Feasibility and Acceptance of Self-Guided Mobile Ultrasound among Pregnant Women in Routine Prenatal Care

Mobile and remote ultrasound devices are becoming increasingly available. The benefits and possible risks of self-guided ultrasound examinations conducted by pregnant women at home have not yet been well explored. This study investigated aspects of feasibility and acceptance, as well as the success...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2023-06, Vol.12 (13), p.4224
Hauptverfasser: Pontones, Constanza A, Titzmann, Adriana, Huebner, Hanna, Danzberger, Nina, Ruebner, Matthias, Häberle, Lothar, Eskofier, Bjoern M, Nissen, Michael, Kehl, Sven, Faschingbauer, Florian, Beckmann, Matthias W, Fasching, Peter A, Schneider, Michael O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 13
container_start_page 4224
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 12
creator Pontones, Constanza A
Titzmann, Adriana
Huebner, Hanna
Danzberger, Nina
Ruebner, Matthias
Häberle, Lothar
Eskofier, Bjoern M
Nissen, Michael
Kehl, Sven
Faschingbauer, Florian
Beckmann, Matthias W
Fasching, Peter A
Schneider, Michael O
description Mobile and remote ultrasound devices are becoming increasingly available. The benefits and possible risks of self-guided ultrasound examinations conducted by pregnant women at home have not yet been well explored. This study investigated aspects of feasibility and acceptance, as well as the success rates of such examinations. In this prospective, single-center, interventional study, forty-six women with singleton pregnancies between 17 + 0 and 29 + 6 weeks of gestation were included in two cohorts, using two different mobile ultrasound systems. The participants examined the fetal heartbeat, fetal profile and amniotic fluid. Aspects of feasibility and acceptance were evaluated using a questionnaire. Success rates in relation to image and video quality were evaluated by healthcare professionals. Two thirds of the women were able to imagine performing the self-guided examination at home, but 87.0% would prefer live support by a professional. Concerns about their own safety and that of the child were expressed by 23.9% of the women. Success rates for locating the target structure were 52.2% for videos of the fetal heartbeat, 52.2% for videos of the amniotic fluid in all four quadrants and 17.9% for videos of the fetal profile. These results show wide acceptance of self-examination using mobile systems for fetal ultrasonography during pregnancy. Image quality was adequate for assessing the amniotic fluid and fetal heartbeat in most participants. Further studies are needed to determine whether ultrasound self-examinations can be implemented in prenatal care and how this would affect the fetomaternal outcome.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm12134224
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10342822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A758335817</galeid><sourcerecordid>A758335817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7c75e81157542dbd66ec60b39f550c77cb0fa5e066d3d2c701b8441f887d20c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt1rFDEUxYMottQ--S4BXwSZms9J9kmWxbZCRVGLjyGT3FmzZJJ1MiP0vzdDP9yKyUMC93dPcg8HoZeUnHG-Iu92bqCMcsGYeIKOGVGqIVzzpwf3I3Rayo7UpbVgVD1HR1wJIZnUxyicgy2hCzFMN9gmj9fOwX6yyQHOPf4GsW8u5uDB40-5YoCv4zTakufK2iGnLf4ywjbZNOEfeYCEQ8Jf8zyFBEsl2clGvLEjvEDPehsLnN6dJ-j6_MP3zWVz9fni42Z91TjB5dQopyRoSqWSgvnOty24lnR81UtJnFKuI72VQNrWc8-cIrTTQtBea-UZcZyfoPe3uvu5G8A7SPW_0ezHMNjxxmQbzONKCj_NNv82lFQbNWNV4c2dwph_zVAmM4TiIEabIM_FMM01EytOdUVf_4Pu8jymOt9CtVWvJeovtbURTEh9rg-7RdSsldScS00X6uw_VN0ehuBygr7a_7jh7W2DG3MpI_QPQ1JilnSYg3RU-tWhLw_sfRb4H3Aqs0c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2836428607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and Acceptance of Self-Guided Mobile Ultrasound among Pregnant Women in Routine Prenatal Care</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pontones, Constanza A ; Titzmann, Adriana ; Huebner, Hanna ; Danzberger, Nina ; Ruebner, Matthias ; Häberle, Lothar ; Eskofier, Bjoern M ; Nissen, Michael ; Kehl, Sven ; Faschingbauer, Florian ; Beckmann, Matthias W ; Fasching, Peter A ; Schneider, Michael O</creator><creatorcontrib>Pontones, Constanza A ; Titzmann, Adriana ; Huebner, Hanna ; Danzberger, Nina ; Ruebner, Matthias ; Häberle, Lothar ; Eskofier, Bjoern M ; Nissen, Michael ; Kehl, Sven ; Faschingbauer, Florian ; Beckmann, Matthias W ; Fasching, Peter A ; Schneider, Michael O</creatorcontrib><description>Mobile and remote ultrasound devices are becoming increasingly available. The benefits and possible risks of self-guided ultrasound examinations conducted by pregnant women at home have not yet been well explored. This study investigated aspects of feasibility and acceptance, as well as the success rates of such examinations. In this prospective, single-center, interventional study, forty-six women with singleton pregnancies between 17 + 0 and 29 + 6 weeks of gestation were included in two cohorts, using two different mobile ultrasound systems. The participants examined the fetal heartbeat, fetal profile and amniotic fluid. Aspects of feasibility and acceptance were evaluated using a questionnaire. Success rates in relation to image and video quality were evaluated by healthcare professionals. Two thirds of the women were able to imagine performing the self-guided examination at home, but 87.0% would prefer live support by a professional. Concerns about their own safety and that of the child were expressed by 23.9% of the women. Success rates for locating the target structure were 52.2% for videos of the fetal heartbeat, 52.2% for videos of the amniotic fluid in all four quadrants and 17.9% for videos of the fetal