Regional analgesia techniques for lumbar spine surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis

Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Traditionally, wound infiltration (WI) with local anesthetics has been widely used by surgeons. Recently, other regional analgesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane blo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of surgery (London, England) England), 2023-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1728-1741
Hauptverfasser: Hong, Boohwi, Baek, Sujin, Kang, Hyemin, Oh, Chahyun, Jo, Yumin, Lee, Soomin, Park, Seyeon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1741
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1728
container_title International journal of surgery (London, England)
container_volume 109
creator Hong, Boohwi
Baek, Sujin
Kang, Hyemin
Oh, Chahyun
Jo, Yumin
Lee, Soomin
Park, Seyeon
description Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Traditionally, wound infiltration (WI) with local anesthetics has been widely used by surgeons. Recently, other regional analgesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block, are being used for multimodal analgesia. The authors aimed to determine the relative efficacy of these using a network meta-analysis. The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Library, and Google Scholar databases to identify all randomized controlled trials that compared the analgesic efficacy of the following interventions: ESPB, TLIP block, WI technique, and controls. The primary endpoint was postoperative opioid consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery, while the pain score, estimated postoperatively at three different time periods, was the secondary objective. The authors included 34 randomized controlled trials with data from 2365 patients. TLIP showed the greatest reduction in opioid consumption compared to controls [mean difference (MD) =-15.0 mg; 95% CI: -18.8 to -11.2]. In pain scores, TLIP had the greatest effect during all time periods compared to controls (MD=-1.9 in early, -1.4 in middle, -0.9 in late). The injection level of ESPB was different in each study. When only surgical site injection of ESPB was included in the network meta-analysis, there was no difference compared with TLIP (MD=1.0 mg; 95% CI: -3.6 to 5.6). TLIP showed the greatest analgesic efficacy after lumbar spine surgery, in terms of postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores, while ESPB and WI are also alternative analgesic options for these surgeries. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal method of providing regional analgesia after lumbar spine surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000270
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10389589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2786518129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7a1372da259e349e5499bc824eef398cb815013a8a8e1ee9ccc192a478c26f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUclOwzAQtRCIQuEPEPKRS4qXpLG5IFSxqhIS9MbBctxJakjiYieg_j2JWqrCHGZGmjdvlofQGSUjSmR6-fQqR2TXWEr20BFNYx5Jmsj9nXyAjkN4JyQmgopDNOBjSVkq6BF6e4HCulqXWHeugGA1bsAsavvZQsC587hsq0x7HJa2BhxaX4BfXWGNcw8dpm5saHANzbfzH7iCRkc90yrYcIIOcl0GON3EIZrd3c4mD9H0-f5xcjONTExkE6Wa8pTNNUsk8FhCEkuZGcFigJxLYTJBE0K5FloABZDGGCqZjlNh2DiXfIiu17TLNqtgbrqVvC7V0ttK-5Vy2qq_ldouVOG-FCVcyET0DBcbBu_6sxtV2WCgLHUNrg2qe9U4oYKyHhqvoca7EDzk2zmUqF4X1emi_uvStZ3v7rht-hWC_wBbOYsl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786518129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regional analgesia techniques for lumbar spine surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hong, Boohwi ; Baek, Sujin ; Kang, Hyemin ; Oh, Chahyun ; Jo, Yumin ; Lee, Soomin ; Park, Seyeon</creator><creatorcontrib>Hong, Boohwi ; Baek, Sujin ; Kang, Hyemin ; Oh, Chahyun ; Jo, Yumin ; Lee, Soomin ; Park, Seyeon</creatorcontrib><description>Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Traditionally, wound infiltration (WI) with local anesthetics has been widely used by surgeons. Recently, other regional analgesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block, are being used for multimodal analgesia. The authors aimed to determine the relative efficacy of these using a network meta-analysis. The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Library, and Google Scholar databases to identify all randomized controlled trials that compared the analgesic efficacy of the following interventions: ESPB, TLIP block, WI technique, and controls. The primary endpoint was postoperative opioid consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery, while the pain score, estimated postoperatively at three different time periods, was the secondary objective. The authors included 34 randomized controlled trials with data from 2365 patients. TLIP showed the greatest reduction in opioid consumption compared to controls [mean difference (MD) =-15.0 mg; 95% CI: -18.8 to -11.2]. In pain scores, TLIP had the greatest effect during all time periods compared to controls (MD=-1.9 in early, -1.4 in middle, -0.9 in late). The injection level of ESPB was different in each study. When only surgical site injection of ESPB was included in the network meta-analysis, there was no difference compared with TLIP (MD=1.0 mg; 95% CI: -3.6 to 5.6). TLIP showed the greatest analgesic efficacy after lumbar spine surgery, in terms of postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores, while ESPB and WI are also alternative analgesic options for these surgeries. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal method of providing regional analgesia after lumbar spine surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-9159</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1743-9191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000270</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36912781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Analgesia ; Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Neurosurgical Procedures ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control ; Reviews</subject><ispartof>International journal of surgery (London, England), 2023-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1728-1741</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7a1372da259e349e5499bc824eef398cb815013a8a8e1ee9ccc192a478c26f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7a1372da259e349e5499bc824eef398cb815013a8a8e1ee9ccc192a478c26f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2468-9271 ; 0000-0001-8344-4245 ; 0000-0002-4847-0250 ; 0000-0002-1478-2096</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36912781$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hong, Boohwi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Sujin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Hyemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Chahyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, Yumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soomin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seyeon</creatorcontrib><title>Regional analgesia techniques for lumbar spine surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis</title><title>International journal of surgery (London, England)</title><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><description>Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Traditionally, wound infiltration (WI) with local anesthetics has been widely used by surgeons. Recently, other regional analgesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block, are being used for multimodal analgesia. The authors aimed to determine the relative efficacy of these using a network meta-analysis. The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Library, and Google Scholar databases to identify all randomized controlled trials that compared the analgesic efficacy of the following interventions: ESPB, TLIP block, WI technique, and controls. The primary endpoint was postoperative opioid consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery, while the pain score, estimated postoperatively at three different time periods, was the secondary objective. The authors included 34 randomized controlled trials with data from 2365 patients. TLIP showed the greatest reduction in opioid consumption compared to controls [mean difference (MD) =-15.0 mg; 95% CI: -18.8 to -11.2]. In pain scores, TLIP had the greatest effect during all time periods compared to controls (MD=-1.9 in early, -1.4 in middle, -0.9 in late). The injection level of ESPB was different in each study. When only surgical site injection of ESPB was included in the network meta-analysis, there was no difference compared with TLIP (MD=1.0 mg; 95% CI: -3.6 to 5.6). TLIP showed the greatest analgesic efficacy after lumbar spine surgery, in terms of postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores, while ESPB and WI are also alternative analgesic options for these surgeries. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal method of providing regional analgesia after lumbar spine surgery.</description><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Neurosurgical Procedures</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><issn>1743-9159</issn><issn>1743-9191</issn><issn>1743-9159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUclOwzAQtRCIQuEPEPKRS4qXpLG5IFSxqhIS9MbBctxJakjiYieg_j2JWqrCHGZGmjdvlofQGSUjSmR6-fQqR2TXWEr20BFNYx5Jmsj9nXyAjkN4JyQmgopDNOBjSVkq6BF6e4HCulqXWHeugGA1bsAsavvZQsC587hsq0x7HJa2BhxaX4BfXWGNcw8dpm5saHANzbfzH7iCRkc90yrYcIIOcl0GON3EIZrd3c4mD9H0-f5xcjONTExkE6Wa8pTNNUsk8FhCEkuZGcFigJxLYTJBE0K5FloABZDGGCqZjlNh2DiXfIiu17TLNqtgbrqVvC7V0ttK-5Vy2qq_ldouVOG-FCVcyET0DBcbBu_6sxtV2WCgLHUNrg2qe9U4oYKyHhqvoca7EDzk2zmUqF4X1emi_uvStZ3v7rht-hWC_wBbOYsl</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Hong, Boohwi</creator><creator>Baek, Sujin</creator><creator>Kang, Hyemin</creator><creator>Oh, Chahyun</creator><creator>Jo, Yumin</creator><creator>Lee, Soomin</creator><creator>Park, Seyeon</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2468-9271</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-4245</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-0250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-2096</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Regional