Establishment and initial implementation of the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry
Introduction and hypothesis Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are common pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Owing to significant adverse events associated with mesh-related pelvic floor procedures (PFPs) in a proportion of the surgically treated population, and deficits i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Urogynecology Journal 2023-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1697-1704 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1704 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1697 |
container_title | International Urogynecology Journal |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Jayasinghe, Randi T. Ruseckaite, Rasa Dean, Joanne Kartik, Aruna Wickremasinghe, Anagi C. Daly, Oliver O’Connell, Helen E. Craig, Amanda Duggan, Anne Vasiliadis, Dora Karantanis, Emmanuel Gallagher, Elizabeth Holme, Gwili Keck, James Williams, Jarrod King, Jennifer Yin, Jessica Short, John Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine Brennan, Pip Rayner, Sally Ahern, Susannah |
description | Introduction and hypothesis
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are common pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Owing to significant adverse events associated with mesh-related pelvic floor procedures (PFPs) in a proportion of the surgically treated population, and deficits in collection and reporting of these events, the Australian Government identified an urgent need for a tracking mechanism to improve safety and quality of care. The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) was recently established following the 2018 Senate Committee Inquiry with the aim of tracking outcomes of PFP involving the use of devices and/or prostheses, with the objective of improving the health outcomes of women who undergo these procedures. This paper will describe the APFPR’s aims, development, implementation and possible challenges on the way to its establishment.
Methods
The APFPR has been developed and implemented in accordance with the national operating principles of clinical quality registries (CQRs). The minimum datasets (MDS) for the registry’s database have been developed using a modified Delphi process, and data are primarily being collected from participating surgeons. Patient recruitment is based on an opt-out approach or a waiver of consent. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) providing additional health and outcome information will be obtained from participating women to support safety monitoring of mesh-related adverse events.
Results
Currently in the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) there are 32 sites from various jurisdictions across Australia, that have obtained relevant ethics and governance approvals to start patient recruitment and data collection as of January 2023. Additionally, there are two sites that are awaiting governance review and five sites that are having documentation compiled for submission. Seventeen sites have commenced patient registration and have entered data into the database. Thus far, we have 308 patients registered in the APFPR database. The registry also published its first status report and a consumer-friendly public report in 2022.
Conclusions
The registry will act as a systematic tracking mechanism by collecting outcomes on PFP, especially those involving devices and/or prostheses to improve safety and quality of care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00192-022-05435-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10415488</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2769591218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-4f610c3ded23cb8382d4c1253a852b2dafeffb1db67cbc07a995c284cb7bc0023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LHTEUhkOp1KvtH-iiBLpxM3ryNZNZiYhfIChFd4WQyWTujWSSazIj-O-b22utddFFCMl58p735EXoK4FDAtAcZQDS0gpoWYIzUckPaEE4YxUDyj6iBbSsqRiv6S7ay_kBADgI-IR2WV23QtawQD_P8qQ77_JqtGHCOvTYBTc57bEb195ubvXkYsBxwNPK4pM5T0l7nZ0O-Nb6J2fwuY8x4dsUje3nZPEPu3SFev6Mdgbts_3ysu-j-_Ozu9PL6vrm4ur05LoyvBFTxYeagGG97SkznWSS9twQKpiWgna014Mdho70Xd2YzkCj21YYKrnpmnIso-6j463ueu5G25viuVhU6-RGnZ5V1E79WwlupZbxSRHgRHApi8LBi0KKj7PNkxpdNtZ7HWycs6JN-bCWULJBv79DH-KcQplPFU9SSM7bulB0S5kUc052eHVDQG3SU9v0VElP_U5PbaS_vZ3j9cmfuArAtkAupbC06W_v_8j-AtZAp5o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2848584496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Establishment and initial implementation of the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Jayasinghe, Randi T. ; Ruseckaite, Rasa ; Dean, Joanne ; Kartik, Aruna ; Wickremasinghe, Anagi C. ; Daly, Oliver ; O’Connell, Helen E. ; Craig, Amanda ; Duggan, Anne ; Vasiliadis, Dora ; Karantanis, Emmanuel ; Gallagher, Elizabeth ; Holme, Gwili ; Keck, James ; Williams, Jarrod ; King, Jennifer ; Yin, Jessica ; Short, John ; Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine ; Brennan, Pip ; Rayner, Sally ; Ahern, Susannah</creator><creatorcontrib>Jayasinghe, Randi T. ; Ruseckaite, Rasa ; Dean, Joanne ; Kartik, Aruna ; Wickremasinghe, Anagi C. ; Daly, Oliver ; O’Connell, Helen E. ; Craig, Amanda ; Duggan, Anne ; Vasiliadis, Dora ; Karantanis, Emmanuel ; Gallagher, Elizabeth ; Holme, Gwili ; Keck, James ; Williams, Jarrod ; King, Jennifer ; Yin, Jessica ; Short, John ; Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine ; Brennan, Pip ; Rayner, Sally ; Ahern, Susannah</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and hypothesis
