Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole
Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Lim...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical medicine 2023-08, Vol.12 (16), p.5188 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 5188 |
container_title | Journal of clinical medicine |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Sborgia, Alessandra Niro, Alfredo Pastore, Valentina Albano, Valeria Boscia, Giacomo Piepoli, Marina Di Pardo, Camilla Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo Zerbinati, Marta Landini, Luca Pignataro, Maria Grazia Petruzzella, Giovanni Donghia, Rossella Alqahtani, Abdullah S Coassin, Marco Dell’Omo, Roberto Boscia, Francesco Alessio, Giovanni Sborgia, Giancarlo |
description | Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique for high myopic macular holes (hMMH). Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with hMMH after surgical hole closure underwent microperimetric biofeedback using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone (n = 12; Biofeedback) or standard of care with scheduled visits (n = 11; Control). Best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (RS) and 4° (CRS) with a mean deviation at central 12° (MD), and fixation stability as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99%) were assessed at baseline and month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The Mann–Whitney test was used to test the difference between the groups. Results: Baseline functional parameters were not significantly different among the groups. BCVA significantly improved in each group (Biofeedback, p = 0.002; Control, p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up visits. CRS significantly improved at 6 (p = 0.03) and 12 (p = 0.01) months in the Biofeedback group and at month 12 (p = 0.01) in the Control group. RS (p = 0.001) and MD (p = 0.005) improved at the last follow-up only in the trained group. After training, BCEA 68% and 95% significantly improved (6 and 12 months, p < 0.05). The Biofeedback group had better results in RS (p ≤ 0.02), CRS (p ≤ 0.02), and BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the Control at all follow-ups. BCVA and MD were better in the Biofeedback group at month 3 (p = 0.01), and month 3 (p = 0.01) and 12 (p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions: Microperimetric biofeedback can increase retinal sensitivity and stabilize fixation better than the standard care over months after a successful inverted ILM-flap for hMMH. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jcm12165188 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10455115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A762478065</galeid><sourcerecordid>A762478065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-f9651591a29ec9a4e7211c0475178eb8abdac71ac1b70eb84ea4b2384cd8af3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpiT9giUsRSvFX1s4JtRWlK-2KA8vZcpzxrhfHXuykUsWfx9FW0CLsg8czz7yjsaeq3hJ8yViLP-7NQChZNETKF9UpxULUmEn28ol9Up3nvMdlSckpEa-rEyYWtKUMn1a_rl20AH2nzQ-0SdoFF7ZI2xES-jYZAznbyaNluIc0Ql-MEgnao5Ub3Dizaxi6pAOgi-Vq_b6-9fqANmB2wf2cANmY0J3b7tD6IR6cQWttJq-LL3p4U72y2mc4fzzPqu-3nzc3d_Xq65flzdWqNpzQsbZtaa9piaYtmFZzEJQQg7loiJDQSd312giiDekELncOmneUSW56qS2z7Kz6dNQ9TN0AvYEwJu3VIblBpwcVtVPPI8Ht1DbeK4J50xDSFIWLR4UUS1d5VIPLBrwvfccpKyobITnDQhb03T_oPk7zix2pgkhC_lJb7UG5YGMpbGZRdVX-hguJF3PZy_9QZfcwOBMDWFf8zxI-HBNMijknsH-aJFjN86KezAv7DRetsHs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857078811</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Sborgia, Alessandra ; Niro, Alfredo ; Pastore, Valentina ; Albano, Valeria ; Boscia, Giacomo ; Piepoli, Marina ; Di Pardo, Camilla ; Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo ; Zerbinati, Marta ; Landini, Luca ; Pignataro, Maria Grazia ; Petruzzella, Giovanni ; Donghia, Rossella ; Alqahtani, Abdullah S ; Coassin, Marco ; Dell’Omo, Roberto ; Boscia, Francesco ; Alessio, Giovanni ; Sborgia, Giancarlo</creator><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Alessandra ; Niro, Alfredo ; Pastore, Valentina ; Albano, Valeria ; Boscia, Giacomo ; Piepoli, Marina ; Di Pardo, Camilla ; Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo ; Zerbinati, Marta ; Landini, Luca ; Pignataro, Maria Grazia ; Petruzzella, Giovanni ; Donghia, Rossella ; Alqahtani, Abdullah S ; Coassin, Marco ; Dell’Omo, Roberto ; Boscia, Francesco ; Alessio, Giovanni ; Sborgia, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique for high myopic macular holes (hMMH). Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with hMMH after surgical hole closure underwent microperimetric biofeedback using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone (n = 12; Biofeedback) or standard of care with scheduled visits (n = 11; Control). Best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (RS) and 4° (CRS) with a mean deviation at central 12° (MD), and fixation stability as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99%) were assessed at baseline and month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The Mann–Whitney test was used to test the difference between the groups. Results: Baseline functional parameters were not significantly different among the groups. BCVA significantly improved in each group (Biofeedback, p = 0.002; Control, p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up visits. CRS significantly improved at 6 (p = 0.03) and 12 (p = 0.01) months in the Biofeedback group and at month 12 (p = 0.01) in the Control group. RS (p = 0.001) and MD (p = 0.005) improved at the last follow-up only in the trained group. After training, BCEA 68% and 95% significantly improved (6 and 12 months, p < 0.05). The Biofeedback group had better results in RS (p ≤ 0.02), CRS (p ≤ 0.02), and BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the Control at all follow-ups. BCVA and MD were better in the Biofeedback group at month 3 (p = 0.01), and month 3 (p = 0.01) and 12 (p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions: Microperimetric biofeedback can increase retinal sensitivity and stabilize