Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity

Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials Science & Engineering C 2020-06, Vol.111, p.110846-110846, Article 110846
Hauptverfasser: Moore, Kathryn M., Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G., Bomba, Hunter N., Murthy, Ananya B., Bachelder, Eric M., Hingtgen, Shawn D., Ainslie, Kristy M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110846
container_issue
container_start_page 110846
container_title Materials Science & Engineering C
container_volume 111
creator Moore, Kathryn M.
Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G.
Bomba, Hunter N.
Murthy, Ananya B.
Bachelder, Eric M.
Hingtgen, Shawn D.
Ainslie, Kristy M.
description Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to deliver NSCs to the resection cavity. Here, we investigated the impact of scaffold degradation rate on NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity. Composite acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX) gelatin electrospun scaffolds were fabricated with two distinct degradation profiles created by changing the ratio of cyclic to acyclic acetal coverage of Ace-DEX. In vitro, fast degrading scaffolds were fully degraded by one week, whereas slow degrading scaffolds had a half-life of >56 days. The scaffolds also retained distinct degradation profiles in vivo. Two different NSC lines readily adhered to and remained viable on Ace-DEX gelatin scaffolds, in vitro. Therapeutic NSCs secreting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) had the same TRAIL output as tissue culture treated polystyrene (TCPS) when seeded on both scaffolds. Furthermore, secreted TRAIL was found to be highly potent against the human derived GBM cell line, GBM8, in vitro. Firefly luciferase expressing NSCs were seeded on scaffolds, implanted in a surgical resection cavity and their persistence in the brain was monitored by bioluminescent imaging (BLI). NSC loaded scaffolds were compared to a direct injection (DI) of NSCs in suspension, which is the current clinical approach to NSC therapy for GBM. Fast and slow degrading scaffolds enhanced NSC implantation efficiency 2.87 and 3.08-fold over DI, respectively. Interestingly, scaffold degradation profile did not significantly impact NSC persistence. However, persistence and long-term survival of NSCs was significantly greater for both scaffolds compared to DI, with scaffold implanted NSCs still detected by BLI at day 120 in most mice. Overall, these results highlight the benefit of utilizing a scaffold for application of tumoricidal NSC therapy for GBM. •Polymer and collagen scaffolds with distinct degradation profiles were fabricated.•Scaffolds helped to delivery tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) for therapy.•Viability and tumoricidal agent output were not affected by scaffold degradation.•NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity increased with scaffold delivery.•Scaffold degradation does not significantly influence NSC persistence
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10350285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0928493119345205</els_id><sourcerecordid>2389211603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-cf116cd0e64482b10be4904cf13d35e2f4ccce3c86d81a50788fb74195df96423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1r3DAQFaWh2W77B3oogl568UZftmUolBD6EQjkkp6FLI02WmzLleSF0D9fuZuGtoeehpl583hvHkJvKNlRQpuLw25MYHaMsDKgRIrmGdpQ2fKK0I4-RxvSMVmJjtNz9DKlAyGN5C17gc45Y20nab1BP67HWZuMg8MmjHNIPgNORjsXBost7KO2Ovsw4ajLptQJlqgHnDKM2MAw4Bli8qWdDGA_4XwPeD_40A865TBqnJa496acRChyf3EZffT54RU6c3pI8PqxbtG3z5_urr5WN7dfrq8ubyojpMiVcZQ2xhJohJCsp6QH0RFRxtzyGpgTxhjgRjZWUl2TVkrXt4J2tXVdIxjfoo8n3nnpR7AGplwcqDn6UccHFbRXf28mf6_24ago4TVhsi4M7x8ZYvi-QMpq9Gk1rycIS1KMy44VlYQX6Lt_oIewxKn4U0xwIbpWFtgWsRPKxJBSBPekhhK1hqsOag1XreGqU7jl6O2fPp5OfqdZAB9OACjfPHqIKhm_5mJ9LJ9XNvj_8f8ES7S4bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434497860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moore, Kathryn M. ; Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G. ; Bomba, Hunter N. ; Murthy, Ananya B. ; Bachelder, Eric M. ; Hingtgen, Shawn D. ; Ainslie, Kristy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kathryn M. ; Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G. ; Bomba, Hunter N. ; Murthy, Ananya B. ; Bachelder, Eric M. ; Hingtgen, Shawn D. ; Ainslie, Kristy M.