Underutilization or appropriate care? Assessing adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival in 3 heterogenous subpopulations with stage II/III colorectal cancer within a large integrated health system
Clinical guidelines have recommended adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, although the survival benefit is unclear. ACT is also recommended for patients with stage III colon cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence and mortality. For stage II/III rectal cance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy 2023-06, Vol.29 (6), p.635-646 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 646 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 635 |
container_title | Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Chen, Yilin Shankaran, Veena Hahn, Erin E Haupt, Eric C Bansal, Aasthaa |
description | Clinical guidelines have recommended adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, although the survival benefit is unclear. ACT is also recommended for patients with stage III colon cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence and mortality. For stage II/III rectal cancer, however, the role of perioperative chemotherapy (PCT, adjuvant or neoadjuvant) remains controversial, resulting in substantial variation in its use in clinical practice.
To understand real-world use and predictors of ACT or PCT use and survival outcomes in 3 heterogeneous patient groups with colorectal cancer (CRC), and to inform the evidence gap between guideline-based care and clinical practice.
This retrospective cohort study included patients with an initial stage II/III CRC diagnosis between 2008 and 2013 identified from Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health record databases. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-74 years at diagnosis and received primary curative surgery. We fitted mixed effects logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of ACT receipt and Cox proportional hazards models on propensity score-matched (PS-matched) samples to assess the association between ACT/PCT receipt and survival.
We included 1,690 patients with colon cancer (stage II: 820 and stage III: 870) and 587 patients with rectal cancer (stage II: 241 and stage III: 346). We found that 65% of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, 15% of those with stage III colon, and 15% of those with stage II/III rectal cancer did not receive ACT/PCT. Patients with stage II colon cancer with T4 stage (odds ratio [OR] = 5.79, 95% CI = 3.33 - 10.06) and a lower comorbidity score were more likely to receive ACT (high vs low Charlson score: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55 - 0.87). Patients with stage III rectal cancer were more likely to receive PCT than those with stage II disease (OR = 7.85, 95% CI = 2.07 - 29.74). Patients with another cancer diagnosis prior to CRC diagnosis were less likely to receive PCT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.16 - 0.85). ACT/PCT use was associated with improved overall survival among patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer (PS-matched hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.70) and those with stage III CRC (stage III colon: PS-matched HR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.36; stage III rectal: PS-matched HR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.13 - 0.31).
We found potential underuse of appropriate chemotherapy treatment in patients with high-risk stage II colo |
doi_str_mv | 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.6.635 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10387960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>37276035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-16efac32db617ed17de83ed8a4ba75db9cd51944863f73ac1adac43210c1112e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtq3DAQhkVpacI2T1AoeoHd6ODjVQihB0OgN821GEuzthZbMpK8Zft6fbFqN2lor2Zg_v8faT5CPnK2401ZytvDrJedYELuRLurdpUs35BrIetqy5kUb196VhbsitzEeGAsa8uq4fI9uZK1qCsmy2vy-8kZDGuyk_0FyXpHfaCwLMEvwUJCqiHgHb2PEWO0bqBgDusRXKJ6xNmnEQMsJ7pGpOAMjWs42iNM1Doq6YgJgx_Q-TXmUb_4ZZ0uWyL9adNIY4IBadfddl1HtZ98QJ2yW4PTGC6aHAR0gpB11iUcQn6Uyckwnf2nmHD-QN7tYYp481I35OnL5x8P37aP3792D_ePW50_nra8wj1oKUxf8RoNrw02Ek0DRQ91afpWm5K3RdFUcl9L0BwM6EIKzjTnXKDckLvn3GXtZzQaXQowqXyoGcJJebDq_4mzoxr8UWUiTd3mg2-IfE7QwccYcP9q5kxduKozV3XmqkSrKpW5Ztenf_e-ev5SlH8ALtanlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Underutilization or appropriate care? Assessing adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival in 3 heterogenous subpopulations with stage II/III colorectal cancer within a large integrated health system</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Chen, Yilin ; Shankaran, Veena ; Hahn, Erin E ; Haupt, Eric C ; Bansal, Aasthaa</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yilin ; Shankaran, Veena ; Hahn, Erin E ; Haupt, Eric C ; Bansal, Aasthaa</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical guidelines have recommended adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, although the survival benefit is unclear. ACT is also recommended for patients with stage III colon cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence and mortality. For stage II/III rectal cancer, however, the role of perioperative chemotherapy (PCT, adjuvant or neoadjuvant) remains controversial, resulting in substantial variation in its use in clinical practice.
To understand real-world use and predictors of ACT or PCT use and survival outcomes in 3 heterogeneous patient groups with colorectal cancer (CRC), and to inform the evidence gap between guideline-based care and clinical practice.
This retrospective cohort study included patients with an initial stage II/III CRC diagnosis between 2008 and 2013 identified from Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health record databases. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-74 years at diagnosis and received primary curative surgery. We fitted mixed effects logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of ACT receipt and Cox proportional hazards models on propensity score-matched (PS-matched) samples to assess the association between ACT/PCT receipt and survival.
