The Expanding Utility of Robotic-Assisted Flap Harvest in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

The expansion of robotic surgery has led to developments in robotic-assisted breast reconstruction techniques. Specifically, robotic flap harvest is being evaluated to help maximize operative reliability and reduce donor site morbidity without compromising flap success. Many publications are feasibi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2023-07, Vol.12 (15), p.4951
Hauptverfasser: Roy, Nikita, Alessandro, Christopher J, Ibelli, Taylor J, Akhavan, Arya A, Sharaf, Jake M, Rabinovitch, David, Henderson, Peter W, Yao, Alice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 15
container_start_page 4951
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 12
creator Roy, Nikita
Alessandro, Christopher J
Ibelli, Taylor J
Akhavan, Arya A
Sharaf, Jake M
Rabinovitch, David
Henderson, Peter W
Yao, Alice
description The expansion of robotic surgery has led to developments in robotic-assisted breast reconstruction techniques. Specifically, robotic flap harvest is being evaluated to help maximize operative reliability and reduce donor site morbidity without compromising flap success. Many publications are feasibility studies or technical descriptions; few cohort analyses exist. This systematic review aims to characterize trends in robotic autologous breast reconstruction and provide a summative analysis of their results. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science to evaluate robot use in breast reconstruction. Studies dated from 2006 to 2022 were identified and analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full-text, peer-reviewed, English-language, and human subject studies were included. Non-breast reconstruction articles, commentary, expert opinion, editor's letter, and duplicate studies were excluded. A total of 17 full-text articles were analyzed. The two robotic breast procedures identified were the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. Results showed comparable complication rates and increased operative times compared to NSQIP data on their corresponding open techniques. Additional findings reported in studies included patient reported outcomes, incision lengths, and downward trends in operative time with consecutive procedures. The available data in the literature confirms that robotic surgery is a promising alternative to traditional open methods of breast reconstruction following mastectomy.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm12154951
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10419897</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A760516190</galeid><sourcerecordid>A760516190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d68131427202dac566b8572473fb97ce8e76f5e0b758d798324bd15f7bfac3b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks9rFTEQxxdRbKk9eZeAF0G25ucm8SLb0lqhINT2HLLZ5DWP3eSZZJ--_96U1vIqJocMM5_5hu8wTfMWwRNCJPy0NjPCiFHJ0IvmEEPOW0gEebkXHzTHOa9hPUJQjPjr5oBw1gnCyGETb-4sOP-90WH0YQVui5982YHowHUcYvGm7XP2udgRXEx6Ay512tpcgA-gX0qc4iouGZwmq2vy2poYckmLKT6Gz6AHP3a1ddZVpxa33v5607xyesr2-PE9am4vzm_OLtur71-_nfVXraGcl3bsBCKIYo4hHrVhXTcIxjHlxA2SGyss7xyzcOBMjFwKgukwIub44LQhAyNHzZcH3c0yzHY0NpSkJ7VJftZpp6L26nkl-Du1iluFIEVSSF4VPjwqpPhzqZ7V7LOx06SDrZ4VFgwS2MFOVvT9P-g6LilUf5WiEiIq9qmVnqzywcX6sbkXVT3vIEMdkrBSJ_-h6h3t7Ot4rfM1_6zh40ODSTHnZN2TSQTV_Y6ovR2p9Lv9uTyxfzeC_AGATLY-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2849014869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Expanding Utility of Robotic-Assisted Flap Harvest in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Roy, Nikita ; Alessandro, Christopher J ; Ibelli, Taylor J ; Akhavan, Arya A ; Sharaf, Jake M ; Rabinovitch, David ; Henderson, Peter W ; Yao, Alice</creator><creatorcontrib>Roy, Nikita ; Alessandro, Christopher J ; Ibelli, Taylor J ; Akhavan, Arya A ; Sharaf, Jake M ; Rabinovitch, David ; Henderson, Peter W ; Yao, Alice</creatorcontrib><description>The expansion of robotic surgery has led to developments in robotic-assisted breast reconstruction techniques. Specifically, robotic flap harvest is being evaluated to help maximize operative reliability and reduce donor site morbidity without compromising flap success. Many publications are feasibility studies or technical descriptions; few cohort analyses exist. This systematic review aims to characterize trends in robotic autologous breast reconstruction and provide a summative analysis of their results. