Comparison of two different minimally invasive techniques used in bladder stone surgery for preschool-aged children

This study was designed to compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous cystolithotomy (mPCL) and transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) in treating bladder stones in preschool-aged children (≤6 years old). Twenty-four patients treated with mPCL and 28 patients treated with TUCL for bladder stones were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Turkish journal of medical sciences 2022-01, Vol.52 (4), p.1274-1280
Hauptverfasser: Yağmur, İsmail, Demir, Mehmet, Katı, Bülent, Pelit, Eyyüp Sabri, Ördek, Eser, Çiftçi, Halil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1280
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1274
container_title Turkish journal of medical sciences
container_volume 52
creator Yağmur, İsmail
Demir, Mehmet
Katı, Bülent
Pelit, Eyyüp Sabri
Ördek, Eser
Çiftçi, Halil
description This study was designed to compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous cystolithotomy (mPCL) and transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) in treating bladder stones in preschool-aged children (≤6 years old). Twenty-four patients treated with mPCL and 28 patients treated with TUCL for bladder stones were compared retrospectively. The operative and postoperative outcomes of both groups were analyzed. The mean age and gender distribution were similar between the groups. The mean stone size was 16.5 ± 0.5 mm for the mPCL group and 14.9 ± 5.7 mm for the TUCL group (p = 0.318). The mean operative time was 41.1 ± 9.9 min for the mPCL group and 39.0 ± 12.3 min for the TUCL group (p = 0.182). Catheterization times and hospitalization times were statistically significantly longer in the mPCL group (p = 0.000). The rate of urinary retention after urethral catheter removal was significantly higher in the TUCL group (p < 0.05). Reintervention was performed for one patient in Group 1 due to urinary leakage and for five patients in Group 2 due to urinary retention. The stone-free rate (SFR) after a single procedure was 100% in the mPCL group and 89.3% in the TUCL group (p = 0.099). After auxiliary procedures performed for three patients, the overall SFR also reached 100% for the TUCL group. Both mPCL and TUCL are effective methods in the treatment of bladder stones of 20 mm.
doi_str_mv 10.55730/1300-0144.5433
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10388091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36326399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-46d9b5e24f9ab38f2a53a417b9d8a2f14a17f1c18b287af72668f5509351681c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCIlsKZG_IPpLXjR5wTQhUvqRIXOFuOYzdGSRzstKh_j9sCgtOudmZnNbMAXGM0Z6wgaIEJQhnClM4ZJeQETNOAZBxzdnroj-AEXMT4jlBOKCvPwYRwknNSllMQl74bVHDR99BbOH56WDtrTTD9CDvXu0617Q66fqui2xo4Gt307mNjItxEUycAVq2qaxNgHH1vYNyEtQk7aH2AQzBRN963mVonrm5cWyfhS3BmVRvN1XedgbeH-9flU7Z6eXxe3q0yTagYM8rrsmImp7ZUFRE2V4woiouqrIXKLaYKFxZrLKpcFMoWOefCMoZKwjAXWJMZuD3qDpuqM7VOloJq5RCSqbCTXjn5H-ldI9d-KzEiQqASJ4XFUUEHH2Mw9ncZI3l4gNxnLPcZy_0D0sbN35u__J_EyRdCt4Px</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two different minimally invasive techniques used in bladder stone surgery for preschool-aged children</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>TÜBİTAK Scientific Journals</source><creator>Yağmur, İsmail ; Demir, Mehmet ; Katı, Bülent ; Pelit, Eyyüp Sabri ; Ördek, Eser ; Çiftçi, Halil</creator><creatorcontrib>Yağmur, İsmail ; Demir, Mehmet ; Katı, Bülent ; Pelit, Eyyüp Sabri ; Ördek, Eser ; Çiftçi, Halil</creatorcontrib><description>This study was designed to compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous cystolithotomy (mPCL) and transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) in treating bladder stones in preschool-aged children (≤6 years old). Twenty-four patients treated with mPCL and 28 patients treated with TUCL for bladder stones were compared retrospectively. The operative and postoperative outcomes of both groups were analyzed. The mean age and gender distribution were similar between the groups. The mean stone size was 16.5 ± 0.5 mm for the mPCL group and 14.9 ± 5.7 mm for the TUCL group (p = 0.318). The mean operative time was 41.1 ± 9.9 min for the mPCL group and 39.0 ± 12.3 min for the TUCL group (p = 0.182). Catheterization times and hospitalization times were statistically significantly longer in the mPCL group (p = 0.000). The rate of urinary retention after urethral catheter removal was significantly higher in the TUCL group (p &lt; 0.05). Reintervention was performed for one patient in Group 1 due to urinary leakage and for five patients in Group 2 due to urinary retention. The stone-free rate (SFR) after a single procedure was 100% in the mPCL group and 89.3% in the TUCL group (p = 0.099). After auxiliary procedures