Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review
Purpose To identify supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers. Methods Experimental studies conducted among men with any urological cancer were eligible for inclusion. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, Social Sciences F...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Supportive care in cancer 2023-09, Vol.31 (9), p.530, Article 530 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 530 |
| container_title | Supportive care in cancer |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Saab, Mohamad M. McCarthy, Megan Murphy, Mike Medved, Katarina O’Malley, Maria Bambury, Richard M. Gleeson, Jack P. Noonan, Brendan |
| description | Purpose
To identify supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers.
Methods
Experimental studies conducted among men with any urological cancer were eligible for inclusion. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson), SocINDEX with Full Text, ERIC, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on 6 December 2022. No database limits were applied. The included studies were methodologically appraised. A narrative synthesis of the results was conducted.
Results
Thirty studies were included with 10 categories of interventions identified. Over 300 outcomes were measured, and more than 100 instruments were used. Multicomponent interventions generally led to positive changes in physiological outcomes like body mass index, as well as exercise tolerance and quality of life. This change, however, was not sustained in the long term. Cognitive-behavioural interventions significantly improved psychological symptoms but seldom physical symptoms. Telephone and web-based interventions showed great promise in improving outcomes like depression, positive affect, negative affect, perceived stress, spiritual wellbeing and fatigue. Findings from physical activity/exercise-based interventions were promising for both, physical and psychological outcomes. Rehabilitative interventions were associated with significant improvements in quality of life, urinary symptoms and psychological symptoms, albeit in the short term. Mixed results were reported for nurse-led interventions, family-based interventions and nutritional interventions.
Conclusion
All but one study focused exclusively on prostate cancer. The included studies were significantly heterogeneous. Multicomponent, cognitive-behavioural, telephone and web-based, physical activity/exercise-based and rehabilitative interventions showed great promise in improving various outcomes. This improvement, however, was often short-lived. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00520-023-07984-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10442278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A761714649</galeid><sourcerecordid>A761714649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9d17cff968c32288b50e123dd1eb6f087ec16d21359663f0708d64ec34c7863f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kktv1TAQhS0EopfCH2CBIrFhkzJ-J2xQVfGSKnUBrK1cZ5y6SuxgJ7fi3-PbW1qKEPLC0sx3jj32IeQlhRMKoN9mAMmgBsZr0G0janhENlRwXmvO28dkA62gteBSHpFnOV8BUK0le0qOuFbAQbMNufi6znNMi99hZbuElQ8Lph2GxceQKxdTNWGorv1yWa0pjnHwthsLGiym_K7qqmzj7MNQJdx5vH5OnrhuzPjidj8m3z9--Hb2uT6_-PTl7PS8tlKwpW57qq1zrWosZ6xpthKQMt73FLfKQaPRUtUzymWrFHegoemVQMuF1U0p8GPy_uA7r9sJe1sunLrRzMlPXfppYufNw07wl2aIO0NBCMZ0Uxze3Dqk-GPFvJjJZ4vj2AWMazaskYILpbQq6Ou_0Ku4plDmu6Eo1ZK399TQjWh8cLEcbPem5lQrqqlQYk-d_IMqq8fJ2xjQ-VJ_IGAHgU0x54TubkgKZp8Dc8iBKTkwNzkwUESv_nyeO8nvjy8APwC5tMKA6X6k_9j-AtiFvJM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2854117539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Saab, Mohamad M. ; McCarthy, Megan ; Murphy, Mike ; Medved, Katarina ; O’Malley, Maria ; Bambury, Richard M. ; Gleeson, Jack P. ; Noonan, Brendan</creator><creatorcontrib>Saab, Mohamad M. ; McCarthy, Megan ; Murphy, Mike ; Medved, Katarina ; O’Malley, Maria ; Bambury, Richard M. ; Gleeson, Jack P. ; Noonan, Brendan</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To identify supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers.
Methods
Experimental studies conducted among men with any urological cancer were eligible for inclusion. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson), SocINDEX with Full Text, ERIC, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on 6 December 2022. No database limits were applied. The included studies were methodologically appraised. A narrative synthesis of the results was conducted.
