Development and implementation of the lung volume reduction pulmonary rehabilitation tool to identify eligibility for lung volume reduction in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during pulmonary rehabilitation
Background Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation is recognised in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines as a key opportunity to consider systematically whether a respiratory review to assess potential suitability for a lung volume reduction (LVR) procedure might be appropriate. We...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chronic respiratory disease 2023-08, Vol.20, p.14799731231198863-14799731231198863 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14799731231198863 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 14799731231198863 |
container_title | Chronic respiratory disease |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Buttery, Sara C Williams, Parris J Brighton, Lisa J Batista, Craig Dewar, Amy Hogg, Lauren Ingram, Karen Korff, Gemma Koulopoulou, Maria Lammin, Helen Maddocks, Matthew McDonnell, Lynn Mehta, Bhavin Meyrick, Victoria Pritchard, Lisa Smith, Oliver Trivedi, Puja Lawson, Rod A Hopkinson, Nicholas S |
description | Background
Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation is recognised in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines as a key opportunity to consider systematically whether a respiratory review to assess potential suitability for a lung volume reduction (LVR) procedure might be appropriate. We describe the development of a simple decision-support tool (the LVR-PR tool) to aid clinicians working in pulmonary rehabilitation, to operationalise this process.
Methods
We took an iterative mixed methods approach, which was partnership-based and involved an initial consensus survey, focus groups and an observational study cohort at multiple pulmonary rehabilitation centres.
Results
Diagnosis (97%), exercise capacity (84%), breathlessness (78%) and co-morbidities (76%) were acknowledged to be essential items for assessing basic LVR eligibility. Collating prior investigations and assessing patient understanding were considered useful but not essential. Clinician concerns included; streamlining the tool; access to clinical information and investigations; and care needed around introducing LVR therapies to patients in a PR setting. Access to clearer information about LVR procedures, the clinician’s role in considering eligibility and how educational resources should be delivered were identified as important themes from patient group discussions. The LVR-PR tool was considered to be feasible and valid for implementation in a variety of PR services across the UK subject to the provision of appropriate health professional training. Clinicians working in specialist LVR centres across the UK who were not otherwise involved in the development process confirmed the tool’s validity using the content validity index (CVI).
Interpretation
The LVR-PR tool appears to be an acceptable tool that can be feasibly implemented in PR services subject to good quality educational resources for both patients and healthcare professionals. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/14799731231198863 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10475255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_14799731231198863</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2860616289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-1176f6963343f55b9c7e1ae7f3a8f8f6e3f282a21c8bba7708fc09c34b8fc3a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1u1DAQxyNEJUrbB-BmiQuXLf5I7PiEUPmUKnGhZ8txxhtXjh3sZNG-bR8Fp7uCAtqLPZ75z29mrKmqVwRfEyLEW1ILKQUjlBEi25azZ9X56tuszudP7BfVy5zvMaZS8Pq8evgAO_BxGiHMSIceuXHysL707GJA0aJ5AOSXsEW76JcRUIJ-MY_BafFjDDrti2_QnfPumDXH6MuBXF9Azu4ReLd1j4I9sjGd4LmChFjqo59uHpAZUgzOoNjlOa2SHTwp2bsMOgPql-QK7FQvl9WZ1T7D1fG-qO4-ffx-82Vz--3z15v3txtT1_W8KZ_ILZecsZrZpumkEUA0CMt0a1vLgVnaUk2JabtOC4Fba7A0rO6KwTRlF9W7A3dauhF6UwZP2qspubE0paJ26u9IcIPaxp0iuBYNbZpCeHMkpPhjgTyr0WUD3usAccmKthxzwmkri_T1P9L7uKRQ5lNUUkyxZA0rKnJQmRRzTmB_d0OwWrdG_bc1Jef6kJP1Fv5QTyf8AlLWy_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920209353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and implementation of the lung volume reduction pulmonary rehabilitation tool to identify eligibility for lung volume reduction in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during pulmonary rehabilitation</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Buttery, Sara C ; Williams, Parris J ; Brighton, Lisa J ; Batista, Craig ; Dewar, Amy ; Hogg, Lauren ; Ingram, Karen ; Korff, Gemma ; Koulopoulou, Maria ; Lammin, Helen ; Maddocks, Matthew ; McDonnell, Lynn ; Mehta, Bhavin ; Meyrick, Victoria ; Pritchard, Lisa ; Smith, Oliver ; Trivedi, Puja ; Lawson, Rod A ; Hopkinson, Nicholas S</creator><creatorcontrib>Buttery, Sara C ; Williams, Parris J ; Brighton, Lisa J ; Batista, Craig ; Dewar, Amy ; Hogg, Lauren ; Ingram, Karen ; Korff, Gemma ; Koulopoulou, Maria ; Lammin, Helen ; Maddocks, Matthew ; McDonnell, Lynn ; Mehta, Bhavin ; Meyrick, Victoria ; Pritchard, Lisa ; Smith, Oliver ; Trivedi, Puja ; Lawson, Rod A ; Hopkinson, Nicholas S</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation is recognised in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines as a key opportunity to consider systematically whether a respiratory review to assess potential suitability for a lung volume reduction (LVR) procedure might be appropriate. We describe the development of a simple decision-support tool (the LVR-PR tool) to aid clinicians working in pulmonary rehabilitation, to operationalise this process.