We included 1,690 patients with colon cancer (stage II: 820 and stage III: 870) and 587 patients with rectal cancer (stage II: 241 and stage III: 346). We found that 65% of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, 15% of those with stage III colon, and 15% of those with stage II/III rectal cancer did not receive ACT/PCT. Patients with stage II colon cancer with T4 stage (odds ratio [OR] = 5.79, 95% CI = 3.33 - 10.06) and a lower comorbidity score were more likely to receive ACT (high vs low Charlson score: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55 - 0.87). Patients with stage III rectal cancer were more likely to receive PCT than those with stage II disease (OR = 7.85, 95% CI = 2.07 - 29.74). Patients with another cancer diagnosis prior to CRC diagnosis were less likely to receive PCT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.16 - 0.85). ACT/PCT use was associated with improved overall survival among patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer (PS-matched hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.70) and those with stage III CRC (stage III colon: PS-matched HR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.36; stage III rectal: PS-matched HR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.13 - 0.31).
We found potential underuse of appropriate chemotherapy treatment in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer and stage III CRC. Clinicians' and providers' decisions on ACT administration may not be fully guided by the risk of recurrence and 5-year survival benefits in stage II colon cancer.
This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (under R37-CA218413). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2376-0540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-1032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.6.635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37276035</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy</publisher><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - methods ; Colonic Neoplasms - pathology ; Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated ; Humans ; Neoplasm Staging ; Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2023-06, Vol.29 (6), p.635-646</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-16efac32db617ed17de83ed8a4ba75db9cd51944863f73ac1adac43210c1112e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387960/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387960/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37276035$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankaran, Veena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Erin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haupt, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Aasthaa</creatorcontrib><title>Underutilization or appropriate care? Assessing adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival in 3 heterogenous subpopulations with stage II/III colorectal cancer within a large integrated health system</title><title>Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy</title><addtitle>J Manag Care Spec Pharm</addtitle><description>Clinical guidelines have recommended adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, although the survival benefit is unclear. ACT is also recommended for patients with stage III colon cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence and mortality. For stage II/III rectal cancer, however, the role of perioperative chemotherapy (PCT, adjuvant or neoadjuvant) remains controversial, resulting in substantial variation in its use in clinical practice.
To understand real-world use and predictors of ACT or PCT use and survival outcomes in 3 heterogeneous patient groups with colorectal cancer (CRC), and to inform the evidence gap between guideline-based care and clinical practice.
This retrospective cohort study included patients with an initial stage II/III CRC diagnosis between 2008 and 2013 identified from Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health record databases. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-74 years at diagnosis and received primary curative surgery. We fitted mixed effects logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of ACT receipt and Cox proportional hazards models on propensity score-matched (PS-matched) samples to assess the association between ACT/PCT receipt and survival.
We included 1,690 patients with colon cancer (stage II: 820 and stage III: 870) and 587 patients with rectal cancer (stage II: 241 and stage III: 346). We found that 65% of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, 15% of those with stage III colon, and 15% of those with stage II/III rectal cancer did not receive ACT/PCT. Patients with stage II colon cancer with T4 stage (odds ratio [OR] = 5.79, 95% CI = 3.33 - 10.06) and a lower comorbidity score were more likely to receive ACT (high vs low Charlson score: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55 - 0.87). Patients with stage III rectal cancer were more likely to receive PCT than those with stage II disease (OR = 7.85, 95% CI = 2.07 - 29.74). Patients with another cancer diagnosis prior to CRC diagnosis were less likely to receive PCT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.16 - 0.85). ACT/PCT use was associated with improved overall survival among patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer (PS-matched hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.70) and those with stage III CRC (stage III colon: PS-matched HR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.36; stage III rectal: PS-matched HR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.13 - 0.31).
We found potential underuse of appropriate chemotherapy treatment in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer and stage III CRC. Clinicians' and providers' decisions on ACT administration may not be fully guided by the risk of recurrence and 5-year survival benefits in stage II colon cancer.
