Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in intermediate-risk regimens: Clinical and economic outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia increases the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and infection with resultant hospitalizations, with substantial health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) is recommended as primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy regim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy 2023-02, Vol.29 (2), p.128-138
Hauptverfasser: Aslam, Saad, Li, Edward, Bell, Elizabeth, Lal, Lincy, Anderson, Amy J, Peterson-Brandt, Jesse, Lyman, Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue 2
container_start_page 128
container_title Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
container_volume 29
creator Aslam, Saad
Li, Edward
Bell, Elizabeth
Lal, Lincy
Anderson, Amy J
Peterson-Brandt, Jesse
Lyman, Gary
description Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia increases the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and infection with resultant hospitalizations, with substantial health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) is recommended as primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy regimens having more than a 20% risk of FN. Yet, for intermediate-risk (10%-20%) regimens, it should be considered only for patients with 1 or more clinical risk factors (RFs) for FN. It is unclear whether FN prophylaxis for intermediate-risk patients is being optimally implemented. To examine RFs, prophylaxis use, HCRU, and costs associated with incident FN during chemotherapy. This retrospective study used administrative claims data for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees with nonmyeloid cancer treated with intermediate-risk chemotherapy regimens during January 1, 2009, to March 31, 2020. Clinical RFs, GCSF prophylaxis, incident FN, HCRU, and costs were analyzed descriptively by receipt of primary GCSF, secondary GCSF, or no GCSF prophylaxis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to examine the association between number of RFs and cumulative FN risk. The sample comprised 13,937 patients (mean age 67 years, 55% female). Patients had a mean of 2.3 RFs, the most common being recent surgery, were aged 65 years or greater, and had baseline liver or renal dysfunction; 98% had 1 or more RFs. However, only 35% of patients received primary prophylaxis; 12% received secondary prophylaxis. The hazard ratio of incident FN was higher with increasing number of RFs during the first line of therapy, yet more than 54% of patients received no prophylaxis, regardless of RFs. Use of GCSF prophylaxis varied more by chemotherapeutic regimen than by number of RFs. Among patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin hydrochloride (doxorubicin hydrochloride), vincristine, and prednisone, 76% received primary prophylaxis, whereas only 22% of patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel received primary prophylaxis. Among patients with a first line of therapy FN event, 78% had an inpatient stay and 42% had an emergency visit. During cycle 1, mean FN-related coordination of benefits-adjusted medical costs per patient per month ($13,886 for patients with primary prophylaxis and $18,233 for those with none) were driven by inpatient hospitalizations, at 91% and 97%, respectively. Incident FN occurred more often with increasing numbers of RFs, but GCSF p
doi_str_mv 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.2.128
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10387928</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>36705281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-434b2e8b60c351d57f04cf03be192383869776dd656f7cb6772ebb694d0165af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUe2K1TAQDaK4y7pPIEheoDUfbZL6R-TiFywIor9Dmk7uzZomJUnFPo8vau_uuigMzAwz5xxmDkIvKWmp6nv--na2S8sI4y0bWtZSpp6gS8alaCjh7OlDTfqOXKDrUm4J2Xd7oSh_ji64kKRnil6i3199-YGTw_YEc6onyGbZGh-n1cKEHYzZB8AR1prTAtEb7OMeFfIMkzcVmnwmyHD0M8TyBh-Cj96agE2cMNgU0-wtTmu1aYZyVjpmE9eQ7FYB2xRS3JpS_bwGU308YmdsTRkvu95pC-aXLy_QM2dCgeuHfIW-f3j_7fCpufny8fPh3U1j98Nq0_FuZKBGQfaeTr10pLOO8BHowLjiSgxSimkSvXDSjkJKBuMohm4iVPTG8Sv09p53Wcf9OguxZhP0kv1s8qaT8fr_SfQnfUw_9f5xJQemdgZ-z2BzKiWDewRTou9802ff9Nk3zQbNNL1DvfpX9xHz1yX-B1Y2mz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in intermediate-risk regimens: Clinical and economic outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Aslam, Saad ; Li, Edward ; Bell, Elizabeth ; Lal, Lincy ; Anderson, Amy J ; Peterson-Brandt, Jesse ; Lyman, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Saad ; Li, Edward ; Bell, Elizabeth ; Lal, Lincy ; Anderson, Amy J ; Peterson-Brandt, Jesse ; Lyman, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia increases the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and infection with resultant hospitalizations, with substantial health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) is recommended as primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy regimens having more than a 20% risk of FN. Yet, for intermediate-risk (10%-20%) regimens, it should be considered only for patients with 1 or more clinical risk factors (RFs) for FN. It is unclear whether FN prophylaxis for intermediate-risk patients is being optimally implemented. To examine RFs, prophylaxis use, HCRU, and costs associated with incident FN during chemotherapy. This