A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk
Gamma evaluation is currently the most widely used dose comparison method for patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). However, existing methods for normalising the dose difference, using either the dose at the global maximum dose point or at each local point, can respectively lead to under- and o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine 2023-09, Vol.46 (3), p.1033-1041 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1041 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1033 |
container_title | Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Yu, Liting Baker, Anthony Kairn, Tanya Livingstone, Alexander Trapp, Jamie Crowe, Scott B |
description | Gamma evaluation is currently the most widely used dose comparison method for patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). However, existing methods for normalising the dose difference, using either the dose at the global maximum dose point or at each local point, can respectively lead to under- and over-sensitivity to dose differences in organ-at-risk structures. This may be of concern for plan evaluation from clinical perspectives. This study has explored and proposed a new method called structural gamma, which takes structural dose tolerances into consideration while performing gamma analysis for PSQA. As a demonstration of the structural gamma method, a total of 78 retrospective plans on four treatment sites were re-calculated on an in-house Monte Carlo system and compared with doses calculated from the treatment planning system. Structural gamma evaluations were performed using both QUANTEC dose tolerances and radiation oncologist specified dose tolerances, then compared with conventional global and local gamma evaluations. Results demonstrated that structural gamma evaluation is especially sensitive to errors in structures with restrictive dose constraints. The structural gamma map provides both geometric and dosimetric information on PSQA results, allowing straightforward clinical interpretation. The proposed structure-based gamma method accounts for dose tolerances for specific anatomical structures. This method can provide a clinically useful method to assess and communicate PSQA results, offering radiation oncologists a more intuitive way of examining agreement in surrounding critical normal structures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10480250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2861033364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a9d97a8c77aee878e0f5ebbd18c53462809cbabd67fb275f5e08dbe8a5fa02ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhSMEolXpH2CBLLFhkzK2k9hZoariUakSG1hbE3uSuiT2xU4q3X-Pyy2Xx4KVRzrfHM_MqaqXHC44gHqbuRRNV4OQNXChoJZPqlPRdaJulFRPj7XoT6rznO8AQLScq659Xp1IJXiven1a7S5ZXtNm1y1RPWAmxyZcFmR0j_OGq4-BLbTeRsfGmJh3FFY_7n2YmJ198Bbnec8SzYUPK3MxE3N-HClRsJSZDyymCUNmuLLk87cX1bMR50znj-9Z9fXD-y9Xn-qbzx-vry5vatuodq2xd71CbZVCIq00wdjSMDiubSubTmjo7YCD69Q4CNUWEbQbSGM7IggkeVa9O_jutmEhZ8vcCWezS37BtDcRvflbCf7WTPHecGh0ORUUhzePDil-3yivZvHZ0jxjoLhlIzTX0OoWHtDX_6B3cUuh7FeojoOUsmsKJQ6UTTHnRONxGg7mIVRzCNWUUM3PUI0sTa_-3OPY8ivCAsgDkIsUJkq___6P7Q91jLAW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2861033364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Yu, Liting ; Baker, Anthony ; Kairn, Tanya ; Livingstone, Alexander ; Trapp, Jamie ; Crowe, Scott B</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Liting ; Baker, Anthony ; Kairn, Tanya ; Livingstone, Alexander ; Trapp, Jamie ; Crowe, Scott B</creatorcontrib><description>Gamma evaluation is currently the most widely used dose comparison method for patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). However, existing methods for normalising the dose difference, using either the dose at the global maximum dose point or at each local point, can respectively lead to under- and over-sensitivity to dose differences in organ-at-risk structures. This may be of concern for plan evaluation from clinical perspectives. This study has explored and proposed a new method called structural gamma, which takes structural dose tolerances into consideration while performing gamma analysis for PSQA. As a demonstration of the structural gamma method, a total of 78 retrospective plans on four treatment sites were re-calculated on an in-house Monte Carlo system and compared with doses calculated from the treatment planning system. Structural gamma evaluations were performed using both QUANTEC dose tolerances and radiation oncologist specified dose tolerances, then compared with conventional global and local gamma evaluations. Results demonstrated that structural gamma evaluation is especially sensitive to errors in structures with restrictive dose constraints. The structural gamma map provides both geometric and dosimetric