Patient-Reported Outcomes as Interradiographic Predictors of Response in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
PURPOSEMinimally invasive biomarkers have been used as important indicators of treatment response and progression in cancers such as prostate and ovarian. Unfortunately, all biomarkers are not prognostic in all cancer types and are often not routinely collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical cancer research 2023-08, Vol.29 (16), p.3142-3150 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3150 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 3142 |
container_title | Clinical cancer research |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Bhatt, Ambika S. Schabath, Matthew B. Hoogland, Aasha I. Jim, Heather S.L. Brady-Nicholls, Renee |
description | PURPOSEMinimally invasive biomarkers have been used as important indicators of treatment response and progression in cancers such as prostate and ovarian. Unfortunately, all biomarkers are not prognostic in all cancer types and are often not routinely collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a non-obtrusive, personalized measure of a patient's quality of life and symptomatology, reported directly from the patient, and are increasingly collected as part of routine care. Previous literature has shown correlations between specific PROs (i.e., insomnia, fatigue) and overall survival. Although promising, these studies often only consider single time points and ignore patient-specific dynamic changes in individual PROs, which might be early predictors of treatment response or progression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNIn this study, PRO dynamics were analyzed to determine if they could be used as interradiographic predictors of tumor volume changes among 85 patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing immunotherapy. PRO questionnaires and tumor volume scans were completed biweekly and monthly, respectively. Correlation and predictive analysis were conducted to identify specific PROs that could accurately predict patient response. RESULTSChanges in tumor volume over time were significantly correlated with dizziness (P < 0.005), insomnia (P < 0.05), and fatigue (P < 0.05). In addition, cumulative changes in insomnia could predict progressive disease with a 77% accuracy, on average 45 days prior to the next imaging scan. CONCLUSIONSThis study presents the first time that patient-specific PRO dynamics have been considered to predict how individual patients will respond to treatment. This is an important first step in adapting treatment to improve response rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0396 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10425729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2820031943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-8b05f4f230a21667b288d2c6dbb127ac973b243e6f3ba645c7d682a91712a1003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1r3TAQFCWlSdP-hIKOvTiVVrYkn0IwSRt4JOG1PQtZXr-oPEuuZBd663_IP-wvqR75gF52F3aYYWYI-cDZGeeN_sSZ0hWrBZx13bYCUTHRylfkhDeNqgTI5qjcz5hj8jbnH4zxmrP6DTkWCoRotTwheGcXj2GptjjHtOBAb9fFxQkztZlehwVTsoOPu2Tne-_oXcLBuyWmTONIt5jnGDJSH-hNDH__PHyd7H5POyxjs4Yd7WxwmN6R16PdZ3z_tE_J96vLb92XanP7-bq72FRO6HapdM-asR5BMAtcStWD1gM4OfQ9B2Vdq0QPtUA5it7KunFqkBpsyxUHyxkTp-T8kXde-wkHV4wluzdz8pNNv0203vz_Cf7e7OIvU2KBRkFbGD4-MaT4c8W8mMlnV-zYgHHNBjQUHd7WokCbR6hLMeeE44sOZ-bQkTnkbw75m9KRAWEOHYl_oP6FbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2820031943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes as Interradiographic Predictors of Response in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer</title><source>American Association for Cancer Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bhatt, Ambika S. ; Schabath, Matthew B. ; Hoogland, Aasha I. ; Jim, Heather S.L. ; Brady-Nicholls, Renee</creator><creatorcontrib>Bhatt, Ambika S. ; Schabath, Matthew B. ; Hoogland, Aasha I. ; Jim, Heather S.L. ; Brady-Nicholls, Renee</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSEMinimally invasive biomarkers have been used as important indicators of treatment response and progression in cancers such as prostate and ovarian. Unfortunately, all biomarkers are not prognostic in all cancer types and are often not routinely collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a non-obtrusive, personalized measure of a patient's quality of life and symptomatology, reported directly from the patient, and are increasingly collected as part of routine care. Previous literature has shown correlations between specific PROs (i.e., insomnia, fatigue) and overall survival. Although promising, these studies often only consider single time points and ignore patient-specific dynamic changes in individual PROs, which might be early predictors of treatment response or progression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNIn this study, PRO dynamics were analyzed to determine if they could be used as interradiographic predictors of tumor volume changes among 85 patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing immunotherapy. PRO questionnaires