performed for three patients, the overall SFR also reached 100% for the TUCL group. Both mPCL and TUCL are effective methods in the treatment of bladder stones of &lt;30 mm in the preschool age group. Although TUCL has some advantages over mPCL, such as shorter hospital stays and catheterization times, there is a risk of urinary retention with increased stone sizes. It may be more advantageous to apply mPCL for the reduction of complications and reintervention rates, especially in small children with bladder stones of &gt;20 mm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-0144</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1303-6165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1300-0144</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5433</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36326399</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; Humans ; Lithotripsy - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Urethra ; Urinary Bladder Calculi - epidemiology ; Urinary Bladder Calculi - surgery ; Urinary Retention</subject><ispartof>Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022-01, Vol.52 (4), p.1274-1280</ispartof><rights>TÜBİTAK 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388091/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10388091/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326399$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yağmur, İsmail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katı, Bülent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelit, Eyyüp Sabri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ördek, Eser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çiftçi, Halil</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two different minimally invasive techniques used in bladder stone surgery for preschool-aged children</title><title>Turkish journal of medical sciences</title><addtitle>Turk J Med Sci</addtitle><description>This study was designed to compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous cystolithotomy (mPCL) and transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) in treating bladder stones in preschool-aged children (≤6 years old). Twenty-four patients treated with mPCL and 28 patients treated with TUCL for bladder stones were compared retrospectively. The operative and postoperative outcomes of both groups were analyzed. The mean age and gender distribution were similar between the groups. The mean stone size was 16.5 ± 0.5 mm for the mPCL group and 14.9 ± 5.7 mm for the TUCL group (p = 0.318). The mean operative time was 41.1 ± 9.9 min for the mPCL group and 39.0 ± 12.3 min for the TUCL group (p = 0.182). Catheterization times and hospitalization times were statistically significantly longer in the mPCL group (p = 0.000). The rate of urinary retention after urethral catheter removal was significantly higher in the TUCL group (p &lt; 0.05). Reintervention was performed for one patient in Group 1 due to urinary leakage and for five patients in Group 2 due to urinary retention. The stone-free rate (SFR) after a single procedure was 100% in the mPCL group and 89.3% in the TUCL group (p = 0.099). After auxiliary procedures performed for three patients, the overall SFR also reached 100% for the TUCL group. Both mPCL and TUCL are effective methods in the treatment of bladder stones of &lt;30 mm in the preschool age group. Although TUCL has some advantages over mPCL, such as shorter hospital stays and catheterization times, there is a risk of urinary retention with increased stone sizes. It may be more advantageous to apply mPCL for the reduction of complications and reintervention rates, especially in small children with bladder stones of &gt;20 mm.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lithotripsy - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urethra</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Calculi - epidemiology</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Retention</subject><issn>1300-0144</issn><issn>1303-6165</issn><issn>1300-0144</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUctOwzAQtBCIlsKZG_IPpLXjR5wTQhUvqRIXOFuOYzdGSRzstKh_j9sCgtOudmZnNbMAXGM0Z6wgaIEJQhnClM4ZJeQETNOAZBxzdnroj-AEXMT4jlBOKCvPwYRwknNSllMQl74bVHDR99BbOH56WDtrTTD9CDvXu0617Q66fqui2xo4Gt307mNjItxEUycAVq2qaxNgHH1vYNyEtQk7aH2AQzBRN963mVonrm5cWyfhS3BmVRvN1XedgbeH-9flU7Z6eXxe3q0yTagYM8rrsmImp7ZUFRE2V4woiouqrIXKLaYKFxZrLKpcFMoWOefCMoZKwjAXWJMZuD3qDpuqM7VOloJq5RCSqbCTXjn5H-ldI9d-KzEiQqASJ4XFUUEHH2Mw9ncZI3l4gNxnLPcZy_0D0sbN35u__J_EyRdCt4Px</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Yağmur, İsmail</creator><creator>Demir, Mehmet</creator><creator>Katı, Bülent</creator><creator>Pelit, Eyyüp Sabri</creator><creator>Ördek, Eser</creator><creator>Çiftçi, Halil</creator><general>Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Comparison of