Regulatory, Policy, and Operational Considerations for Outcomes-Based Risk-Sharing Agreements in the U.S. Market: Opportunities for Reform
Although interest in outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSAs) and other value-based contracts (VBCs) continues to grow, the number of VBCs in the United States is still limited. A better understanding of the evolving and fluid context of policies, regulations, and operational factors affectin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy 2019-11, Vol.25 (11), p.1174-1181 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1181 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1174 |
container_title | Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Goodman, Clifford Villarivera, Christel Gregor, Karl van Bavel, Julie |
description | Although interest in outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSAs) and other value-based contracts (VBCs) continues to grow, the number of VBCs in the United States is still limited. A better understanding of the evolving and fluid context of policies, regulations, and operational factors affecting their uptake in the United States is needed in order to lower or obviate barriers and advance OBRSAs.
To (a) identify and recognize priorities among policies, regulations, and other factors that are most likely to influence the feasibility, design, and execution of OBRSAs and (b) suggest opportunities for reform and other modifications that may advance OBRSAs in the United States.
Across 18 months during 2017-2018, we reviewed health policy literature, examined stakeholder group communications, and conducted semistructured interviews with representatives of 12 diverse stakeholder organizations. Across these, and incorporating real-time contextual changes, we identified priorities for enabling and improving OBRSAs.
Regulatory and policy priorities most often cited by manufacturers were Medicaid best price rule, Medicare Part B average sales pricing, FDA restrictions on communications, and the Anti-Kickback Statute. While recognizing these, health plans were more concerned about operational barriers, particularly associated with data collection and analysis, selection of outcomes that are feasible to assess, bandwidth for managing OBRSAs, and implementation costs relative to return on investment. Most recognized limitations on access to personal health information, target population turnover, and insufficient information sharing of OBRSA experiences. Noteworthy were asymmetries of administrative burden and cost management: individual manufacturers may pursue OBRSAs for 1 or a few products per year, while health plans are approached by multiple manufacturers about OBRSAs for their respective products; manufacturers focus on drugs, while health plans must manage broader costs of care.
While all stakeholders express interest in OBRSAs, health plans tend to consider them as a narrower priority than manufacturers. Solving operational barriers, in addition to addressing policy and regulatory barriers, is essential for aligning efforts to advance OBRSAs. Doing so depends on collaboration to improve decisions about when and how to pursue OBRSAs, with attention to data management, modeling and piloting OBRSAs, and information sharing. These findings pertain to companies |
doi_str_mv | 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19167 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10398029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>31535596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-c5ac686d57fdb6d07b058f29a79a3682cb39909cf71d2d46149626123e4a2f9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV1PwyAUhonRqNHde2X4AbbyMWjxxujiV6KZ2fSaUKAb2pYGmIl_wV9tddPozTmHkPc5hAeAI4xyXDJGT19a3ecEYZFjgXmxBfYJLXiGESXbmxmxMdoDoxhfEEKEMl5iugv2KGaUMcH3wcfMLlaNSj68n8BH3zg9dNUZOO1tUMn5TjVw4rvozOYcYe0DnK6S9q2N2aWK1sCZi6_ZfKmC6xbwYhGsbW2XInQdTEsLn_N5Dh9UeLXpbCD3PqRV55Kza9jMDrU9BDu1aqIdbfoBeL6-eprcZvfTm7vJxX2mqShSppnSvOSGFbWpuEFFhVhZE6EKoSgvia6oEEjousCGmDHHY8EJx4TasSK1qOgBOF9z-1XVWqOHhwbVyD64VoV36ZWT_286t5QL_yaHjxUlImIgoDVBBx9jsPVvGCP57UZ-uZFfbuS3myFy_Hfpb-DHBP0ECYmN0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regulatory, Policy, and Operational Considerations for Outcomes-Based Risk-Sharing Agreements in the U.S. Market: Opportunities for Reform</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Goodman, Clifford ; Villarivera, Christel ; Gregor, Karl ; van Bavel, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Clifford ; Villarivera, Christel ; Gregor, Karl ; van Bavel, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>Although interest in outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSAs) and other value-based contracts (VBCs) continues to grow, the number of VBCs in the United States is still limited. A better understanding of the evolving and fluid context of policies, regulations, and operational factors affecting their uptake in the United States is needed in order to lower or obviate barriers and advance OBRSAs.
To (a) identify and recognize priorities among policies, regulations, and other factors that are most likely to influence the feasibility, design, and execution of OBRSAs and (b) suggest opportunities for reform and other modifications that may advance OBRSAs in the United States.