fixation better than the standard care over months after a successful inverted ILM-flap for hMMH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37629230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biofeedback ; Biofeedback training ; Care and treatment ; Cataracts ; Clinical medicine ; Demographic aspects ; Diabetes ; Diabetic retinopathy ; Diagnosis ; Informed consent ; Myopia ; Patients ; Rehabilitation ; Scotoma ; Software ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Training ; Visual acuity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-08, Vol.12 (16), p.5188</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-f9651591a29ec9a4e7211c0475178eb8abdac71ac1b70eb84ea4b2384cd8af3f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7951-3591 ; 0000-0001-5568-0400 ; 0000-0001-7271-0536 ; 0000-0002-6193-3299 ; 0000-0002-9140-673X ; 0000-0002-7663-8874 ; 0000-0002-8768-899X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455115/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10455115/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niro, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastore, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albano, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscia, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepoli, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Pardo, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerbinati, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignataro, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petruzzella, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donghia, Rossella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alqahtani, Abdullah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coassin, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell’Omo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><title>Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><description>Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique for high myopic macular holes (hMMH). Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with hMMH after surgical hole closure underwent microperimetric biofeedback using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone (n = 12; Biofeedback) or standard of care with scheduled visits (n = 11; Control). Best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (RS) and 4° (CRS) with a mean deviation at central 12° (MD), and fixation stability as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99%) were assessed at baseline and month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The Mann–Whitney test was used to test the difference between the groups. Results: Baseline functional parameters were not significantly different among the groups. BCVA significantly improved in each group (Biofeedback, p = 0.002; Control, p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up visits. CRS significantly improved at 6 (p = 0.03) and 12 (p = 0.01) months in the Biofeedback group and at month 12 (p = 0.01) in the Control group. RS (p = 0.001) and MD (p = 0.005) improved at the last follow-up only in the trained group. After training, BCEA 68% and 95% significantly improved (6 and 12 months, p < 0.05). The Biofeedback group had better results in RS (p ≤ 0.02), CRS (p ≤ 0.02), and BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the Control at all follow-ups. BCVA and MD were better in the Biofeedback group at month 3 (p = 0.01), and month 3 (p = 0.01) and 12 (p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions: Microperimetric biofeedback can increase retinal sensitivity and stabilize fixation better than the standard care over months after a successful inverted ILM-flap for hMMH.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biofeedback</subject><subject>Biofeedback training</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetic retinopathy</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Myopia</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Scotoma</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpiT9giUsRSvFX1s4JtRWlK-2KA8vZcpzxrhfHXuykUsWfx9FW0CLsg8czz7yjsaeq3hJ8yViLP-7NQChZNETKF9UpxULUmEn28ol9Up3nvMdlSckpEa-rEyYWtKUMn1a_rl20AH2nzQ-0SdoFF7ZI2xES-jYZAznbyaNluIc0Ql-MEgnao5Ub3Dizaxi6pAOgi-Vq_b6-9fqANmB2wf2cANmY0J3b7tD6IR6cQWttJq-LL3p4U72y2mc4fzzPqu-3nzc3d_Xq65flzdWqNpzQsbZtaa9piaYtmFZzEJQQg7loiJDQSd312giiDekELncOmneUSW56qS2z7Kz6dNQ9TN0AvYEwJu3VIblBpwcVtVPPI8Ht1DbeK4J50xDSFIWLR4UUS1d5VIPLBrwvfccpKyobITnDQhb03T_oPk7zix2pgkhC_lJb7UG5YGMpbGZRdVX-hguJF3PZy_9QZfcwOBMDWFf8zxI-HBNMijknsH-aJFjN86KezAv7DRetsHs</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Sborgia, Alessandra</creator><creator>Niro, Alfredo</creator><creator>Pastore, Valentina</creator><creator>Albano, Valeria</creator><creator>Boscia, Giacomo</creator><creator>Piepoli, Marina</creator><creator>Di Pardo, Camilla</creator><creator>Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Zerbinati, Marta</creator><creator>Landini, Luca</creator><creator>Pignataro, Maria Grazia</creator><creator>Petruzzella, Giovanni</creator><creator>Donghia, Rossella</creator><creator>Alqahtani, Abdullah S</creator><creator>Coassin, Marco</creator><creator>Dell’Omo, Roberto</creator><creator>Boscia, Francesco</creator><creator>Alessio, Giovanni</creator><creator>Sborgia, Giancarlo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-3591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-0400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7271-0536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6193-3299</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-673X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-8874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8768-899X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole</title><author>Sborgia, Alessandra ; Niro, Alfredo ; Pastore, Valentina ; Albano, Valeria ; Boscia, Giacomo ; Piepoli, Marina ; Di Pardo, Camilla ; Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo ; Zerbinati, Marta ; Landini, Luca ; Pignataro, Maria Grazia ; Petruzzella, Giovanni ; Donghia, Rossella ; Alqahtani, Abdullah S ; Coassin, Marco ; Dell’Omo, Roberto ; Boscia, Francesco ; Alessio, Giovanni ; Sborgia, Giancarlo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-f9651591a29ec9a4e7211c0475178eb8abdac71ac1b70eb84ea4b2384cd8af3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biofeedback</topic><topic>Biofeedback training</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetic retinopathy</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Myopia</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Scotoma</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niro, Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastore, Valentina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albano, Valeria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscia, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepoli, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Pardo, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zerbinati, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignataro, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petruzzella, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donghia, Rossella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alqahtani, Abdullah S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coassin, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dell’Omo, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boscia, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sborgia, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sborgia, Alessandra</au><au>Niro, Alfredo</au><au>Pastore, Valentina</au><au>Albano, Valeria</au><au>Boscia, Giacomo</au><au>Piepoli, Marina</au><au>Di Pardo, Camilla</au><au>Accurso Tagano, Lorenzo</au><au>Zerbinati, Marta</au><au>Landini, Luca</au><au>Pignataro, Maria Grazia</au><au>Petruzzella, Giovanni</au><au>Donghia, Rossella</au><au>Alqahtani, Abdullah S</au><au>Coassin, Marco</au><au>Dell’Omo, Roberto</au><au>Boscia, Francesco</au><au>Alessio, Giovanni</au><au>Sborgia, Giancarlo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>5188</spage><pages>5188-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Background: Microperimetric biofeedback training improved visual acuity and fixation stability in patients who previously underwent macular surgery. We aimed to compare the functional results of biofeedback training with the standard of care in patients who underwent successful inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-flap technique for high myopic macular holes (hMMH). Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, cohort study. Patients with hMMH after surgical hole closure underwent microperimetric biofeedback using structured light stimulus plus acoustic tone (n = 12; Biofeedback) or standard of care with scheduled visits (n = 11; Control). Best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity at central 12° (RS) and 4° (CRS) with a mean deviation at central 12° (MD), and fixation stability as bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99%) were assessed at baseline and month 1, 3, 6, and 12. The Mann–Whitney test was used to test the difference between the groups. Results: Baseline functional parameters were not significantly different among the groups. BCVA significantly improved in each group (Biofeedback, p = 0.002; Control, p ≤ 0.02) at all follow-up visits. CRS significantly improved at 6 (p = 0.03) and 12 (p = 0.01) months in the Biofeedback group and at month 12 (p = 0.01) in the Control group. RS (p = 0.001) and MD (p = 0.005) improved at the last follow-up only in the trained group. After training, BCEA 68% and 95% significantly improved (6 and 12 months, p < 0.05). The Biofeedback group had better results in RS (p ≤ 0.02), CRS (p ≤ 0.02), and BCEA 68%, 95%, and 99% (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the Control at all follow-ups. BCVA and MD were better in the Biofeedback group at month 3 (p = 0.01), and month 3 (p = 0.01) and 12 (p = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions: Microperimetric biofeedback can increase retinal sensitivity and stabilize fixation better than the standard care over months after a successful inverted ILM-flap for hMMH.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37629230</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm12165188</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-3591</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5568-0400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7271-0536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6193-3299</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-673X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-8874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8768-899X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2077-0383 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-08, Vol.12 (16), p.5188 |
issn | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10455115 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Analysis Biofeedback Biofeedback training Care and treatment Cataracts Clinical medicine Demographic aspects Diabetes Diabetic retinopathy Diagnosis Informed consent Myopia Patients Rehabilitation Scotoma Software Surgery Surgical outcomes Training Visual acuity |
title | Biofeedback Training after Successful Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane (ILM)-Flap Technique for High Myopic Macular Hole |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A55%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biofeedback%20Training%20after%20Successful%20Inverted%20Internal%20Limiting%20Membrane%20(ILM)-Flap%20Technique%20for%20High%20Myopic%20Macular%20Hole&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Sborgia,%20Alessandra&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=5188&rft.pages=5188-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm12165188&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA762478065%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857078811&rft_id=info:pmid/37629230&rft_galeid=A762478065&rfr_iscdi=true |