The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)

An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymers 2023-07, Vol.15 (13), p.2951
Hauptverfasser: Carta, Mariolino, Antonangelo, Ariana R, Jansen, Johannes Carolus, Longo, Mariagiulia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 13
container_start_page 2951
container_title Polymers
container_volume 15
creator Carta, Mariolino
Antonangelo, Ariana R
Jansen, Johannes Carolus
Longo, Mariagiulia
description An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation systems over a relatively short time. A common approach to address this issue is the development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). These hybrid systems typically utilise either crystalline or amorphous additives, so-called fillers, which are incorporated into polymeric membranes at different loadings, with the aim to improve and stabilise the final gas separation performance. After a general introduction to the most relevant models to describe the transport properties in MMMs, this review intends to investigate and discuss the main advantages and disadvantages derived from the inclusion of fillers of different morphologies. Particular emphasis will be given to the study of the compatibility at the interface between the filler and the matrix created by the two different classes of additives, the inorganic and crystalline fillers vs. their organic and amorphous counterparts. It will conclude with a brief summary of the main findings.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/polym15132951
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10347269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A758481943</galeid><sourcerecordid>A758481943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-23710119bbcd49ea6f1da80072df4361ea2ab8618fa1879a7e40bc9bf7b3a3973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks9vFCEUxydGY5vao1dD4qUepsLADHAym9VWk040sZ4JzDy6NAyMMKvdP8L_WTZbm1Y48Ovzvu99yauq1wSfUyrx-zn63URaQhvZkmfVcYM5rRnt8PNH-6PqNOdbXAZru47wl9UR5YzxVnbH1Z_rDaCPzlpIEAZALqBvkGxMk94fdRjROk6zXpxx3i07ZGD5DRDQOu3yor134UCtppjmTdxmdOG8h5T3Ur27gxH1eknuDvUwmaQDZFTk0aXO6DvMOhXpGNBZ3_f53avqhdU-w-n9elL9uPh0vf5cX329_LJeXdUDa9ulbignmBBpzDAyCbqzZNQCY96MtjgmoBttREeE1URwqTkwbAZpLDdUU8npSfXhoDtvzQTjAGFJ2qs5uUmnnYraqacvwW3UTfylCKaMN50sCmf3Cin-3EJe1OTyAN4Xg-UTVCOoaFjLxD7Z2__Q27hNofjbU10puJGiUOcH6kZ7UC7YWBIPZY4wuSEGsK7cr3grmCCS0RJQHwKGFHNOYB_KJ1jtu0M96Y7Cv3ns-YH-1wv0LyYOt5Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836436298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Carta, Mariolino ; Antonangelo, Ariana R ; Jansen, Johannes Carolus ; Longo, Mariagiulia</creator><creatorcontrib>Carta, Mariolino ; Antonangelo, Ariana R ; Jansen, Johannes Carolus ; Longo, Mariagiulia</creatorcontrib><description>An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation systems over a relatively short time. A common approach to address this issue is the development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). These hybrid systems typically utilise either crystalline or amorphous additives, so-called fillers, which are incorporated into polymeric membranes at different loadings, with the aim to improve and stabilise the final gas separation performance. After a general introduction to the most relevant models to describe the transport properties in MMMs, this review intends to investigate and discuss the main advantages and disadvantages derived from the inclusion of fillers of different morphologies. Particular emphasis will be given to the study of the compatibility at the interface between the filler and the matrix created by the two different classes of additives, the inorganic and crystalline fillers vs. their organic and amorphous counterparts. It will conclude with a brief summary of the main findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/polym15132951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37447596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Additives ; Aging ; Commercialization ; Compatibility ; Fillers ; Gas separation ; Gases ; Hybrid systems ; Membranes ; Permeability ; Polymers ; Review ; Transport properties ; Zeolites</subject><ispartof>Polymers, 2023-07, Vol.15 (13), p.2951</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-23710119bbcd49ea6f1da80072df4361ea2ab8618fa1879a7e40bc9bf7b3a3973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-23710119bbcd49ea6f1da80072df4361ea2ab8618fa1879a7e40bc9bf7b3a3973</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0718-6971 ; 0000-0003-4538-6851</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347269/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347269/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37447596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carta, Mariolino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonangelo, Ariana R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Johannes Carolus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Mariagiulia</creatorcontrib><title>The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)</title><title>Polymers</title><addtitle>Polymers (Basel)</addtitle><description>An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation systems over a relatively short time. A common approach to address this issue is the development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). These hybrid systems typically utilise either crystalline or amorphous additives, so-called fillers, which are incorporated into polymeric membranes at different loadings, with the aim to improve and stabilise the final gas separation performance. After a general introduction to the most relevant models to describe the transport properties in MMMs, this review intends to investigate and discuss the main advantages and disadvantages derived from the inclusion of fillers of different morphologies. Particular emphasis will be given to the study of the compatibility at the interface between the filler and the matrix created by the two different classes of additives, the inorganic and crystalline fillers vs. their organic and amorphous counterparts. It will conclude with a brief summary of the main findings.