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science to evaluate robot use in breast reconstruction. Studies dated from 2006 to 2022 were identified and analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full-text, peer-reviewed, English-language, and human subject studies were included. Non-breast reconstruction articles, commentary, expert opinion, editor's letter, and duplicate studies were excluded. A total of 17 full-text articles were analyzed. The two robotic breast procedures identified were the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. Results showed comparable complication rates and increased operative times compared to NSQIP data on their corresponding open techniques. Additional findings reported in studies included patient reported outcomes, incision lengths, and downward trends in operative time with consecutive procedures. The available data in the literature confirms that robotic surgery is a promising alternative to traditional open methods of breast reconstruction following mastectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37568353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Breast surgery ; Case reports ; Clinical medicine ; Cohort analysis ; Flaps (Surgery) ; Mammaplasty ; Mastectomy ; Methods ; Patients ; Robotic surgery ; Surgery, Experimental ; Surgical outcomes ; Surgical research ; Systematic Review</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-07, Vol.12 (15), p.4951</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d68131427202dac566b8572473fb97ce8e76f5e0b758d798324bd15f7bfac3b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d68131427202dac566b8572473fb97ce8e76f5e0b758d798324bd15f7bfac3b53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7119-9123 ; 0000-0003-4970-7747</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419897/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419897/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roy, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessandro, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibelli, Taylor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhavan, Arya A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharaf, Jake M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabinovitch, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Alice</creatorcontrib><title>The Expanding Utility of Robotic-Assisted Flap Harvest in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>The expansion of robotic surgery has led to developments in robotic-assisted breast reconstruction techniques. Specifically, robotic flap harvest is being evaluated to help maximize operative reliability and reduce donor site morbidity without compromising flap success. Many publications are feasibility studies or technical descriptions; few cohort analyses exist. This systematic review aims to characterize trends in robotic autologous breast reconstruction and provide a summative analysis of their results. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science to evaluate robot use in breast reconstruction. Studies dated from 2006 to 2022 were identified and analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full-text, peer-reviewed, English-language, and human subject studies were included. Non-breast reconstruction articles, commentary, expert opinion, editor's letter, and duplicate studies were excluded. A total of 17 full-text articles were analyzed. The two robotic breast procedures identified were the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. Results showed comparable complication rates and increased operative times compared to NSQIP data on their corresponding open techniques. Additional findings reported in studies included patient reported outcomes, incision lengths, and downward trends in operative time with consecutive procedures. The available data in the literature confirms that robotic surgery is a promising alternative to traditional open methods of breast reconstruction following mastectomy.</description><subject>Breast surgery</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Flaps (Surgery)</subject><subject>Mammaplasty</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Surgery, Experimental</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Surgical research</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptks9rFTEQxxdRbKk9eZeAF0G25ucm8SLb0lqhINT2HLLZ5DWP3eSZZJ--_96U1vIqJocMM5_5hu8wTfMWwRNCJPy0NjPCiFHJ0IvmEEPOW0gEebkXHzTHOa9hPUJQjPjr5oBw1gnCyGETb-4sOP-90WH0YQVui5982YHowHUcYvGm7XP2udgRXEx6Ay512tpcgA-gX0qc4iouGZwmq2vy2poYckmLKT6Gz6AHP3a1ddZVpxa33v5607xyesr2-PE9am4vzm_OLtur71-_nfVXraGcl3bsBCKIYo4hHrVhXTcIxjHlxA2SGyss7xyzcOBMjFwKgukwIub44LQhAyNHzZcH3c0yzHY0NpSkJ7VJftZpp6L26nkl-Du1iluFIEVSSF4VPjwqpPhzqZ7V7LOx06SDrZ4VFgwS2MFOVvT9P-g6LilUf5WiEiIq9qmVnqzywcX6sbkXVT3vIEMdkrBSJ_-h6h3t7Ot4rfM1_6zh40ODSTHnZN2TSQTV_Y6ovR2p9Lv9uTyxfzeC_AGATLY-</recordid><startdate>20230727</startdate><enddate>20230727</enddate><creator>Roy, Nikita</creator><creator>Alessandro, Christopher J</creator><creator>Ibelli, Taylor J</creator><creator>Akhavan, Arya A</creator><creator>Sharaf, Jake M</creator><creator>Rabinovitch, David</creator><creator>Henderson, Peter