Improved 1-year outcomes after active cooling during left atrial radiofrequency ablation
Background Active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly being utilized to reduce esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula formation. Randomized controlled data also show trends tow...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2023-10, Vol.66 (7), p.1621-1629 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1629 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1621 |
container_title | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Joseph, Christopher Nazari, Jose Zagrodzky, Jason Brumback, Babette Sherman, Jacob Zagrodzky, William Bailey, Shane Kulstad, Erik Metzl, Mark |
description | Background
Active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly being utilized to reduce esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula formation. Randomized controlled data also show trends towards increased freedom from AF when using active cooling. This study aimed to compare 1-year arrhythmia recurrence rates between patients treated with luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring versus active esophageal cooling during left atrial ablation.
Method
Data from two healthcare systems (including 3 hospitals and 4 electrophysiologists) were reviewed for patient rhythm status at 1-year follow-up after receiving PVI for the treatment of AF. Results were compared between patients receiving active esophageal cooling (ensoETM, Attune Medical, Chicago, IL) and those treated with traditional LET monitoring using Kaplan–Meier estimates.
Results
A total of 513 patients were reviewed; 253 received LET monitoring using either single or multi-sensor temperature probes; and 260 received active cooling. The mean age was 66.8 (SD ± 10) years, and 36.8% were female. Arrhythmias were 60.1% paroxysmal AF, 34.3% persistent AF, and 5.6% long-standing persistent AF, with no significant difference between groups. At 1-year follow-up, KM estimates for freedom from AF were 58.2% for LET-monitored patients and 72.2% for actively cooled patients, for an absolute increase in freedom from AF of 14% with active esophageal cooling (
p
= .03). Adjustment for the confounders of patient age, gender, type of AF, and operator with an inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.6 for the effect of cooling on AF recurrence (
p
= 0.045).
Conclusions
In this first study to date of the association between esophageal protection strategy and long-term efficacy of left atrial RF ablation, a clinically and statistically significant improvement in freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1 year was found in patients treated with active esophageal cooling when compared to patients who received LET monitoring. More rigorous prospective studies or randomized studies are required to validate the findings of the current study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10840-023-01474-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10359433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2871972370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c926d0129711cefdeb438f76fc2014dcf815daffc575f0c1f2069dac1b928e2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LJDEQhoMofoz-AQ8S8OKldytJd6f7JCJ-gbAXBW8hk1Q00t0Zk_TA_Pvt2VFX97CnKshbb-qth5BjBj8YgPyZGDQlFMBFAayUZSG2yD6rJC-aqq22v_R75CClVwBogde7ZE_UtQTB5T55uusXMSzRUlasUEcaxmxCj4lqlzFSbbJfIjUhdH54pnaM69Khy1Tn6HVHo7Y-uIhvIw5mRfW809mH4ZDsON0lPHqvM_J4ffVweVvc_7q5u7y4L0wpq1yYltcWGG8lYwadxXkpGidrZ_iUyRrXsMpq50wlKweGOQ51a7Vh85Y3yK2YkfON72Kc92gNDjnqTi2i73VcqaC9-v4y-Bf1HJaKgajaUojJ4ezdIYYpRMqq98lg1-kBw5gUl3XDy5LVcpKe_iN9DWMcpnyKN5K1kovprjPCNyoTQ0oR3ec2DNSanNqQUxM59YecWm9x8jXH58gHqkkgNoK0WDPA-Pfv_9j-BnJWpdM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2871972370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved 1-year outcomes after active cooling during left atrial radiofrequency ablation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Joseph, Christopher ; Nazari, Jose ; Zagrodzky, Jason ; Brumback, Babette ; Sherman, Jacob ; Zagrodzky, William ; Bailey, Shane ; Kulstad, Erik ; Metzl, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Christopher ; Nazari, Jose ; Zagrodzky, Jason ; Brumback, Babette ; Sherman, Jacob ; Zagrodzky, William ; Bailey, Shane ; Kulstad, Erik ; Metzl, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly being utilized to reduce esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula formation. Randomized controlled data also show trends towards increased freedom from AF when using active cooling. This study aimed to compare 1-year arrhythmia recurrence rates between patients treated with luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring versus active esophageal cooling during left atrial ablation.
Method
Data from two healthcare systems (including 3 hospitals and 4 electrophysiologists) were reviewed for patient rhythm status at 1-year follow-up after receiving PVI for the treatment of AF. Results were compared between patients receiving active esophageal cooling (ensoETM, Attune Medical, Chicago, IL) and those treated with traditional LET monitoring using Kaplan–Meier estimates.