Methods
We took an iterative mixed methods approach, which was partnership-based and involved an initial consensus survey, focus groups and an observational study cohort at multiple pulmonary rehabilitation centres.
Results
Diagnosis (97%), exercise capacity (84%), breathlessness (78%) and co-morbidities (76%) were acknowledged to be essential items for assessing basic LVR eligibility. Collating prior investigations and assessing patient understanding were considered useful but not essential. Clinician concerns included; streamlining the tool; access to clinical information and investigations; and care needed around introducing LVR therapies to patients in a PR setting. Access to clearer information about LVR procedures, the clinician’s role in considering eligibility and how educational resources should be delivered were identified as important themes from patient group discussions. The LVR-PR tool was considered to be feasible and valid for implementation in a variety of PR services across the UK subject to the provision of appropriate health professional training. Clinicians working in specialist LVR centres across the UK who were not otherwise involved in the development process confirmed the tool’s validity using the content validity index (CVI).
Interpretation
The LVR-PR tool appears to be an acceptable tool that can be feasibly implemented in PR services subject to good quality educational resources for both patients and healthcare professionals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1479-9731</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1479-9723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-9731</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14799731231198863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Chronic illnesses ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Original Paper ; Rehabilitation</subject><ispartof>Chronic respiratory disease, 2023-08, Vol.20, p.14799731231198863-14799731231198863</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023 2023 SAGE Publications Ltd unless otherwise noted. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-1176f6963343f55b9c7e1ae7f3a8f8f6e3f282a21c8bba7708fc09c34b8fc3a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-1176f6963343f55b9c7e1ae7f3a8f8f6e3f282a21c8bba7708fc09c34b8fc3a23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3235-0454 ; 0000-0001-9410-414X ; 0000-0001-8027-1879 ; 0000-0003-0516-0102</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475255/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10475255/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,21945,27830,27901,27902,44921,45309,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buttery, Sara C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Parris J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brighton, Lisa J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batista, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korff, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koulopoulou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammin, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddocks, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Bhavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyrick, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trivedi, Puja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Rod A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, Nicholas S</creatorcontrib><title>Development and implementation of the lung volume reduction pulmonary rehabilitation tool to identify eligibility for lung volume reduction in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during pulmonary rehabilitation</title><title>Chronic respiratory disease</title><addtitle>Chron Respir Dis</addtitle><description>Background
Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation is recognised in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines as a key opportunity to consider systematically whether a respiratory review to assess potential suitability for a lung volume reduction (LVR) procedure might be appropriate. We describe the development of a simple decision-support tool (the LVR-PR tool) to aid clinicians working in pulmonary rehabilitation, to operationalise this process.