Across 18 months during 2017-2018, we reviewed health policy literature, examined stakeholder group communications, and conducted semistructured interviews with representatives of 12 diverse stakeholder organizations. Across these, and incorporating real-time contextual changes, we identified priorities for enabling and improving OBRSAs.
Regulatory and policy priorities most often cited by manufacturers were Medicaid best price rule, Medicare Part B average sales pricing, FDA restrictions on communications, and the Anti-Kickback Statute. While recognizing these, health plans were more concerned about operational barriers, particularly associated with data collection and analysis, selection of outcomes that are feasible to assess, bandwidth for managing OBRSAs, and implementation costs relative to return on investment. Most recognized limitations on access to personal health information, target population turnover, and insufficient information sharing of OBRSA experiences. Noteworthy were asymmetries of administrative burden and cost management: individual manufacturers may pursue OBRSAs for 1 or a few products per year, while health plans are approached by multiple manufacturers about OBRSAs for their respective products; manufacturers focus on drugs, while health plans must manage broader costs of care.
While all stakeholders express interest in OBRSAs, health plans tend to consider them as a narrower priority than manufacturers. Solving operational barriers, in addition to addressing policy and regulatory barriers, is essential for aligning efforts to advance OBRSAs. Doing so depends on collaboration to improve decisions about when and how to pursue OBRSAs, with attention to data management, modeling and piloting OBRSAs, and information sharing. These findings pertain to companies operating in the United States and some likely extend to certain value-based arrangements in other countries.
This analysis was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck, as a component of the Learning Laboratory for Advancing Value-Based Healthcare, which is a multiyear collaboration of MSD and Optum, a health services, technology, and data company. The manuscript underwent an internal review by the sponsor. The Lewin Group (Lewin) is a subsidiary of OptumServe. OptumServe is wholly owned by UnitedHealth Group (UHG). Neither OptumServe nor UHG or its subsidiaries review the work products of Lewin. Lewin operates with editorial independence and provides its clients with health care and human services policy research and consulting services. Goodman and Villarivera are employees of Lewin; Gregor is an employee of Optum; and van Bavel is an employee of MSD. Goodman and Villarivera report fees from UHG, unrelated to this study. A poster presentation based on this manuscript was accepted and presented at the ISPOR Europe 2018 Conference in Barcelona, Spain, on November 13, 2018.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2376-0540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-1032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19167</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31535596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Decision Making ; Delivery of Health Care - economics ; Delivery of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence ; Drug Costs ; Drug Industry - economics ; Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence ; Drug Industry - organization & administration ; Health Policy - economics ; Health Policy - legislation & jurisprudence ; Humans ; Medicaid - economics ; Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence ; Medicare - economics ; Medicare - legislation & jurisprudence ; Risk Sharing, Financial - economics ; Risk Sharing, Financial - organization & administration ; Stakeholder Participation ; United States ; Value-Based Health Insurance - economics ; Value-Based Health Insurance - organization & administration]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2019-11, Vol.25 (11), p.1174-1181</ispartof><rights>2019, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-c5ac686d57fdb6d07b058f29a79a3682cb39909cf71d2d46149626123e4a2f9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-c5ac686d57fdb6d07b058f29a79a3682cb39909cf71d2d46149626123e4a2f9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398029/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10398029/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31535596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Clifford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villarivera, Christel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregor, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Bavel, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>Regulatory, Policy, and Operational Considerations for Outcomes-Based Risk-Sharing Agreements in the U.S. Market: Opportunities for Reform</title><title>Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy</title><addtitle>J Manag Care Spec Pharm</addtitle><description>Although interest in outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSAs) and other value-based contracts (VBCs) continues to grow, the number of VBCs in the United States is still limited. A better understanding of the evolving and fluid context of policies, regulations, and operational factors affecting their uptake in the United States is needed in order to lower or obviate barriers and advance OBRSAs.
To (a) identify and recognize priorities among policies, regulations, and other factors that are most likely to influence the feasibility, design, and execution of OBRSAs and (b) suggest opportunities for reform and other modifications that may advance OBRSAs in the United States.
Across 18 months during 2017-2018, we reviewed health policy literature, examined stakeholder group communications, and conducted semistructured interviews with representatives of 12 diverse stakeholder organizations. Across these, and incorporating real-time contextual changes, we identified priorities for enabling and improving OBRSAs.
