Clinical assessment of a novel machine‐learning automated contouring tool for radiotherapy planning

Contouring has become an increasingly important aspect of radiotherapy due to inverse planning. Several studies have suggested that the clinical implementation of automated contouring tools can reduce inter‐observer variation while increasing contouring efficiency, thereby improving the quality of r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2023-07, Vol.24 (7), p.e13949-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Yunfei, Nguyen, Huong, Smith, Claire, Chen, Tom, Byrne, Mikel, Archibald‐Heeren, Ben, Rijken, James, Aland, Trent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Contouring has become an increasingly important aspect of radiotherapy due to inverse planning. Several studies have suggested that the clinical implementation of automated contouring tools can reduce inter‐observer variation while increasing contouring efficiency, thereby improving the quality of radiotherapy treatment and reducing the time between simulation and treatment. In this study, a novel, commercial automated contouring tool based on machine learning, the AI‐Rad Companion Organs RT™ (AI‐Rad) software (Version VA31) (Siemens Healthineers, Munich, Germany), was assessed against both manually delineated contours and another commercially available automated contouring software, Varian Smart Segmentation™ (SS) (Version 16.0) (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, United States). The quality of contours generated by AI‐Rad in Head and Neck (H&N), Thorax, Breast, Male Pelvis (Pelvis_M), and Female Pelvis (Pevis_F) anatomical areas was evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively using several metrics. A timing analysis was subsequently performed to explore potential time savings achieved by AI‐Rad. Results showed that most automated contours generated by AI‐Rad were not only clinically acceptable and required minimal editing, but also superior in quality to contours generated by SS in multiple structures. In addition, timing analysis favored AI‐Rad over manual contouring, indicating the largest time saving (753s per patient) in the Thorax area. AI‐Rad was concluded to be a promising automated contouring solution that generated clinically acceptable contours and achieved time savings, thereby greatly benefiting the radiotherapy process.
ISSN:1526-9914
1526-9914
DOI:10.1002/acm2.13949