analgesia techniques for lumbar spine surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis</title><author>Hong, Boohwi ; Baek, Sujin ; Kang, Hyemin ; Oh, Chahyun ; Jo, Yumin ; Lee, Soomin ; Park, Seyeon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-7a1372da259e349e5499bc824eef398cb815013a8a8e1ee9ccc192a478c26f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Neurosurgical Procedures</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hong, Boohwi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baek, Sujin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Hyemin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Chahyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jo, Yumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Soomin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Seyeon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hong, Boohwi</au><au>Baek, Sujin</au><au>Kang, Hyemin</au><au>Oh, Chahyun</au><au>Jo, Yumin</au><au>Lee, Soomin</au><au>Park, Seyeon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regional analgesia techniques for lumbar spine surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>109</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1728</spage><epage>1741</epage><pages>1728-1741</pages><issn>1743-9159</issn><issn>1743-9191</issn><eissn>1743-9159</eissn><abstract>Various regional analgesia techniques are used to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Traditionally, wound infiltration (WI) with local anesthetics has been widely used by surgeons. Recently, other regional analgesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block, are being used for multimodal analgesia. The authors aimed to determine the relative efficacy of these using a network meta-analysis. The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Library, and Google Scholar databases to identify all randomized controlled trials that compared the analgesic efficacy of the following interventions: ESPB, TLIP block, WI technique, and controls. The primary endpoint was postoperative opioid consumption during the first 24 hours after surgery, while the pain score, estimated postoperatively at three different time periods, was the secondary objective. The authors included 34 randomized controlled trials with data from 2365 patients. TLIP showed the greatest reduction in opioid consumption compared to controls [mean difference (MD) =-15.0 mg; 95% CI: -18.8 to -11.2]. In pain scores, TLIP had the greatest effect during all time periods compared to controls (MD=-1.9 in early, -1.4 in middle, -0.9 in late). The injection level of ESPB was different in each study. When only surgical site injection of ESPB was included in the network meta-analysis, there was no difference compared with TLIP (MD=1.0 mg; 95% CI: -3.6 to 5.6). TLIP showed the greatest analgesic efficacy after lumbar spine surgery, in terms of postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores, while ESPB and WI are also alternative analgesic options for these surgeries. However, further studies are needed to determine the optimal method of providing regional analgesia after lumbar spine surgery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>36912781</pmid><doi>10.1097/JS9.0000000000000270</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2468-9271</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-4245</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-0250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-2096</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-9159
ispartof International journal of surgery (London, England), 2023-06, Vol.109 (6), p.1728-1741
issn 1743-9159
1743-9191
1743-9159
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10389589
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Analgesia
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Humans
Network Meta-Analysis
Neurosurgical Procedures
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Pain, Postoperative - etiology
Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control
Reviews
title Regional analgesia techniques for lumbar spine surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T13%3A17%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regional%20analgesia%20techniques%20for%20lumbar%20spine%20surgery:%20a%20frequentist%20network%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20surgery%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Hong,%20Boohwi&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=109&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1728&rft.epage=1741&rft.pages=1728-1741&rft.issn=1743-9159&rft.eissn=1743-9159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000270&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2786518129%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786518129&rft_id=info:pmid/36912781&rfr_iscdi=true