Results
A total of 513 patients were reviewed; 253 received LET monitoring using either single or multi-sensor temperature probes; and 260 received active cooling. The mean age was 66.8 (SD ± 10) years, and 36.8% were female. Arrhythmias were 60.1% paroxysmal AF, 34.3% persistent AF, and 5.6% long-standing persistent AF, with no significant difference between groups. At 1-year follow-up, KM estimates for freedom from AF were 58.2% for LET-monitored patients and 72.2% for actively cooled patients, for an absolute increase in freedom from AF of 14% with active esophageal cooling (
p
= .03). Adjustment for the confounders of patient age, gender, type of AF, and operator with an inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.6 for the effect of cooling on AF recurrence (
p
= 0.045).
Conclusions
In this first study to date of the association between esophageal protection strategy and long-term efficacy of left atrial RF ablation, a clinically and statistically significant improvement in freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1 year was found in patients treated with active esophageal cooling when compared to patients who received LET monitoring. More rigorous prospective studies or randomized studies are required to validate the findings of the current study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-8595</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1383-875X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8595</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10840-023-01474-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36670327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Arrhythmia ; Cardiac arrhythmia ; Cardiology ; Cooling ; Cooling effects ; Esophagus ; Estimates ; Health hazards ; Health services ; Injury prevention ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Monitoring ; Patients ; Radio frequency ; Radiofrequency ablation ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2023-10, Vol.66 (7), p.1621-1629</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c926d0129711cefdeb438f76fc2014dcf815daffc575f0c1f2069dac1b928e2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c926d0129711cefdeb438f76fc2014dcf815daffc575f0c1f2069dac1b928e2d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9331-8266</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10840-023-01474-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10840-023-01474-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36670327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazari, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagrodzky, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumback, Babette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagrodzky, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulstad, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzl, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Improved 1-year outcomes after active cooling during left atrial radiofrequency ablation</title><title>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</title><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Background
Active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly being utilized to reduce esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula formation. Randomized controlled data also show trends towards increased freedom from AF when using active cooling. This study aimed to compare 1-year arrhythmia recurrence rates between patients treated with luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring versus active esophageal cooling during left atrial ablation.
Method
Data from two healthcare systems (including 3 hospitals and 4 electrophysiologists) were reviewed for patient rhythm status at 1-year follow-up after receiving PVI for the treatment of AF. Results were compared between patients receiving active esophageal cooling (ensoETM, Attune Medical, Chicago, IL) and those treated with traditional LET monitoring using Kaplan–Meier estimates.
Results
A total of 513 patients were reviewed; 253 received LET monitoring using either single or multi-sensor temperature probes; and 260 received active cooling. The mean age was 66.8 (SD ± 10) years, and 36.8% were female. Arrhythmias were 60.1% paroxysmal AF, 34.3% persistent AF, and 5.6% long-standing persistent AF, with no significant difference between groups. At 1-year follow-up, KM estimates for freedom from AF were 58.2% for LET-monitored patients and 72.2% for actively cooled patients, for an absolute increase in freedom from AF of 14% with active esophageal cooling (
p
= .03). Adjustment for the confounders of patient age, gender, type of AF, and operator with an inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.6 for the effect of cooling on AF recurrence (
p
= 0.045).
Conclusions
In this first study to date of the association between esophageal protection strategy and long-term efficacy of left atrial RF ablation, a clinically and statistically significant improvement in freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1 year was found in patients treated with active esophageal cooling when compared to patients who received LET monitoring. More rigorous prospective studies or randomized studies are required to validate the findings of the current study.