Reproductive Well-Being: A Framework for Expanding Contraceptive Access

Currently, more than 19 million women eligible for publicly funded contraception live in counties where they lack reasonable access to the full range of birth control methods. Around 1.2 million of these 19 million women live in counties without a single health center offering the full range of meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of public health (1971) 2022-06, Vol.112 (S5), p.S504-S507
Hauptverfasser: Axelson, Sarah M., Sealy, Gillian A., McDonald-Mosley, Raegan E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S507
container_issue S5
container_start_page S504
container_title American journal of public health (1971)
container_volume 112
creator Axelson, Sarah M.
Sealy, Gillian A.
McDonald-Mosley, Raegan E.
description Currently, more than 19 million women eligible for publicly funded contraception live in counties where they lack reasonable access to the full range of birth control methods. Around 1.2 million of these 19 million women live in counties without a single health center offering the full range of methods, compounding burden and inhibiting reproductive autonomy. These "contraceptive deserts" are defined as counties where the number of health centers offering the full range of methods is not enough to meet the needs of the county's estimated number of people eligible for publicly funded contraception, defined as at least one health center for every 1000 people in need of publicly funded contraception. This calculation is based upon ratios developed by Richard Cooper, MD, ofthe University of Pennsylvania Wharton School, one of the leading physician utilization and supply experts in the United States.1
doi_str_mv 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306898
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10490304</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2682787222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a611052c88a59807d1eb21757c65fcdb668ce894401da25fad39cde7251a4b1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1rGzEQxUVpSJyPe48LvfSy7oxWn70UxyROQyAlJOQoZEmbrmuvNpLXSf_7rmNTaE4zML95vMcj5BPCmCLwr5Prn1djCpSOKxBKqw9khJxhCcDURzIC0DDslTgixzkvABA1x0NyVHEppNRiRGZ3oUvR927dbELxGJbL8jw07dO3YlJcJrsKLzH9LuqYiovXzrZ-OBXT2K6TdaF7-5k4F3I-JQe1XeZwtp8n5OHy4n56Vd7czn5MJzelY0DXpRU4-KZOKcu1AukxzClKLp3gtfNzIZQLSjMG6C3ltfWVdj5IytGyOfrqhHzf6Xb9fBW8C1srS9OlZmXTHxNtY_6_tM0v8xQ3BoFpqIANCl_2Cik-9yGvzarJbghu2xD7bKhQVCpJKR3Qz-_QRexTO-QzVKKsGGiEgYId5VLMOYX6nxsEs63JbGsy25rMrqbqL1n1g1E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2717340910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reproductive Well-Being: A Framework for Expanding Contraceptive Access</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Education Source</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Axelson, Sarah M. ; Sealy, Gillian A. ; McDonald-Mosley, Raegan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Axelson, Sarah M. ; Sealy, Gillian A. ; McDonald-Mosley, Raegan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Currently, more than 19 million women eligible for publicly funded contraception live in counties where they lack reasonable access to the full range of birth control methods. Around 1.2 million of these 19 million women live in counties without a single health center offering the full range of methods, compounding burden and inhibiting reproductive autonomy. These "contraceptive deserts" are defined as counties where the number of health centers offering the full range of methods is not enough to meet the needs of the county's estimated number of people eligible for publicly funded contraception, defined as at least one health center for every 1000 people in need of publicly funded contraception. This calculation is based upon ratios developed by Richard Cooper, MD, ofthe University of Pennsylvania Wharton School, one of the leading physician utilization and supply experts in the United States.1</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-0036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-0048</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306898</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35767796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Public Health Association</publisher><subject>Access to Care ; Birth Control ; Contraception ; Contraceptives ; Control methods ; Counties ; Decision making ; Gynecology ; Health ; Health care policy ; Health Service Delivery ; Insurance policies ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Methods ; Opinions, Ideas, &amp; Practice ; Pregnancy ; Public health ; Reproductive health ; Sexual Health ; Shortages ; Womens health ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>American journal of public health (1971), 2022-06, Vol.112 (S5), p.S504-S507</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Public Health Association Jun 2022</rights><rights>American Public Health Association 2022 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a611052c88a59807d1eb21757c65fcdb668ce894401da25fad39cde7251a4b1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a611052c88a59807d1eb21757c65fcdb668ce894401da25fad39cde7251a4b1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490304/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10490304/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27845,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Axelson, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sealy, Gillian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald-Mosley, Raegan E.