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are common pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Owing to significant adverse events associated with mesh-related pelvic floor procedures (PFPs) in a proportion of the surgically treated population, and deficits in collection and reporting of these events, the Australian Government identified an urgent need for a tracking mechanism to improve safety and quality of care. The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) was recently established following the 2018 Senate Committee Inquiry with the aim of tracking outcomes of PFP involving the use of devices and/or prostheses, with the objective of improving the health outcomes of women who undergo these procedures. This paper will describe the APFPR’s aims, development, implementation and possible challenges on the way to its establishment.
Methods
The APFPR has been developed and implemented in accordance with the national operating principles of clinical quality registries (CQRs). The minimum datasets (MDS) for the registry’s database have been developed using a modified Delphi process, and data are primarily being collected from participating surgeons. Patient recruitment is based on an opt-out approach or a waiver of consent. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) providing additional health and outcome information will be obtained from participating women to support safety monitoring of mesh-related adverse events.
Results
Currently in the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) there are 32 sites from various jurisdictions across Australia, that have obtained relevant ethics and governance approvals to start patient recruitment and data collection as of January 2023. Additionally, there are two sites that are awaiting governance review and five sites that are having documentation compiled for submission. Seventeen sites have commenced patient registration and have entered data into the database. Thus far, we have 308 patients registered in the APFPR database. The registry also published its first status report and a consumer-friendly public report in 2022.
Conclusions
The registry will act as a systematic tracking mechanism by collecting outcomes on PFP, especially those involving devices and/or prostheses to improve safety and quality of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-3462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05435-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36695860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Gynecology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original ; Original Article ; Pelvis ; Prostheses ; Urology</subject><ispartof>International Urogynecology Journal, 2023-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1697-1704</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. corrected publication 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. corrected publication 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-4f610c3ded23cb8382d4c1253a852b2dafeffb1db67cbc07a995c284cb7bc0023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-4f610c3ded23cb8382d4c1253a852b2dafeffb1db67cbc07a995c284cb7bc0023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2577-2528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00192-022-05435-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00192-022-05435-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695860$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jayasinghe, Randi T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruseckaite, Rasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartik, Aruna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickremasinghe, Anagi C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Helen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duggan, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasiliadis, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karantanis, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holme, Gwili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keck, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Jarrod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Pip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayner, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahern, Susannah</creatorcontrib><title>Establishment and initial implementation of the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry</title><title>International Urogynecology Journal</title><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><description>Introduction and hypothesis
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are common pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Owing to significant adverse events associated with mesh-related pelvic floor procedures (PFPs) in a proportion of the surgically treated population, and deficits in collection and reporting of these events, the Australian Government identified an urgent need for a tracking mechanism to improve safety and quality of care. The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) was recently established following the 2018 Senate Committee Inquiry with the aim of tracking outcomes of PFP involving the use of devices and/or prostheses, with the objective of improving the health outcomes of women who undergo these procedures. This paper will describe the APFPR’s aims, development, implementation and possible challenges on the way to its establishment.
