Evaluation of patch test results in paediatric patients in a tertiary dermatology clinic

Background and Objectives: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in childhood as well as in adulthood. Children could be affected by numerous allergens. Allergen sources could change by region. In this study, we aimed to identify the most common allergens that cause contact sensitivity in paediatric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of dermatology 2023-05, Vol.68 (3), p.354-354
Hauptverfasser: Kazan, Didem, Odyakmaz-Demirsoy, Evren, Eloglu, Hatice, Kiran, Rebiay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 354
container_issue 3
container_start_page 354
container_title Indian journal of dermatology
container_volume 68
creator Kazan, Didem
Odyakmaz-Demirsoy, Evren
Eloglu, Hatice
Kiran, Rebiay
description Background and Objectives: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in childhood as well as in adulthood. Children could be affected by numerous allergens. Allergen sources could change by region. In this study, we aimed to identify the most common allergens that cause contact sensitivity in paediatric patients in our region to make a standardized patch test series and define the ways of exposure to these allergens. Materials and Methods: Between June 2013 and January 2021, a total of 61 patients' European baseline series patch test results were evaluated. Results: Among 61 patients, 36 (%59) were female and 25 (%41) were male. The mean age was 10.4 years. Positivity with at least one allergen was present in 39 (64%) cases. The most common allergens with positive reactions were balsam of Peru (BOP) in 11 (18%) patients, nickel in eight (13.1%) patients, and fragrance mix-1 in seven (11.4%) patients. No statically significant difference was found between patch test results and gender (P = 0.109), atopy (P = 0.774), atopic dermatitis (P = 0.662), hobby (P = 0.377) and side of lesions (P = 0.826). However, there was a significant relationship between the duration of complaints and patch test results (P = 0.007). Conclusion: The responsible allergen in paediatric patients may vary especially by region, thus this could be challenging for diagnosis. Therefore, each region should create its own specific standardized paediatric patch tests.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/ijd.ijd_152_23
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10389143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A757476551</galeid><sourcerecordid>A757476551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536i-9d00eb14fa395da616e4072818adfd9087f0b13d38910ca3d2e9ac7cec9945363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kttrFDEUxoModq2--igDvvgya84kmZk8aSn1AgVfFHwL2SSzzTabrMlMl_73nmF7sVIlhMDJL9-55CPkNdAlB8re-41d4lYgGtWwJ2QBUvY1awGekgWlIGsBgh-RF6VsKOUMenhOjlgnGsk5LMjPsysdJj36FKs0VDs9motqdGWssitTGEvlI0ad9XrM3syAd_EQ1gjm0et8XVmXt3pMIa2vKxN89OYleTboUNyrm_OY_Ph09v30S33-7fPX05Pz2gjW-lpaSt0K-KCZFFa30DpOu6aHXtvBStp3A10Bs6yXQI1mtnFSm844IyVHBXZMPhx0d9Nq66zB4rIOapf9FgtTSXv18Cb6C7VOVwqnh5qcocK7G4Wcfk3Yutr6YlwIOro0FdX0XADl0M7J3v6FbtKUI_aHFOsF73hD76m1Dk75OCRMbGZRddKJjnetEIBU_Qi1dtFhlSm6wWP4Ab98hMdl3dab_z0wOZWS3XA3FKBqNo-ajXNvHnzw5s9R3uG3bkHg4wHYp4BfXy7DtHdZIXsZ0_4fsooJrm5dxn4DL0XXNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2838547420</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of patch test results in paediatric patients in a tertiary dermatology clinic</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kazan, Didem ; Odyakmaz-Demirsoy, Evren ; Eloglu, Hatice ; Kiran, Rebiay</creator><creatorcontrib>Kazan, Didem ; Odyakmaz-Demirsoy, Evren ; Eloglu, Hatice ; Kiran, Rebiay</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in childhood as well as in adulthood. Children could be affected by numerous allergens. Allergen sources could change by region. In this study, we aimed to identify the most common allergens that cause contact sensitivity in paediatric patients in our region to make a standardized patch test series and define the ways of exposure to these allergens. Materials and Methods: Between June 2013 and January 2021, a total of 61 patients' European baseline series patch test results were evaluated. Results: Among 61 patients, 36 (%59) were female and 25 (%41) were male. The mean age was 10.4 years. Positivity with at least one allergen was present in 39 (64%) cases. The most common allergens with positive reactions were balsam of Peru (BOP) in 11 (18%) patients, nickel in eight (13.1%) patients, and fragrance mix-1 in seven (11.4%) patients. No statically significant difference was found between patch test results and gender (P = 0.109), atopy (P = 0.774), atopic dermatitis (P = 0.662), hobby (P = 0.377) and side of lesions (P = 0.826). However, there was a significant relationship between the duration of complaints and patch test results (P = 0.007). Conclusion: The responsible allergen in paediatric patients may vary especially by region, thus this could be challenging for diagnosis. Therefore, each region should create its own specific standardized paediatric patch tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-5154</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_152_23</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37529441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergens ; Allergies ; Allergy ; Analysis ; Dermatitis ; Eczema ; Neomycin ; Original ; Pediatrics ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of dermatology, 2023-05, Vol.68 (3), p.354-354</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Dermatology.