From biorepositories to data repositories: Open-access resources accelerate early R&D and validation of equitable diagnostic tools
Diagnostics are critical tools that guide clinical decision-making for patient care and support disease surveillance. Despite its importance, developers and manufacturers often note that access to specimen panels and essential reagents is one of the key challenges in developing quality diagnostics,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLOS global public health 2023-08, Vol.3 (8), p.e0002044-e0002044 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e0002044 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e0002044 |
container_title | PLOS global public health |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Peck, Roger Storey, Helen L. Barney, Becky Israeli, Shirli Halas, Olivia Oroszlan, Deborah Brodsky, Shiri Agarwal, Neha Murphy, Eileen Sagalovsky, Mariana Cohen, Jessica Trias, Elizabeth Schutzer, Aaron Boyle, David S. |
description | Diagnostics are critical tools that guide clinical decision-making for patient care and support disease surveillance. Despite its importance, developers and manufacturers often note that access to specimen panels and essential reagents is one of the key challenges in developing quality diagnostics, particularly in low-resource settings. A recent example, as the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded there was a need for clinical samples across the globe to support the rapid development of diagnostics. To address these challenges and gaps, PATH, a global nonprofit, along with its partners collaborated to create a COVID-19 biorepository to improve access to biological samples. Since then, the need for data resources to advance universal rapid diagnostic test (RDT) readers and noninvasive clinical measurement tools for screening children have also been identified and initiated. From biospecimens to data files, there are more similarities than differences in creating open-access repositories. And to ensure equitable technologies are developed, diverse sample panels and datasets are critical in the development process. Here we share one experience in creating open-access repositories as a case study to describe the steps taken, the key factors required to establish a biorepository, the ethical and legal frameworks that guided the initiative and the lessons learned. As diagnostic tools are evolving, more forms of data are critical to de-risk and accelerate early research and development (R&D) for products serving low resource settings. Creating physical and virtual repositories of freely available, well characterized, and high quality clinical and electronic data resources defray development costs to improve equitable access and test affordability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10426984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2851870373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-2adf59d239400a05e8909b4a870d5c87148b9964325b38aa04156a884a0f9bc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1LxDAUDKKoqP_AQ07ipWu-2iReRPwGYUH0HF7bdI1km5q0C1795WbZRfT0hnnDzHsMQqeUzCiX9OIjTLEHPxsWw_uMEMKIEDvokMlKFpzLcvcPPkAnKX2sRYoSqfk-OsisYqSih-j7PoYlrl2IdgjJjSE6m_AYcAsj4L_kJZ4Pti-gaWxKeZPyCRniNeFthNFiC9F_4ZezWwx9i1fgXXZxocehw_ZzciPU3uLWwaIPaXRNzgk-HaO9DnyyJ9t5hN7u715vHovn-cPTzfVz0TBORcGg7UrdMq4FIUBKqzTRtQAlSVs2SlKhaq0rwVlZcwVABC0rUEoA6XTdSH6Erja-w1QvbdvYfozgzRDdEuKXCeDM_03v3s0irAwlglVaiexwvnWI4XOyaTRLl_L3HnobpmSYKmk-h0uepWIjbWJIKdruN4cSs67QbCs06wrNtkL-A318k_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2851870373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>From biorepositories to data repositories: Open-access resources accelerate early R&D and validation of equitable diagnostic tools</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Peck, Roger ; Storey, Helen L. ; Barney, Becky ; Israeli, Shirli ; Halas, Olivia ; Oroszlan, Deborah ; Brodsky, Shiri ; Agarwal, Neha ; Murphy, Eileen ; Sagalovsky, Mariana ; Cohen, Jessica ; Trias, Elizabeth ; Schutzer, Aaron ; Boyle, David S.</creator><contributor>Kajungu, Dan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peck, Roger ; Storey, Helen L. ; Barney, Becky ; Israeli, Shirli ; Halas, Olivia ; Oroszlan, Deborah ; Brodsky, Shiri ; Agarwal, Neha ; Murphy, Eileen ; Sagalovsky, Mariana ; Cohen, Jessica ; Trias, Elizabeth ; Schutzer, Aaron ; Boyle, David S. ; Kajungu, Dan</creatorcontrib><description>Diagnostics are critical tools that guide clinical decision-making for patient care and support disease surveillance. Despite its importance, developers and manufacturers often note that access to specimen panels and essential reagents is one of the key challenges in developing quality diagnostics, particularly in low-resource settings. A recent example, as the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded there was a need for clinical samples across the globe to support the rapid development of diagnostics. To address these challenges and gaps, PATH, a global nonprofit, along with its partners collaborated to create a COVID-19 biorepository to improve access to biological samples. Since then, the need for data resources to advance universal rapid diagnostic test (RDT) readers and noninvasive clinical measurement tools for screening children have also been identified and initiated. From biospecimens to data files, there are more similarities than differences in creating open-access repositories. And to ensure equitable technologies are developed, diverse sample panels and datasets are critical in the development process. Here we share one experience