profile. These results show wide acceptance of self-examination using mobile systems for fetal ultrasonography during pregnancy. Image quality was adequate for assessing the amniotic fluid and fetal heartbeat in most participants. Further studies are needed to determine whether ultrasound self-examinations can be implemented in prenatal care and how this would affect the fetomaternal outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134224</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37445258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Amniotic fluid ; Cellular telephones ; Clinical medicine ; Evaluation ; Fetus ; Medical equipment ; Methods ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal care ; Questionnaires ; Self-examination, Medical ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonics in obstetrics ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-06, Vol.12 (13), p.4224</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7c75e81157542dbd66ec60b39f550c77cb0fa5e066d3d2c701b8441f887d20c33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6889-1493 ; 0000-0002-7583-307X ; 0000-0002-3556-8523 ; 0000-0001-5472-132X ; 0000-0003-4885-8471 ; 0000-0002-0417-0336</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342822/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10342822/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37445258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pontones, Constanza A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titzmann, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danzberger, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruebner, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Häberle, Lothar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskofier, Bjoern M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissen, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehl, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faschingbauer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, Matthias W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasching, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Michael O</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and Acceptance of Self-Guided Mobile Ultrasound among Pregnant Women in Routine Prenatal Care</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>Mobile and remote ultrasound devices are becoming increasingly available. The benefits and possible risks of self-guided ultrasound examinations conducted by pregnant women at home have not yet been well explored. This study investigated aspects of feasibility and acceptance, as well as the success rates of such examinations. In this prospective, single-center, interventional study, forty-six women with singleton pregnancies between 17 + 0 and 29 + 6 weeks of gestation were included in two cohorts, using two different mobile ultrasound systems. The participants examined the fetal heartbeat, fetal profile and amniotic fluid. Aspects of feasibility and acceptance were evaluated using a questionnaire. Success rates in relation to image and video quality were evaluated by healthcare professionals. Two thirds of the women were able to imagine performing the self-guided examination at home, but 87.0% would prefer live support by a professional. Concerns about their own safety and that of the child were expressed by 23.9% of the women. Success rates for locating the target structure were 52.2% for videos of the fetal heartbeat, 52.2% for videos of the amniotic fluid in all four quadrants and 17.9% for videos of the fetal profile. These results show wide acceptance of self-examination using mobile systems for fetal ultrasonography during pregnancy. Image quality was adequate for assessing the amniotic fluid and fetal heartbeat in most participants. Further studies are needed to determine whether ultrasound self-examinations can be implemented in prenatal care and how this would affect the fetomaternal outcome.</description><subject>Amniotic fluid</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fetus</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Self-examination, Medical</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonics in obstetrics</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt1rFDEUxYMottQ--S4BXwSZms9J9kmWxbZCRVGLjyGT3FmzZJJ1MiP0vzdDP9yKyUMC93dPcg8HoZeUnHG-Iu92bqCMcsGYeIKOGVGqIVzzpwf3I3Rayo7UpbVgVD1HR1wJIZnUxyicgy2hCzFMN9gmj9fOwX6yyQHOPf4GsW8u5uDB40-5YoCv4zTakufK2iGnLf4ywjbZNOEfeYCEQ8Jf8zyFBEsl2clGvLEjvEDPehsLnN6dJ-j6_MP3zWVz9fni42Z91TjB5dQopyRoSqWSgvnOty24lnR81UtJnFKuI72VQNrWc8-cIrTTQtBea-UZcZyfoPe3uvu5G8A7SPW_0ezHMNjxxmQbzONKCj_NNv82lFQbNWNV4c2dwph_zVAmM4TiIEabIM_FMM01EytOdUVf_4Pu8jymOt9CtVWvJeovtbURTEh9rg-7RdSsldScS00X6uw_VN0ehuBygr7a_7jh7W2DG3MpI_QPQ1JilnSYg3RU-tWhLw_sfRb4H3Aqs0c</recordid><startdate>20230622</startdate><enddate>20230622</enddate><creator>Pontones, Constanza A</creator><creator>Titzmann, Adriana</creator><creator>Huebner, Hanna</creator><creator>Danzberger, Nina</creator><creator>Ruebner, Matthias</creator><creator>Häberle, Lothar</creator><creator>Eskofier, Bjoern M</creator><creator>Nissen, Michael</creator><creator>Kehl, Sven</creator><creator>Faschingbauer, Florian</creator><creator>Beckmann, Matthias W</creator><creator>Fasching, Peter A</creator><creator>Schneider, Michael O</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6889-1493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7583-307X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-8523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5472-132X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-8471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0417-0336</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230622</creationdate><title>Feasibility