Results
Thirty studies were included with 10 categories of interventions identified. Over 300 outcomes were measured, and more than 100 instruments were used. Multicomponent interventions generally led to positive changes in physiological outcomes like body mass index, as well as exercise tolerance and quality of life. This change, however, was not sustained in the long term. Cognitive-behavioural interventions significantly improved psychological symptoms but seldom physical symptoms. Telephone and web-based interventions showed great promise in improving outcomes like depression, positive affect, negative affect, perceived stress, spiritual wellbeing and fatigue. Findings from physical activity/exercise-based interventions were promising for both, physical and psychological outcomes. Rehabilitative interventions were associated with significant improvements in quality of life, urinary symptoms and psychological symptoms, albeit in the short term. Mixed results were reported for nurse-led interventions, family-based interventions and nutritional interventions.
Conclusion
All but one study focused exclusively on prostate cancer. The included studies were significantly heterogeneous. Multicomponent, cognitive-behavioural, telephone and web-based, physical activity/exercise-based and rehabilitative interventions showed great promise in improving various outcomes. This improvement, however, was often short-lived.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07984-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37603072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Body Mass Index ; Cancer ; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ; Exercise ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mens health ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Pain Medicine ; Palliative care ; Physical fitness ; Physiological aspects ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms ; Quality of Life ; Rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Review ; Symptom management ; Urologic Neoplasms - therapy ; Urological cancer</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2023-09, Vol.31 (9), p.530, Article 530</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9d17cff968c32288b50e123dd1eb6f087ec16d21359663f0708d64ec34c7863f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9d17cff968c32288b50e123dd1eb6f087ec16d21359663f0708d64ec34c7863f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1415-8461 ; 0000-0002-7277-6268 ; 0000-0001-6908-495X ; 0000-0002-0495-8588 ; 0000-0002-8379-3813 ; 0000-0002-1227-7045 ; 0000-0002-2189-6972</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-023-07984-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-023-07984-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37603072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saab, Mohamad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medved, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Malley, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bambury, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleeson, Jack P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noonan, Brendan</creatorcontrib><title>Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose
To identify supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers.
Methods
Experimental studies conducted among men with any urological cancer were eligible for inclusion. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson), SocINDEX with Full Text, ERIC, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on 6 December 2022. No database limits were applied. The included studies were methodologically appraised. A narrative synthesis of the results was conducted.
Results
Thirty studies were included with 10 categories of interventions identified. Over 300 outcomes were measured, and more than 100 instruments were used. Multicomponent interventions generally led to positive changes in physiological outcomes like body mass index, as well as exercise tolerance and quality of life. This change, however, was not sustained in the long term. Cognitive-behavioural interventions significantly improved psychological symptoms but seldom physical symptoms. Telephone and web-based interventions showed great promise in improving outcomes like depression, positive affect, negative affect, perceived stress, spiritual wellbeing and fatigue. Findings from physical activity/exercise-based interventions were promising for both, physical and psychological outcomes. Rehabilitative interventions were associated with significant improvements in quality of life, urinary symptoms and psychological symptoms, albeit in the short term. Mixed results were reported for nurse-led interventions, family-based interventions and nutritional interventions.