information on PSQA results, allowing straightforward clinical interpretation. The proposed structure-based gamma method accounts for dose tolerances for specific anatomical structures. This method can provide a clinically useful method to assess and communicate PSQA results, offering radiation oncologists a more intuitive way of examining agreement in surrounding critical normal structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2662-4729</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0158-9938</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2662-4737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-5447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37219798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Biological and Medical Physics ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Biomedicine ; Biophysics ; Dosimetry ; Evaluation ; Mathematical analysis ; Medical and Radiation Physics ; Quality assurance ; Radiation ; Radiation dosage ; Scientific Paper ; Tolerances</subject><ispartof>Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine, 2023-09, Vol.46 (3), p.1033-1041</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a9d97a8c77aee878e0f5ebbd18c53462809cbabd67fb275f5e08dbe8a5fa02ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a9d97a8c77aee878e0f5ebbd18c53462809cbabd67fb275f5e08dbe8a5fa02ae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1264-9996</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37219798$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Liting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kairn, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livingstone, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapp, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Scott B</creatorcontrib><title>A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk</title><title>Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine</title><addtitle>Phys Eng Sci Med</addtitle><addtitle>Phys Eng Sci Med</addtitle><description>Gamma evaluation is currently the most widely used dose comparison method for patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). However, existing methods for normalising the dose difference, using either the dose at the global maximum dose point or at each local point, can respectively lead to under- and over-sensitivity to dose differences in organ-at-risk structures. This may be of concern for plan evaluation from clinical perspectives. This study has explored and proposed a new method called structural gamma, which takes structural dose tolerances into consideration while performing gamma analysis for PSQA. As a demonstration of the structural gamma method, a total of 78 retrospective plans on four treatment sites were re-calculated on an in-house Monte Carlo system and compared with doses calculated from the treatment planning system. Structural gamma evaluations were performed using both QUANTEC dose tolerances and radiation oncologist specified dose tolerances, then compared with conventional global and local gamma evaluations. Results demonstrated that structural gamma evaluation is especially sensitive to errors in structures with restrictive dose constraints. The structural gamma map provides both geometric and dosimetric information on PSQA results, allowing straightforward clinical interpretation. The proposed structure-based gamma method accounts for dose tolerances for specific anatomical structures. This method can provide a clinically useful method to assess and communicate PSQA results, offering radiation oncologists a more intuitive way of examining agreement in surrounding critical normal structures.</description><subject>Biological and Medical Physics</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Dosimetry</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medical and Radiation Physics</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation dosage</subject><subject>Scientific Paper</subject><subject>Tolerances</subject><issn>2662-4729</issn><issn>0158-9938</issn><issn>2662-4737</issn><issn>1879-5447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhSMEolXpH2CBLLFhkzK2k9hZoariUakSG1hbE3uSuiT2xU4q3X-Pyy2Xx4KVRzrfHM_MqaqXHC44gHqbuRRNV4OQNXChoJZPqlPRdaJulFRPj7XoT6rznO8AQLScq659Xp1IJXiven1a7S5ZXtNm1y1RPWAmxyZcFmR0j_OGq4-BLbTeRsfGmJh3FFY_7n2YmJ198Bbnec8SzYUPK3MxE3N-HClRsJSZDyymCUNmuLLk87cX1bMR50znj-9Z9fXD-y9Xn-qbzx-vry5vatuodq2xd71CbZVCIq00wdjSMDiubSubTmjo7YCD69Q4CNUWEbQbSGM7IggkeVa9O_jutmEhZ8vcCWezS37BtDcRvflbCf7WTPHecGh0ORUUhzePDil-3yivZvHZ0jxjoLhlIzTX0OoWHtDX_6B3cUuh7FeojoOUsmsKJQ6UTTHnRONxGg7mIVRzCNWUUM3PUI0sTa_-3OPY8ivCAsgDkIsUJkq___6P7Q91jLAW</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Yu, Liting</creator><creator>Baker, Anthony</creator><creator>Kairn, Tanya</creator><creator>Livingstone, Alexander</creator><creator>Trapp, Jamie</creator><creator>Crowe, Scott