Regulatory and policy priorities most often cited by manufacturers were Medicaid best price rule, Medicare Part B average sales pricing, FDA restrictions on communications, and the Anti-Kickback Statute. While recognizing these, health plans were more concerned about operational barriers, particularly associated with data collection and analysis, selection of outcomes that are feasible to assess, bandwidth for managing OBRSAs, and implementation costs relative to return on investment. Most recognized limitations on access to personal health information, target population turnover, and insufficient information sharing of OBRSA experiences. Noteworthy were asymmetries of administrative burden and cost management: individual manufacturers may pursue OBRSAs for 1 or a few products per year, while health plans are approached by multiple manufacturers about OBRSAs for their respective products; manufacturers focus on drugs, while health plans must manage broader costs of care.
While all stakeholders express interest in OBRSAs, health plans tend to consider them as a narrower priority than manufacturers. Solving operational barriers, in addition to addressing policy and regulatory barriers, is essential for aligning efforts to advance OBRSAs. Doing so depends on collaboration to improve decisions about when and how to pursue OBRSAs, with attention to data management, modeling and piloting OBRSAs, and information sharing. These findings pertain to companies operating in the United States and some likely extend to certain value-based arrangements in other countries.
This analysis was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck, as a component of the Learning Laboratory for Advancing Value-Based Healthcare, which is a multiyear collaboration of MSD and Optum, a health services, technology, and data company. The manuscript underwent an internal review by the sponsor. The Lewin Group (Lewin) is a subsidiary of OptumServe. OptumServe is wholly owned by UnitedHealth Group (UHG). Neither OptumServe nor UHG or its subsidiaries review the work products of Lewin. Lewin operates with editorial independence and provides its clients with health care and human services policy research and consulting services. Goodman and Villarivera are employees of Lewin; Gregor is an employee of Optum; and van Bavel is an employee of MSD. Goodman and Villarivera report fees from UHG, unrelated to this study. A poster presentation based on this manuscript was accepted and presented at the ISPOR Europe 2018 Conference in Barcelona, Spain, on November 13, 2018.</description><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - economics</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Drug Costs</subject><subject>Drug Industry - economics</subject><subject>Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Drug Industry - organization & administration</subject><subject>Health Policy - economics</subject><subject>Health Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicaid - economics</subject><subject>Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Medicare - economics</subject><subject>Medicare - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Risk Sharing, Financial - economics</subject><subject>Risk Sharing, Financial - organization & administration</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Value-Based Health Insurance - economics</subject><subject>Value-Based Health Insurance - organization & administration</subject><issn>2376-0540</issn><issn>2376-1032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkV1PwyAUhonRqNHde2X4AbbyMWjxxujiV6KZ2fSaUKAb2pYGmIl_wV9tddPozTmHkPc5hAeAI4xyXDJGT19a3ecEYZFjgXmxBfYJLXiGESXbmxmxMdoDoxhfEEKEMl5iugv2KGaUMcH3wcfMLlaNSj68n8BH3zg9dNUZOO1tUMn5TjVw4rvozOYcYe0DnK6S9q2N2aWK1sCZi6_ZfKmC6xbwYhGsbW2XInQdTEsLn_N5Dh9UeLXpbCD3PqRV55Kza9jMDrU9BDu1aqIdbfoBeL6-eprcZvfTm7vJxX2mqShSppnSvOSGFbWpuEFFhVhZE6EKoSgvia6oEEjousCGmDHHY8EJx4TasSK1qOgBOF9z-1XVWqOHhwbVyD64VoV36ZWT_286t5QL_yaHjxUlImIgoDVBBx9jsPVvGCP57UZ-uZFfbuS3myFy_Hfpb-DHBP0ECYmN0w</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Goodman, Clifford</creator><creator>Villarivera, Christel</creator><creator>Gregor, Karl</creator><creator>van Bavel, Julie</creator><general>Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Regulatory, Policy, and Operational Considerations for Outcomes-Based Risk-Sharing Agreements in the U.S. Market: Opportunities for Reform</title><author>Goodman, Clifford ; Villarivera, Christel ; Gregor, Karl ; van Bavel, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-c5ac686d57fdb6d07b058f29a79a3682cb39909cf71d2d46149626123e4a2f9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - economics</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Drug Costs</topic><topic>Drug Industry - economics</topic><topic>Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Drug Industry - organization & administration</topic><topic>Health Policy - economics</topic><topic>Health Policy - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicaid - economics</topic><topic>Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Medicare - economics</topic><topic>Medicare - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Risk Sharing, Financial - economics</topic><topic>Risk Sharing, Financial - organization & administration</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Value-Based Health Insurance - economics</topic><topic>Value-Based Health Insurance - organization & administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Clifford</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villarivera, Christel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregor, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Bavel, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodman, Clifford</au><au>Villarivera, Christel</au><au>Gregor, Karl</au><au>van Bavel, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regulatory, Policy, and Operational Considerations for Outcomes-Based Risk-Sharing Agreements in the U.S. Market: Opportunities for Reform</atitle><jtitle>Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy</jtitle><addtitle>J Manag Care Spec Pharm</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1174</spage><epage>1181</epage><pages>1174-1181</pages><issn>2376-0540</issn><eissn>2376-1032</eissn><abstract>Although interest in outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSAs) and other value-based contracts (VBCs) continues to grow, the number of VBCs in the United States is still limited. A better understanding of the evolving and fluid context of policies, regulations, and operational factors affecting their uptake in the United States is needed in order to lower or obviate barriers and advance OBRSAs.