in creating open-access repositories as a case study to describe the steps taken, the key factors required to establish a biorepository, the ethical and legal frameworks that guided the initiative and the lessons learned. As diagnostic tools are evolving, more forms of data are critical to de-risk and accelerate early research and development (R&D) for products serving low resource settings. Creating physical and virtual repositories of freely available, well characterized, and high quality clinical and electronic data resources defray development costs to improve equitable access and test affordability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2767-3375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002044</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37582061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco, CA USA: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences ; People and places ; Science Policy</subject><ispartof>PLOS global public health, 2023-08, Vol.3 (8), p.e0002044-e0002044</ispartof><rights>2023 Peck et al 2023 Peck et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-2adf59d239400a05e8909b4a870d5c87148b9964325b38aa04156a884a0f9bc73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-2adf59d239400a05e8909b4a870d5c87148b9964325b38aa04156a884a0f9bc73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6263-2749 ; 0000-0003-1085-2883</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426984/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426984/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2928,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Kajungu, Dan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peck, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storey, Helen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barney, Becky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Israeli, Shirli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halas, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oroszlan, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodsky, Shiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagalovsky, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trias, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutzer, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, David S.</creatorcontrib><title>From biorepositories to data repositories: Open-access resources accelerate early R&D and validation of equitable diagnostic tools</title><title>PLOS global public health</title><description>Diagnostics are critical tools that guide clinical decision-making for patient care and support disease surveillance. Despite its importance, developers and manufacturers often note that access to specimen panels and essential reagents is one of the key challenges in developing quality diagnostics, particularly in low-resource settings. A recent example, as the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded there was a need for clinical samples across the globe to support the rapid development of diagnostics. To address these challenges and gaps, PATH, a global nonprofit, along with its partners collaborated to create a COVID-19 biorepository to improve access to biological samples. Since then, the need for data resources to advance universal rapid diagnostic test (RDT) readers and noninvasive clinical measurement tools for screening children have also been identified and initiated. From biospecimens to data files, there are more similarities than differences in creating open-access repositories. And to ensure equitable technologies are developed, diverse sample panels and datasets are critical in the development process. Here we share one experience in creating open-access repositories as a case study to describe the steps taken, the key factors required to establish a biorepository, the ethical and legal frameworks that guided the initiative and the lessons learned. As diagnostic tools are evolving, more forms of data are critical to de-risk and accelerate early research and development (R&D) for products serving low resource settings. Creating physical and virtual repositories of freely available, well characterized, and high quality clinical and electronic data resources defray development costs to improve equitable access and test affordability.</description><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>People and places</subject><subject>Science Policy</subject><issn>2767-3375</issn><issn>2767-3375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1LxDAUDKKoqP_AQ07ipWu-2iReRPwGYUH0HF7bdI1km5q0C1795WbZRfT0hnnDzHsMQqeUzCiX9OIjTLEHPxsWw_uMEMKIEDvokMlKFpzLcvcPPkAnKX2sRYoSqfk-OsisYqSih-j7PoYlrl2IdgjJjSE6m_AYcAsj4L_kJZ4Pti-gaWxKeZPyCRniNeFthNFiC9F_4ZezWwx9i1fgXXZxocehw_ZzciPU3uLWwaIPaXRNzgk-HaO9DnyyJ9t5hN7u715vHovn-cPTzfVz0TBORcGg7UrdMq4FIUBKqzTRtQAlSVs2SlKhaq0rwVlZcwVABC0rUEoA6XTdSH6Erja-w1QvbdvYfozgzRDdEuKXCeDM_03v3s0irAwlglVaiexwvnWI4XOyaTRLl_L3HnobpmSYKmk-h0uepWIjbWJIKdruN4cSs67QbCs06wrNtkL-A318k_A</recordid><startdate>20230815</startdate><enddate>20230815</enddate><creator>Peck, Roger</creator><creator>Storey, Helen L.</creator><creator>Barney, Becky</creator><creator>Israeli, Shirli</creator><creator>Halas, Olivia</creator><creator>Oroszlan, Deborah</creator><creator>Brodsky, Shiri</creator><creator>Agarwal, Neha</creator><creator>Murphy, Eileen</creator><creator>Sagalovsky, Mariana</creator><creator>Cohen, Jessica</creator><creator>Trias, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Schutzer, Aaron</creator><creator>Boyle, David S.