B</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1264-9996</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk</title><author>Yu, Liting ; Baker, Anthony ; Kairn, Tanya ; Livingstone, Alexander ; Trapp, Jamie ; Crowe, Scott B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-a9d97a8c77aee878e0f5ebbd18c53462809cbabd67fb275f5e08dbe8a5fa02ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biological and Medical Physics</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Dosimetry</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medical and Radiation Physics</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation dosage</topic><topic>Scientific Paper</topic><topic>Tolerances</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Liting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kairn, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livingstone, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trapp, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Scott B</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Liting</au><au>Baker, Anthony</au><au>Kairn, Tanya</au><au>Livingstone, Alexander</au><au>Trapp, Jamie</au><au>Crowe, Scott B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk</atitle><jtitle>Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine</jtitle><stitle>Phys Eng Sci Med</stitle><addtitle>Phys Eng Sci Med</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1033</spage><epage>1041</epage><pages>1033-1041</pages><issn>2662-4729</issn><issn>0158-9938</issn><eissn>2662-4737</eissn><eissn>1879-5447</eissn><abstract>Gamma evaluation is currently the most widely used dose comparison method for patient specific quality assurance (PSQA). However, existing methods for normalising the dose difference, using either the dose at the global maximum dose point or at each local point, can respectively lead to under- and over-sensitivity to dose differences in organ-at-risk structures. This may be of concern for plan evaluation from clinical perspectives. This study has explored and proposed a new method called structural gamma, which takes structural dose tolerances into consideration while performing gamma analysis for PSQA. As a demonstration of the structural gamma method, a total of 78 retrospective plans on four treatment sites were re-calculated on an in-house Monte Carlo system and compared with doses calculated from the treatment planning system. Structural gamma evaluations were performed using both QUANTEC dose tolerances and radiation oncologist specified dose tolerances, then compared with conventional global and local gamma evaluations. Results demonstrated that structural gamma evaluation is especially sensitive to errors in structures with restrictive dose constraints. The structural gamma map provides both geometric and dosimetric information on PSQA results, allowing straightforward clinical interpretation. The proposed structure-based gamma method accounts for dose tolerances for specific anatomical structures. This method can provide a clinically useful method to assess and communicate PSQA results, offering radiation oncologists a more intuitive way of examining agreement in surrounding critical normal structures.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37219798</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1264-9996</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2662-4729 |
ispartof | Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine, 2023-09, Vol.46 (3), p.1033-1041 |
issn | 2662-4729 0158-9938 2662-4737 1879-5447 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10480250 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Biological and Medical Physics Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Biomedicine Biophysics Dosimetry Evaluation Mathematical analysis Medical and Radiation Physics Quality assurance Radiation Radiation dosage Scientific Paper Tolerances |
title | A structure-based gamma evaluation method for identifying clinically relevant dose differences in organs at risk |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T21%3A29%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20structure-based%20gamma%20evaluation%20method%20for%20identifying%20clinically%20relevant%20dose%20differences%20in%20organs%20at%20risk&rft.jtitle=Australasian%20physical%20&%20engineering%20sciences%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Yu,%20Liting&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1033&rft.epage=1041&rft.pages=1033-1041&rft.issn=2662-4729&rft.eissn=2662-4737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13246-023-01270-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2861033364%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2861033364&rft_id=info:pmid/37219798&rfr_iscdi=true |