and tumor volume scans were completed biweekly and monthly, respectively. Correlation and predictive analysis were conducted to identify specific PROs that could accurately predict patient response. RESULTSChanges in tumor volume over time were significantly correlated with dizziness (P < 0.005), insomnia (P < 0.05), and fatigue (P < 0.05). In addition, cumulative changes in insomnia could predict progressive disease with a 77% accuracy, on average 45 days prior to the next imaging scan. CONCLUSIONSThis study presents the first time that patient-specific PRO dynamics have been considered to predict how individual patients will respond to treatment. This is an important first step in adapting treatment to improve response rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-0432</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-3265</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0396</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37233986</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Association for Cancer Research</publisher><subject>Translational Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy</subject><ispartof>Clinical cancer research, 2023-08, Vol.29 (16), p.3142-3150</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research 2023 American Association for Cancer Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-8b05f4f230a21667b288d2c6dbb127ac973b243e6f3ba645c7d682a91712a1003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-8b05f4f230a21667b288d2c6dbb127ac973b243e6f3ba645c7d682a91712a1003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8691-8132 ; 0000-0001-7353-3711 ; 0009-0007-0015-3807 ; 0000-0003-3241-3216 ; 0000-0003-1759-8283</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3343,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bhatt, Ambika S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schabath, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogland, Aasha I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jim, Heather S.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady-Nicholls, Renee</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes as Interradiographic Predictors of Response in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer</title><title>Clinical cancer research</title><description>PURPOSEMinimally invasive biomarkers have been used as important indicators of treatment response and progression in cancers such as prostate and ovarian. Unfortunately, all biomarkers are not prognostic in all cancer types and are often not routinely collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a non-obtrusive, personalized measure of a patient's quality of life and symptomatology, reported directly from the patient, and are increasingly collected as part of routine care. Previous literature has shown correlations between specific PROs (i.e., insomnia, fatigue) and overall survival. Although promising, these studies often only consider single time points and ignore patient-specific dynamic changes in individual PROs, which might be early predictors of treatment response or progression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNIn this study, PRO dynamics were analyzed to determine if they could be used as interradiographic predictors of tumor volume changes among 85 patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing immunotherapy. PRO questionnaires and tumor volume scans were completed biweekly and monthly, respectively. Correlation and predictive analysis were conducted to identify specific PROs that could accurately predict patient response. RESULTSChanges in tumor volume over time were significantly correlated with dizziness (P < 0.005), insomnia (P < 0.05), and fatigue (P < 0.05). In addition, cumulative changes in insomnia could predict progressive disease with a 77% accuracy, on average 45 days prior to the next imaging scan. CONCLUSIONSThis study presents the first time that patient-specific PRO dynamics have been considered to predict how individual patients will respond to treatment. This is an important first step in adapting treatment to improve response rates.</description><subject>Translational Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy</subject><issn>1078-0432</issn><issn>1557-3265</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUU1r3TAQFCWlSdP-hIKOvTiVVrYkn0IwSRt4JOG1PQtZXr-oPEuuZBd663_IP-wvqR75gF52F3aYYWYI-cDZGeeN_sSZ0hWrBZx13bYCUTHRylfkhDeNqgTI5qjcz5hj8jbnH4zxmrP6DTkWCoRotTwheGcXj2GptjjHtOBAb9fFxQkztZlehwVTsoOPu2Tne-_oXcLBuyWmTONIt5jnGDJSH-hNDH__PHyd7H5POyxjs4Yd7WxwmN6R16PdZ3z_tE_J96vLb92XanP7-bq72FRO6HapdM-asR5BMAtcStWD1gM4OfQ9B2Vdq0QPtUA5it7KunFqkBpsyxUHyxkTp-T8kXde-wkHV4wluzdz8pNNv0203vz_Cf7e7OIvU2KBRkFbGD4-MaT4c8W8mMlnV-zYgHHNBjQUHd7WokCbR6hLMeeE44sOZ-bQkTnkbw75m9KRAWEOHYl_oP6FbA</recordid><startdate>20230815</startdate><enddate>20230815</enddate><creator>Bhatt, Ambika S.</creator><creator>Schabath, Matthew B.</creator><creator>Hoogland, Aasha I.</creator><creator>Jim, Heather S.L.