Asymetric Event-Related Potential Priming Effects Between English Letters and American Sign Language Fingerspelling Fonts
Letter recognition plays an important role in reading and follows different phases of processing, from early visual feature detection to the access of abstract letter representations. Deaf ASL–English bilinguals experience orthography in two forms: English letters and fingerspelling. However, the ne...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurobiology of language 2023-06, Vol.4 (2), p.361-381 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 381 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 361 |
container_title | Neurobiology of language |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova Midgley, Katherine J. Emmorey, Karen Holcomb, Phillip J. |
description | Letter recognition plays an important role in reading and follows different phases of processing, from early visual feature detection to the access of abstract letter representations. Deaf ASL–English bilinguals experience orthography in two forms: English letters and fingerspelling. However, the neurobiological nature of fingerspelling representations, and the relationship between the two orthographies, remains unexplored. We examined the temporal dynamics of single English letter and ASL fingerspelling font processing in an unmasked priming paradigm with centrally presented targets for 200 ms preceded by 100 ms primes. Event-related brain potentials were recorded while participants performed a probe detection task. Experiment 1 examined English letter-to-letter priming in deaf signers and hearing non-signers. We found that English letter recognition is similar for deaf and hearing readers, extending previous findings with hearing readers to unmasked presentations. Experiment 2 examined priming effects between English letters and ASL fingerspelling fonts in deaf signers only. We found that fingerspelling fonts primed both fingerspelling fonts and English letters, but English letters did not prime fingerspelling fonts, indicating a priming asymmetry between letters and fingerspelling fonts. We also found an
-like priming effect when the primes were fingerspelling fonts which might reflect strategic access to the lexical names of letters. The studies suggest that deaf ASL–English bilinguals process English letters and ASL fingerspelling differently and that the two systems may have distinct neural representations. However, the fact that fingerspelling fonts can prime English letters suggests that the two orthographies may share abstract representations to some extent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1162/nol_a_00104 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10403274</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_26d017ff1d474ed1a7a78aaf9e077841</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2847345912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-9f0aa60b50f5f7eb9100257703774373c3734e1b839aba4fed245c65c25220883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhi0EolXoiTuyxAEktGB7vevdE0qrBCpFouLjbE12x1tHu3awnaL8exxSqhRxsPz1-vG8M0PIS87ec16LD86PGjRjnMkn5FzUkheyrJunJ-szchHjhjEmKi5KUT4nZ6WqZF237Jzs53E_YQq2o4s7dKn4iiMk7OmNT3lrYaQ3wU7WDXRhDHYp0ktMvxAdXbhhtPGWrjAlDJGC6-l8wowCR7_ZwdEVuGEHA9Jlfp8lWxzHA2npXYovyDMDY8SL-3lGfiwX368-F6svn66v5quiyyGmojUMoGbripnKKFy3_GBEKVYqJUtVdnlI5OumbGEN0mAvZNXVVScqIVjTlDNyfeT2HjZ6m81A2GsPVv858GHQEJLtRtSi7hlXxvBeKok9BwWqATAtMqUayTPr45G13a0n7LucoQDjI-jjG2dv9eDvdC4PK0UOeEbe3hOC_7nDmPRkY5fzAg79LmrRyOynanOlZuT1P9KN3wWXc5VVTVu1TdUegO-Oqi74GAOah2g404cW0SctktWvTg08aP82RBa8OQome_Lf_1C_AdJIxIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889598594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Asymetric Event-Related Potential Priming Effects Between English Letters and American Sign Language Fingerspelling Fonts</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova ; Midgley, Katherine J. ; Emmorey, Karen ; Holcomb, Phillip J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova ; Midgley, Katherine J. ; Emmorey, Karen ; Holcomb, Phillip J.</creatorcontrib><description>Letter recognition plays an important role in reading and follows different phases of processing, from early visual feature detection to the access of abstract letter representations. Deaf ASL–English bilinguals experience orthography in two forms: English letters and fingerspelling. However, the neurobiological nature of fingerspelling representations, and the relationship between the two orthographies, remains unexplored. We examined the temporal dynamics of single English letter and ASL fingerspelling font processing in an unmasked priming paradigm with centrally presented targets for 200 ms preceded by 100 ms primes. Event-related brain potentials were recorded while participants performed a probe detection task. Experiment 1 examined English letter-to-letter priming in deaf signers and hearing non-signers. We found that English letter recognition is similar for deaf and hearing readers, extending previous findings with hearing readers to unmasked presentations. Experiment 2 examined priming effects between English letters and ASL fingerspelling fonts in deaf signers only. We found that fingerspelling fonts primed both fingerspelling fonts and English letters, but English letters did not prime fingerspelling fonts, indicating a priming asymmetry between letters and fingerspelling fonts. We also found an
