Risk factors for postoperative surgical site wound problems after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery: A meta-analysis

Risk factors for postoperative surgical site wound problems after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis study was conducted to assess the risk factors (RFs) for postoperative surgical site wound problems (POSSWPs) after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery (STS). A comprehensive literature examination until February 2023 was implemented, and 1786 linked studies were appraised. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International wound journal 2023-10, Vol.20 (8), p.3006-3014
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Jiwen, Si, Mengdi, Huang, Zongqiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Bias
Chemotherapy
Meta-analysis
Metastasis
Original
Radiation therapy
Risk factors
Spinal cancer
Steroids
Surgery
Tumors
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3014
container_issue 8
container_start_page 3006
container_title International wound journal
container_volume 20
creator Zhu, Jiwen
Si, Mengdi
Huang, Zongqiang
description A meta-analysis study was conducted to assess the risk factors (RFs) for postoperative surgical site wound problems (POSSWPs) after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery (STS). A comprehensive literature examination until February 2023 was implemented, and 1786 linked studies were appraised. The 18 picked studies contained 18 580 subjects with surgery in the studies' baseline with and without different RFs. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of RFs for POSSWPs after metastatic and primary STS using the dichotomous and continuous styles and a fixed or random model. Subjects with surgical instrumentation in their surgery had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.49-3.49, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iwj.14175
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10502245</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090609815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-630fc149e0e12b08f2820cbf4d072c9b78ad8c5a65a64760c9ec471a13dbccc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU2L1TAUhoMozocu_AMScKOLjkmaNokbGQZHhQFBFNyFND0dc22bmpPOcDf-djN3rhc1BBI4Dw9v8hLyjLMzXtbrcLs545Kr5gE55kqKSmr-7eHhzvgROUHcMCZM06jH5KhWnGsj1DH59TngDzo4n2NCOsREl4g5LpBcDjdAcU3XwbuRYshAb-M693RJsRthQuqGDIlOkB3mgnvqdtMwubSluIQZaF6nuKadBtL2DT3f4ZWb3bjFgE_Io8GNCE_35yn5evnuy8WH6urT-48X51eVl0zmqq3Z4Lk0wICLjulBaMF8N8ieKeFNp7TrtW9cW7ZULfMGvFTc8brvvPeyPiVv773L2k3Qe5hzcqPdZ7XRBfvvZA7f7XW8sZw1TAjZFMPLvSHFnytgtlNAD-PoZogrWqGZMly3hhf0xX_opvxBeTHamhnWMqP5nfDVPeVTREwwHNJwZu9qtaVWu6u1sM__jn8g__RY_wZGqqFn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090609815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk factors for postoperative surgical site wound problems after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery: A meta-analysis</title><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Zhu, Jiwen ; Si, Mengdi ; Huang, Zongqiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jiwen ; Si, Mengdi ; Huang, Zongqiang</creatorcontrib><description>A meta-analysis study was conducted to assess the risk factors (RFs) for postoperative surgical site wound problems (POSSWPs) after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery (STS). A comprehensive literature examination until February 2023 was implemented, and 1786 linked studies were appraised. The 18 picked studies contained 18 580 subjects with surgery in the studies' baseline with and without different RFs. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of RFs for POSSWPs after metastatic and primary STS using the dichotomous and continuous styles and a fixed or random model. Subjects with surgical instrumentation in their surgery had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.49-3.49, P &lt; 0.001) compared with those without surgical instrumentation. Subjects with preoperative chemotherapy had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.09-3.00, P = 0.02) compared with those without preoperative chemotherapy. Subjects with preoperative radiotherapy had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.12-3.34, P = 0.02) compared with those without preoperative radiotherapy. Subjects with corticosteroid intake had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.73-4.82, P &lt; 0.001) compared with those without corticosteroid intake. No significant difference was found between males and females in the rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.37, P = 0.78). Surgical instrumentation, preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy and corticosteroid are RFs for the higher rate of POSSWPs in STS; however, gender was not shown to be a risk factor. Though precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences since some of the studies picked for this meta-analysis had low sample sizes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-4801</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1742-481X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14175</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37118927</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Chemotherapy ; Meta-analysis ; Metastasis ; Original ; Radiation therapy ; Risk factors ; Spinal cancer ; Steroids ; Surgery ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>International wound journal, 2023-10, Vol.20 (8), p.3006-3014</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-630fc149e0e12b08f2820cbf4d072c9b78ad8c5a65a64760c9ec471a13dbccc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-630fc149e0e12b08f2820cbf4d072c9b78ad8c5a65a64760c9ec471a13dbccc43</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-7262-1871</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502245/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502245/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37118927$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jiwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Si, Mengdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zongqiang</creatorcontrib><title>Risk factors for postoperative surgical site wound problems after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery: A meta-analysis</title><title>International wound journal</title><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><description>A meta-analysis study was conducted to assess the risk factors (RFs) for postoperative surgical site wound problems (POSSWPs) after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery (STS). A comprehensive literature examination until February 2023 was implemented, and 1786 linked studies were appraised. The 18 picked studies contained 18 580 subjects with surgery in the studies' baseline with and without different RFs. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of RFs for POSSWPs after metastatic and primary STS using the dichotomous and continuous styles and a fixed or random model. Subjects with surgical instrumentation in their surgery had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.49-3.49, P &lt; 0.001) compared with those without surgical instrumentation. Subjects with preoperative chemotherapy had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.09-3.00, P = 0.02) compared with those without preoperative chemotherapy. Subjects with preoperative radiotherapy had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.12-3.34, P = 0.02) compared with those without preoperative radiotherapy. Subjects with corticosteroid intake had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.73-4.82, P &lt; 0.001) compared with those without corticosteroid intake. No significant difference was found between males and females in the rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.37, P = 0.78). Surgical instrumentation, preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy and corticosteroid are RFs for the higher rate of POSSWPs in STS; however, gender was not shown to be a risk factor. Though precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences since some of the studies picked for this meta-analysis had low sample sizes.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Spinal cancer</subject><subject>Steroids</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1742-4801</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU2L1TAUhoMozocu_AMScKOLjkmaNokbGQZHhQFBFNyFND0dc22bmpPOcDf-djN3rhc1BBI4Dw9v8hLyjLMzXtbrcLs545Kr5gE55kqKSmr-7eHhzvgROUHcMCZM06jH5KhWnGsj1DH59TngDzo4n2NCOsREl4g5LpBcDjdAcU3XwbuRYshAb-M693RJsRthQuqGDIlOkB3mgnvqdtMwubSluIQZaF6nuKadBtL2DT3f4ZWb3bjFgE_Io8GNCE_35yn5evnuy8WH6urT-48X51eVl0zmqq3Z4Lk0wICLjulBaMF8N8ieKeFNp7TrtW9cW7ZULfMGvFTc8brvvPeyPiVv773L2k3Qe5hzcqPdZ7XRBfvvZA7f7XW8sZw1TAjZFMPLvSHFnytgtlNAD-PoZogrWqGZMly3hhf0xX_opvxBeTHamhnWMqP5nfDVPeVTREwwHNJwZu9qtaVWu6u1sM__jn8g__RY_wZGqqFn</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Zhu, Jiwen</creator><creator>Si, Mengdi</creator><creator>Huang, Zongqiang</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7262-1871</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Risk factors for postoperative surgical site wound problems after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery: A meta-analysis</title><author>Zhu, Jiwen ; Si, Mengdi ; Huang, Zongqiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-630fc149e0e12b08f2820cbf4d072c9b78ad8c5a65a64760c9ec471a13dbccc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Spinal cancer</topic><topic>Steroids</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Jiwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Si, Mengdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zongqiang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhu, Jiwen</au><au>Si, Mengdi</au><au>Huang, Zongqiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk factors for postoperative surgical site wound problems after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery: A meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3006</spage><epage>3014</epage><pages>3006-3014</pages><issn>1742-4801</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><eissn>1742-481X</eissn><abstract>A meta-analysis study was conducted to assess the risk factors (RFs) for postoperative surgical site wound problems (POSSWPs) after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery (STS). A comprehensive literature examination until February 2023 was implemented, and 1786 linked studies were appraised. The 18 picked studies contained 18 580 subjects with surgery in the studies' baseline with and without different RFs. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of RFs for POSSWPs after metastatic and primary STS using the dichotomous and continuous styles and a fixed or random model. Subjects with surgical instrumentation in their surgery had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.49-3.49, P &lt; 0.001) compared with those without surgical instrumentation. Subjects with preoperative chemotherapy had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.09-3.00, P = 0.02) compared with those without preoperative chemotherapy. Subjects with preoperative radiotherapy had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.12-3.34, P = 0.02) compared with those without preoperative radiotherapy. Subjects with corticosteroid intake had a significantly higher rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.73-4.82, P &lt; 0.001) compared with those without corticosteroid intake. No significant difference was found between males and females in the rate of POSSWPs in STS (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.37, P = 0.78). Surgical instrumentation, preoperative chemotherapy, preoperative radiotherapy and corticosteroid are RFs for the higher rate of POSSWPs in STS; however, gender was not shown to be a risk factor. Though precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences since some of the studies picked for this meta-analysis had low sample sizes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37118927</pmid><doi>10.1111/iwj.14175</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7262-1871</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-4801
ispartof International wound journal, 2023-10, Vol.20 (8), p.3006-3014
issn 1742-4801
1742-481X
1742-481X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10502245
source PMC (PubMed Central); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection; Wiley Open Access; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Bias
Chemotherapy
Meta-analysis
Metastasis
Original
Radiation therapy
Risk factors
Spinal cancer
Steroids
Surgery
Tumors
title Risk factors for postoperative surgical site wound problems after metastatic and primary spine tumour surgery: A meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A21%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20factors%20for%20postoperative%20surgical%20site%20wound%20problems%20after%20metastatic%20and%20primary%20spine%20tumour%20surgery:%20A%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20wound%20journal&rft.au=Zhu,%20Jiwen&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3006&rft.epage=3014&rft.pages=3006-3014&rft.issn=1742-4801&rft.eissn=1742-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iwj.14175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3090609815%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090609815&rft_id=info:pmid/37118927&rfr_iscdi=true