Cost-effectiveness analysis of introducing rotavirus vaccine into immunization program in Zhejiang province, China: A decision tree-Markov model study
Two RV vaccines have been licensed in Zhejiang province, China, including the pentavalent RotaTeq (RV5) and the monovalent RV vaccine (RV1). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RV1 and RV5 to inform the prioritization of provincial immunization program. A decision tree-Markov mode...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics 2023-08, Vol.19 (2), p.2217075-2217075 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2217075 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 2217075 |
container_title | Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Lv, Huakun Chen, Fuxing Wang, Ying Chen, Yaping Hu, Yu |
description | Two RV vaccines have been licensed in Zhejiang province, China, including the pentavalent RotaTeq (RV5) and the monovalent RV vaccine (RV1). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RV1 and RV5 to inform the prioritization of provincial immunization program. A decision tree-Markov model was applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of RV1 or RV5 vaccination, compared to no RV vaccination in a 5-year period. The incremental health cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) is averted when each kind of RV vaccine included in the immunization program was estimated. It was also compared to the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 1 time of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of Zhejiang province in 2021 (16865.70US$). The uncertainties of these results were assessed through the one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. In the base-case scenario, RV5 was the least costly RV vaccine with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 510 US$ per DALY averted. The other RV1 vaccines provided equivalent benefits but at higher costs, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 4600 US$ per DALY averted. Compared to no vaccination, the probabilities of being cost-effective were 72.3% for RV1 and 88.4% for RV5, at a WTP threshold of 1 time of the GDP per capita. An RV vaccination program using any of the two China-licensed RV vaccines compared to no vaccination would avert 30-70% of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and deaths from RVGE. RV5 was currently estimated to be the most cost-effective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/21645515.2023.2217075 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10353328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4b6df43648af4958850ac0683bb1f452</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2838645059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-f7f986c530df4d6841475c451047e93623043c0a3b13498a41376e06d94c25603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAUjBCIXS37E0A-ciBdO_5IwgVWFbArLeICEuJivTp265LYxXaCyg_h9-LQbsVe8MVP82bmWX5TFM8JXhDc4KuKCMY54YsKV3RRVaTGNX9UnM94yTn7-vhUE35WXMa4xfnUuGJCPC3OaJ3lDPPz4vfSx1RqY7RKdtJOx4jAQb-PNiJvkHUp-G5U1q1R8AkmG8aIJlAZ0XPXIzsMo7O_IFnv0C74dYAhd9C3jd5ayLqMTdYp_QotN9bBa3SNOq1snPkpaF1-hPDdT2jwne5RTGO3f1Y8MdBHfXm8L4ov7999Xt6Ud58-3C6v70rFKU-lqU3biFzjzrBONIywmivGCWa1bqmoKGZUYaArQlnbACO0FhqLrmWq4gLTi-L24Nt52MpdsAOEvfRg5V_Ah7WEkKzqtWQrkYdQwRowrOVNwzEoLBq6WhHDeJW93hy8duNq0J3S-eugf2D6sOPsRq79JAmmnNKqyQ4vjw7B_xh1THKwUem-B6f9GGWmNHnxmLeZyg9UFXyMQZvTHILlnBF5nxE5Z0QeM5J1L_595El1n4hMeHsgWGd8GOCnD30nE-x7H0wAl_cm6f9n_AHAhs0j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2838645059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of introducing rotavirus vaccine into immunization program in Zhejiang province, China: A decision tree-Markov model study</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lv, Huakun ; Chen, Fuxing ; Wang, Ying ; Chen, Yaping ; Hu, Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Lv, Huakun ; Chen, Fuxing ; Wang, Ying ; Chen, Yaping ; Hu, Yu</creatorcontrib><description>Two RV vaccines have been licensed in Zhejiang province, China, including the pentavalent RotaTeq (RV5) and the monovalent RV vaccine (RV1). