Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?
Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics. Methods: A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hand (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-07, Vol.18 (5), p.732-739 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 739 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 732 |
container_title | Hand (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Burnier, Marion Gil, Joseph A. Hooke, Alexander Elhassan, Bassem Kakar, Sanjeev |
description | Background:
The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics.
Methods:
A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, “Intact”; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, “Fracture”; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, “Graft.”
Results:
The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction.
Conclusions:
Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/15589447211063570 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10336802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15589447211063570</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2626891913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3060-e3ecf15d11ecb1e7ee8f82f3bd9ec9a5665b3f424ed67cca1da0aa966f7da1653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi3Uiq_yA3pBOXJZ8MSxnZwQonypqCDaiqOZdcZglI23doLg32O0dClC6sljzzvPjOdl7CvwXQCt90DKuqkqXQJwJaTmK2z95W3SVFJ-WsaVXmMbKd1zXqm6blbZmpAguK7KdXbzLVAqLmN49DPsilOc4UDFSUQ3FC7Et8xPi_O74Nviimzo0xBHO_jQ52saQqTiBw7-gYrr6NNQfPc9ZZC3af8L--ywS7T1em6y38dHvw5PJ-cXJ2eHB-cTK7jiExJkHcgWgOwUSBPVri6dmLYN2QalUnIqXFVW1CptLUKLHLFRyukWQUmxyfYX3Pk4nVFrqR8idmYe8_TxyQT05n2m93fmNjwY4EKompeZsPNKiOHPmL9lZj5Z6jrsKYzJlKpUdQMNiCyFhdTGkFIkt-wD3LxYYz5Yk2u2_x1wWfHXiyzYXQgS3pK5D2Ps88L-Q3wGStmZRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626891913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Burnier, Marion ; Gil, Joseph A. ; Hooke, Alexander ; Elhassan, Bassem ; Kakar, Sanjeev</creator><creatorcontrib>Burnier, Marion ; Gil, Joseph A. ; Hooke, Alexander ; Elhassan, Bassem ; Kakar, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics.
Methods:
A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, “Intact”; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, “Fracture”; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, “Graft.”
Results:
The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction.
Conclusions:
Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9447</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15589447211063570</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35130742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Fractures, Bone ; Hamate Bone - transplantation ; Humans ; Scaphoid Bone - surgery ; Surgery ; Wrist ; Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><ispartof>Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2023-07, Vol.18 (5), p.732-739</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 American Association for Hand Surgery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3060-e3ecf15d11ecb1e7ee8f82f3bd9ec9a5665b3f424ed67cca1da0aa966f7da1653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2886-1510 ; 0000-0002-0117-1026</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336802/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336802/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burnier, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooke, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhassan, Bassem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakar, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><title>Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?</title><title>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><description>Background:
The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics.
Methods:
A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, “Intact”; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, “Fracture”; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, “Graft.”
Results:
The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction.
Conclusions:
Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone</subject><subject>Hamate Bone - transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Scaphoid Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><subject>Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><issn>1558-9447</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi3Uiq_yA3pBOXJZ8MSxnZwQonypqCDaiqOZdcZglI23doLg32O0dClC6sljzzvPjOdl7CvwXQCt90DKuqkqXQJwJaTmK2z95W3SVFJ-WsaVXmMbKd1zXqm6blbZmpAguK7KdXbzLVAqLmN49DPsilOc4UDFSUQ3FC7Et8xPi_O74Nviimzo0xBHO_jQ52saQqTiBw7-gYrr6NNQfPc9ZZC3af8L--ywS7T1em6y38dHvw5PJ-cXJ2eHB-cTK7jiExJkHcgWgOwUSBPVri6dmLYN2QalUnIqXFVW1CptLUKLHLFRyukWQUmxyfYX3Pk4nVFrqR8idmYe8_TxyQT05n2m93fmNjwY4EKompeZsPNKiOHPmL9lZj5Z6jrsKYzJlKpUdQMNiCyFhdTGkFIkt-wD3LxYYz5Yk2u2_x1wWfHXiyzYXQgS3pK5D2Ps88L-Q3wGStmZRA</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Burnier, Marion</creator><creator>Gil, Joseph A.</creator><creator>Hooke, Alexander</creator><creator>Elhassan, Bassem</creator><creator>Kakar, Sanjeev</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-1510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0117-1026</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?</title><author>Burnier, Marion ; Gil, Joseph A. ; Hooke, Alexander ; Elhassan, Bassem ; Kakar, Sanjeev</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3060-e3ecf15d11ecb1e7ee8f82f3bd9ec9a5665b3f424ed67cca1da0aa966f7da1653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone</topic><topic>Hamate Bone - transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Scaphoid Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><topic>Wrist Joint - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burnier, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooke, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhassan, Bassem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakar, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burnier, Marion</au><au>Gil, Joseph A.</au><au>Hooke, Alexander</au><au>Elhassan, Bassem</au><au>Kakar, Sanjeev</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?</atitle><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>732-739</pages><issn>1558-9447</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><eissn>1558-9455</eissn><abstract>Background:
The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics.
Methods:
A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, “Intact”; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, “Fracture”; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, “Graft.”
Results:
The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction.
Conclusions:
Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>35130742</pmid><doi>10.1177/15589447211063570</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-1510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0117-1026</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1558-9447 |
ispartof | Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2023-07, Vol.18 (5), p.732-739 |
issn | 1558-9447 1558-9455 1558-9455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10336802 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SAGE Complete; PubMed Central |
subjects | Biomechanical Phenomena Fractures, Bone Hamate Bone - transplantation Humans Scaphoid Bone - surgery Surgery Wrist Wrist Joint - surgery |
title | Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A51%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Proximal%20Hamate%20Graft%20for%20Proximal%20Scaphoid%20Reconstruction%20Restore%20Native%20Wrist%20Kinematics?&rft.jtitle=Hand%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Burnier,%20Marion&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=732-739&rft.issn=1558-9447&rft.eissn=1558-9455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15589447211063570&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2626891913%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626891913&rft_id=info:pmid/35130742&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15589447211063570&rfr_iscdi=true |