W</creator><creator>Yao, Alice</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-9123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4970-7747</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230727</creationdate><title>The Expanding Utility of Robotic-Assisted Flap Harvest in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review</title><author>Roy, Nikita ; Alessandro, Christopher J ; Ibelli, Taylor J ; Akhavan, Arya A ; Sharaf, Jake M ; Rabinovitch, David ; Henderson, Peter W ; Yao, Alice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-d68131427202dac566b8572473fb97ce8e76f5e0b758d798324bd15f7bfac3b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Breast surgery</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Flaps (Surgery)</topic><topic>Mammaplasty</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Surgery, Experimental</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Surgical research</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roy, Nikita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alessandro, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibelli, Taylor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhavan, Arya A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharaf, Jake M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabinovitch, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Peter W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Alice</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roy, Nikita</au><au>Alessandro, Christopher J</au><au>Ibelli, Taylor J</au><au>Akhavan, Arya A</au><au>Sharaf, Jake M</au><au>Rabinovitch, David</au><au>Henderson, Peter W</au><au>Yao, Alice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Expanding Utility of Robotic-Assisted Flap Harvest in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2023-07-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>4951</spage><pages>4951-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>The expansion of robotic surgery has led to developments in robotic-assisted breast reconstruction techniques. Specifically, robotic flap harvest is being evaluated to help maximize operative reliability and reduce donor site morbidity without compromising flap success. Many publications are feasibility studies or technical descriptions; few cohort analyses exist. This systematic review aims to characterize trends in robotic autologous breast reconstruction and provide a summative analysis of their results. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science to evaluate robot use in breast reconstruction. Studies dated from 2006 to 2022 were identified and analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full-text, peer-reviewed, English-language, and human subject studies were included. Non-breast reconstruction articles, commentary, expert opinion, editor's letter, and duplicate studies were excluded. A total of 17 full-text articles were analyzed. The two robotic breast procedures identified were the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap. Results showed comparable complication rates and increased operative times compared to NSQIP data on their corresponding open techniques. Additional findings reported in studies included patient reported outcomes, incision lengths, and downward trends in operative time with consecutive procedures. The available data in the literature confirms that robotic surgery is a promising alternative to traditional open methods of breast reconstruction following mastectomy.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37568353</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm12154951</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-9123</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4970-7747</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-07, Vol.12 (15), p.4951
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10419897
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Breast surgery
Case reports
Clinical medicine
Cohort analysis
Flaps (Surgery)
Mammaplasty
Mastectomy
Methods
Patients
Robotic surgery
Surgery, Experimental
Surgical outcomes
Surgical research
Systematic Review
title The Expanding Utility of Robotic-Assisted Flap Harvest in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A11%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Expanding%20Utility%20of%20Robotic-Assisted%20Flap%20Harvest%20in%20Autologous%20Breast%20Reconstruction:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Roy,%20Nikita&rft.date=2023-07-27&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=4951&rft.pages=4951-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm12154951&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA760516190%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2849014869&rft_id=info:pmid/37568353&rft_galeid=A760516190&rfr_iscdi=true