Methods
The APFPR has been developed and implemented in accordance with the national operating principles of clinical quality registries (CQRs). The minimum datasets (MDS) for the registry’s database have been developed using a modified Delphi process, and data are primarily being collected from participating surgeons. Patient recruitment is based on an opt-out approach or a waiver of consent. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) providing additional health and outcome information will be obtained from participating women to support safety monitoring of mesh-related adverse events.
Results
Currently in the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) there are 32 sites from various jurisdictions across Australia, that have obtained relevant ethics and governance approvals to start patient recruitment and data collection as of January 2023. Additionally, there are two sites that are awaiting governance review and five sites that are having documentation compiled for submission. Seventeen sites have commenced patient registration and have entered data into the database. Thus far, we have 308 patients registered in the APFPR database. The registry also published its first status report and a consumer-friendly public report in 2022.
Conclusions
The registry will act as a systematic tracking mechanism by collecting outcomes on PFP, especially those involving devices and/or prostheses to improve safety and quality of care.</description><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0937-3462</issn><issn>1433-3023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LHTEUhkOp1KvtH-iiBLpxM3ryNZNZiYhfIChFd4WQyWTujWSSazIj-O-b22utddFFCMl58p735EXoK4FDAtAcZQDS0gpoWYIzUckPaEE4YxUDyj6iBbSsqRiv6S7ay_kBADgI-IR2WV23QtawQD_P8qQ77_JqtGHCOvTYBTc57bEb195ubvXkYsBxwNPK4pM5T0l7nZ0O-Nb6J2fwuY8x4dsUje3nZPEPu3SFev6Mdgbts_3ysu-j-_Ozu9PL6vrm4ur05LoyvBFTxYeagGG97SkznWSS9twQKpiWgna014Mdho70Xd2YzkCj21YYKrnpmnIso-6j463ueu5G25viuVhU6-RGnZ5V1E79WwlupZbxSRHgRHApi8LBi0KKj7PNkxpdNtZ7HWycs6JN-bCWULJBv79DH-KcQplPFU9SSM7bulB0S5kUc052eHVDQG3SU9v0VElP_U5PbaS_vZ3j9cmfuArAtkAupbC06W_v_8j-AtZAp5o</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Jayasinghe, Randi T.</creator><creator>Ruseckaite, Rasa</creator><creator>Dean, Joanne</creator><creator>Kartik, Aruna</creator><creator>Wickremasinghe, Anagi C.</creator><creator>Daly, Oliver</creator><creator>O’Connell, Helen E.</creator><creator>Craig, Amanda</creator><creator>Duggan, Anne</creator><creator>Vasiliadis, Dora</creator><creator>Karantanis, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Gallagher, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Holme, Gwili</creator><creator>Keck, James</creator><creator>Williams, Jarrod</creator><creator>King, Jennifer</creator><creator>Yin, Jessica</creator><creator>Short, John</creator><creator>Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine</creator><creator>Brennan, Pip</creator><creator>Rayner, Sally</creator><creator>Ahern, Susannah</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-2528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Establishment and initial implementation of the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry</title><author>Jayasinghe, Randi T. ; Ruseckaite, Rasa ; Dean, Joanne ; Kartik, Aruna ; Wickremasinghe, Anagi C. ; Daly, Oliver ; O’Connell, Helen E. ; Craig, Amanda ; Duggan, Anne ; Vasiliadis, Dora ; Karantanis, Emmanuel ; Gallagher, Elizabeth ; Holme, Gwili ; Keck, James ; Williams, Jarrod ; King, Jennifer ; Yin, Jessica ; Short, John ; Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine ; Brennan, Pip ; Rayner, Sally ; Ahern, Susannah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-4f610c3ded23cb8382d4c1253a852b2dafeffb1db67cbc07a995c284cb7bc0023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jayasinghe, Randi T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruseckaite, Rasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartik, Aruna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickremasinghe, Anagi C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Helen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craig, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duggan, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasiliadis, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karantanis, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holme, Gwili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keck, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Jarrod</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Short, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Pip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rayner, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahern, Susannah</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jayasinghe, Randi T.