</creatorcontrib><description>Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to deliver NSCs to the resection cavity. Here, we investigated the impact of scaffold degradation rate on NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity. Composite acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX) gelatin electrospun scaffolds were fabricated with two distinct degradation profiles created by changing the ratio of cyclic to acyclic acetal coverage of Ace-DEX. In vitro, fast degrading scaffolds were fully degraded by one week, whereas slow degrading scaffolds had a half-life of &gt;56 days. The scaffolds also retained distinct degradation profiles in vivo. Two different NSC lines readily adhered to and remained viable on Ace-DEX gelatin scaffolds, in vitro. Therapeutic NSCs secreting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) had the same TRAIL output as tissue culture treated polystyrene (TCPS) when seeded on both scaffolds. Furthermore, secreted TRAIL was found to be highly potent against the human derived GBM cell line, GBM8, in vitro. Firefly luciferase expressing NSCs were seeded on scaffolds, implanted in a surgical resection cavity and their persistence in the brain was monitored by bioluminescent imaging (BLI). NSC loaded scaffolds were compared to a direct injection (DI) of NSCs in suspension, which is the current clinical approach to NSC therapy for GBM. Fast and slow degrading scaffolds enhanced NSC implantation efficiency 2.87 and 3.08-fold over DI, respectively. Interestingly, scaffold degradation profile did not significantly impact NSC persistence. However, persistence and long-term survival of NSCs was significantly greater for both scaffolds compared to DI, with scaffold implanted NSCs still detected by BLI at day 120 in most mice. Overall, these results highlight the benefit of utilizing a scaffold for application of tumoricidal NSC therapy for GBM. •Polymer and collagen scaffolds with distinct degradation profiles were fabricated.•Scaffolds helped to delivery tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) for therapy.•Viability and tumoricidal agent output were not affected by scaffold degradation.•NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity increased with scaffold delivery.•Scaffold degradation does not significantly influence NSC persistence in the brain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-4931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32279815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acetalated dextran ; Acetylation ; Animals ; Apoptosis ; Biomaterials ; Biomedical materials ; Brain ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Cell culture ; Cell Line ; Cell Survival ; Cross-Linking Reagents - chemistry ; Degradation ; Dextran ; Dextrans ; Dextrans - chemistry ; Electrospinning ; Female ; Gelatin ; Gelatin - chemistry ; Genetic engineering ; Glioblastoma ; Glioblastoma - pathology ; Implantation ; Materials science ; Mice, Nude ; Neural stem cells ; Neural Stem Cells - pathology ; Neuroimaging ; Polystyrene ; Polystyrene resins ; Scaffolds ; Stem cell transplantation ; Stem cells ; Surgical implants ; Temperature ; Therapy ; Tissue culture ; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry ; TRAIL ; TRAIL protein ; Tumoricidal neural stem cell therapy</subject><ispartof>Materials Science &amp; Engineering C, 2020-06, Vol.111, p.110846-110846, Article 110846</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 2020</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-cf116cd0e64482b10be4904cf13d35e2f4ccce3c86d81a50788fb74195df96423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-cf116cd0e64482b10be4904cf13d35e2f4ccce3c86d81a50788fb74195df96423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32279815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kathryn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomba, Hunter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ananya B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachelder, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hingtgen, Shawn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ainslie, Kristy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity</title><title>Materials Science &amp; Engineering C</title><addtitle>Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl</addtitle><description>Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to deliver NSCs to the resection cavity. Here, we investigated the impact of scaffold degradation rate on NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity. Composite acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX) gelatin electrospun scaffolds were fabricated with two distinct degradation profiles created by changing the ratio of cyclic to acyclic acetal coverage of Ace-DEX. In vitro, fast degrading scaffolds were fully degraded by one week, whereas slow degrading scaffolds had a half-life of &gt;56 days. The scaffolds also retained distinct degradation profiles in vivo. Two different NSC lines readily adhered to and remained viable on Ace-DEX gelatin scaffolds, in vitro. Therapeutic NSCs secreting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) had the same TRAIL output as tissue culture treated polystyrene (TCPS) when seeded on both scaffolds. Furthermore, secreted TRAIL was found to be highly