Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole

Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Lim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2023-08, Vol.12 (16), p.5188
Hauptverfasser: Sborgia, Alessandra, Niro, Alfredo, Pastore, Valentina, Albano, Valeria, Boscia, Giacomo, Piepoli, Marina, Di Pardo, Camilla, Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo, Zerbinati, Marta, Landini, Luca, Pignataro, Maria Grazia, Petruzzella, Giovanni, Donghia, Rossella, Alqahtani, Abdullah S, Coassin, Marco, Dell’Omo, Roberto, Boscia, Francesco, Alessio, Giovanni, Sborgia, Giancarlo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 16
container_start_page 5188
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 12
creator Sborgia, Alessandra
Niro, Alfredo
Pastore, Valentina
Albano, Valeria
Boscia, Giacomo
Piepoli, Marina
Di Pardo, Camilla
Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo
Zerbinati, Marta
Landini, Luca
Pignataro, Maria Grazia
Petruzzella, Giovanni
Donghia, Rossella
Alqahtani, Abdullah S
Coassin, Marco
Dell’Omo, Roberto
Boscia, Francesco
Alessio, Giovanni
Sborgia, Giancarlo
description Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique for high myopic macular holes (hMMH). Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with hMMH after surgical hole closure underwent microperimetric biofeedback using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone (n = 12; Biofeedback) or standard of care with scheduled visits (n = 11; Control). Best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (RS) and 4° (CRS) with a mean deviation at central 12° (MD), and fixation stability as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99%) were assessed at baseline and month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The Mann–Whitney test was used to test the difference between the groups. Results: Baseline functional parameters were not significantly different among the groups. BCVA significantly improved in each group (Biofeedback, p = 0.002; Control, p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up visits. CRS significantly improved at 6 (p = 0.03) and 12 (p = 0.01) months in the Biofeedback group and at month 12 (p = 0.01) in the Control group. RS (p = 0.001) and MD (p = 0.005) improved at the last follow-up only in the trained group. After training, BCEA 68% and 95% significantly improved (6 and 12 months, p < 0.05). The Biofeedback group had better results in RS (p ≤ 0.02), CRS (p ≤ 0.02), and BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the Control at all follow-ups. BCVA and MD were better in the Biofeedback group at month 3 (p = 0.01), and month 3 (p = 0.01) and 12 (p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions: Microperimetric biofeedback can increase retinal sensitivity and stabilize fixation better than the standard care over months after a successful inverted ILM-flap for hMMH.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm12165188
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10455115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A762478065</galeid><sourcerecordid>A762478065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-f9651591a29ec9a4e7211c0475178eb8abdac71ac1b70eb84ea4b2384cd8af3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpiT9giUsRSvFX1s4JtRWlK-2KA8vZcpzxrhfHXuykUsWfx9FW0CLsg8czz7yjsaeq3hJ8yViLP-7NQChZNETKF9UpxULUmEn28ol9Up3nvMdlSckpEa-rEyYWtKUMn1a_rl20AH2nzQ-0SdoFF7ZI2xES-jYZAznbyaNluIc0Ql-MEgnao5Ub3Dizaxi6pAOgi-Vq_b6-9fqANmB2wf2cANmY0J3b7tD6IR6cQWttJq-LL3p4U72y2mc4fzzPqu-3nzc3d_Xq65flzdWqNpzQsbZtaa9piaYtmFZzEJQQg7loiJDQSd312giiDekELncOmneUSW56qS2z7Kz6dNQ9TN0AvYEwJu3VIblBpwcVtVPPI8Ht1DbeK4J50xDSFIWLR4UUS1d5VIPLBrwvfccpKyobITnDQhb03T_oPk7zix2pgkhC_lJb7UG5YGMpbGZRdVX-hguJF3PZy_9QZfcwOBMDWFf8zxI-HBNMijknsH-aJFjN86KezAv7DRetsHs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857078811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Sborgia, Alessandra ; Niro, Alfredo ; Pastore, Valentina ; Albano, Valeria ; Boscia, Giacomo ; Piepoli, Marina ; Di Pardo, Camilla ; Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo ; Zerbinati, Marta ; Landini, Luca ; Pignataro, Maria Grazia ; Petruzzella, Giovanni ; Donghia, Rossella ; Alqahtani, Abdullah S ; Coassin, Marco ; Dell’Omo, Roberto ; Boscia, Francesco ; Alessio, Giovanni ; Sborgia, Giancarlo</creator><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Alessandra ; Niro, Alfredo ; Pastore, Valentina ; Albano, Valeria ; Boscia, Giacomo ; Piepoli, Marina ; Di Pardo, Camilla ; Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo ; Zerbinati, Marta ; Landini, Luca ; Pignataro, Maria Grazia ; Petruzzella, Giovanni ; Donghia, Rossella ; Alqahtani, Abdullah S ; Coassin, Marco ; Dell’Omo, Roberto ; Boscia, Francesco ; Alessio, Giovanni ; Sborgia, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique for high myopic macular holes (hMMH). Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with hMMH after surgical hole closure underwent microperimetric biofeedback using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone (n = 12; Biofeedback) or standard of care with scheduled visits (n = 11; Control). Best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (RS) and 4° (CRS) with a mean deviation at central 12° (MD), and fixation stability as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99%) were assessed at baseline and month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The Mann–Whitney test was used to test the difference between the groups. Results: Baseline functional parameters were not significantly different among the groups. BCVA significantly improved in each group (Biofeedback, p = 0.002; Control, p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up visits. CRS significantly improved at 6 (p = 0.03) and 12 (p = 0.01) months in the Biofeedback group and at month 12 (p = 0.01) in the Control group. RS (p = 0.001) and MD (p = 0.005) improved at the last follow-up only in