retrospective study used administrative claims data for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees with nonmyeloid cancer treated with intermediate-risk chemotherapy regimens during January 1, 2009, to March 31, 2020. Clinical RFs, GCSF prophylaxis, incident FN, HCRU, and costs were analyzed descriptively by receipt of primary GCSF, secondary GCSF, or no GCSF prophylaxis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to examine the association between number of RFs and cumulative FN risk. The sample comprised 13,937 patients (mean age 67 years, 55% female). Patients had a mean of 2.3 RFs, the most common being recent surgery, were aged 65 years or greater, and had baseline liver or renal dysfunction; 98% had 1 or more RFs. However, only 35% of patients received primary prophylaxis; 12% received secondary prophylaxis. The hazard ratio of incident FN was higher with increasing number of RFs during the first line of therapy, yet more than 54% of patients received no prophylaxis, regardless of RFs. Use of GCSF prophylaxis varied more by chemotherapeutic regimen than by number of RFs. Among patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin hydrochloride (doxorubicin hydrochloride), vincristine, and prednisone, 76% received primary prophylaxis, whereas only 22% of patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel received primary prophylaxis. Among patients with a first line of therapy FN event, 78% had an inpatient stay and 42% had an emergency visit. During cycle 1, mean FN-related coordination of benefits-adjusted medical costs per patient per month ($13,886 for patients with primary prophylaxis and $18,233 for those with none) were driven by inpatient hospitalizations, at 91% and 97%, respectively. Incident FN occurred more often with increasing numbers of RFs, but GCSF prophylaxis use did not rise correspondingly. Variation in prophylaxis use was greater based on regimen than RF number. Lower health care costs were observed among patients with primary prophylaxis use. Improved individual risk identification for intermediate-risk regimens and appropriate prophylaxis may decrease FN events toward the goal of better clinical and health care cost outcomes. This work was funded by Sandoz Inc., which participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data, writing and revision of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The study was performed by Optum under contract with Sandoz Inc. The author(s) meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The authors received no direct compensation related to the development of the manuscript. Dr Li is an employee of Sandoz Inc. Drs Bell and Lal and Mr Peterson-Brandt were employees of Optum at the time of the study. Ms Anderson and Dr Aslam are employees of Optum. Dr Lyman has been primary investigator on a research grant from Amgen to their institution and has consulted for Sandoz, G1 Therapeutics, Partners Healthcare, BeyondSpring, ER Squibb, Merck, Jazz Pharm, Kallyope, Teva; Fresenius Kabi, Seattle Genetics, and Samsung.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2376-0540</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2376-1032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.2.128</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36705281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy</publisher><subject>Aged ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects ; Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia - drug therapy ; Cyclophosphamide - adverse effects ; Doxorubicin - adverse effects ; Female ; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Medicare ; Retrospective Studies ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of managed care &amp; specialty pharmacy, 2023-02, Vol.29 (2), p.128-138</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy. All rights reserved. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-434b2e8b60c351d57f04cf03be192383869776dd656f7cb6772ebb694d0165af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387928/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387928/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Lincy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Amy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson-Brandt, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyman, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in intermediate-risk regimens: Clinical and economic outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis</title><title>Journal of managed care &amp; specialty pharmacy</title><addtitle>J Manag Care Spec Pharm</addtitle><description>Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia increases the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and infection with resultant hospitalizations, with substantial health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) is recommended as primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy regimens having more than a 20% risk of FN. Yet, for intermediate-risk (10%-20%) regimens, it should be considered only for patients with 1 or more clinical risk factors (RFs) for FN. It is unclear whether FN prophylaxis for intermediate-risk patients is being optimally implemented. To examine RFs, prophylaxis use, HCRU, and costs associated with incident FN during chemotherapy. This retrospective study used administrative claims data