</creatorcontrib><title>Reproductive Well-Being: A Framework for Expanding Contraceptive Access</title><title>American journal of public health (1971)</title><description>Currently, more than 19 million women eligible for publicly funded contraception live in counties where they lack reasonable access to the full range of birth control methods. Around 1.2 million of these 19 million women live in counties without a single health center offering the full range of methods, compounding burden and inhibiting reproductive autonomy. These "contraceptive deserts" are defined as counties where the number of health centers offering the full range of methods is not enough to meet the needs of the county's estimated number of people eligible for publicly funded contraception, defined as at least one health center for every 1000 people in need of publicly funded contraception. This calculation is based upon ratios developed by Richard Cooper, MD, ofthe University of Pennsylvania Wharton School, one of the leading physician utilization and supply experts in the United States.1</description><subject>Access to Care</subject><subject>Birth Control</subject><subject>Contraception</subject><subject>Contraceptives</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Counties</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Service Delivery</subject><subject>Insurance policies</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Opinions, Ideas, &amp; Practice</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Reproductive health</subject><subject>Sexual Health</subject><subject>Shortages</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0090-0036</issn><issn>1541-0048</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1rGzEQxUVpSJyPe48LvfSy7oxWn70UxyROQyAlJOQoZEmbrmuvNpLXSf_7rmNTaE4zML95vMcj5BPCmCLwr5Prn1djCpSOKxBKqw9khJxhCcDURzIC0DDslTgixzkvABA1x0NyVHEppNRiRGZ3oUvR927dbELxGJbL8jw07dO3YlJcJrsKLzH9LuqYiovXzrZ-OBXT2K6TdaF7-5k4F3I-JQe1XeZwtp8n5OHy4n56Vd7czn5MJzelY0DXpRU4-KZOKcu1AukxzClKLp3gtfNzIZQLSjMG6C3ltfWVdj5IytGyOfrqhHzf6Xb9fBW8C1srS9OlZmXTHxNtY_6_tM0v8xQ3BoFpqIANCl_2Cik-9yGvzarJbghu2xD7bKhQVCpJKR3Qz-_QRexTO-QzVKKsGGiEgYId5VLMOYX6nxsEs63JbGsy25rMrqbqL1n1g1E</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Axelson, Sarah M.</creator><creator>Sealy, Gillian A.</creator><creator>McDonald-Mosley, Raegan E.</creator><general>American Public Health Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Reproductive Well-Being: A Framework for Expanding Contraceptive Access</title><author>Axelson, Sarah M. ; Sealy, Gillian A. ; McDonald-Mosley, Raegan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-a611052c88a59807d1eb21757c65fcdb668ce894401da25fad39cde7251a4b1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access to Care</topic><topic>Birth Control</topic><topic>Contraception</topic><topic>Contraceptives</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Counties</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Service Delivery</topic><topic>Insurance policies</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Opinions, Ideas, &amp; Practice</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Reproductive health</topic><topic>Sexual Health</topic><topic>Shortages</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Axelson, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sealy, Gillian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald-Mosley, Raegan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Axelson, Sarah M.</au><au>Sealy, Gillian A.</au><au>McDonald-Mosley, Raegan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reproductive Well-Being: A Framework for Expanding Contraceptive Access</atitle><jtitle>American journal of public health (1971)</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>S5</issue><spage>S504</spage><epage>S507</epage><pages>S504-S507</pages><issn>0090-0036</issn><eissn>1541-0048</eissn><abstract>Currently, more than 19 million women eligible for publicly funded contraception live in counties where they lack reasonable access to the full range of birth control methods. Around 1.2 million of these 19 million women live in counties without a single health center offering the full range of methods, compounding burden and inhibiting reproductive autonomy. These "contraceptive deserts" are defined as counties where the number of health centers offering the full range of methods is not enough to meet the needs of the county's estimated number of people eligible for publicly funded contraception, defined as at least one health center for every 1000 people in need of publicly funded contraception. This calculation is based upon ratios developed by Richard Cooper, MD, ofthe University of Pennsylvania Wharton School, one of the leading physician utilization and supply experts in the United States.1</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Public Health Association</pub><pmid>35767796</pmid><doi>10.2105/AJPH.2022.306898</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-0036
ispartof American journal of public health (1971), 2022-06, Vol.112 (S5), p.S504-S507
issn 0090-0036
1541-0048
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10490304
source PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Education Source; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Access to Care
Birth Control
Contraception
Contraceptives
Control methods
Counties
Decision making
Gynecology
Health
Health care policy
Health Service Delivery
Insurance policies
Maternal & child health
Methods
Opinions, Ideas, & Practice
Pregnancy
Public health
Reproductive health
Sexual Health
Shortages
Womens health
Young adults
title Reproductive Well-Being: A Framework for Expanding Contraceptive Access
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T14%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reproductive%20Well-Being:%20A%20Framework%20for%20Expanding%20Contraceptive%20Access&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20public%20health%20(1971)&rft.au=Axelson,%20Sarah%20M.&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=S5&rft.spage=S504&rft.epage=S507&rft.pages=S504-S507&rft.issn=0090-0036&rft.eissn=1541-0048&rft_id=info:doi/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306898&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2682787222%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2717340910&rft_id=info:pmid/35767796&rfr_iscdi=true