.3–42.6) and 17.3 months (95% CI, 13.6–22.0) for TTFields therapy-treated patients and SOC, respectively. Rates of gross total resection were generally higher in the real-world setting, irrespective of TTFields therapy use. Average device usage of ≥75% was associated with prolonged survival vs &lt;75% usage (pooled HR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48–0.83; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Data suggest a significant survival benefit when TTFields therapy is added to SOC for patients with ndGBM. Usage of ≥75% may be meaningful in the real-world setting.</description><subject>BNOS 2023 ABSTRACTS: POSTER PRESENTATIONS</subject><issn>1522-8517</issn><issn>1523-5866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9PgzAcxYnRxJ__gKce9cBsC7TgxdTRzSYdGOi27NQAKzqjsIAz8X_wj7aKMfFmvofvS957n8tznHMERwhG3lVjdm1TXTVtsUY-HUFC95wjFGDPDUJC9r81dsMA0UPnuO-fIMQoIOjI-VDzWTrPgMo4UyKZgongMs7BhVKDugTqjmfsfgVEAhK-lCsQCzZN0pzHYCpFeitZrtIZuwYMzLhiLkuYXOUiByyJQb7KFZ9Z9BhkfCH4EqQTq5h0l2kmrT_PFmLBJIiZYqfOQV089-bs55848wlX4ztXplMxtp0KhYi6qCxrQ9aY4AhhXK_LyJS-CaEXEUODiCCKK4oqPyowLqlXltinJvAJ9sIaRjZ34twM3O2ufDHryjSvXfGst93mpejedVts9F-n2Tzqh_ZNIxjYg74l4IFQdW3fd6b-LSOovxbRwyL6ZxFtF7Eldyi1u-1_8p-2_IcC</recordid><startdate>20230916</startdate><enddate>20230916</enddate><creator>Ballo, Matthew</creator><creator>Conlon, Patrick</creator><creator>Lavy-Shahaf, Gitit</creator><creator>Urman, Noa</creator><creator>Kinzel, Adrian</creator><creator>Vyamzal, Josef</creator><creator>Rulseh, Aaron</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230916</creationdate><title>TUMOUR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REAL-WORLD SURVIVAL DATA</title><author>Ballo, Matthew ; Conlon, Patrick ; Lavy-Shahaf, Gitit ; Urman, Noa ; Kinzel, Adrian ; Vyamzal, Josef ; Rulseh, Aaron</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1817-1bbfe6d2629122fdb9eb4e80396e7596172c71c49a22b73bb247e546238f09803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>BNOS 2023 ABSTRACTS: POSTER PRESENTATIONS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ballo, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conlon, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavy-Shahaf, Gitit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urman, Noa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinzel, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vyamzal, Josef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rulseh, Aaron</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ballo, Matthew</au><au>Conlon, Patrick</au><au>Lavy-Shahaf, Gitit</au><au>Urman, Noa</au><au>Kinzel, Adrian</au><au>Vyamzal, Josef</au><au>Rulseh, Aaron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>TUMOUR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REAL-WORLD SURVIVAL DATA</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2023-09-16</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><spage>iii16</spage><epage>iii16</epage><pages>iii16-iii16</pages><issn>1522-8517</issn><eissn>1523-5866</eissn><abstract>Abstract AIMS Tumour Treating Fields (TTFields) are electric fields that disrupt processes required for cancer cell viability and tumour progression. TTFields therapy gained FDA approval and CE accreditation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (ndGBM) following the EF-14 study (NCT00916409). We aimed to determine the real-world survival benefit of TTFields therapy. METHOD Survival data from clinical studies in TTFields therapy-treated patients with ndGBM were identified using a literature search and analysed. The Cochran Q test and Higgins I2 statistic were used to assess and quantify inter-study heterogeneity. Survival curves were pooled using a distribution-free random-effects method. RESULTS Among studies evaluating the clinical effcacy of TTFields therapy in ndGBM, six studies were identified which compared the addition of TTFields therapy to standard of care (SOC) vs SOC alone. The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in OS for TTFields therapy-treated patients vs SOC alone (P &lt; 0.001). The pooled effect was robust and independent of any individual study. In post-approval studies, the pooled median OS was 22.2 months (95% CI, 17.3–42.6) and 17.3 months (95% CI, 13.6–22.0) for TTFields therapy-treated patients and SOC, respectively. Rates of gross total resection were generally higher in the real-world setting, irrespective of TTFields therapy use. Average device usage of ≥75% was associated with prolonged survival vs &lt;75% usage (pooled HR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48–0.83; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Data suggest a significant survival benefit when TTFields therapy is added to SOC for patients with ndGBM. Usage of ≥75% may be meaningful in the real-world setting.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/neuonc/noad147.067</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-8517
ispartof Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2023-09, Vol.25 (Supplement_3), p.iii16-iii16
issn 1522-8517
1523-5866
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10505004
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects BNOS 2023 ABSTRACTS: POSTER PRESENTATIONS
title TUMOUR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) THERAPY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA: A META-ANALYSIS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF REAL-WORLD SURVIVAL DATA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A27%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TUMOUR%20TREATING%20FIELDS%20(TTFIELDS)%20THERAPY%20IN%20NEWLY%20DIAGNOSED%20GLIOBLASTOMA:%20A%20META-ANALYSIS%20AND%20SYSTEMATIC%20REVIEW%20OF%20REAL-WORLD%20SURVIVAL%20DATA&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Ballo,%20Matthew&rft.date=2023-09-16&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.spage=iii16&rft.epage=iii16&rft.pages=iii16-iii16&rft.issn=1522-8517&rft.eissn=1523-5866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/neuonc/noad147.067&rft_dat=%3Coup_pubme%3E10.1093/neuonc/noad147.067%3C/oup_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/neuonc/noad147.067&rfr_iscdi=true