Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity
Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Materials Science & Engineering C 2020-06, Vol.111, p.110846-110846, Article 110846 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 110846 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 110846 |
container_title | Materials Science & Engineering C |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Moore, Kathryn M. Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G. Bomba, Hunter N. Murthy, Ananya B. Bachelder, Eric M. Hingtgen, Shawn D. Ainslie, Kristy M. |
description | Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to deliver NSCs to the resection cavity. Here, we investigated the impact of scaffold degradation rate on NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity. Composite acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX) gelatin electrospun scaffolds were fabricated with two distinct degradation profiles created by changing the ratio of cyclic to acyclic acetal coverage of Ace-DEX. In vitro, fast degrading scaffolds were fully degraded by one week, whereas slow degrading scaffolds had a half-life of >56 days. The scaffolds also retained distinct degradation profiles in vivo. Two different NSC lines readily adhered to and remained viable on Ace-DEX gelatin scaffolds, in vitro. Therapeutic NSCs secreting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) had the same TRAIL output as tissue culture treated polystyrene (TCPS) when seeded on both scaffolds. Furthermore, secreted TRAIL was found to be highly potent against the human derived GBM cell line, GBM8, in vitro. Firefly luciferase expressing NSCs were seeded on scaffolds, implanted in a surgical resection cavity and their persistence in the brain was monitored by bioluminescent imaging (BLI). NSC loaded scaffolds were compared to a direct injection (DI) of NSCs in suspension, which is the current clinical approach to NSC therapy for GBM. Fast and slow degrading scaffolds enhanced NSC implantation efficiency 2.87 and 3.08-fold over DI, respectively. Interestingly, scaffold degradation profile did not significantly impact NSC persistence. However, persistence and long-term survival of NSCs was significantly greater for both scaffolds compared to DI, with scaffold implanted NSCs still detected by BLI at day 120 in most mice. Overall, these results highlight the benefit of utilizing a scaffold for application of tumoricidal NSC therapy for GBM.
•Polymer and collagen scaffolds with distinct degradation profiles were fabricated.•Scaffolds helped to delivery tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) for therapy.•Viability and tumoricidal agent output were not affected by scaffold degradation.•NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity increased with scaffold delivery.•Scaffold degradation does not significantly influence NSC persistence |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10350285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0928493119345205</els_id><sourcerecordid>2389211603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-cf116cd0e64482b10be4904cf13d35e2f4ccce3c86d81a50788fb74195df96423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1r3DAQFaWh2W77B3oogl568UZftmUolBD6EQjkkp6FLI02WmzLleSF0D9fuZuGtoeehpl583hvHkJvKNlRQpuLw25MYHaMsDKgRIrmGdpQ2fKK0I4-RxvSMVmJjtNz9DKlAyGN5C17gc45Y20nab1BP67HWZuMg8MmjHNIPgNORjsXBost7KO2Ovsw4ajLptQJlqgHnDKM2MAw4Bli8qWdDGA_4XwPeD_40A865TBqnJa496acRChyf3EZffT54RU6c3pI8PqxbtG3z5_urr5WN7dfrq8ubyojpMiVcZQ2xhJohJCsp6QH0RFRxtzyGpgTxhjgRjZWUl2TVkrXt4J2tXVdIxjfoo8n3nnpR7AGplwcqDn6UccHFbRXf28mf6_24ago4TVhsi4M7x8ZYvi-QMpq9Gk1rycIS1KMy44VlYQX6Lt_oIewxKn4U0xwIbpWFtgWsRPKxJBSBPekhhK1hqsOag1XreGqU7jl6O2fPp5OfqdZAB9OACjfPHqIKhm_5mJ9LJ9XNvj_8f8ES7S4bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434497860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Moore, Kathryn M. ; Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G. ; Bomba, Hunter N. ; Murthy, Ananya B. ; Bachelder, Eric M. ; Hingtgen, Shawn D. ; Ainslie, Kristy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kathryn M. ; Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G. ; Bomba, Hunter N. ; Murthy, Ananya B. ; Bachelder, Eric M. ; Hingtgen, Shawn D. ; Ainslie, Kristy M.</creatorcontrib><description>Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to deliver NSCs to the resection cavity. Here, we investigated the impact of scaffold degradation rate on NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity. Composite acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX) gelatin electrospun scaffolds were fabricated with two distinct degradation profiles created by changing the ratio of cyclic to acyclic acetal coverage of Ace-DEX. In vitro, fast degrading scaffolds were fully degraded by one week, whereas slow degrading scaffolds had a half-life of >56 days. The scaffolds also retained distinct degradation profiles in vivo. Two different NSC lines readily adhered to and remained viable on Ace-DEX gelatin scaffolds, in vitro. Therapeutic NSCs secreting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) had the same TRAIL output as tissue culture treated polystyrene (TCPS) when seeded on both scaffolds. Furthermore, secreted TRAIL was found to be highly