-like priming effect when the primes were fingerspelling fonts which might reflect strategic access to the lexical names of letters. The studies suggest that deaf ASL–English bilinguals process English letters and ASL fingerspelling differently and that the two systems may have distinct neural representations. However, the fact that fingerspelling fonts can prime English letters suggests that the two orthographies may share abstract representations to some extent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2641-4368</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2641-4368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/nol_a_00104</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37546690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Broadway, 12th Floor, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>American Sign Language ; Bilingualism ; Brain ; Deafness ; English language ; ERPs ; Event-related potentials ; Fingerspelling ; Hearing ; Information processing ; Orthography ; Priming ; Recognition ; Typefaces</subject><ispartof>Neurobiology of language, 2023-06, Vol.4 (2), p.361-381</ispartof><rights>2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2023 Massachusetts Institute of Technology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-9f0aa60b50f5f7eb9100257703774373c3734e1b839aba4fed245c65c25220883</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7912-5428 ; 0000-0002-5647-0066 ; 0000-0001-7243-464X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10403274/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2889598594?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,21367,27901,27902,33721,33722,43781,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37546690$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midgley, Katherine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmorey, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcomb, Phillip J.</creatorcontrib><title>Asymetric Event-Related Potential Priming Effects Between English Letters and American Sign Language Fingerspelling Fonts</title><title>Neurobiology of language</title><addtitle>Neurobiol Lang (Camb)</addtitle><description>Letter recognition plays an important role in reading and follows different phases of processing, from early visual feature detection to the access of abstract letter representations. Deaf ASL–English bilinguals experience orthography in two forms: English letters and fingerspelling. However, the neurobiological nature of fingerspelling representations, and the relationship between the two orthographies, remains unexplored. We examined the temporal dynamics of single English letter and ASL fingerspelling font processing in an unmasked priming paradigm with centrally presented targets for 200 ms preceded by 100 ms primes. Event-related brain potentials were recorded while participants performed a probe detection task. Experiment 1 examined English letter-to-letter priming in deaf signers and hearing non-signers. We found that English letter recognition is similar for deaf and hearing readers, extending previous findings with hearing readers to unmasked presentations. Experiment 2 examined priming effects between English letters and ASL fingerspelling fonts in deaf signers only. We found that fingerspelling fonts primed both fingerspelling fonts and English letters, but English letters did not prime fingerspelling fonts, indicating a priming asymmetry between letters and fingerspelling fonts. We also found an
-like priming effect when the primes were fingerspelling fonts which might reflect strategic access to the lexical names of letters. The studies suggest that deaf ASL–English bilinguals process English letters and ASL fingerspelling differently and that the two systems may have distinct neural representations. However, the fact that fingerspelling fonts can prime English letters suggests that the two orthographies may share abstract representations to some extent.</description><subject>American Sign Language</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Deafness</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>ERPs</subject><subject>Event-related potentials</subject><subject>Fingerspelling</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Orthography</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Typefaces</subject><issn>2641-4368</issn><issn>2641-4368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhi0EolXoiTuyxAEktGB7vevdE0qrBCpFouLjbE12x1tHu3awnaL8exxSqhRxsPz1-vG8M0PIS87ec16LD86PGjRjnMkn5FzUkheyrJunJ-szchHjhjEmKi5KUT4nZ6WqZF237Jzs53E_YQq2o4s7dKn4iiMk7OmNT3lrYaQ3wU7WDXRhDHYp0ktMvxAdXbhhtPGWrjAlDJGC6-l8wowCR7_ZwdEVuGEHA9Jlfp8lWxzHA2npXYovyDMDY8SL-3lGfiwX368-F6svn66v5quiyyGmojUMoGbripnKKFy3_GBEKVYqJUtVdnlI5OumbGEN0mAvZNXVVScqIVjTlDNyfeT2HjZ6m81A2GsPVv858GHQEJLtRtSi7hlXxvBeKok9BwWqATAtMqUayTPr45G13a0n7LucoQDjI-jjG2dv9eDvdC4PK0UOeEbe3hOC_7nDmPRkY5fzAg79LmrRyOynanOlZuT1P9KN3wWXc5VVTVu1TdUegO-Oqi74GAOah2g404cW0SctktWvTg08aP82RBa8OQome_Lf_1C_AdJIxIg</recordid><startdate>20230613</startdate><enddate>20230613</enddate><creator>Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova</creator><creator>Midgley, Katherine J.</creator><creator>Emmorey, Karen</creator><creator>Holcomb, Phillip J.