</au><au>Ruseckaite, Rasa</au><au>Dean, Joanne</au><au>Kartik, Aruna</au><au>Wickremasinghe, Anagi C.</au><au>Daly, Oliver</au><au>O’Connell, Helen E.</au><au>Craig, Amanda</au><au>Duggan, Anne</au><au>Vasiliadis, Dora</au><au>Karantanis, Emmanuel</au><au>Gallagher, Elizabeth</au><au>Holme, Gwili</au><au>Keck, James</au><au>Williams, Jarrod</au><au>King, Jennifer</au><au>Yin, Jessica</au><au>Short, John</au><au>Sketcher-Baker, Kirstine</au><au>Brennan, Pip</au><au>Rayner, Sally</au><au>Ahern, Susannah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Establishment and initial implementation of the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry</atitle><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Urogynecol J</stitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1697</spage><epage>1704</epage><pages>1697-1704</pages><issn>0937-3462</issn><eissn>1433-3023</eissn><abstract>Introduction and hypothesis
Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are common pelvic floor disorders (PFDs). Owing to significant adverse events associated with mesh-related pelvic floor procedures (PFPs) in a proportion of the surgically treated population, and deficits in collection and reporting of these events, the Australian Government identified an urgent need for a tracking mechanism to improve safety and quality of care. The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) was recently established following the 2018 Senate Committee Inquiry with the aim of tracking outcomes of PFP involving the use of devices and/or prostheses, with the objective of improving the health outcomes of women who undergo these procedures. This paper will describe the APFPR’s aims, development, implementation and possible challenges on the way to its establishment.
Methods
The APFPR has been developed and implemented in accordance with the national operating principles of clinical quality registries (CQRs). The minimum datasets (MDS) for the registry’s database have been developed using a modified Delphi process, and data are primarily being collected from participating surgeons. Patient recruitment is based on an opt-out approach or a waiver of consent. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) providing additional health and outcome information will be obtained from participating women to support safety monitoring of mesh-related adverse events.
Results
Currently in the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) there are 32 sites from various jurisdictions across Australia, that have obtained relevant ethics and governance approvals to start patient recruitment and data collection as of January 2023. Additionally, there are two sites that are awaiting governance review and five sites that are having documentation compiled for submission. Seventeen sites have commenced patient registration and have entered data into the database. Thus far, we have 308 patients registered in the APFPR database. The registry also published its first status report and a consumer-friendly public report in 2022.
Conclusions
The registry will act as a systematic tracking mechanism by collecting outcomes on PFP, especially those involving devices and/or prostheses to improve safety and quality of care.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>36695860</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00192-022-05435-8</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-2528</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-3462 |
ispartof | International Urogynecology Journal, 2023-08, Vol.34 (8), p.1697-1704 |
issn | 0937-3462 1433-3023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10415488 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Gynecology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Original Article Pelvis Prostheses Urology |
title | Establishment and initial implementation of the Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T14%3A22%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Establishment%20and%20initial%20implementation%20of%20the%20Australasian%20Pelvic%20Floor%20Procedure%20Registry&rft.jtitle=International%20Urogynecology%20Journal&rft.au=Jayasinghe,%20Randi%20T.&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1697&rft.epage=1704&rft.pages=1697-1704&rft.issn=0937-3462&rft.eissn=1433-3023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00192-022-05435-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2769591218%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2848584496&rft_id=info:pmid/36695860&rfr_iscdi=true |