potent against the human derived GBM cell line, GBM8, in vitro. Firefly luciferase expressing NSCs were seeded on scaffolds, implanted in a surgical resection cavity and their persistence in the brain was monitored by bioluminescent imaging (BLI). NSC loaded scaffolds were compared to a direct injection (DI) of NSCs in suspension, which is the current clinical approach to NSC therapy for GBM. Fast and slow degrading scaffolds enhanced NSC implantation efficiency 2.87 and 3.08-fold over DI, respectively. Interestingly, scaffold degradation profile did not significantly impact NSC persistence. However, persistence and long-term survival of NSCs was significantly greater for both scaffolds compared to DI, with scaffold implanted NSCs still detected by BLI at day 120 in most mice. Overall, these results highlight the benefit of utilizing a scaffold for application of tumoricidal NSC therapy for GBM. •Polymer and collagen scaffolds with distinct degradation profiles were fabricated.•Scaffolds helped to delivery tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) for therapy.•Viability and tumoricidal agent output were not affected by scaffold degradation.•NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity increased with scaffold delivery.•Scaffold degradation does not significantly influence NSC persistence in the brain.</description><subject>Acetalated dextran</subject><subject>Acetylation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cross-Linking Reagents - chemistry</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Dextran</subject><subject>Dextrans</subject><subject>Dextrans - chemistry</subject><subject>Electrospinning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gelatin</subject><subject>Gelatin - chemistry</subject><subject>Genetic engineering</subject><subject>Glioblastoma</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - pathology</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Mice, Nude</subject><subject>Neural stem cells</subject><subject>Neural Stem Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Polystyrene</subject><subject>Polystyrene resins</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Tissue culture</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><subject>TRAIL</subject><subject>TRAIL protein</subject><subject>Tumoricidal neural stem cell therapy</subject><issn>0928-4931</issn><issn>1873-0191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1r3DAQFaWh2W77B3oogl568UZftmUolBD6EQjkkp6FLI02WmzLleSF0D9fuZuGtoeehpl583hvHkJvKNlRQpuLw25MYHaMsDKgRIrmGdpQ2fKK0I4-RxvSMVmJjtNz9DKlAyGN5C17gc45Y20nab1BP67HWZuMg8MmjHNIPgNORjsXBost7KO2Ovsw4ajLptQJlqgHnDKM2MAw4Bli8qWdDGA_4XwPeD_40A865TBqnJa496acRChyf3EZffT54RU6c3pI8PqxbtG3z5_urr5WN7dfrq8ubyojpMiVcZQ2xhJohJCsp6QH0RFRxtzyGpgTxhjgRjZWUl2TVkrXt4J2tXVdIxjfoo8n3nnpR7AGplwcqDn6UccHFbRXf28mf6_24ago4TVhsi4M7x8ZYvi-QMpq9Gk1rycIS1KMy44VlYQX6Lt_oIewxKn4U0xwIbpWFtgWsRPKxJBSBPekhhK1hqsOag1XreGqU7jl6O2fPp5OfqdZAB9OACjfPHqIKhm_5mJ9LJ9XNvj_8f8ES7S4bQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Moore, Kathryn M.</creator><creator>Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G.</creator><creator>Bomba, Hunter N.</creator><creator>Murthy, Ananya B.</creator><creator>Bachelder, Eric M.</creator><creator>Hingtgen, Shawn D.</creator><creator>Ainslie, Kristy M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity</title><author>Moore, Kathryn M. ; Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G. ; Bomba, Hunter N. ; Murthy, Ananya B. ; Bachelder, Eric M. ; Hingtgen, Shawn D. ; Ainslie, Kristy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-cf116cd0e64482b10be4904cf13d35e2f4ccce3c86d81a50788fb74195df96423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acetalated dextran</topic><topic>Acetylation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cross-Linking Reagents - chemistry</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Dextran</topic><topic>Dextrans</topic><topic>Dextrans - chemistry</topic><topic>Electrospinning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gelatin</topic><topic>Gelatin - chemistry</topic><topic>Genetic engineering</topic><topic>Glioblastoma</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - pathology</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Mice, Nude</topic><topic>Neural stem cells</topic><topic>Neural Stem Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Polystyrene</topic><topic>Polystyrene resins</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Tissue culture</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</topic><topic>TRAIL</topic><topic>TRAIL protein</topic><topic>Tumoricidal neural stem cell therapy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kathryn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomba, Hunter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ananya B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachelder, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hingtgen, Shawn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ainslie, Kristy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials Science &amp; Engineering C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, Kathryn M.