the trained group. After training, BCEA 68% and 95% significantly improved (6 and 12 months, p &lt; 0.05). The Biofeedback group had better results in RS (p ≤ 0.02), CRS (p ≤ 0.02), and BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the Control at all follow-ups. BCVA and MD were better in the Biofeedback group at month 3 (p = 0.01), and month 3 (p = 0.01) and 12 (p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions: Microperimetric biofeedback can increase retinal sensitivity and stabilize fixation better than the standard care over months after a successful inverted ILM-flap for hMMH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37629230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biofeedback ; Biofeedback training ; Care and treatment ; Cataracts ; Clinical medicine ; Demographic aspects ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Diagnosis ; Informed consent ; Myopia ; Patients ; Rehabilitation ; Scotoma ; Software ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Training ; Visual acuity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-08, Vol.12 (16), p.5188</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-f9651591a29ec9a4e7211c0475178eb8abdac71ac1b70eb84ea4b2384cd8af3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7951-3591 ; 0000-0001-5568-0400 ; 0000-0001-7271-0536 ; 0000-0002-6193-3299 ; 0000-0002-9140-673X ; 0000-0002-7663-8874 ; 0000-0002-8768-899X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455115/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455115/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niro, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastore, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albano, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscia, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepoli, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Pardo, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerbinati, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignataro, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petruzzella, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donghia, Rossella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alqahtani, Abdullah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coassin, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell’Omo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><title>Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><description>Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique for high myopic macular holes (hMMH). Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with hMMH after surgical hole closure underwent microperimetric biofeedback using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone (n = 12; Biofeedback) or standard of care with scheduled visits (n = 11; Control). Best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (RS) and 4° (CRS) with a mean deviation at central 12° (MD), and fixation stability as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99%) were assessed at baseline and month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The Mann–Whitney test was used to test the difference between the groups. Results: Baseline functional parameters were not significantly different among the groups. BCVA significantly improved in each group (Biofeedback, p = 0.002; Control, p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up visits. CRS significantly improved at 6 (p = 0.03) and 12 (p = 0.01) months in the Biofeedback group and at month 12 (p = 0.01) in the Control group. RS (p = 0.001) and MD (p = 0.005) improved at the last follow-up only in the trained group. After training, BCEA 68% and 95% significantly improved (6 and 12 months, p &lt; 0.05). The Biofeedback group had better results in RS (p ≤ 0.02), CRS (p ≤ 0.02), and BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the Control at all follow-ups. BCVA and MD were better in the Biofeedback group at month 3 (p = 0.01), and month 3 (p = 0.01) and 12 (p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions: Microperimetric biofeedback can increase retinal sensitivity and stabilize fixation better than the standard care over months after a successful inverted ILM-flap for hMMH.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biofeedback</subject><subject>Biofeedback training</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Myopia</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Scotoma</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpiT9giUsRSvFX1s4JtRWlK-2KA8vZcpzxrhfHXuykUsWfx9FW0CLsg8czz7yjsaeq3hJ8yViLP-7NQChZNETKF9UpxULUmEn28ol9Up3nvMdlSckpEa-rEyYWtKUMn1a_rl20AH2nzQ-0SdoFF7ZI2xES-jYZAznbyaNluIc0Ql-MEgnao5Ub3Dizaxi6pAOgi-Vq_b6-9fqANmB2wf2cANmY0J3b7tD6IR6cQWttJq-LL3p4U72y2mc4fzzPqu-3nzc3d_Xq65flzdWqNpzQsbZtaa9piaYtmFZzEJQQg7loiJDQSd312giiDekELncOmneUSW56qS2z7Kz6dNQ9TN0AvYEwJu3VIblBpwcVtVPPI8Ht1DbeK4J50xDSFIWLR4UUS1d5VIPLBrwvfccpKyobITnDQhb03T_oPk7zix2pgkhC_lJb7UG5YGMpbGZRdVX-hguJF3PZy_9QZfcwOBMDWFf8zxI-HBNMijknsH-aJFjN86KezAv7DRetsHs</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Sborgia, Alessandra</creator><creator>Niro, Alfredo</creator><creator>Pastore, Valentina</creator><creator>Albano, Valeria</creator><creator>Boscia, Giacomo</creator><creator>Piepoli, Marina</creator><creator>Di Pardo, Camilla</creator><creator>Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Zerbinati, Marta</creator><creator>Landini, Luca</creator><creator>Pignataro, Maria Grazia</creator><creator>Petruzzella, Giovanni</creator><creator>Donghia, Rossella</creator><creator>Alqahtani, Abdullah S</creator><creator>Coassin, Marco</creator><creator>Dell’Omo, Roberto</creator><creator>Boscia, Francesco</creator><creator>Alessio, Giovanni</creator><creator>Sborgia, Giancarlo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-3591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-0400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7271-0536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6193-3299</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-673X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-8874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8768-899X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole</title><author>Sborgia, Alessandra ; Niro, Alfredo ; Pastore, Valentina ; Albano, Valeria ; Boscia, Giacomo ; Piepoli, Marina ; Di Pardo, Camilla ; Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo ; Zerbinati, Marta ; Landini, Luca ; Pignataro, Maria Grazia ; Petruzzella, Giovanni ; Donghia, Rossella ; Alqahtani, Abdullah S ; Coassin, Marco ; Dell’Omo, Roberto ; Boscia, Francesco ; Alessio, Giovanni ; Sborgia, Giancarlo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-f9651591a29ec9a4e7211c0475178eb8abdac71ac1b70eb84ea4b2384cd8af3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biofeedback</topic><topic>Biofeedback training</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Myopia</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Scotoma</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niro, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastore, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albano, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscia, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepoli, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Pardo, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerbinati, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignataro, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petruzzella, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donghia, Rossella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alqahtani, Abdullah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coassin, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell’Omo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sborgia, Alessandra</au><au>Niro, Alfredo</au><au>Pastore, Valentina</au><au>Albano, Valeria</au><au>Boscia, Giacomo</au><au>Piepoli, Marina</au><au>Di Pardo, Camilla</au><au>Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo</au><au>Zerbinati, Marta</au><au>Landini, Luca</au><au>Pignataro, Maria Grazia</au><au>Petruzzella, Giovanni</au><au>Donghia, Rossella</au><au>Alqahtani, Abdullah S</au><au>Coassin, Marco</au><au>Dell’Omo, Roberto</au><au>Boscia, Francesco</au><au>Alessio, Giovanni</au><au>Sborgia, Giancarlo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>5188</spage><pages>5188-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique for high myopic macular holes (hMMH). Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with hMMH after surgical hole closure underwent microperimetric biofeedback using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone (n = 12; Biofeedback) or standard of care with scheduled visits (n = 11; Control). Best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (RS) and 4° (CRS) with a mean deviation at central 12° (MD), and fixation stability as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99%) were assessed at baseline and month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The Mann–Whitney test was used to test the difference between the groups. Results: Baseline functional parameters were not significantly different among the groups. BCVA significantly improved in each group (Biofeedback, p = 0.002; Control, p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up visits. CRS significantly improved at 6 (p = 0.03) and 12 (p = 0.01) months in the Biofeedback group and at month 12 (p = 0.01) in the Control group. RS (p = 0.001) and MD (p = 0.005) improved at the last follow-up only in the trained group. After training, BCEA 68% and 95% significantly improved (6 and 12 months, p &lt; 0.05). The Biofeedback group had better results in RS (p ≤ 0.02), CRS (p ≤ 0.02), and BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the Control at all follow-ups. BCVA and MD were better in the Biofeedback group at month 3 (p = 0.01), and month 3 (p = 0.01) and 12 (p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions: Microperimetric biofeedback can increase retinal sensitivity and stabilize fixation better than the standard care over months after a successful inverted ILM-flap for hMMH.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37629230</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm12165188</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-3591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-0400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7271-0536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6193-3299</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-673X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-8874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8768-899X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-08, Vol.12 (16), p.5188
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10455115
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Analysis
Biofeedback
Biofeedback training
Care and treatment
Cataracts
Clinical medicine
Demographic aspects
Diabetes
Diabetic retinopathy
Diagnosis
Informed consent
Myopia
Patients
Rehabilitation
Scotoma
Software
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Training
Visual acuity
title Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A55%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biofeedback%20Training%20after%20Successful%20Inverted%20Internal%20Limiting%20Membrane%20(ILM)-Flap%20Technique%20for%20High%20Myopic%20Macular%20Hole&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Sborgia,%20Alessandra&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=5188&rft.pages=5188-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm12165188&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA762478065%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857078811&rft_id=info:pmid/37629230&rft_galeid=A762478065&rfr_iscdi=true