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiac arrhythmia</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cooling effects</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Injury prevention</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radio frequency</subject><subject>Radiofrequency ablation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>1572-8595</issn><issn>1383-875X</issn><issn>1572-8595</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LJDEQhoMofoz-AQ8S8OKldytJd6f7JCJ-gbAXBW8hk1Q00t0Zk_TA_Pvt2VFX97CnKshbb-qth5BjBj8YgPyZGDQlFMBFAayUZSG2yD6rJC-aqq22v_R75CClVwBogde7ZE_UtQTB5T55uusXMSzRUlasUEcaxmxCj4lqlzFSbbJfIjUhdH54pnaM69Khy1Tn6HVHo7Y-uIhvIw5mRfW809mH4ZDsON0lPHqvM_J4ffVweVvc_7q5u7y4L0wpq1yYltcWGG8lYwadxXkpGidrZ_iUyRrXsMpq50wlKweGOQ51a7Vh85Y3yK2YkfON72Kc92gNDjnqTi2i73VcqaC9-v4y-Bf1HJaKgajaUojJ4ezdIYYpRMqq98lg1-kBw5gUl3XDy5LVcpKe_iN9DWMcpnyKN5K1kovprjPCNyoTQ0oR3ec2DNSanNqQUxM59YecWm9x8jXH58gHqkkgNoK0WDPA-Pfv_9j-BnJWpdM</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Joseph, Christopher</creator><creator>Nazari, Jose</creator><creator>Zagrodzky, Jason</creator><creator>Brumback, Babette</creator><creator>Sherman, Jacob</creator><creator>Zagrodzky, William</creator><creator>Bailey, Shane</creator><creator>Kulstad, Erik</creator><creator>Metzl, Mark</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9331-8266</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Improved 1-year outcomes after active cooling during left atrial radiofrequency ablation</title><author>Joseph, Christopher ; Nazari, Jose ; Zagrodzky, Jason ; Brumback, Babette ; Sherman, Jacob ; Zagrodzky, William ; Bailey, Shane ; Kulstad, Erik ; Metzl, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-c926d0129711cefdeb438f76fc2014dcf815daffc575f0c1f2069dac1b928e2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiac arrhythmia</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cooling effects</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Injury prevention</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radio frequency</topic><topic>Radiofrequency ablation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Joseph, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nazari, Jose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagrodzky, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumback, Babette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherman, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagrodzky, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bailey, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulstad, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzl, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Joseph, Christopher</au><au>Nazari, Jose</au><au>Zagrodzky, Jason</au><au>Brumback, Babette</au><au>Sherman, Jacob</au><au>Zagrodzky, William</au><au>Bailey, Shane</au><au>Kulstad, Erik</au><au>Metzl, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved 1-year outcomes after active cooling during left atrial radiofrequency ablation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology</jtitle><stitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</stitle><addtitle>J Interv Card Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1621</spage><epage>1629</epage><pages>1621-1629</pages><issn>1572-8595</issn><issn>1383-875X</issn><eissn>1572-8595</eissn><abstract>Background
Active esophageal cooling during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly being utilized to reduce esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula formation. Randomized controlled data also show trends towards increased freedom from AF when using active cooling. This study aimed to compare 1-year arrhythmia recurrence rates between patients treated with luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring versus active esophageal cooling during left atrial ablation.
Method
Data from two healthcare systems (including 3 hospitals and 4 electrophysiologists) were reviewed for patient rhythm status at 1-year follow-up after receiving PVI for the treatment of AF. Results were compared between patients receiving active esophageal cooling (ensoETM, Attune Medical, Chicago, IL) and those treated with traditional LET monitoring using Kaplan–Meier estimates.
Results
A total of 513 patients were reviewed; 253 received LET monitoring using either single or multi-sensor temperature probes; and 260 received active cooling. The mean age was 66.8 (SD ± 10) years, and 36.8% were female. Arrhythmias were 60.1% paroxysmal AF, 34.3% persistent AF, and 5.6% long-standing persistent AF, with no significant difference between groups. At 1-year follow-up, KM estimates for freedom from AF were 58.2% for LET-monitored patients and 72.2% for actively cooled patients, for an absolute increase in freedom from AF of 14% with active esophageal cooling (
p
= .03). Adjustment for the confounders of patient age, gender, type of AF, and operator with an inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.6 for the effect of cooling on AF recurrence (
p
= 0.045).
Conclusions
In this first study to date of the association between esophageal protection strategy and long-term efficacy of left atrial RF ablation, a clinically and statistically significant improvement in freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 1 year was found in patients treated with active esophageal cooling when compared to patients who received LET monitoring. More rigorous prospective studies or randomized studies are required to validate the findings of the current study.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>36670327</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10840-023-01474-3</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9331-8266</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1572-8595 |
ispartof | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology, 2023-10, Vol.66 (7), p.1621-1629 |
issn | 1572-8595 1383-875X 1572-8595 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10359433 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Ablation Arrhythmia Cardiac arrhythmia Cardiology Cooling Cooling effects Esophagus Estimates Health hazards Health services Injury prevention Medicine Medicine & Public Health Monitoring Patients Radio frequency Radiofrequency ablation Statistical analysis Statistical models Telemedicine |
title | Improved 1-year outcomes after active cooling during left atrial radiofrequency ablation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%201-year%20outcomes%20after%20active%20cooling%20during%20left%20atrial%20radiofrequency%20ablation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interventional%20cardiac%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Joseph,%20Christopher&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1621&rft.epage=1629&rft.pages=1621-1629&rft.issn=1572-8595&rft.eissn=1572-8595&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10840-023-01474-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2871972370%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2871972370&rft_id=info:pmid/36670327&rfr_iscdi=true |