Triage Procedures for Critical Care Resource Allocation During Scarcity
Importance During the COVID-19 pandemic, many US states issued or revised pandemic preparedness plans guiding allocation of critical care resources during crises. State plans vary in the factors used to triage patients and have faced criticism from advocacy groups due to the potential for discrimina...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA network open 2023-08, Vol.6 (8), p.e2329688-e2329688 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e2329688 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e2329688 |
container_title | JAMA network open |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Ennis, Jackson S. Riggan, Kirsten A. Nguyen, Nicholas V. Kramer, Daniel B. Smith, Alexander K. Sulmasy, Daniel P. Tilburt, Jon C. Wolf, Susan M. DeMartino, Erin S. |
description | Importance During the COVID-19 pandemic, many US states issued or revised pandemic preparedness plans guiding allocation of critical care resources during crises. State plans vary in the factors used to triage patients and have faced criticism from advocacy groups due to the potential for discrimination. Objective To analyze the role of comorbidities and long-term prognosis in state triage procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data gathered from parallel internet searches for state-endorsed pandemic preparedness plans for the 50 US states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico (hereafter referred to as states), which were conducted between November 25, 2021, and June 16, 2023. Plans available on June 16, 2023, that provided step-by-step instructions for triaging critically ill patients were categorized for use of comorbidities and prognostication. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence and contents of lists of comorbidities and their stated function in triage and instructions to predict duration of postdischarge survival. Results Overall, 32 state-promulgated pandemic preparedness plans included triage procedures specific enough to guide triage in clinical practice. Twenty of these (63%) included lists of comorbidities that excluded (11 of 20 [55%]) or deprioritized (8 of 20 [40%]) patients during triage; one state’s list was formulated to resolve ties between patients with equal triage scores. Most states with triage procedures (21 of 32 [66%]) considered predicted survival beyond hospital discharge. These states proposed different prognostic time horizons; 15 of 21 (71%) were numeric (ranging from 6 months to 5 years after hospital discharge), with the remaining 6 (29%) using descriptive terms, such as long-term. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of state-promulgated critical care triage policies, most plans restricted access to scarce critical care resources for patients with listed comorbidities and/or for patients with less-than-average expected postdischarge survival. This analysis raises concerns about access to care during a public health crisis for populations with high burdens of chronic illness, such as individuals with disabilities and minoritized racial and ethnic groups. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29688 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10466166</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2858586319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-706f995ed5e8ac76e896b62cca238b5548ff7103bdd82bb98e2db632f80c202c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctOwzAQRS0EAlT4hwg2bFr8iB2bDULhKVUC8VhbjjMpLklc7ATUvyelCEFXM9KcuZo7F6EjgicEY3I6N41pofv04c0voJ1QTNmEKiHlFtqnPEvHTGK-_affQ4cxzjHGFBOmBN9FeywT6bCT7aOb5-DMDJKH4C2UfYCYVD4keXCds6ZOchMgeYTo-2Ahuahrb03nfJtc9sG1s-TJmmBdtzxAO5WpIxz-1BF6ub56zm_H0_ubu_xiOjYpJ904w6JSikPJQRqbCZBKFIJaayiTBeeprKqMYFaUpaRFoSTQshCMVhLbwallI3S-1l30RQOlhbYLptaL4BoTltobp_9PWveqZ_5DE5wKQYQYFE5-FIJ_7yF2unHRQl0Pb_V91FRyqRQhgg7o8QY6H_7QDv6-KS4FI2qgztaUDT7GANXvNQTrVWZ6IzO9ykx_Z8a-AJhgjqA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858586319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Triage Procedures for Critical Care Resource Allocation During Scarcity</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ennis, Jackson S. ; Riggan, Kirsten A. ; Nguyen, Nicholas V. ; Kramer, Daniel B. ; Smith, Alexander K. ; Sulmasy, Daniel P. ; Tilburt, Jon C. ; Wolf, Susan M. ; DeMartino, Erin S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ennis, Jackson S. ; Riggan, Kirsten A. ; Nguyen, Nicholas V. ; Kramer, Daniel B. ; Smith, Alexander K. ; Sulmasy, Daniel P. ; Tilburt, Jon C. ; Wolf, Susan M. ; DeMartino, Erin S.</creatorcontrib><description>Importance During the COVID-19 pandemic, many US states issued or revised pandemic preparedness plans guiding allocation of critical care resources during crises. State plans vary in the factors used to triage patients and have faced criticism from advocacy groups due to the potential for discrimination. Objective To analyze the role of comorbidities and long-term prognosis in state triage procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data gathered from parallel internet searches for state-endorsed pandemic preparedness plans for the 50 US states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico (hereafter referred to as states), which were conducted between November 25, 2021, and June 16, 2023. Plans available on June 16, 2023, that provided step-by-step instructions for triaging critically ill patients were categorized for use of comorbidities and prognostication. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence and contents of lists of comorbidities and their stated function in triage and instructions to predict duration of postdischarge survival. Results Overall, 32 state-promulgated pandemic preparedness plans included triage procedures specific enough to guide triage in clinical practice. Twenty of these (63%) included lists of comorbidities that excluded (11 of 20 [55%]) or deprioritized (8 of 20 [40%]) patients during triage; one state’s list was formulated to resolve ties between patients with equal triage scores. Most states with triage procedures (21 of 32 [66%]) considered predicted survival beyond hospital discharge. These states proposed different prognostic time horizons; 15 of 21 (71%) were numeric (ranging from 6 months to 5 years after hospital discharge), with the remaining 6 (29%) using descriptive terms, such as long-term. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of state-promulgated critical care triage policies, most plans restricted access to scarce critical care resources for patients with listed comorbidities and/or for patients with less-than-average expected postdischarge survival. This analysis raises concerns about access to care during a public health crisis for populations with high burdens of chronic illness, such as individuals with disabilities and minoritized racial and ethnic groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29688</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37642967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Critical care ; Critical Care Medicine ; Cross-sectional studies ; Health care access ; Medical prognosis ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Pandemics</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2023-08, Vol.6 (8), p.e2329688-e2329688</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2023 Ennis JS et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-706f995ed5e8ac76e896b62cca238b5548ff7103bdd82bb98e2db632f80c202c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-706f995ed5e8ac76e896b62cca238b5548ff7103bdd82bb98e2db632f80c202c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,861,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ennis, Jackson S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggan, Kirsten A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Nicholas V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Alexander K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulmasy, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tilburt, Jon C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMartino, Erin S.</creatorcontrib><title>Triage Procedures for Critical Care Resource Allocation During Scarcity</title><title>JAMA network open</title><description>Importance During the COVID-19 pandemic, many US states issued or revised pandemic preparedness plans guiding allocation of critical care resources during crises. State plans vary in the factors used to triage patients and have faced criticism from advocacy groups due to the potential for discrimination. Objective To analyze the role of comorbidities and long-term prognosis in state triage procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data gathered from parallel internet searches for state-endorsed pandemic preparedness plans for the 50 US states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico (hereafter referred to as states), which were conducted between November 25, 2021, and June 16, 2023. Plans available on June 16, 2023, that provided step-by-step instructions for triaging critically ill patients were categorized for use of comorbidities and prognostication. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence and contents of lists of comorbidities and their stated function in triage and instructions to predict duration of postdischarge survival. Results Overall, 32 state-promulgated pandemic preparedness plans included triage procedures specific enough to guide triage in clinical practice. Twenty of these (63%) included lists of comorbidities that excluded (11 of 20 [55%]) or deprioritized (8 of 20 [40%]) patients during triage; one state’s list was formulated to resolve ties between patients with equal triage scores. Most states with triage procedures (21 of 32 [66%]) considered predicted survival beyond hospital discharge. These states proposed different prognostic time horizons; 15 of 21 (71%) were numeric (ranging from 6 months to 5 years after hospital discharge), with the remaining 6 (29%) using descriptive terms, such as long-term. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of state-promulgated critical care triage policies, most plans restricted access to scarce critical care resources for patients with listed comorbidities and/or for patients with less-than-average expected postdischarge survival. This analysis raises concerns about access to care during a public health crisis for populations with high burdens of chronic illness, such as individuals with disabilities and minoritized racial and ethnic groups.</description><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctOwzAQRS0EAlT4hwg2bFr8iB2bDULhKVUC8VhbjjMpLklc7ATUvyelCEFXM9KcuZo7F6EjgicEY3I6N41pofv04c0voJ1QTNmEKiHlFtqnPEvHTGK-_affQ4cxzjHGFBOmBN9FeywT6bCT7aOb5-DMDJKH4C2UfYCYVD4keXCds6ZOchMgeYTo-2Ahuahrb03nfJtc9sG1s-TJmmBdtzxAO5WpIxz-1BF6ub56zm_H0_ubu_xiOjYpJ904w6JSikPJQRqbCZBKFIJaayiTBeeprKqMYFaUpaRFoSTQshCMVhLbwallI3S-1l30RQOlhbYLptaL4BoTltobp_9PWveqZ_5DE5wKQYQYFE5-FIJ_7yF2unHRQl0Pb_V91FRyqRQhgg7o8QY6H_7QDv6-KS4FI2qgztaUDT7GANXvNQTrVWZ6IzO9ykx_Z8a-AJhgjqA</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Ennis, Jackson S.