Impact of changes in diabetes screening guidelines on testing eligibility and potential yield among adults without diagnosed diabetes in the United States

Recent USPSTF and ADA guidelines expanded criteria of whom to test to identify prediabetes and diabetes. We described which Americans are eligible and report receiving glucose testing by USPSTF 2015 and 2021 as well as ADA 2003 and 2022 recommendations, and performance of each guideline. We analyzed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes research and clinical practice 2023-03, Vol.197, p.110572-110572, Article 110572
Hauptverfasser: Ali, Mohammed K., Imperatore, Giuseppina, Benoit, Stephen R., O'Brien, Matthew J., Holliday, Christopher S., Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B., McKeever Bullard, Kai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110572
container_issue
container_start_page 110572
container_title Diabetes research and clinical practice
container_volume 197
creator Ali, Mohammed K.
Imperatore, Giuseppina
Benoit, Stephen R.
O'Brien, Matthew J.
Holliday, Christopher S.
Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B.
McKeever Bullard, Kai
description Recent USPSTF and ADA guidelines expanded criteria of whom to test to identify prediabetes and diabetes. We described which Americans are eligible and report receiving glucose testing by USPSTF 2015 and 2021 as well as ADA 2003 and 2022 recommendations, and performance of each guideline. We analyzed cross-sectional data from 6,007 non-pregnant U.S. adults without diagnosed diabetes in the 2013–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. We reported proportions of adults who met each guideline’s criteria for glucose testing and reported receiving glucose testing in the past three years, overall and by key population subgroups,. Defining prediabetes (FPG 100–125 mg/dL and/or HbA1c 5.7–6.4 %) or previously undiagnosed diabetes (FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5 %), we assessed sensitivity and specificity. During 2013–2018, 76.7 million, 90.4 million, 157.7 million, and 169.5 million US adults met eligibility for glucose testing by USPSTF 2015, 2021, and ADA 2003 and 2022 guidelines, respectively. On average, 52 % of adults reported receiving glucose testing within the past 3 years. Likelihood of receiving glucose testing was lower among younger adults, men, Hispanic adults, those with less than high school completion, those living in poverty, and those without health insurance or a usual place of care than their respective counterparts. ADA recommendations were most sensitive (range: 91.0 % to 100.0 %) and least specific (range: 18.3 % to 35.3 %); USPSTF recommendations exhibited lower sensitivity (51.9 % to 66.6 %), but higher specificity (56.6 % to 74.5 %). An additional 12–14 million US adults are eligible for diabetes screening. USPSTF 2021 criteria provide balanced sensitivity and specificity while ADA 2022 criteria maximize sensitivity. Glucose testing does not align with guidelines and disparities remain.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110572
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10352955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168822723000475</els_id><sourcerecordid>2775952563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-fc937a61579c3b1523a6409d3f0ed57d24a12bd2bf7d01570874ba5e98ba77ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUcuO1DAQtBCIHRY-AeQjlxn8iOPkhNCKx0orcYA9W47dyfQoYw-xs6v5Fb4Whxl24cTJrerqKncXIa8523DG63e7jUfbTZA2ggm54ZwpLZ6QFW-0WDdC6KdkVXjN7_qCvEhpxxirZaWekwtZa62YqFbk5_X-YF2msadua8MAiWKgizTkUic3AQQMAx1m9DBiKGAMtPTyghZkwA5HzEdqg6eHmCFktCM9Ioye2n0sLOvnMSd6j3kb57yoDyEm8I8-xTNvgd4GzAX-lm0BX5JnvR0TvDq_l-T208fvV1_WN18_X199uFm7qm7yunet1LbmSrdOdlwJaeuKtV72DLzSXlSWi86LrteeFRZrdNVZBW3TWa3ByUvy_qR7mLs9eFcWmOxoDhPu7XQ00aL5txNwa4Z4ZziTSrRKFYW3Z4Up_pjLacwek4NxtAHinIwo126VULUsVHWiuimmNEH_4MOZWYI1O3MO1izBmlOwZe7N3598mPqT5OMWUE51hzCZ5BCCA48TuGx8xP9Y_AImwrum</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2775952563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of changes in diabetes screening guidelines on testing eligibility and potential yield among adults without diagnosed diabetes in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ali, Mohammed K. ; Imperatore, Giuseppina ; Benoit, Stephen R. ; O'Brien, Matthew J. ; Holliday, Christopher S. ; Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B. ; McKeever Bullard, Kai</creator><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mohammed K. ; Imperatore, Giuseppina ; Benoit, Stephen R. ; O'Brien, Matthew J. ; Holliday, Christopher S. ; Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B. ; McKeever Bullard, Kai</creatorcontrib><description>Recent USPSTF and ADA guidelines expanded criteria of whom to test to identify prediabetes and diabetes. We described which Americans are eligible and report receiving glucose testing by USPSTF 2015 and 2021 as well as ADA 2003 and 2022 recommendations, and performance of each guideline. We analyzed cross-sectional data from 6,007 non-pregnant U.S. adults without diagnosed diabetes in the 2013–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. We reported proportions of adults who met each guideline’s criteria for glucose testing and reported receiving glucose testing in the past three years, overall and by key population subgroups,. Defining prediabetes (FPG 100–125 mg/dL and/or HbA1c 5.7–6.4 %) or previously undiagnosed diabetes (FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5 %), we assessed sensitivity and specificity. During 2013–2018, 76.7 million, 90.4 million, 157.7 million, and 169.5 million US adults met eligibility for glucose testing by USPSTF 2015, 2021, and ADA 2003 and 2022 guidelines, respectively. On