This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (under R37-CA218413). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.</description><subject>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - methods</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>2376-0540</issn><issn>2376-1032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdtq3DAQhkVpacI2T1AoeoHd6ODjVQihB0OgN821GEuzthZbMpK8Zft6fbFqN2lor2Zg_v8faT5CPnK2401ZytvDrJedYELuRLurdpUs35BrIetqy5kUb196VhbsitzEeGAsa8uq4fI9uZK1qCsmy2vy-8kZDGuyk_0FyXpHfaCwLMEvwUJCqiHgHb2PEWO0bqBgDusRXKJ6xNmnEQMsJ7pGpOAMjWs42iNM1Doq6YgJgx_Q-TXmUb_4ZZ0uWyL9adNIY4IBadfddl1HtZ98QJ2yW4PTGC6aHAR0gpB11iUcQn6Uyckwnf2nmHD-QN7tYYp481I35OnL5x8P37aP3792D_ePW50_nra8wj1oKUxf8RoNrw02Ek0DRQ91afpWm5K3RdFUcl9L0BwM6EIKzjTnXKDckLvn3GXtZzQaXQowqXyoGcJJebDq_4mzoxr8UWUiTd3mg2-IfE7QwccYcP9q5kxduKozV3XmqkSrKpW5Ztenf_e-ev5SlH8ALtanlQ</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Chen, Yilin</creator><creator>Shankaran, Veena</creator><creator>Hahn, Erin E</creator><creator>Haupt, Eric C</creator><creator>Bansal, Aasthaa</creator><general>Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Underutilization or appropriate care? Assessing adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival in 3 heterogenous subpopulations with stage II/III colorectal cancer within a large integrated health system</title><author>Chen, Yilin ; Shankaran, Veena ; Hahn, Erin E ; Haupt, Eric C ; Bansal, Aasthaa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-16efac32db617ed17de83ed8a4ba75db9cd51944863f73ac1adac43210c1112e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - methods</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yilin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankaran, Veena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Erin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haupt, Eric C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Aasthaa</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Yilin</au><au>Shankaran, Veena</au><au>Hahn, Erin E</au><au>Haupt, Eric C</au><au>Bansal, Aasthaa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Underutilization or appropriate care? Assessing adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival in 3 heterogenous subpopulations with stage II/III colorectal cancer within a large integrated health system</atitle><jtitle>Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy</jtitle><addtitle>J Manag Care Spec Pharm</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>646</epage><pages>635-646</pages><issn>2376-0540</issn><eissn>2376-1032</eissn><abstract>Clinical guidelines have recommended adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, although the survival benefit is unclear. ACT is also recommended for patients with stage III colon cancer to reduce the risk of recurrence and mortality. For stage II/III rectal cancer, however, the role of perioperative chemotherapy (PCT, adjuvant or neoadjuvant) remains controversial, resulting in substantial variation in its use in clinical practice.
To understand real-world use and predictors of ACT or PCT use and survival outcomes in 3 heterogeneous patient groups with colorectal cancer (CRC), and to inform the evidence gap between guideline-based care and clinical practice.
This retrospective cohort study included patients with an initial stage II/III CRC diagnosis between 2008 and 2013 identified from Kaiser Permanente Southern California electronic health record databases. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18-74 years at diagnosis and received primary curative surgery. We fitted mixed effects logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of ACT receipt and Cox proportional hazards models on propensity score-matched (PS-matched) samples to assess the association between ACT/PCT receipt and survival.
We included 1,690 patients with colon cancer (stage II: 820 and stage III: 870) and 587 patients with rectal cancer (stage II: 241 and stage III: 346). We found that 65% of patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer, 15% of those with stage III colon, and 15% of those with stage II/III rectal cancer did not receive ACT/PCT. Patients with stage II colon cancer with T4 stage (odds ratio [OR] = 5.79, 95% CI = 3.33 - 10.06) and a lower comorbidity score were more likely to receive ACT (high vs low Charlson score: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.55 - 0.87). Patients with stage III rectal cancer were more likely to receive PCT than those with stage II disease (OR = 7.85, 95% CI = 2.07 - 29.74). Patients with another cancer diagnosis prior to CRC diagnosis were less likely to receive PCT (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.16 - 0.85). ACT/PCT use was associated with improved overall survival among patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer (PS-matched hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.70) and those with stage III CRC (stage III colon: PS-matched HR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.25 - 0.36; stage III rectal: PS-matched HR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.13 - 0.31).
We found potential underuse of appropriate chemotherapy treatment in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer and stage III CRC. Clinicians' and providers' decisions on ACT administration may not be fully guided by the risk of recurrence and 5-year survival benefits in stage II colon cancer.
This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (under R37-CA218413). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy</pub><pmid>37276035</pmid><doi>10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.6.635</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2376-0540 |
ispartof | Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2023-06, Vol.29 (6), p.635-646 |
issn | 2376-0540 2376-1032 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10387960 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central |
subjects | Chemotherapy, Adjuvant - methods Colonic Neoplasms - pathology Colorectal Neoplasms - drug therapy Delivery of Health Care, Integrated Humans Neoplasm Staging Rectal Neoplasms - drug therapy Retrospective Studies |
title | Underutilization or appropriate care? Assessing adjuvant chemotherapy use and survival in 3 heterogenous subpopulations with stage II/III colorectal cancer within a large integrated health system |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A01%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Underutilization%20or%20appropriate%20care?%20Assessing%20adjuvant%20chemotherapy%20use%20and%20survival%20in%203%20heterogenous%20subpopulations%20with%20stage%20II/III%20colorectal%20cancer%20within%20a%20large%20integrated%20health%20system&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20managed%20care%20&%20specialty%20pharmacy&rft.au=Chen,%20Yilin&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=646&rft.pages=635-646&rft.issn=2376-0540&rft.eissn=2376-1032&rft_id=info:doi/10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.6.635&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E37276035%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/37276035&rfr_iscdi=true |