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RV1 and RV5 to inform the prioritization of provincial immunization program. A decision tree-Markov model was applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of RV1 or RV5 vaccination, compared to no RV vaccination in a 5-year period. The incremental health cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) is averted when each kind of RV vaccine included in the immunization program was estimated. It was also compared to the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 1 time of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of Zhejiang province in 2021 (16865.70US$). The uncertainties of these results were assessed through the one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. In the base-case scenario, RV5 was the least costly RV vaccine with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 510 US$ per DALY averted. The other RV1 vaccines provided equivalent benefits but at higher costs, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 4600 US$ per DALY averted. Compared to no vaccination, the probabilities of being cost-effective were 72.3% for RV1 and 88.4% for RV5, at a WTP threshold of 1 time of the GDP per capita. An RV vaccination program using any of the two China-licensed RV vaccines compared to no vaccination would avert 30-70% of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and deaths from RVGE. RV5 was currently estimated to be the most cost-effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2164-5515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2164-554X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2217075</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37455405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>cost-effectiveness ; immunization program ; Rotavirus ; vaccine</subject><ispartof>Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023-08, Vol.19 (2), p.2217075-2217075</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. 2023</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. 2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-f7f986c530df4d6841475c451047e93623043c0a3b13498a41376e06d94c25603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-f7f986c530df4d6841475c451047e93623043c0a3b13498a41376e06d94c25603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353328/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10353328/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,2096,27479,27901,27902,53766,53768,59116,59117</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37455405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lv, Huakun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Fuxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yu</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of introducing rotavirus vaccine into immunization program in Zhejiang province, China: A decision tree-Markov model study</title><title>Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics</title><addtitle>Hum Vaccin Immunother</addtitle><description>Two RV vaccines have been licensed in Zhejiang province, China, including the pentavalent RotaTeq (RV5) and the monovalent RV vaccine (RV1). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RV1 and RV5 to inform the prioritization of provincial immunization program. A decision tree-Markov model was applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of RV1 or RV5 vaccination, compared to no RV vaccination in a 5-year period. The incremental health cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) is averted when each kind of RV vaccine included in the immunization program was estimated. It was also compared to the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 1 time of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of Zhejiang province in 2021 (16865.70US$). The uncertainties of these results were assessed through the one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. In the base-case scenario, RV5 was the least costly RV vaccine with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 510 US$ per DALY averted. The other RV1 vaccines provided equivalent benefits but at higher costs, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 4600 US$ per DALY averted. Compared to no vaccination, the probabilities of being cost-effective were 72.3% for RV1 and 88.4% for RV5, at a WTP threshold of 1 time of the GDP per capita. An RV vaccination program using any of the two China-licensed RV vaccines compared to no vaccination would avert 30-70% of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and deaths from RVGE. RV5 was currently estimated to be the most cost-effective.