</description><subject>Additives</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Compatibility</subject><subject>Fillers</subject><subject>Gas separation</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Hybrid systems</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Transport properties</subject><subject>Zeolites</subject><issn>2073-4360</issn><issn>2073-4360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks9vFCEUxydGY5vao1dD4qUepsLADHAym9VWk040sZ4JzDy6NAyMMKvdP8L_WTZbm1Y48Ovzvu99yauq1wSfUyrx-zn63URaQhvZkmfVcYM5rRnt8PNH-6PqNOdbXAZru47wl9UR5YzxVnbH1Z_rDaCPzlpIEAZALqBvkGxMk94fdRjROk6zXpxx3i07ZGD5DRDQOu3yor134UCtppjmTdxmdOG8h5T3Ur27gxH1eknuDvUwmaQDZFTk0aXO6DvMOhXpGNBZ3_f53avqhdU-w-n9elL9uPh0vf5cX329_LJeXdUDa9ulbignmBBpzDAyCbqzZNQCY96MtjgmoBttREeE1URwqTkwbAZpLDdUU8npSfXhoDtvzQTjAGFJ2qs5uUmnnYraqacvwW3UTfylCKaMN50sCmf3Cin-3EJe1OTyAN4Xg-UTVCOoaFjLxD7Z2__Q27hNofjbU10puJGiUOcH6kZ7UC7YWBIPZY4wuSEGsK7cr3grmCCS0RJQHwKGFHNOYB_KJ1jtu0M96Y7Cv3ns-YH-1wv0LyYOt5Y</recordid><startdate>20230705</startdate><enddate>20230705</enddate><creator>Carta, Mariolino</creator><creator>Antonangelo, Ariana R</creator><creator>Jansen, Johannes Carolus</creator><creator>Longo, Mariagiulia</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0718-6971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4538-6851</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230705</creationdate><title>The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)</title><author>Carta, Mariolino ; Antonangelo, Ariana R ; Jansen, Johannes Carolus ; Longo, Mariagiulia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-23710119bbcd49ea6f1da80072df4361ea2ab8618fa1879a7e40bc9bf7b3a3973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Additives</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Compatibility</topic><topic>Fillers</topic><topic>Gas separation</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Hybrid systems</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Transport properties</topic><topic>Zeolites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carta, Mariolino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonangelo, Ariana R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jansen, Johannes Carolus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Mariagiulia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carta, Mariolino</au><au>Antonangelo, Ariana R</au><au>Jansen, Johannes Carolus</au><au>Longo, Mariagiulia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)</atitle><jtitle>Polymers</jtitle><addtitle>Polymers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2023-07-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2951</spage><pages>2951-</pages><issn>2073-4360</issn><eissn>2073-4360</eissn><abstract>An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation systems over a relatively short time. A common approach to address this issue is the development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). These hybrid systems typically utilise either crystalline or amorphous additives, so-called fillers, which are incorporated into polymeric membranes at different loadings, with the aim to improve and stabilise the final gas separation performance. After a general introduction to the most relevant models to describe the transport properties in MMMs, this review intends to investigate and discuss the main advantages and disadvantages derived from the inclusion of fillers of different morphologies. Particular emphasis will be given to the study of the compatibility at the interface between the filler and the matrix created by the two different classes of additives, the inorganic and crystalline fillers vs. their organic and amorphous counterparts. It will conclude with a brief summary of the main findings.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37447596</pmid><doi>10.3390/polym15132951</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0718-6971</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4538-6851</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4360
ispartof Polymers, 2023-07, Vol.15 (13), p.2951
issn 2073-4360
2073-4360
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10347269
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Additives
Aging
Commercialization
Compatibility
Fillers
Gas separation
Gases
Hybrid systems
Membranes
Permeability
Polymers
Review
Transport properties
Zeolites
title The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A46%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Difference%20in%20Performance%20and%20Compatibility%20between%20Crystalline%20and%20Amorphous%20Fillers%20in%20Mixed%20Matrix%20Membranes%20for%20Gas%20Separation%20(MMMs)&rft.jtitle=Polymers&rft.au=Carta,%20Mariolino&rft.date=2023-07-05&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2951&rft.pages=2951-&rft.issn=2073-4360&rft.eissn=2073-4360&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/polym15132951&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA758481943%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836436298&rft_id=info:pmid/37447596&rft_galeid=A758481943&rfr_iscdi=true