potent against the human derived GBM cell line, GBM8, in vitro. Firefly luciferase expressing NSCs were seeded on scaffolds, implanted in a surgical resection cavity and their persistence in the brain was monitored by bioluminescent imaging (BLI). NSC loaded scaffolds were compared to a direct injection (DI) of NSCs in suspension, which is the current clinical approach to NSC therapy for GBM. Fast and slow degrading scaffolds enhanced NSC implantation efficiency 2.87 and 3.08-fold over DI, respectively. Interestingly, scaffold degradation profile did not significantly impact NSC persistence. However, persistence and long-term survival of NSCs was significantly greater for both scaffolds compared to DI, with scaffold implanted NSCs still detected by BLI at day 120 in most mice. Overall, these results highlight the benefit of utilizing a scaffold for application of tumoricidal NSC therapy for GBM.
•Polymer and collagen scaffolds with distinct degradation profiles were fabricated.•Scaffolds helped to delivery tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) for therapy.•Viability and tumoricidal agent output were not affected by scaffold degradation.•NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity increased with scaffold delivery.•Scaffold degradation does not significantly influence NSC persistence in the brain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0928-4931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-0191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32279815</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acetalated dextran ; Acetylation ; Animals ; Apoptosis ; Biomaterials ; Biomedical materials ; Brain ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Cell culture ; Cell Line ; Cell Survival ; Cross-Linking Reagents - chemistry ; Degradation ; Dextran ; Dextrans ; Dextrans - chemistry ; Electrospinning ; Female ; Gelatin ; Gelatin - chemistry ; Genetic engineering ; Glioblastoma ; Glioblastoma - pathology ; Implantation ; Materials science ; Mice, Nude ; Neural stem cells ; Neural Stem Cells - pathology ; Neuroimaging ; Polystyrene ; Polystyrene resins ; Scaffolds ; Stem cell transplantation ; Stem cells ; Surgical implants ; Temperature ; Therapy ; Tissue culture ; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry ; TRAIL ; TRAIL protein ; Tumoricidal neural stem cell therapy</subject><ispartof>Materials Science & Engineering C, 2020-06, Vol.111, p.110846-110846, Article 110846</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 2020</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-cf116cd0e64482b10be4904cf13d35e2f4ccce3c86d81a50788fb74195df96423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-cf116cd0e64482b10be4904cf13d35e2f4ccce3c86d81a50788fb74195df96423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32279815$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kathryn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomba, Hunter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ananya B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachelder, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hingtgen, Shawn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ainslie, Kristy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity</title><title>Materials Science & Engineering C</title><addtitle>Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl</addtitle><description>Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to deliver NSCs to the resection cavity. Here, we investigated the impact of scaffold degradation rate on NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity. Composite acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX) gelatin electrospun scaffolds were fabricated with two distinct degradation profiles created by changing the ratio of cyclic to acyclic acetal coverage of Ace-DEX. In vitro, fast degrading scaffolds were fully degraded by one week, whereas slow degrading scaffolds had a half-life of >56 days. The scaffolds also retained distinct degradation profiles in vivo. Two different NSC lines readily adhered to and remained viable on Ace-DEX gelatin scaffolds, in vitro. Therapeutic NSCs secreting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) had the same TRAIL output as tissue culture treated polystyrene (TCPS) when seeded on both scaffolds. Furthermore, secreted TRAIL was found to be highly potent against the human derived GBM cell line, GBM8, in vitro. Firefly luciferase expressing NSCs were seeded on scaffolds, implanted in a surgical resection cavity and their persistence in the brain was monitored by bioluminescent imaging (BLI). NSC loaded scaffolds were compared to a direct injection (DI) of NSCs in suspension, which is the current clinical approach to NSC therapy for GBM. Fast and slow degrading scaffolds enhanced NSC implantation efficiency 2.87 and 3.08-fold over DI, respectively. Interestingly, scaffold degradation profile did not significantly impact NSC persistence. However, persistence and long-term survival of NSCs was significantly greater for both scaffolds compared to DI, with scaffold implanted NSCs still detected by BLI at day 120 in most mice. Overall, these results highlight the benefit of utilizing a scaffold for application of tumoricidal NSC therapy for GBM.