for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees with nonmyeloid cancer treated with intermediate-risk chemotherapy regimens during January 1, 2009, to March 31, 2020. Clinical RFs, GCSF prophylaxis, incident FN, HCRU, and costs were analyzed descriptively by receipt of primary GCSF, secondary GCSF, or no GCSF prophylaxis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to examine the association between number of RFs and cumulative FN risk. The sample comprised 13,937 patients (mean age 67 years, 55% female). Patients had a mean of 2.3 RFs, the most common being recent surgery, were aged 65 years or greater, and had baseline liver or renal dysfunction; 98% had 1 or more RFs. However, only 35% of patients received primary prophylaxis; 12% received secondary prophylaxis. The hazard ratio of incident FN was higher with increasing number of RFs during the first line of therapy, yet more than 54% of patients received no prophylaxis, regardless of RFs. Use of GCSF prophylaxis varied more by chemotherapeutic regimen than by number of RFs. Among patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin hydrochloride (doxorubicin hydrochloride), vincristine, and prednisone, 76% received primary prophylaxis, whereas only 22% of patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel received primary prophylaxis. Among patients with a first line of therapy FN event, 78% had an inpatient stay and 42% had an emergency visit. During cycle 1, mean FN-related coordination of benefits-adjusted medical costs per patient per month ($13,886 for patients with primary prophylaxis and $18,233 for those with none) were driven by inpatient hospitalizations, at 91% and 97%, respectively. Incident FN occurred more often with increasing numbers of RFs, but GCSF prophylaxis use did not rise correspondingly. Variation in prophylaxis use was greater based on regimen than RF number. Lower health care costs were observed among patients with primary prophylaxis use. Improved individual risk identification for intermediate-risk regimens and appropriate prophylaxis may decrease FN events toward the goal of better clinical and health care cost outcomes. This work was funded by Sandoz Inc., which participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data, writing and revision of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The study was performed by Optum under contract with Sandoz Inc. The author(s) meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The authors received no direct compensation related to the development of the manuscript. Dr Li is an employee of Sandoz Inc. Drs Bell and Lal and Mr Peterson-Brandt were employees of Optum at the time of the study. Ms Anderson and Dr Aslam are employees of Optum. Dr Lyman has been primary investigator on a research grant from Amgen to their institution and has consulted for Sandoz, G1 Therapeutics, Partners Healthcare, BeyondSpring, ER Squibb, Merck, Jazz Pharm, Kallyope, Teva; Fresenius Kabi, Seattle Genetics, and Samsung.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Cyclophosphamide - adverse effects</subject><subject>Doxorubicin - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>2376-0540</issn><issn>2376-1032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUe2K1TAQDaK4y7pPIEheoDUfbZL6R-TiFywIor9Dmk7uzZomJUnFPo8vau_uuigMzAwz5xxmDkIvKWmp6nv--na2S8sI4y0bWtZSpp6gS8alaCjh7OlDTfqOXKDrUm4J2Xd7oSh_ji64kKRnil6i3199-YGTw_YEc6onyGbZGh-n1cKEHYzZB8AR1prTAtEb7OMeFfIMkzcVmnwmyHD0M8TyBh-Cj96agE2cMNgU0-wtTmu1aYZyVjpmE9eQ7FYB2xRS3JpS_bwGU308YmdsTRkvu95pC-aXLy_QM2dCgeuHfIW-f3j_7fCpufny8fPh3U1j98Nq0_FuZKBGQfaeTr10pLOO8BHowLjiSgxSimkSvXDSjkJKBuMohm4iVPTG8Sv09p53Wcf9OguxZhP0kv1s8qaT8fr_SfQnfUw_9f5xJQemdgZ-z2BzKiWDewRTou9802ff9Nk3zQbNNL1DvfpX9xHz1yX-B1Y2mz0</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Aslam, Saad</creator><creator>Li, Edward</creator><creator>Bell, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Lal, Lincy</creator><creator>Anderson, Amy J</creator><creator>Peterson-Brandt, Jesse</creator><creator>Lyman, Gary</creator><general>Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in intermediate-risk regimens: Clinical and economic outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis</title><author>Aslam, Saad ; Li, Edward ; Bell, Elizabeth ; Lal, Lincy ; Anderson, Amy J ; Peterson-Brandt, Jesse ; Lyman, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-434b2e8b60c351d57f04cf03be192383869776dd656f7cb6772ebb694d0165af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Cyclophosphamide - adverse effects</topic><topic>Doxorubicin - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aslam, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Lincy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Amy J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peterson-Brandt, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyman, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of managed care &amp; specialty pharmacy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aslam, Saad</au><au>Li, Edward</au><au>Bell, Elizabeth</au><au>Lal, Lincy</au><au>Anderson, Amy J</au><au>Peterson-Brandt, Jesse</au><au>Lyman, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in intermediate-risk regimens: Clinical and economic outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of managed care &amp; specialty pharmacy</jtitle><addtitle>J Manag Care Spec