Methods
We took an iterative mixed methods approach, which was partnership-based and involved an initial consensus survey, focus groups and an observational study cohort at multiple pulmonary rehabilitation centres.
Results
Diagnosis (97%), exercise capacity (84%), breathlessness (78%) and co-morbidities (76%) were acknowledged to be essential items for assessing basic LVR eligibility. Collating prior investigations and assessing patient understanding were considered useful but not essential. Clinician concerns included; streamlining the tool; access to clinical information and investigations; and care needed around introducing LVR therapies to patients in a PR setting. Access to clearer information about LVR procedures, the clinician’s role in considering eligibility and how educational resources should be delivered were identified as important themes from patient group discussions. The LVR-PR tool was considered to be feasible and valid for implementation in a variety of PR services across the UK subject to the provision of appropriate health professional training. Clinicians working in specialist LVR centres across the UK who were not otherwise involved in the development process confirmed the tool’s validity using the content validity index (CVI).
Interpretation
The LVR-PR tool appears to be an acceptable tool that can be feasibly implemented in PR services subject to good quality educational resources for both patients and healthcare professionals.</description><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><issn>1479-9731</issn><issn>1479-9723</issn><issn>1479-9731</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1u1DAQxyNEJUrbB-BmiQuXLf5I7PiEUPmUKnGhZ8txxhtXjh3sZNG-bR8Fp7uCAtqLPZ75z29mrKmqVwRfEyLEW1ILKQUjlBEi25azZ9X56tuszudP7BfVy5zvMaZS8Pq8evgAO_BxGiHMSIceuXHysL707GJA0aJ5AOSXsEW76JcRUIJ-MY_BafFjDDrti2_QnfPumDXH6MuBXF9Azu4ReLd1j4I9sjGd4LmChFjqo59uHpAZUgzOoNjlOa2SHTwp2bsMOgPql-QK7FQvl9WZ1T7D1fG-qO4-ffx-82Vz--3z15v3txtT1_W8KZ_ILZecsZrZpumkEUA0CMt0a1vLgVnaUk2JabtOC4Fba7A0rO6KwTRlF9W7A3dauhF6UwZP2qspubE0paJ26u9IcIPaxp0iuBYNbZpCeHMkpPhjgTyr0WUD3usAccmKthxzwmkri_T1P9L7uKRQ5lNUUkyxZA0rKnJQmRRzTmB_d0OwWrdG_bc1Jef6kJP1Fv5QTyf8AlLWy_Q</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Buttery, Sara C</creator><creator>Williams, Parris J</creator><creator>Brighton, Lisa J</creator><creator>Batista, Craig</creator><creator>Dewar, Amy</creator><creator>Hogg, Lauren</creator><creator>Ingram, Karen</creator><creator>Korff, Gemma</creator><creator>Koulopoulou, Maria</creator><creator>Lammin, Helen</creator><creator>Maddocks, Matthew</creator><creator>McDonnell, Lynn</creator><creator>Mehta, Bhavin</creator><creator>Meyrick, Victoria</creator><creator>Pritchard, Lisa</creator><creator>Smith, Oliver</creator><creator>Trivedi, Puja</creator><creator>Lawson, Rod A</creator><creator>Hopkinson, Nicholas S</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-0454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-414X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-1879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0516-0102</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Development and implementation of the lung volume reduction pulmonary rehabilitation tool to identify eligibility for lung volume reduction in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during pulmonary rehabilitation</title><author>Buttery, Sara C ; Williams, Parris J ; Brighton, Lisa J ; Batista, Craig ; Dewar, Amy ; Hogg, Lauren ; Ingram, Karen ; Korff, Gemma ; Koulopoulou, Maria ; Lammin, Helen ; Maddocks, Matthew ; McDonnell, Lynn ; Mehta, Bhavin ; Meyrick, Victoria ; Pritchard, Lisa ; Smith, Oliver ; Trivedi, Puja ; Lawson, Rod A ; Hopkinson, Nicholas S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-1176f6963343f55b9c7e1ae7f3a8f8f6e3f282a21c8bba7708fc09c34b8fc3a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buttery, Sara C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Parris J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brighton, Lisa J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batista, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dewar, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogg, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingram, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korff, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koulopoulou, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lammin, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddocks, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonnell, Lynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Bhavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyrick, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pritchard, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trivedi, Puja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Rod A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkinson, Nicholas