average, 52 % of adults reported receiving glucose testing within the past 3 years. Likelihood of receiving glucose testing was lower among younger adults, men, Hispanic adults, those with less than high school completion, those living in poverty, and those without health insurance or a usual place of care than their respective counterparts. ADA recommendations were most sensitive (range: 91.0 % to 100.0 %) and least specific (range: 18.3 % to 35.3 %); USPSTF recommendations exhibited lower sensitivity (51.9 % to 66.6 %), but higher specificity (56.6 % to 74.5 %). An additional 12–14 million US adults are eligible for diabetes screening. USPSTF 2021 criteria provide balanced sensitivity and specificity while ADA 2022 criteria maximize sensitivity. Glucose testing does not align with guidelines and disparities remain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110572</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36775024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blood Glucose ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diabetes ; Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis ; Diabetes Mellitus - epidemiology ; Glucose ; Glycated Hemoglobin ; Humans ; Male ; Prediabetic State - diagnosis ; Prediabetic State - epidemiology ; Prevalence ; Screening guidelines ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2023-03, Vol.197, p.110572-110572, Article 110572</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-fc937a61579c3b1523a6409d3f0ed57d24a12bd2bf7d01570874ba5e98ba77ec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-fc937a61579c3b1523a6409d3f0ed57d24a12bd2bf7d01570874ba5e98ba77ec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7266-2503</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110572$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mohammed K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imperatore, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holliday, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeever Bullard, Kai</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of changes in diabetes screening guidelines on testing eligibility and potential yield among adults without diagnosed diabetes in the United States</title><title>Diabetes research and clinical practice</title><addtitle>Diabetes Res Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Recent USPSTF and ADA guidelines expanded criteria of whom to test to identify prediabetes and diabetes. We described which Americans are eligible and report receiving glucose testing by USPSTF 2015 and 2021 as well as ADA 2003 and 2022 recommendations, and performance of each guideline. We analyzed cross-sectional data from 6,007 non-pregnant U.S. adults without diagnosed diabetes in the 2013–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. We reported proportions of adults who met each guideline’s criteria for glucose testing and reported receiving glucose testing in the past three years, overall and by key population subgroups,. Defining prediabetes (FPG 100–125 mg/dL and/or HbA1c 5.7–6.4 %) or previously undiagnosed diabetes (FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5 %), we assessed sensitivity and specificity. During 2013–2018, 76.7 million, 90.4 million, 157.7 million, and 169.5 million US adults met eligibility for glucose testing by USPSTF 2015, 2021, and ADA 2003 and 2022 guidelines, respectively. On average, 52 % of adults reported receiving glucose testing within the past 3 years. Likelihood of receiving glucose testing was lower among younger adults, men, Hispanic adults, those with less than high school completion, those living in poverty, and those without health insurance or a usual place of care than their respective counterparts. ADA recommendations were most sensitive (range: 91.0 % to 100.0 %) and least specific (range: 18.3 % to 35.3 %); USPSTF recommendations exhibited lower sensitivity (51.9 % to 66.6 %), but higher specificity (56.6 % to 74.5 %). An additional 12–14 million US adults are eligible for diabetes screening. USPSTF 2021 criteria provide balanced sensitivity and specificity while ADA 2022 criteria maximize sensitivity. Glucose testing does not align with guidelines and disparities remain.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blood Glucose</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus - epidemiology</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glycated Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prediabetic State - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prediabetic State - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Screening guidelines</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0168-8227</issn><issn>1872-8227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUcuO1DAQtBCIHRY-AeQjlxn8iOPkhNCKx0orcYA9W47dyfQoYw-xs6v5Fb4Whxl24cTJrerqKncXIa8523DG63e7jUfbTZA2ggm54ZwpLZ6QFW-0WDdC6KdkVXjN7_qCvEhpxxirZaWekwtZa62YqFbk5_X-YF2msadua8MAiWKgizTkUic3AQQMAx1m9DBiKGAMtPTyghZkwA5HzEdqg6eHmCFktCM9Ioye2n0sLOvnMSd6j3kb57yoDyEm8I8-xTNvgd4GzAX-lm0BX5JnvR0TvDq_l-T208fvV1_WN18_X199uFm7qm7yunet1LbmSrdOdlwJaeuKtV72DLzSXlSWi86LrteeFRZrdNVZBW3TWa3ByUvy_qR7mLs9eFcWmOxoDhPu7XQ00aL5txNwa4Z4ZziTSrRKFYW3Z4Up_pjLacwek4NxtAHinIwo126VULUsVHWiuimmNEH_4MOZWYI1O3MO1izBmlOwZe7N3598mPqT5OMWUE51hzCZ5BCCA48TuGx8xP9Y_AImwrum</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Ali, Mohammed K.</creator><creator>Imperatore, Giuseppina</creator><creator>Benoit, Stephen R.</creator><creator>O'Brien, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Holliday, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B.