</creator><creator>Brady-Nicholls, Renee</creator><general>American Association for Cancer Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-8132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-3711</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0015-3807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3241-3216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-8283</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230815</creationdate><title>Patient-Reported Outcomes as Interradiographic Predictors of Response in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer</title><author>Bhatt, Ambika S. ; Schabath, Matthew B. ; Hoogland, Aasha I. ; Jim, Heather S.L. ; Brady-Nicholls, Renee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-8b05f4f230a21667b288d2c6dbb127ac973b243e6f3ba645c7d682a91712a1003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Translational Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bhatt, Ambika S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schabath, Matthew B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogland, Aasha I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jim, Heather S.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady-Nicholls, Renee</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bhatt, Ambika S.</au><au>Schabath, Matthew B.</au><au>Hoogland, Aasha I.</au><au>Jim, Heather S.L.</au><au>Brady-Nicholls, Renee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-Reported Outcomes as Interradiographic Predictors of Response in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Clinical cancer research</jtitle><date>2023-08-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>3142</spage><epage>3150</epage><pages>3142-3150</pages><issn>1078-0432</issn><eissn>1557-3265</eissn><abstract>PURPOSEMinimally invasive biomarkers have been used as important indicators of treatment response and progression in cancers such as prostate and ovarian. Unfortunately, all biomarkers are not prognostic in all cancer types and are often not routinely collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide a non-obtrusive, personalized measure of a patient's quality of life and symptomatology, reported directly from the patient, and are increasingly collected as part of routine care. Previous literature has shown correlations between specific PROs (i.e., insomnia, fatigue) and overall survival. Although promising, these studies often only consider single time points and ignore patient-specific dynamic changes in individual PROs, which might be early predictors of treatment response or progression. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNIn this study, PRO dynamics were analyzed to determine if they could be used as interradiographic predictors of tumor volume changes among 85 patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing immunotherapy. PRO questionnaires and tumor volume scans were completed biweekly and monthly, respectively. Correlation and predictive analysis were conducted to identify specific PROs that could accurately predict patient response. RESULTSChanges in tumor volume over time were significantly correlated with dizziness (P < 0.005), insomnia (P < 0.05), and fatigue (P < 0.05). In addition, cumulative changes in insomnia could predict progressive disease with a 77% accuracy, on average 45 days prior to the next imaging scan. CONCLUSIONSThis study presents the first time that patient-specific PRO dynamics have been considered to predict how individual patients will respond to treatment. This is an important first step in adapting treatment to improve response rates.</abstract><pub>American Association for Cancer Research</pub><pmid>37233986</pmid><doi>10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0396</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8691-8132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-3711</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0015-3807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3241-3216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1759-8283</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-0432 |
ispartof | Clinical cancer research, 2023-08, Vol.29 (16), p.3142-3150 |
issn | 1078-0432 1557-3265 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10425729 |
source | American Association for Cancer Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Translational Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy |
title | Patient-Reported Outcomes as Interradiographic Predictors of Response in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T07%3A55%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-Reported%20Outcomes%20as%20Interradiographic%20Predictors%20of%20Response%20in%20Non%E2%80%93Small%20Cell%20Lung%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20cancer%20research&rft.au=Bhatt,%20Ambika%20S.&rft.date=2023-08-15&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=3142&rft.epage=3150&rft.pages=3142-3150&rft.issn=1078-0432&rft.eissn=1557-3265&rft_id=info:doi/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0396&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2820031943%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2820031943&rft_id=info:pmid/37233986&rfr_iscdi=true |