S</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Chronic respiratory disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buttery, Sara C</au><au>Williams, Parris J</au><au>Brighton, Lisa J</au><au>Batista, Craig</au><au>Dewar, Amy</au><au>Hogg, Lauren</au><au>Ingram, Karen</au><au>Korff, Gemma</au><au>Koulopoulou, Maria</au><au>Lammin, Helen</au><au>Maddocks, Matthew</au><au>McDonnell, Lynn</au><au>Mehta, Bhavin</au><au>Meyrick, Victoria</au><au>Pritchard, Lisa</au><au>Smith, Oliver</au><au>Trivedi, Puja</au><au>Lawson, Rod A</au><au>Hopkinson, Nicholas S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and implementation of the lung volume reduction pulmonary rehabilitation tool to identify eligibility for lung volume reduction in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during pulmonary rehabilitation</atitle><jtitle>Chronic respiratory disease</jtitle><addtitle>Chron Respir Dis</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><spage>14799731231198863</spage><epage>14799731231198863</epage><pages>14799731231198863-14799731231198863</pages><issn>1479-9731</issn><issn>1479-9723</issn><eissn>1479-9731</eissn><abstract>Background
Completion of pulmonary rehabilitation is recognised in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines as a key opportunity to consider systematically whether a respiratory review to assess potential suitability for a lung volume reduction (LVR) procedure might be appropriate. We describe the development of a simple decision-support tool (the LVR-PR tool) to aid clinicians working in pulmonary rehabilitation, to operationalise this process.
Methods
We took an iterative mixed methods approach, which was partnership-based and involved an initial consensus survey, focus groups and an observational study cohort at multiple pulmonary rehabilitation centres.
Results
Diagnosis (97%), exercise capacity (84%), breathlessness (78%) and co-morbidities (76%) were acknowledged to be essential items for assessing basic LVR eligibility. Collating prior investigations and assessing patient understanding were considered useful but not essential. Clinician concerns included; streamlining the tool; access to clinical information and investigations; and care needed around introducing LVR therapies to patients in a PR setting. Access to clearer information about LVR procedures, the clinician’s role in considering eligibility and how educational resources should be delivered were identified as important themes from patient group discussions. The LVR-PR tool was considered to be feasible and valid for implementation in a variety of PR services across the UK subject to the provision of appropriate health professional training. Clinicians working in specialist LVR centres across the UK who were not otherwise involved in the development process confirmed the tool’s validity using the content validity index (CVI).
Interpretation
The LVR-PR tool appears to be an acceptable tool that can be feasibly implemented in PR services subject to good quality educational resources for both patients and healthcare professionals.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/14799731231198863</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-0454</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-414X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8027-1879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0516-0102</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1479-9731 |
ispartof | Chronic respiratory disease, 2023-08, Vol.20, p.14799731231198863-14799731231198863 |
issn | 1479-9731 1479-9723 1479-9731 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10475255 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Chronic illnesses Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Original Paper Rehabilitation |
title | Development and implementation of the lung volume reduction pulmonary rehabilitation tool to identify eligibility for lung volume reduction in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during pulmonary rehabilitation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A48%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20implementation%20of%20the%20lung%20volume%20reduction%20pulmonary%20rehabilitation%20tool%20to%20identify%20eligibility%20for%20lung%20volume%20reduction%20in%20people%20with%20chronic%20obstructive%20pulmonary%20disease%20during%20pulmonary%20rehabilitation&rft.jtitle=Chronic%20respiratory%20disease&rft.au=Buttery,%20Sara%20C&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.spage=14799731231198863&rft.epage=14799731231198863&rft.pages=14799731231198863-14799731231198863&rft.issn=1479-9731&rft.eissn=1479-9731&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14799731231198863&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2860616289%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920209353&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14799731231198863&rfr_iscdi=true |