•Polymer and collagen scaffolds with distinct degradation profiles were fabricated.•Scaffolds helped to delivery tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) for therapy.•Viability and tumoricidal agent output were not affected by scaffold degradation.•NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity increased with scaffold delivery.•Scaffold degradation does not significantly influence NSC persistence in the brain.</description><subject>Acetalated dextran</subject><subject>Acetylation</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Cell Survival</subject><subject>Cross-Linking Reagents - chemistry</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Dextran</subject><subject>Dextrans</subject><subject>Dextrans - chemistry</subject><subject>Electrospinning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gelatin</subject><subject>Gelatin - chemistry</subject><subject>Genetic engineering</subject><subject>Glioblastoma</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - pathology</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Mice, Nude</subject><subject>Neural stem cells</subject><subject>Neural Stem Cells - pathology</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Polystyrene</subject><subject>Polystyrene resins</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Tissue culture</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</subject><subject>TRAIL</subject><subject>TRAIL protein</subject><subject>Tumoricidal neural stem cell therapy</subject><issn>0928-4931</issn><issn>1873-0191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1r3DAQFaWh2W77B3oogl568UZftmUolBD6EQjkkp6FLI02WmzLleSF0D9fuZuGtoeehpl583hvHkJvKNlRQpuLw25MYHaMsDKgRIrmGdpQ2fKK0I4-RxvSMVmJjtNz9DKlAyGN5C17gc45Y20nab1BP67HWZuMg8MmjHNIPgNORjsXBost7KO2Ovsw4ajLptQJlqgHnDKM2MAw4Bli8qWdDGA_4XwPeD_40A865TBqnJa496acRChyf3EZffT54RU6c3pI8PqxbtG3z5_urr5WN7dfrq8ubyojpMiVcZQ2xhJohJCsp6QH0RFRxtzyGpgTxhjgRjZWUl2TVkrXt4J2tXVdIxjfoo8n3nnpR7AGplwcqDn6UccHFbRXf28mf6_24ago4TVhsi4M7x8ZYvi-QMpq9Gk1rycIS1KMy44VlYQX6Lt_oIewxKn4U0xwIbpWFtgWsRPKxJBSBPekhhK1hqsOag1XreGqU7jl6O2fPp5OfqdZAB9OACjfPHqIKhm_5mJ9LJ9XNvj_8f8ES7S4bQ</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Moore, Kathryn M.</creator><creator>Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G.</creator><creator>Bomba, Hunter N.</creator><creator>Murthy, Ananya B.</creator><creator>Bachelder, Eric M.</creator><creator>Hingtgen, Shawn D.</creator><creator>Ainslie, Kristy M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity</title><author>Moore, Kathryn M. ; Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G. ; Bomba, Hunter N. ; Murthy, Ananya B. ; Bachelder, Eric M. ; Hingtgen, Shawn D. ; Ainslie, Kristy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-cf116cd0e64482b10be4904cf13d35e2f4ccce3c86d81a50788fb74195df96423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acetalated dextran</topic><topic>Acetylation</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Cell Survival</topic><topic>Cross-Linking Reagents - chemistry</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Dextran</topic><topic>Dextrans</topic><topic>Dextrans - chemistry</topic><topic>Electrospinning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gelatin</topic><topic>Gelatin - chemistry</topic><topic>Genetic engineering</topic><topic>Glioblastoma</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - pathology</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Mice, Nude</topic><topic>Neural stem cells</topic><topic>Neural Stem Cells - pathology</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Polystyrene</topic><topic>Polystyrene resins</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Tissue culture</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry</topic><topic>TRAIL</topic><topic>TRAIL protein</topic><topic>Tumoricidal neural stem cell therapy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, Kathryn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bomba, Hunter N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murthy, Ananya B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachelder, Eric M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hingtgen, Shawn D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ainslie, Kristy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Materials Science & Engineering C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, Kathryn M.</au><au>Graham-Gurysh, Elizabeth G.</au><au>Bomba, Hunter N.</au><au>Murthy, Ananya B.</au><au>Bachelder, Eric M.</au><au>Hingtgen, Shawn D.