two different minimally invasive techniques used in bladder stone surgery for preschool-aged children</title><author>Yağmur, İsmail ; Demir, Mehmet ; Katı, Bülent ; Pelit, Eyyüp Sabri ; Ördek, Eser ; Çiftçi, Halil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-46d9b5e24f9ab38f2a53a417b9d8a2f14a17f1c18b287af72668f5509351681c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lithotripsy - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urethra</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Calculi - epidemiology</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Retention</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yağmur, İsmail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demir, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katı, Bülent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelit, Eyyüp Sabri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ördek, Eser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çiftçi, Halil</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Turkish journal of medical sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yağmur, İsmail</au><au>Demir, Mehmet</au><au>Katı, Bülent</au><au>Pelit, Eyyüp Sabri</au><au>Ördek, Eser</au><au>Çiftçi, Halil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two different minimally invasive techniques used in bladder stone surgery for preschool-aged children</atitle><jtitle>Turkish journal of medical sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Med Sci</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1274</spage><epage>1280</epage><pages>1274-1280</pages><issn>1300-0144</issn><eissn>1303-6165</eissn><eissn>1300-0144</eissn><abstract>This study was designed to compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous cystolithotomy (mPCL) and transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) in treating bladder stones in preschool-aged children (≤6 years old). Twenty-four patients treated with mPCL and 28 patients treated with TUCL for bladder stones were compared retrospectively. The operative and postoperative outcomes of both groups were analyzed. The mean age and gender distribution were similar between the groups. The mean stone size was 16.5 ± 0.5 mm for the mPCL group and 14.9 ± 5.7 mm for the TUCL group (p = 0.318). The mean operative time was 41.1 ± 9.9 min for the mPCL group and 39.0 ± 12.3 min for the TUCL group (p = 0.182). Catheterization times and hospitalization times were statistically significantly longer in the mPCL group (p = 0.000). The rate of urinary retention after urethral catheter removal was significantly higher in the TUCL group (p &lt; 0.05). Reintervention was performed for one patient in Group 1 due to urinary leakage and for five patients in Group 2 due to urinary retention. The stone-free rate (SFR) after a single procedure was 100% in the mPCL group and 89.3% in the TUCL group (p = 0.099). After auxiliary procedures performed for three patients, the overall SFR also reached 100% for the TUCL group. Both mPCL and TUCL are effective methods in the treatment of bladder stones of &lt;30 mm in the preschool age group. Although TUCL has some advantages over mPCL, such as shorter hospital stays and catheterization times, there is a risk of urinary retention with increased stone sizes. It may be more advantageous to apply mPCL for the reduction of complications and reintervention rates, especially in small children with bladder stones of &gt;20 mm.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)</pub><pmid>36326399</pmid><doi>10.55730/1300-0144.5433</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1300-0144
ispartof Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2022-01, Vol.52 (4), p.1274-1280
issn 1300-0144
1303-6165
1300-0144
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10388091
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; TÜBİTAK Scientific Journals
subjects Child
Child, Preschool
Humans
Lithotripsy - methods
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Urethra
Urinary Bladder Calculi - epidemiology
Urinary Bladder Calculi - surgery
Urinary Retention
title Comparison of two different minimally invasive techniques used in bladder stone surgery for preschool-aged children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A33%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20different%20minimally%20invasive%20techniques%20used%20in%20bladder%20stone%20surgery%20for%20preschool-aged%20children&rft.jtitle=Turkish%20journal%20of%20medical%20sciences&rft.au=Ya%C4%9Fmur,%20%C4%B0smail&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1274&rft.epage=1280&rft.pages=1274-1280&rft.issn=1300-0144&rft.eissn=1303-6165&rft_id=info:doi/10.55730/1300-0144.5433&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E36326399%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36326399&rfr_iscdi=true