To (a) identify and recognize priorities among policies, regulations, and other factors that are most likely to influence the feasibility, design, and execution of OBRSAs and (b) suggest opportunities for reform and other modifications that may advance OBRSAs in the United States.
Across 18 months during 2017-2018, we reviewed health policy literature, examined stakeholder group communications, and conducted semistructured interviews with representatives of 12 diverse stakeholder organizations. Across these, and incorporating real-time contextual changes, we identified priorities for enabling and improving OBRSAs.
Regulatory and policy priorities most often cited by manufacturers were Medicaid best price rule, Medicare Part B average sales pricing, FDA restrictions on communications, and the Anti-Kickback Statute. While recognizing these, health plans were more concerned about operational barriers, particularly associated with data collection and analysis, selection of outcomes that are feasible to assess, bandwidth for managing OBRSAs, and implementation costs relative to return on investment. Most recognized limitations on access to personal health information, target population turnover, and insufficient information sharing of OBRSA experiences. Noteworthy were asymmetries of administrative burden and cost management: individual manufacturers may pursue OBRSAs for 1 or a few products per year, while health plans are approached by multiple manufacturers about OBRSAs for their respective products; manufacturers focus on drugs, while health plans must manage broader costs of care.
While all stakeholders express interest in OBRSAs, health plans tend to consider them as a narrower priority than manufacturers. Solving operational barriers, in addition to addressing policy and regulatory barriers, is essential for aligning efforts to advance OBRSAs. Doing so depends on collaboration to improve decisions about when and how to pursue OBRSAs, with attention to data management, modeling and piloting OBRSAs, and information sharing. These findings pertain to companies operating in the United States and some likely extend to certain value-based arrangements in other countries.
This analysis was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck, as a component of the Learning Laboratory for Advancing Value-Based Healthcare, which is a multiyear collaboration of MSD and Optum, a health services, technology, and data company. The manuscript underwent an internal review by the sponsor. The Lewin Group (Lewin) is a subsidiary of OptumServe. OptumServe is wholly owned by UnitedHealth Group (UHG). Neither OptumServe nor UHG or its subsidiaries review the work products of Lewin. Lewin operates with editorial independence and provides its clients with health care and human services policy research and consulting services. Goodman and Villarivera are employees of Lewin; Gregor is an employee of Optum; and van Bavel is an employee of MSD. Goodman and Villarivera report fees from UHG, unrelated to this study. A poster presentation based on this manuscript was accepted and presented at the ISPOR Europe 2018 Conference in Barcelona, Spain, on November 13, 2018.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy</pub><pmid>31535596</pmid><doi>10.18553/jmcp.2019.19167</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2376-0540 |
ispartof | Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2019-11, Vol.25 (11), p.1174-1181 |
issn | 2376-0540 2376-1032 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10398029 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central |
subjects | Decision Making Delivery of Health Care - economics Delivery of Health Care - legislation & jurisprudence Drug Costs Drug Industry - economics Drug Industry - legislation & jurisprudence Drug Industry - organization & administration Health Policy - economics Health Policy - legislation & jurisprudence Humans Medicaid - economics Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence Medicare - economics Medicare - legislation & jurisprudence Risk Sharing, Financial - economics Risk Sharing, Financial - organization & administration Stakeholder Participation United States Value-Based Health Insurance - economics Value-Based Health Insurance - organization & administration |
title | Regulatory, Policy, and Operational Considerations for Outcomes-Based Risk-Sharing Agreements in the U.S. Market: Opportunities for Reform |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A31%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regulatory,%20Policy,%20and%20Operational%20Considerations%20for%20Outcomes-Based%20Risk-Sharing%20Agreements%20in%20the%20U.S.%20Market:%20Opportunities%20for%20Reform&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20managed%20care%20&%20specialty%20pharmacy&rft.au=Goodman,%20Clifford&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1174&rft.epage=1181&rft.pages=1174-1181&rft.issn=2376-0540&rft.eissn=2376-1032&rft_id=info:doi/10.18553/jmcp.2019.19167&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E31535596%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/31535596&rfr_iscdi=true |