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Dermatology 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536i-9d00eb14fa395da616e4072818adfd9087f0b13d38910ca3d2e9ac7cec9945363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389143/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10389143/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37529441$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kazan, Didem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odyakmaz-Demirsoy, Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eloglu, Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiran, Rebiay</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of patch test results in paediatric patients in a tertiary dermatology clinic</title><title>Indian journal of dermatology</title><addtitle>Indian J Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in childhood as well as in adulthood. Children could be affected by numerous allergens. Allergen sources could change by region. In this study, we aimed to identify the most common allergens that cause contact sensitivity in paediatric patients in our region to make a standardized patch test series and define the ways of exposure to these allergens. Materials and Methods: Between June 2013 and January 2021, a total of 61 patients' European baseline series patch test results were evaluated. Results: Among 61 patients, 36 (%59) were female and 25 (%41) were male. The mean age was 10.4 years. Positivity with at least one allergen was present in 39 (64%) cases. The most common allergens with positive reactions were balsam of Peru (BOP) in 11 (18%) patients, nickel in eight (13.1%) patients, and fragrance mix-1 in seven (11.4%) patients. No statically significant difference was found between patch test results and gender (P = 0.109), atopy (P = 0.774), atopic dermatitis (P = 0.662), hobby (P = 0.377) and side of lesions (P = 0.826). However, there was a significant relationship between the duration of complaints and patch test results (P = 0.007). Conclusion: The responsible allergen in paediatric patients may vary especially by region, thus this could be challenging for diagnosis. Therefore, each region should create its own specific standardized paediatric patch tests.</description><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Allergy</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Eczema</subject><subject>Neomycin</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0019-5154</issn><issn>1998-3611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kttrFDEUxoModq2--igDvvgya84kmZk8aSn1AgVfFHwL2SSzzTabrMlMl_73nmF7sVIlhMDJL9-55CPkNdAlB8re-41d4lYgGtWwJ2QBUvY1awGekgWlIGsBgh-RF6VsKOUMenhOjlgnGsk5LMjPsysdJj36FKs0VDs9motqdGWssitTGEvlI0ad9XrM3syAd_EQ1gjm0et8XVmXt3pMIa2vKxN89OYleTboUNyrm_OY_Ph09v30S33-7fPX05Pz2gjW-lpaSt0K-KCZFFa30DpOu6aHXtvBStp3A10Bs6yXQI1mtnFSm844IyVHBXZMPhx0d9Nq66zB4rIOapf9FgtTSXv18Cb6C7VOVwqnh5qcocK7G4Wcfk3Yutr6YlwIOro0FdX0XADl0M7J3v6FbtKUI_aHFOsF73hD76m1Dk75OCRMbGZRddKJjnetEIBU_Qi1dtFhlSm6wWP4Ab98hMdl3dab_z0wOZWS3XA3FKBqNo-ajXNvHnzw5s9R3uG3bkHg4wHYp4BfXy7DtHdZIXsZ0_4fsooJrm5dxn4DL0XXNA</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Kazan, Didem</creator><creator>Odyakmaz-Demirsoy, Evren</creator><creator>Eloglu, Hatice</creator><creator>Kiran, Rebiay</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of patch test results in paediatric patients in a tertiary dermatology clinic</title><author>Kazan, Didem ; Odyakmaz-Demirsoy, Evren ; Eloglu, Hatice ; Kiran, Rebiay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536i-9d00eb14fa395da616e4072818adfd9087f0b13d38910ca3d2e9ac7cec9945363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Allergy</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Eczema</topic><topic>Neomycin</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kazan, Didem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odyakmaz-Demirsoy, Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eloglu, Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiran, Rebiay</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kazan, Didem</au><au>Odyakmaz-Demirsoy, Evren</au><au>Eloglu, Hatice</au><au>Kiran, Rebiay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of patch test results in paediatric patients in a tertiary dermatology clinic</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Dermatol</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>354</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>354-354</pages><issn>0019-5154</issn><eissn>1998-3611</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives: Allergic contact dermatitis is common in childhood as well as in adulthood. Children could be affected by numerous allergens. Allergen sources could change by region. In this study, we aimed to identify the most common allergens that cause contact sensitivity in paediatric patients in our region to make a standardized patch test series and define the ways of exposure to these allergens. Materials and Methods: Between June 2013 and January 2021, a total of 61 patients' European baseline series patch test results were evaluated. Results: Among 61 patients, 36 (%59) were female and 25 (%41) were male. The mean age was 10.4 years. Positivity with at least one allergen was present in 39 (64%) cases. The most common allergens with positive reactions were balsam of Peru (BOP) in 11 (18%) patients, nickel in eight (13.1%) patients, and fragrance mix-1 in seven (11.4%) patients. No statically significant difference was found between patch test results and gender (P = 0.109), atopy (P = 0.774), atopic dermatitis (P = 0.662), hobby (P = 0.377) and side of lesions (P = 0.826). However, there was a significant relationship between the duration of complaints and patch test results (P = 0.007). Conclusion: The responsible allergen in paediatric patients may vary especially by region, thus this could be challenging for diagnosis. Therefore, each region should create its own specific standardized paediatric patch tests.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>37529441</pmid><doi>10.4103/ijd.ijd_152_23</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-5154
ispartof Indian journal of dermatology, 2023-05, Vol.68 (3), p.354-354
issn 0019-5154
1998-3611
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10389143
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Allergens
Allergies
Allergy
Analysis
Dermatitis
Eczema
Neomycin
Original
Pediatrics
Testing
title Evaluation of patch test results in paediatric patients in a tertiary dermatology clinic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A58%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20patch%20test%20results%20in%20paediatric%20patients%20in%20a%20tertiary%20dermatology%20clinic&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20dermatology&rft.au=Kazan,%20Didem&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=354&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=354-354&rft.issn=0019-5154&rft.eissn=1998-3611&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijd.ijd_152_23&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA757476551%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2838547420&rft_id=info:pmid/37529441&rft_galeid=A757476551&rfr_iscdi=true