and Acceptance of Self-Guided Mobile Ultrasound among Pregnant Women in Routine Prenatal Care</title><author>Pontones, Constanza A ; Titzmann, Adriana ; Huebner, Hanna ; Danzberger, Nina ; Ruebner, Matthias ; Häberle, Lothar ; Eskofier, Bjoern M ; Nissen, Michael ; Kehl, Sven ; Faschingbauer, Florian ; Beckmann, Matthias W ; Fasching, Peter A ; Schneider, Michael O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-7c75e81157542dbd66ec60b39f550c77cb0fa5e066d3d2c701b8441f887d20c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Amniotic fluid</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fetus</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Self-examination, Medical</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonics in obstetrics</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pontones, Constanza A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Titzmann, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huebner, Hanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danzberger, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruebner, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Häberle, Lothar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eskofier, Bjoern M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissen, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehl, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faschingbauer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beckmann, Matthias W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasching, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Michael O</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pontones, Constanza A</au><au>Titzmann, Adriana</au><au>Huebner, Hanna</au><au>Danzberger, Nina</au><au>Ruebner, Matthias</au><au>Häberle, Lothar</au><au>Eskofier, Bjoern M</au><au>Nissen, Michael</au><au>Kehl, Sven</au><au>Faschingbauer, Florian</au><au>Beckmann, Matthias W</au><au>Fasching, Peter A</au><au>Schneider, Michael O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and Acceptance of Self-Guided Mobile Ultrasound among Pregnant Women in Routine Prenatal Care</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2023-06-22</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>4224</spage><pages>4224-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Mobile and remote ultrasound devices are becoming increasingly available. The benefits and possible risks of self-guided ultrasound examinations conducted by pregnant women at home have not yet been well explored. This study investigated aspects of feasibility and acceptance, as well as the success rates of such examinations. In this prospective, single-center, interventional study, forty-six women with singleton pregnancies between 17 + 0 and 29 + 6 weeks of gestation were included in two cohorts, using two different mobile ultrasound systems. The participants examined the fetal heartbeat, fetal profile and amniotic fluid. Aspects of feasibility and acceptance were evaluated using a questionnaire. Success rates in relation to image and video quality were evaluated by healthcare professionals. Two thirds of the women were able to imagine performing the self-guided examination at home, but 87.0% would prefer live support by a professional. Concerns about their own safety and that of the child were expressed by 23.9% of the women. Success rates for locating the target structure were 52.2% for videos of the fetal heartbeat, 52.2% for videos of the amniotic fluid in all four quadrants and 17.9% for videos of the fetal profile. These results show wide acceptance of self-examination using mobile systems for fetal ultrasonography during pregnancy. Image quality was adequate for assessing the amniotic fluid and fetal heartbeat in most participants. Further studies are needed to determine whether ultrasound self-examinations can be implemented in prenatal care and how this would affect the fetomaternal outcome.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37445258</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm12134224</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6889-1493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7583-307X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-8523</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5472-132X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-8471</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0417-0336</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2023-06, Vol.12 (13), p.4224
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10342822
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Amniotic fluid
Cellular telephones
Clinical medicine
Evaluation
Fetus
Medical equipment
Methods
Obstetrics
Pregnancy
Prenatal care
Questionnaires
Self-examination, Medical
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonics in obstetrics
Womens health
title Feasibility and Acceptance of Self-Guided Mobile Ultrasound among Pregnant Women in Routine Prenatal Care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T20%3A56%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20Acceptance%20of%20Self-Guided%20Mobile%20Ultrasound%20among%20Pregnant%20Women%20in%20Routine%20Prenatal%20Care&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Pontones,%20Constanza%20A&rft.date=2023-06-22&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=4224&rft.pages=4224-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm12134224&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA758335817%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2836428607&rft_id=info:pmid/37445258&rft_galeid=A758335817&rfr_iscdi=true