</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-2749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1085-2883</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230815</creationdate><title>From biorepositories to data repositories: Open-access resources accelerate early R&D and validation of equitable diagnostic tools</title><author>Peck, Roger ; Storey, Helen L. ; Barney, Becky ; Israeli, Shirli ; Halas, Olivia ; Oroszlan, Deborah ; Brodsky, Shiri ; Agarwal, Neha ; Murphy, Eileen ; Sagalovsky, Mariana ; Cohen, Jessica ; Trias, Elizabeth ; Schutzer, Aaron ; Boyle, David S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-2adf59d239400a05e8909b4a870d5c87148b9964325b38aa04156a884a0f9bc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>People and places</topic><topic>Science Policy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peck, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storey, Helen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barney, Becky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Israeli, Shirli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halas, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oroszlan, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodsky, Shiri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagalovsky, Mariana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trias, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutzer, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, David S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PLOS global public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peck, Roger</au><au>Storey, Helen L.</au><au>Barney, Becky</au><au>Israeli, Shirli</au><au>Halas, Olivia</au><au>Oroszlan, Deborah</au><au>Brodsky, Shiri</au><au>Agarwal, Neha</au><au>Murphy, Eileen</au><au>Sagalovsky, Mariana</au><au>Cohen, Jessica</au><au>Trias, Elizabeth</au><au>Schutzer, Aaron</au><au>Boyle, David S.</au><au>Kajungu, Dan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>From biorepositories to data repositories: Open-access resources accelerate early R&D and validation of equitable diagnostic tools</atitle><jtitle>PLOS global public health</jtitle><date>2023-08-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0002044</spage><epage>e0002044</epage><pages>e0002044-e0002044</pages><issn>2767-3375</issn><eissn>2767-3375</eissn><abstract>Diagnostics are critical tools that guide clinical decision-making for patient care and support disease surveillance. Despite its importance, developers and manufacturers often note that access to specimen panels and essential reagents is one of the key challenges in developing quality diagnostics, particularly in low-resource settings. A recent example, as the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded there was a need for clinical samples across the globe to support the rapid development of diagnostics. To address these challenges and gaps, PATH, a global nonprofit, along with its partners collaborated to create a COVID-19 biorepository to improve access to biological samples. Since then, the need for data resources to advance universal rapid diagnostic test (RDT) readers and noninvasive clinical measurement tools for screening children have also been identified and initiated. From biospecimens to data files, there are more similarities than differences in creating open-access repositories. And to ensure equitable technologies are developed, diverse sample panels and datasets are critical in the development process. Here we share one experience in creating open-access repositories as a case study to describe the steps taken, the key factors required to establish a biorepository, the ethical and legal frameworks that guided the initiative and the lessons learned. As diagnostic tools are evolving, more forms of data are critical to de-risk and accelerate early research and development (R&D) for products serving low resource settings. Creating physical and virtual repositories of freely available, well characterized, and high quality clinical and electronic data resources defray development costs to improve equitable access and test affordability.</abstract><cop>San Francisco, CA USA</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>37582061</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pgph.0002044</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-2749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1085-2883</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2767-3375 |
ispartof | PLOS global public health, 2023-08, Vol.3 (8), p.e0002044-e0002044 |
issn | 2767-3375 2767-3375 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10426984 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Medicine and Health Sciences People and places Science Policy |
title | From biorepositories to data repositories: Open-access resources accelerate early R&D and validation of equitable diagnostic tools |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A38%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=From%20biorepositories%20to%20data%20repositories:%20Open-access%20resources%20accelerate%20early%20R&D%20and%20validation%20of%20equitable%20diagnostic%20tools&rft.jtitle=PLOS%20global%20public%20health&rft.au=Peck,%20Roger&rft.date=2023-08-15&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0002044&rft.epage=e0002044&rft.pages=e0002044-e0002044&rft.issn=2767-3375&rft.eissn=2767-3375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002044&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2851870373%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2851870373&rft_id=info:pmid/37582061&rfr_iscdi=true |