</creator><creator>Riggan, Kirsten A.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Nicholas V.</creator><creator>Kramer, Daniel B.</creator><creator>Smith, Alexander K.</creator><creator>Sulmasy, Daniel P.</creator><creator>Tilburt, Jon C.</creator><creator>Wolf, Susan M.</creator><creator>DeMartino, Erin S.</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Triage Procedures for Critical Care Resource Allocation During Scarcity</title><author>Ennis, Jackson S. ; Riggan, Kirsten A. ; Nguyen, Nicholas V. ; Kramer, Daniel B. ; Smith, Alexander K. ; Sulmasy, Daniel P. ; Tilburt, Jon C. ; Wolf, Susan M. ; DeMartino, Erin S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a451t-706f995ed5e8ac76e896b62cca238b5548ff7103bdd82bb98e2db632f80c202c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ennis, Jackson S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riggan, Kirsten A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Nicholas V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Alexander K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulmasy, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tilburt, Jon C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Susan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeMartino, Erin S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ennis, Jackson S.</au><au>Riggan, Kirsten A.</au><au>Nguyen, Nicholas V.</au><au>Kramer, Daniel B.</au><au>Smith, Alexander K.</au><au>Sulmasy, Daniel P.</au><au>Tilburt, Jon C.</au><au>Wolf, Susan M.</au><au>DeMartino, Erin S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Triage Procedures for Critical Care Resource Allocation During Scarcity</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e2329688</spage><epage>e2329688</epage><pages>e2329688-e2329688</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Importance During the COVID-19 pandemic, many US states issued or revised pandemic preparedness plans guiding allocation of critical care resources during crises. State plans vary in the factors used to triage patients and have faced criticism from advocacy groups due to the potential for discrimination. Objective To analyze the role of comorbidities and long-term prognosis in state triage procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study used data gathered from parallel internet searches for state-endorsed pandemic preparedness plans for the 50 US states, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico (hereafter referred to as states), which were conducted between November 25, 2021, and June 16, 2023. Plans available on June 16, 2023, that provided step-by-step instructions for triaging critically ill patients were categorized for use of comorbidities and prognostication. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence and contents of lists of comorbidities and their stated function in triage and instructions to predict duration of postdischarge survival. Results Overall, 32 state-promulgated pandemic preparedness plans included triage procedures specific enough to guide triage in clinical practice. Twenty of these (63%) included lists of comorbidities that excluded (11 of 20 [55%]) or deprioritized (8 of 20 [40%]) patients during triage; one state’s list was formulated to resolve ties between patients with equal triage scores. Most states with triage procedures (21 of 32 [66%]) considered predicted survival beyond hospital discharge. These states proposed different prognostic time horizons; 15 of 21 (71%) were numeric (ranging from 6 months to 5 years after hospital discharge), with the remaining 6 (29%) using descriptive terms, such as long-term. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of state-promulgated critical care triage policies, most plans restricted access to scarce critical care resources for patients with listed comorbidities and/or for patients with less-than-average expected postdischarge survival. This analysis raises concerns about access to care during a public health crisis for populations with high burdens of chronic illness, such as individuals with disabilities and minoritized racial and ethnic groups.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>37642967</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29688</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2574-3805 |
ispartof | JAMA network open, 2023-08, Vol.6 (8), p.e2329688-e2329688 |
issn | 2574-3805 2574-3805 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10466166 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Critical care Critical Care Medicine Cross-sectional studies Health care access Medical prognosis Online Only Original Investigation Pandemics |
title | Triage Procedures for Critical Care Resource Allocation During Scarcity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T03%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Triage%20Procedures%20for%20Critical%20Care%20Resource%20Allocation%20During%20Scarcity&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Ennis,%20Jackson%20S.&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e2329688&rft.epage=e2329688&rft.pages=e2329688-e2329688&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.29688&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2858586319%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858586319&rft_id=info:pmid/37642967&rfr_iscdi=true |