Detection method of intraoperative awareness: a randomized comparative study

: The incidence of intraoperative awareness varies in a wide range in the literature. The reasons for these different results include the questioning method used and the questioning time. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different questioning methods and times used in intrao...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Turkish journal of medical sciences 2022-01, Vol.52 (6), p.1997-2003
Hauptverfasser: Bektaş, Meltem, Çakan, Türkay, Kırdemir, Pinar, Engin, Melis, Başar, Hülya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2003
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1997
container_title Turkish journal of medical sciences
container_volume 52
creator Bektaş, Meltem
Çakan, Türkay
Kırdemir, Pinar
Engin, Melis
Başar, Hülya
description : The incidence of intraoperative awareness varies in a wide range in the literature. The reasons for these different results include the questioning method used and the questioning time. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different questioning methods and times used in intraoperative awareness research for detecting the incidence. We recruited patients between the ages of 18-70 years, with normal cognitive functions and able to speak after general anesthesia to the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1 we applied the modified Brice questionnaire in the first 2 h and 24 h after surgery for investigating intraoperative awareness. In Group 2, 24 h after surgery, we asked about anesthesia satisfaction and patients' complaints, if any. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age (p = 0.514).The proportion of women was significantly higher (p = 0.002), the duration of anesthesia was shorter, and the rate of narcotic analgesic use was higher in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The assessment in the first 2 h showed the frequency of awareness was statistically higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p = 0.016). In the postoperative 24-h assessment, we found no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative awareness between the groups (p < 0.05). In Group 1, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of incidence of awareness according to evaluation time (p = 250). The incidence of intraoperative awareness in Group 1 was significantly higher than in Group 2 in the evaluation conducted in the first 2 h. There was no significant difference in the determination of intraoperative awareness between questioning times in group 1.
doi_str_mv 10.55730/1300-0144.5548
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10390120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36945981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a3fcec590c9d26e5b96c79813332c154136866ca34c9d350d13d5652ed1ed1db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5ob6B8qSOslaLgiNT2kSFzhHWeKyorWpkm5o_HrSbUwgWbIdv35jPYRcMnotxATomAGlKWWcx57nR2QYHyCVTIrjbb0bDshZCJ-UZsBFcUoGIItY5GxIZvfYoekq1yQ1dgtnE1cmVdN57Vr0uqvWmOgv7bHBEG4SnXjdWFdX32gT4-pW7zWhW9nNOTkp9TLgxT6PyPvjw9v0OZ29Pr1M72apAZ53qYbSoBEFNYXNJIp5Ic0kXgMAmWGCM5C5lEYDjwIQ1DKwQooMLYth5zAitzvfdjWv0Rrs712q1le19hvldKX-T5pqoT7cWjEKBWUZjQ7jnYPxLgSP5WGZUbUlq3p4qoenerJx4-rvnwf9L0r4AUpKdZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Detection method of intraoperative awareness: a randomized comparative study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>TÜBİTAK Scientific Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Bektaş, Meltem ; Çakan, Türkay ; Kırdemir, Pinar ; Engin, Melis ; Başar, Hülya</creator><creatorcontrib>Bektaş, Meltem ; Çakan, Türkay ; Kırdemir, Pinar ; Engin, Melis ; Başar, Hülya</creatorcontrib><description>: The incidence of intraoperative awareness varies in a wide range in the literature. The reasons for these different results include the questioning method used and the questioning time. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different questioning methods and times used in intraoperative awareness research for detecting the incidence. We recruited patients between the ages of 18-70 years, with normal cognitive functions and able to speak after general anesthesia to the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1 we applied the modified Brice questionnaire in the first 2 h and 24 h after surgery for investigating intraoperative awareness. In Group 2, 24 h after surgery, we asked about anesthesia satisfaction and patients' complaints, if any. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age (p = 0.514).The proportion of women was significantly higher (p = 0.002), the duration of anesthesia was shorter, and the rate of narcotic analgesic use was higher in Group 2 (p &lt; 0.001). The assessment in the first 2 h showed the frequency of awareness was statistically higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p = 0.016). In the postoperative 24-h assessment, we found no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative awareness between the groups (p &lt; 0.05). In Group 1, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of incidence of awareness according to evaluation time (p = 250). The incidence of intraoperative awareness in Group 1 was significantly higher than in Group 2 in the evaluation conducted in the first 2 h. There was no significant difference in the determination of intraoperative awareness between questioning times in group 1.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-0144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1303-6165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1300-0144</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5548</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36945981</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia, General - adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Intraoperative Awareness - diagnosis ; Intraoperative Awareness - epidemiology ; Intraoperative Awareness - psychology ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Period ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022-01, Vol.52 (6), p.1997-2003</ispartof><rights>TÜBİTAK 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390120/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10390120/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36945981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bektaş, Meltem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çakan, Türkay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırdemir, Pinar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engin, Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Başar, Hülya</creatorcontrib><title>Detection method of intraoperative awareness: a randomized comparative study</title><title>Turkish journal of medical sciences</title><addtitle>Turk J Med Sci</addtitle><description>: The incidence of intraoperative awareness varies in a wide range in the literature. The reasons for these different results include the questioning method used and the questioning time. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different questioning methods and times used in intraoperative awareness research for detecting the incidence. We recruited patients between the ages of 18-70 years, with normal cognitive functions and able to speak after general anesthesia to the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1 we applied the modified Brice questionnaire in the first 2 h and 24 h after surgery for investigating intraoperative awareness. In Group 2, 24 h after surgery, we asked about anesthesia satisfaction and patients' complaints, if any. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age (p = 0.514).The proportion of women was significantly higher (p = 0.002), the duration of anesthesia was shorter, and the rate of narcotic analgesic use was higher in Group 2 (p &lt; 0.001). The assessment in the first 2 h showed the frequency of awareness was statistically higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p = 0.016). In the postoperative 24-h assessment, we found no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative awareness between the groups (p &lt; 0.05). In Group 1, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of incidence of awareness according to evaluation time (p = 250). The incidence of intraoperative awareness in Group 1 was significantly higher than in Group 2 in the evaluation conducted in the first 2 h. There was no significant difference in the determination of intraoperative awareness between questioning times in group 1.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Awareness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intraoperative Awareness - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intraoperative Awareness - psychology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1300-0144</issn><issn>1303-6165</issn><issn>1300-0144</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5ob6B8qSOslaLgiNT2kSFzhHWeKyorWpkm5o_HrSbUwgWbIdv35jPYRcMnotxATomAGlKWWcx57nR2QYHyCVTIrjbb0bDshZCJ-UZsBFcUoGIItY5GxIZvfYoekq1yQ1dgtnE1cmVdN57Vr0uqvWmOgv7bHBEG4SnXjdWFdX32gT4-pW7zWhW9nNOTkp9TLgxT6PyPvjw9v0OZ29Pr1M72apAZ53qYbSoBEFNYXNJIp5Ic0kXgMAmWGCM5C5lEYDjwIQ1DKwQooMLYth5zAitzvfdjWv0Rrs712q1le19hvldKX-T5pqoT7cWjEKBWUZjQ7jnYPxLgSP5WGZUbUlq3p4qoenerJx4-rvnwf9L0r4AUpKdZQ</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Bektaş, Meltem</creator><creator>Çakan, Türkay</creator><creator>Kırdemir, Pinar</creator><creator>Engin, Melis</creator><creator>Başar, Hülya</creator><general>Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Detection method of intraoperative awareness: a randomized comparative study</title><author>Bektaş, Meltem ; Çakan, Türkay ; Kırdemir, Pinar ; Engin, Melis ; Başar, Hülya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a3fcec590c9d26e5b96c79813332c154136866ca34c9d350d13d5652ed1ed1db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Awareness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intraoperative Awareness - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intraoperative Awareness - psychology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bektaş, Meltem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çakan, Türkay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırdemir, Pinar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engin, Melis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Başar, Hülya</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Turkish journal of medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bektaş, Meltem</au><au>Çakan, Türkay</au><au>Kırdemir, Pinar</au><au>Engin, Melis</au><au>Başar, Hülya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Detection method of intraoperative awareness: a randomized comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Turkish journal of medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Med Sci</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1997</spage><epage>2003</epage><pages>1997-2003</pages><issn>1300-0144</issn><eissn>1303-6165</eissn><eissn>1300-0144</eissn><abstract>: The incidence of intraoperative awareness varies in a wide range in the literature. The reasons for these different results include the questioning method used and the questioning time. The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of different questioning methods and times used in intraoperative awareness research for detecting the incidence. We recruited patients between the ages of 18-70 years, with normal cognitive functions and able to speak after general anesthesia to the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. In Group 1 we applied the modified Brice questionnaire in the first 2 h and 24 h after surgery for investigating intraoperative awareness. In Group 2, 24 h after surgery, we asked about anesthesia satisfaction and patients' complaints, if any. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age (p = 0.514).The proportion of women was significantly higher (p = 0.002), the duration of anesthesia was shorter, and the rate of narcotic analgesic use was higher in Group 2 (p &lt; 0.001). The assessment in the first 2 h showed the frequency of awareness was statistically higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p = 0.016). In the postoperative 24-h assessment, we found no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative awareness between the groups (p &lt; 0.05). In Group 1, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of incidence of awareness according to evaluation time (p = 250). The incidence of intraoperative awareness in Group 1 was significantly higher than in Group 2 in the evaluation conducted in the first 2 h. There was no significant difference in the determination of intraoperative awareness between questioning times in group 1.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)</pub><pmid>36945981</pmid><doi>10.55730/1300-0144.5548</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1300-0144
ispartof Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022-01, Vol.52 (6), p.1997-2003
issn 1300-0144
1303-6165
1300-0144
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10390120
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; TÜBİTAK Scientific Journals; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anesthesia, General - adverse effects
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Awareness - diagnosis
Intraoperative Awareness - epidemiology
Intraoperative Awareness - psychology
Middle Aged
Postoperative Period
Young Adult
title Detection method of intraoperative awareness: a randomized comparative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T16%3A37%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Detection%20method%20of%20intraoperative%20awareness:%20a%20randomized%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Turkish%20journal%20of%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Bekta%C5%9F,%20Meltem&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1997&rft.epage=2003&rft.pages=1997-2003&rft.issn=1300-0144&rft.eissn=1303-6165&rft_id=info:doi/10.55730/1300-0144.5548&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E36945981%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36945981&rfr_iscdi=true