Conclusion
All but one study focused exclusively on prostate cancer. The included studies were significantly heterogeneous. Multicomponent, cognitive-behavioural, telephone and web-based, physical activity/exercise-based and rehabilitative interventions showed great promise in improving various outcomes. This improvement, however, was often short-lived.</description><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mens health</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Symptom management</subject><subject>Urologic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Urological cancer</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kktv1TAQhS0EopfCH2CBIrFhkzJ-J2xQVfGSKnUBrK1cZ5y6SuxgJ7fi3-PbW1qKEPLC0sx3jj32IeQlhRMKoN9mAMmgBsZr0G0janhENlRwXmvO28dkA62gteBSHpFnOV8BUK0le0qOuFbAQbMNufi6znNMi99hZbuElQ8Lph2GxceQKxdTNWGorv1yWa0pjnHwthsLGiym_K7qqmzj7MNQJdx5vH5OnrhuzPjidj8m3z9--Hb2uT6_-PTl7PS8tlKwpW57qq1zrWosZ6xpthKQMt73FLfKQaPRUtUzymWrFHegoemVQMuF1U0p8GPy_uA7r9sJe1sunLrRzMlPXfppYufNw07wl2aIO0NBCMZ0Uxze3Dqk-GPFvJjJZ4vj2AWMazaskYILpbQq6Ou_0Ku4plDmu6Eo1ZK399TQjWh8cLEcbPem5lQrqqlQYk-d_IMqq8fJ2xjQ-VJ_IGAHgU0x54TubkgKZp8Dc8iBKTkwNzkwUESv_nyeO8nvjy8APwC5tMKA6X6k_9j-AtiFvJM</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Saab, Mohamad M.</creator><creator>McCarthy, Megan</creator><creator>Murphy, Mike</creator><creator>Medved, Katarina</creator><creator>O’Malley, Maria</creator><creator>Bambury, Richard M.</creator><creator>Gleeson, Jack P.</creator><creator>Noonan, Brendan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1415-8461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7277-6268</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-495X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-8588</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8379-3813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1227-7045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2189-6972</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review</title><author>Saab, Mohamad M. ; McCarthy, Megan ; Murphy, Mike ; Medved, Katarina ; O’Malley, Maria ; Bambury, Richard M. ; Gleeson, Jack P. ; Noonan, Brendan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c542t-9d17cff968c32288b50e123dd1eb6f087ec16d21359663f0708d64ec34c7863f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cognitive Behavioral Therapy</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mens health</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Symptom management</topic><topic>Urologic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Urological cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saab, Mohamad M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medved, Katarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Malley, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bambury, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleeson, Jack P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noonan, Brendan</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saab, Mohamad M.</au><au>McCarthy, Megan</au><au>Murphy, Mike</au><au>Medved, Katarina</au><au>O’Malley, Maria</au><au>Bambury, Richard M.</au><au>Gleeson, Jack P.</au><au>Noonan, Brendan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>530</spage><pages>530-</pages><artnum>530</artnum><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To identify supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers.
Methods
Experimental studies conducted among men with any urological cancer were eligible for inclusion. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson), SocINDEX with Full Text, ERIC, Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on 6 December 2022. No database limits were applied. The included studies were methodologically appraised. A narrative synthesis of the results was conducted.
Results
Thirty studies were included with 10 categories of interventions identified. Over 300 outcomes were measured, and more than 100 instruments were used. Multicomponent interventions generally led to positive changes in physiological outcomes like body mass index, as well as exercise tolerance and quality of life. This change, however, was not sustained in the long term. Cognitive-behavioural interventions significantly improved psychological symptoms but seldom physical symptoms. Telephone and web-based interventions showed great promise in improving outcomes like depression, positive affect, negative affect, perceived stress, spiritual wellbeing and fatigue. Findings from physical activity/exercise-based interventions were promising for both, physical and psychological outcomes. Rehabilitative interventions were associated with significant improvements in quality of life, urinary symptoms and psychological symptoms, albeit in the short term. Mixed results were reported for nurse-led interventions, family-based interventions and nutritional interventions.
Conclusion
All but one study focused exclusively on prostate cancer. The included studies were significantly heterogeneous. Multicomponent, cognitive-behavioural, telephone and web-based, physical activity/exercise-based and rehabilitative interventions showed great promise in improving various outcomes. This improvement, however, was often short-lived.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37603072</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-023-07984-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1415-8461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7277-6268</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-495X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0495-8588</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8379-3813</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1227-7045</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2189-6972</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0941-4355 |
| ispartof | Supportive care in cancer, 2023-09, Vol.31 (9), p.530, Article 530 |
| issn | 0941-4355 1433-7339 1433-7339 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10442278 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Body Mass Index Cancer Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Exercise Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mens health Nursing Nursing Research Oncology Pain Medicine Palliative care Physical fitness Physiological aspects Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms Quality of Life Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Medicine Review Symptom management Urologic Neoplasms - therapy Urological cancer |
| title | Supportive care interventions for men with urological cancers: a scoping review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A32%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supportive%20care%20interventions%20for%20men%20with%20urological%20cancers:%20a%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Saab,%20Mohamad%20M.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=530&rft.pages=530-&rft.artnum=530&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-023-07984-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA761714649%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2854117539&rft_id=info:pmid/37603072&rft_galeid=A761714649&rfr_iscdi=true |