Pharm</addtitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>128-138</pages><issn>2376-0540</issn><eissn>2376-1032</eissn><abstract>Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia increases the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) and infection with resultant hospitalizations, with substantial health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) is recommended as primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy regimens having more than a 20% risk of FN. Yet, for intermediate-risk (10%-20%) regimens, it should be considered only for patients with 1 or more clinical risk factors (RFs) for FN. It is unclear whether FN prophylaxis for intermediate-risk patients is being optimally implemented. To examine RFs, prophylaxis use, HCRU, and costs associated with incident FN during chemotherapy. This retrospective study used administrative claims data for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees with nonmyeloid cancer treated with intermediate-risk chemotherapy regimens during January 1, 2009, to March 31, 2020. Clinical RFs, GCSF prophylaxis, incident FN, HCRU, and costs were analyzed descriptively by receipt of primary GCSF, secondary GCSF, or no GCSF prophylaxis. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to examine the association between number of RFs and cumulative FN risk. The sample comprised 13,937 patients (mean age 67 years, 55% female). Patients had a mean of 2.3 RFs, the most common being recent surgery, were aged 65 years or greater, and had baseline liver or renal dysfunction; 98% had 1 or more RFs. However, only 35% of patients received primary prophylaxis; 12% received secondary prophylaxis. The hazard ratio of incident FN was higher with increasing number of RFs during the first line of therapy, yet more than 54% of patients received no prophylaxis, regardless of RFs. Use of GCSF prophylaxis varied more by chemotherapeutic regimen than by number of RFs. Among patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin hydrochloride (doxorubicin hydrochloride), vincristine, and prednisone, 76% received primary prophylaxis, whereas only 22% of patients treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel received primary prophylaxis. Among patients with a first line of therapy FN event, 78% had an inpatient stay and 42% had an emergency visit. During cycle 1, mean FN-related coordination of benefits-adjusted medical costs per patient per month ($13,886 for patients with primary prophylaxis and $18,233 for those with none) were driven by inpatient hospitalizations, at 91% and 97%, respectively. Incident FN occurred more often with increasing numbers of RFs, but GCSF prophylaxis use did not rise correspondingly. Variation in prophylaxis use was greater based on regimen than RF number. Lower health care costs were observed among patients with primary prophylaxis use. Improved individual risk identification for intermediate-risk regimens and appropriate prophylaxis may decrease FN events toward the goal of better clinical and health care cost outcomes. This work was funded by Sandoz Inc., which participated in the design of the study, interpretation of the data, writing and revision of the manuscript, and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The study was performed by Optum under contract with Sandoz Inc. The author(s) meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. The authors received no direct compensation related to the development of the manuscript. Dr Li is an employee of Sandoz Inc. Drs Bell and Lal and Mr Peterson-Brandt were employees of Optum at the time of the study. Ms Anderson and Dr Aslam are employees of Optum. Dr Lyman has been primary investigator on a research grant from Amgen to their institution and has consulted for Sandoz, G1 Therapeutics, Partners Healthcare, BeyondSpring, ER Squibb, Merck, Jazz Pharm, Kallyope, Teva; Fresenius Kabi, Seattle Genetics, and Samsung.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy</pub><pmid>36705281</pmid><doi>10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.2.128</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2376-0540
ispartof Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2023-02, Vol.29 (2), p.128-138
issn 2376-0540
2376-1032
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10387928
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects
Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia - drug therapy
Cyclophosphamide - adverse effects
Doxorubicin - adverse effects
Female
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - therapeutic use
Humans
Male
Medicare
Retrospective Studies
United States
title Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in intermediate-risk regimens: Clinical and economic outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A41%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20of%20chemotherapy-induced%20febrile%20neutropenia%20in%20intermediate-risk%20regimens:%20Clinical%20and%20economic%20outcomes%20of%20granulocyte%20colony-stimulating%20factor%20prophylaxis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20managed%20care%20&%20specialty%20pharmacy&rft.au=Aslam,%20Saad&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=128-138&rft.issn=2376-0540&rft.eissn=2376-1032&rft_id=info:doi/10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.2.128&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E36705281%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/36705281&rfr_iscdi=true