</description><subject>cost-effectiveness</subject><subject>immunization program</subject><subject>Rotavirus</subject><subject>vaccine</subject><issn>2164-5515</issn><issn>2164-554X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk2P0zAUjBCIXS37E0A-ciBdO_5IwgVWFbArLeICEuJivTp265LYxXaCyg_h9-LQbsVe8MVP82bmWX5TFM8JXhDc4KuKCMY54YsKV3RRVaTGNX9UnM94yTn7-vhUE35WXMa4xfnUuGJCPC3OaJ3lDPPz4vfSx1RqY7RKdtJOx4jAQb-PNiJvkHUp-G5U1q1R8AkmG8aIJlAZ0XPXIzsMo7O_IFnv0C74dYAhd9C3jd5ayLqMTdYp_QotN9bBa3SNOq1snPkpaF1-hPDdT2jwne5RTGO3f1Y8MdBHfXm8L4ov7999Xt6Ud58-3C6v70rFKU-lqU3biFzjzrBONIywmivGCWa1bqmoKGZUYaArQlnbACO0FhqLrmWq4gLTi-L24Nt52MpdsAOEvfRg5V_Ah7WEkKzqtWQrkYdQwRowrOVNwzEoLBq6WhHDeJW93hy8duNq0J3S-eugf2D6sOPsRq79JAmmnNKqyQ4vjw7B_xh1THKwUem-B6f9GGWmNHnxmLeZyg9UFXyMQZvTHILlnBF5nxE5Z0QeM5J1L_595El1n4hMeHsgWGd8GOCnD30nE-x7H0wAl_cm6f9n_AHAhs0j</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Lv, Huakun</creator><creator>Chen, Fuxing</creator><creator>Wang, Ying</creator><creator>Chen, Yaping</creator><creator>Hu, Yu</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of introducing rotavirus vaccine into immunization program in Zhejiang province, China: A decision tree-Markov model study</title><author>Lv, Huakun ; Chen, Fuxing ; Wang, Ying ; Chen, Yaping ; Hu, Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c535t-f7f986c530df4d6841475c451047e93623043c0a3b13498a41376e06d94c25603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>cost-effectiveness</topic><topic>immunization program</topic><topic>Rotavirus</topic><topic>vaccine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lv, Huakun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Fuxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lv, Huakun</au><au>Chen, Fuxing</au><au>Wang, Ying</au><au>Chen, Yaping</au><au>Hu, Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness analysis of introducing rotavirus vaccine into immunization program in Zhejiang province, China: A decision tree-Markov model study</atitle><jtitle>Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Vaccin Immunother</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2217075</spage><epage>2217075</epage><pages>2217075-2217075</pages><issn>2164-5515</issn><eissn>2164-554X</eissn><abstract>Two RV vaccines have been licensed in Zhejiang province, China, including the pentavalent RotaTeq (RV5) and the monovalent RV vaccine (RV1). This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RV1 and RV5 to inform the prioritization of provincial immunization program. A decision tree-Markov model was applied to assess the cost-effectiveness of RV1 or RV5 vaccination, compared to no RV vaccination in a 5-year period. The incremental health cost per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) is averted when each kind of RV vaccine included in the immunization program was estimated. It was also compared to the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 1 time of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of Zhejiang province in 2021 (16865.70US$). The uncertainties of these results were assessed through the one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. In the base-case scenario, RV5 was the least costly RV vaccine with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 510 US$ per DALY averted. The other RV1 vaccines provided equivalent benefits but at higher costs, with a cost-effectiveness ratio of 4600 US$ per DALY averted. Compared to no vaccination, the probabilities of being cost-effective were 72.3% for RV1 and 88.4% for RV5, at a WTP threshold of 1 time of the GDP per capita. An RV vaccination program using any of the two China-licensed RV vaccines compared to no vaccination would avert 30-70% of outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and deaths from RVGE. RV5 was currently estimated to be the most cost-effective.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>37455405</pmid><doi>10.1080/21645515.2023.2217075</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2164-5515 |
ispartof | Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2023-08, Vol.19 (2), p.2217075-2217075 |
issn | 2164-5515 2164-554X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10353328 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | cost-effectiveness immunization program Rotavirus vaccine |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of introducing rotavirus vaccine into immunization program in Zhejiang province, China: A decision tree-Markov model study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A04%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20analysis%20of%20introducing%20rotavirus%20vaccine%20into%20immunization%20program%20in%20Zhejiang%20province,%20China:%20A%20decision%20tree-Markov%20model%20study&rft.jtitle=Human%20vaccines%20&%20immunotherapeutics&rft.au=Lv,%20Huakun&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2217075&rft.epage=2217075&rft.pages=2217075-2217075&rft.issn=2164-5515&rft.eissn=2164-554X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/21645515.2023.2217075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2838645059%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2838645059&rft_id=info:pmid/37455405&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_4b6df43648af4958850ac0683bb1f452&rfr_iscdi=true |