</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><general>The MIT Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7912-5428</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5647-0066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-464X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230613</creationdate><title>Asymetric Event-Related Potential Priming Effects Between English Letters and American Sign Language Fingerspelling Fonts</title><author>Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova ; Midgley, Katherine J. ; Emmorey, Karen ; Holcomb, Phillip J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-9f0aa60b50f5f7eb9100257703774373c3734e1b839aba4fed245c65c25220883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>American Sign Language</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Deafness</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>ERPs</topic><topic>Event-related potentials</topic><topic>Fingerspelling</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Orthography</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Typefaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Midgley, Katherine J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emmorey, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcomb, Phillip J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Neurobiology of language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sehyr, Zed Sevcikova</au><au>Midgley, Katherine J.</au><au>Emmorey, Karen</au><au>Holcomb, Phillip J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Asymetric Event-Related Potential Priming Effects Between English Letters and American Sign Language Fingerspelling Fonts</atitle><jtitle>Neurobiology of language</jtitle><addtitle>Neurobiol Lang (Camb)</addtitle><date>2023-06-13</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>361-381</pages><issn>2641-4368</issn><eissn>2641-4368</eissn><abstract>Letter recognition plays an important role in reading and follows different phases of processing, from early visual feature detection to the access of abstract letter representations. Deaf ASL–English bilinguals experience orthography in two forms: English letters and fingerspelling. However, the neurobiological nature of fingerspelling representations, and the relationship between the two orthographies, remains unexplored. We examined the temporal dynamics of single English letter and ASL fingerspelling font processing in an unmasked priming paradigm with centrally presented targets for 200 ms preceded by 100 ms primes. Event-related brain potentials were recorded while participants performed a probe detection task. Experiment 1 examined English letter-to-letter priming in deaf signers and hearing non-signers. We found that English letter recognition is similar for deaf and hearing readers, extending previous findings with hearing readers to unmasked presentations. Experiment 2 examined priming effects between English letters and ASL fingerspelling fonts in deaf signers only. We found that fingerspelling fonts primed both fingerspelling fonts and English letters, but English letters did not prime fingerspelling fonts, indicating a priming asymmetry between letters and fingerspelling fonts. We also found an
-like priming effect when the primes were fingerspelling fonts which might reflect strategic access to the lexical names of letters. The studies suggest that deaf ASL–English bilinguals process English letters and ASL fingerspelling differently and that the two systems may have distinct neural representations. However, the fact that fingerspelling fonts can prime English letters suggests that the two orthographies may share abstract representations to some extent.</abstract><cop>One Broadway, 12th Floor, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><pmid>37546690</pmid><doi>10.1162/nol_a_00104</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7912-5428</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5647-0066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-464X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2641-4368 |
ispartof | Neurobiology of language, 2023-06, Vol.4 (2), p.361-381 |
issn | 2641-4368 2641-4368 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10403274 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; ProQuest Central |
subjects | American Sign Language Bilingualism Brain Deafness English language ERPs Event-related potentials Fingerspelling Hearing Information processing Orthography Priming Recognition Typefaces |
title | Asymetric Event-Related Potential Priming Effects Between English Letters and American Sign Language Fingerspelling Fonts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A42%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Asymetric%20Event-Related%20Potential%20Priming%20Effects%20Between%20English%20Letters%20and%20American%20Sign%20Language%20Fingerspelling%20Fonts&rft.jtitle=Neurobiology%20of%20language&rft.au=Sehyr,%20Zed%20Sevcikova&rft.date=2023-06-13&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=361-381&rft.issn=2641-4368&rft.eissn=2641-4368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/nol_a_00104&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2847345912%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889598594&rft_id=info:pmid/37546690&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_26d017ff1d474ed1a7a78aaf9e077841&rfr_iscdi=true |