</au><au>Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G.</au><au>Bomba, Hunter N.</au><au>Murthy, Ananya B.</au><au>Bachelder, Eric M.</au><au>Hingtgen, Shawn D.</au><au>Ainslie, Kristy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity</atitle><jtitle>Materials Science &amp; Engineering C</jtitle><addtitle>Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>110846</spage><epage>110846</epage><pages>110846-110846</pages><artnum>110846</artnum><issn>0928-4931</issn><eissn>1873-0191</eissn><abstract>Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to deliver NSCs to the resection cavity. Here, we investigated the impact of scaffold degradation rate on NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity. Composite acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX) gelatin electrospun scaffolds were fabricated with two distinct degradation profiles created by changing the ratio of cyclic to acyclic acetal coverage of Ace-DEX. In vitro, fast degrading scaffolds were fully degraded by one week, whereas slow degrading scaffolds had a half-life of &gt;56 days. The scaffolds also retained distinct degradation profiles in vivo. Two different NSC lines readily adhered to and remained viable on Ace-DEX gelatin scaffolds, in vitro. Therapeutic NSCs secreting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) had the same TRAIL output as tissue culture treated polystyrene (TCPS) when seeded on both scaffolds. Furthermore, secreted TRAIL was found to be highly potent against the human derived GBM cell line, GBM8, in vitro. Firefly luciferase expressing NSCs were seeded on scaffolds, implanted in a surgical resection cavity and their persistence in the brain was monitored by bioluminescent imaging (BLI). NSC loaded scaffolds were compared to a direct injection (DI) of NSCs in suspension, which is the current clinical approach to NSC therapy for GBM. Fast and slow degrading scaffolds enhanced NSC implantation efficiency 2.87 and 3.08-fold over DI, respectively. Interestingly, scaffold degradation profile did not significantly impact NSC persistence. However, persistence and long-term survival of NSCs was significantly greater for both scaffolds compared to DI, with scaffold implanted NSCs still detected by BLI at day 120 in most mice. Overall, these results highlight the benefit of utilizing a scaffold for application of tumoricidal NSC therapy for GBM. •Polymer and collagen scaffolds with distinct degradation profiles were fabricated.•Scaffolds helped to delivery tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) for therapy.•Viability and tumoricidal agent output were not affected by scaffold degradation.•NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity increased with scaffold delivery.•Scaffold degradation does not significantly influence NSC persistence in the brain.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32279815</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0928-4931
ispartof Materials Science & Engineering C, 2020-06, Vol.111, p.110846-110846, Article 110846
issn 0928-4931
1873-0191
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10350285
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acetalated dextran
Acetylation
Animals
Apoptosis
Biomaterials
Biomedical materials
Brain
Brain Neoplasms - pathology
Cell culture
Cell Line
Cell Survival
Cross-Linking Reagents - chemistry
Degradation
Dextran
Dextrans
Dextrans - chemistry
Electrospinning
Female
Gelatin
Gelatin - chemistry
Genetic engineering
Glioblastoma
Glioblastoma - pathology
Implantation
Materials science
Mice, Nude
Neural stem cells
Neural Stem Cells - pathology
Neuroimaging
Polystyrene
Polystyrene resins
Scaffolds
Stem cell transplantation
Stem cells
Surgical implants
Temperature
Therapy
Tissue culture
Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry
TRAIL
TRAIL protein
Tumoricidal neural stem cell therapy
title Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T19%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20composite%20scaffold%20degradation%20rate%20on%20neural%20stem%20cell%20persistence%20in%20the%20glioblastoma%20surgical%20resection%20cavity&rft.jtitle=Materials%20Science%20&%20Engineering%20C&rft.au=Moore,%20Kathryn%20M.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=110846&rft.epage=110846&rft.pages=110846-110846&rft.artnum=110846&rft.issn=0928-4931&rft.eissn=1873-0191&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2389211603%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434497860&rft_id=info:pmid/32279815&rft_els_id=S0928493119345205&rfr_iscdi=true