</creator><creator>McKeever Bullard, Kai</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7266-2503</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Impact of changes in diabetes screening guidelines on testing eligibility and potential yield among adults without diagnosed diabetes in the United States</title><author>Ali, Mohammed K. ; Imperatore, Giuseppina ; Benoit, Stephen R. ; O'Brien, Matthew J. ; Holliday, Christopher S. ; Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B. ; McKeever Bullard, Kai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-fc937a61579c3b1523a6409d3f0ed57d24a12bd2bf7d01570874ba5e98ba77ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blood Glucose</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus - epidemiology</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glycated Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prediabetic State - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prediabetic State - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Screening guidelines</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ali, Mohammed K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imperatore, Giuseppina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoit, Stephen R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holliday, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKeever Bullard, Kai</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Diabetes research and clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ali, Mohammed K.</au><au>Imperatore, Giuseppina</au><au>Benoit, Stephen R.</au><au>O'Brien, Matthew J.</au><au>Holliday, Christopher S.</au><au>Echouffo-Tcheugui, Justin B.</au><au>McKeever Bullard, Kai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of changes in diabetes screening guidelines on testing eligibility and potential yield among adults without diagnosed diabetes in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes research and clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Res Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>197</volume><spage>110572</spage><epage>110572</epage><pages>110572-110572</pages><artnum>110572</artnum><issn>0168-8227</issn><eissn>1872-8227</eissn><abstract>Recent USPSTF and ADA guidelines expanded criteria of whom to test to identify prediabetes and diabetes. We described which Americans are eligible and report receiving glucose testing by USPSTF 2015 and 2021 as well as ADA 2003 and 2022 recommendations, and performance of each guideline. We analyzed cross-sectional data from 6,007 non-pregnant U.S. adults without diagnosed diabetes in the 2013–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. We reported proportions of adults who met each guideline’s criteria for glucose testing and reported receiving glucose testing in the past three years, overall and by key population subgroups,. Defining prediabetes (FPG 100–125 mg/dL and/or HbA1c 5.7–6.4 %) or previously undiagnosed diabetes (FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL and/or HbA1c ≥ 6.5 %), we assessed sensitivity and specificity. During 2013–2018, 76.7 million, 90.4 million, 157.7 million, and 169.5 million US adults met eligibility for glucose testing by USPSTF 2015, 2021, and ADA 2003 and 2022 guidelines, respectively. On average, 52 % of adults reported receiving glucose testing within the past 3 years. Likelihood of receiving glucose testing was lower among younger adults, men, Hispanic adults, those with less than high school completion, those living in poverty, and those without health insurance or a usual place of care than their respective counterparts. ADA recommendations were most sensitive (range: 91.0 % to 100.0 %) and least specific (range: 18.3 % to 35.3 %); USPSTF recommendations exhibited lower sensitivity (51.9 % to 66.6 %), but higher specificity (56.6 % to 74.5 %). An additional 12–14 million US adults are eligible for diabetes screening. USPSTF 2021 criteria provide balanced sensitivity and specificity while ADA 2022 criteria maximize sensitivity. Glucose testing does not align with guidelines and disparities remain.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36775024</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110572</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7266-2503</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-8227
ispartof Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2023-03, Vol.197, p.110572-110572, Article 110572
issn 0168-8227
1872-8227
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10352955
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Blood Glucose
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus - diagnosis
Diabetes Mellitus - epidemiology
Glucose
Glycated Hemoglobin
Humans
Male
Prediabetic State - diagnosis
Prediabetic State - epidemiology
Prevalence
Screening guidelines
United States - epidemiology
title Impact of changes in diabetes screening guidelines on testing eligibility and potential yield among adults without diagnosed diabetes in the United States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A29%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20changes%20in%20diabetes%20screening%20guidelines%20on%20testing%20eligibility%20and%20potential%20yield%20among%20adults%20without%20diagnosed%20diabetes%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20research%20and%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Ali,%20Mohammed%20K.&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=197&rft.spage=110572&rft.epage=110572&rft.pages=110572-110572&rft.artnum=110572&rft.issn=0168-8227&rft.eissn=1872-8227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110572&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2775952563%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2775952563&rft_id=info:pmid/36775024&rft_els_id=S0168822723000475&rfr_iscdi=true