</au><au>Ainslie, Kristy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity</atitle><jtitle>Materials Science & Engineering C</jtitle><addtitle>Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>110846</spage><epage>110846</epage><pages>110846-110846</pages><artnum>110846</artnum><issn>0928-4931</issn><eissn>1873-0191</eissn><abstract>Tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) are an emerging therapy to combat glioblastoma (GBM). This therapy employs genetically engineered NSCs that secrete tumoricidal agents to seek out and kill tumor foci remaining after GBM surgical resection. Biomaterial scaffolds have previously been utilized to deliver NSCs to the resection cavity. Here, we investigated the impact of scaffold degradation rate on NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity. Composite acetalated dextran (Ace-DEX) gelatin electrospun scaffolds were fabricated with two distinct degradation profiles created by changing the ratio of cyclic to acyclic acetal coverage of Ace-DEX. In vitro, fast degrading scaffolds were fully degraded by one week, whereas slow degrading scaffolds had a half-life of >56 days. The scaffolds also retained distinct degradation profiles in vivo. Two different NSC lines readily adhered to and remained viable on Ace-DEX gelatin scaffolds, in vitro. Therapeutic NSCs secreting tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) had the same TRAIL output as tissue culture treated polystyrene (TCPS) when seeded on both scaffolds. Furthermore, secreted TRAIL was found to be highly potent against the human derived GBM cell line, GBM8, in vitro. Firefly luciferase expressing NSCs were seeded on scaffolds, implanted in a surgical resection cavity and their persistence in the brain was monitored by bioluminescent imaging (BLI). NSC loaded scaffolds were compared to a direct injection (DI) of NSCs in suspension, which is the current clinical approach to NSC therapy for GBM. Fast and slow degrading scaffolds enhanced NSC implantation efficiency 2.87 and 3.08-fold over DI, respectively. Interestingly, scaffold degradation profile did not significantly impact NSC persistence. However, persistence and long-term survival of NSCs was significantly greater for both scaffolds compared to DI, with scaffold implanted NSCs still detected by BLI at day 120 in most mice. Overall, these results highlight the benefit of utilizing a scaffold for application of tumoricidal NSC therapy for GBM.
•Polymer and collagen scaffolds with distinct degradation profiles were fabricated.•Scaffolds helped to delivery tumoricidal neural stem cells (NSCs) for therapy.•Viability and tumoricidal agent output were not affected by scaffold degradation.•NSC persistence in the brain resection cavity increased with scaffold delivery.•Scaffold degradation does not significantly influence NSC persistence in the brain.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>32279815</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0928-4931 |
ispartof | Materials Science & Engineering C, 2020-06, Vol.111, p.110846-110846, Article 110846 |
issn | 0928-4931 1873-0191 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10350285 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Acetalated dextran Acetylation Animals Apoptosis Biomaterials Biomedical materials Brain Brain Neoplasms - pathology Cell culture Cell Line Cell Survival Cross-Linking Reagents - chemistry Degradation Dextran Dextrans Dextrans - chemistry Electrospinning Female Gelatin Gelatin - chemistry Genetic engineering Glioblastoma Glioblastoma - pathology Implantation Materials science Mice, Nude Neural stem cells Neural Stem Cells - pathology Neuroimaging Polystyrene Polystyrene resins Scaffolds Stem cell transplantation Stem cells Surgical implants Temperature Therapy Tissue culture Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry TRAIL TRAIL protein Tumoricidal neural stem cell therapy |
title | Impact of composite scaffold degradation rate on neural stem cell persistence in the glioblastoma surgical resection cavity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T19%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20composite%20scaffold%20degradation%20rate%20on%20neural%20stem%20cell%20persistence%20in%20the%20glioblastoma%20surgical%20resection%20cavity&rft.jtitle=Materials%20Science%20&%20Engineering%20C&rft.au=Moore,%20Kathryn%20M.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=110846&rft.epage=110846&rft.pages=110846-110846&rft.artnum=110846&rft.issn=0928-4931&rft.eissn=1873-0191&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.msec.2020.110846&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2389211603%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434497860&rft_id=info:pmid/32279815&rft_els_id=S0928493119345205&rfr_iscdi=true |