Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?

Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics. Methods: A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hand (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-07, Vol.18 (5), p.732-739
Hauptverfasser: Burnier, Marion, Gil, Joseph A., Hooke, Alexander, Elhassan, Bassem, Kakar, Sanjeev
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 739
container_issue 5
container_start_page 732
container_title Hand (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 18
creator Burnier, Marion
Gil, Joseph A.
Hooke, Alexander
Elhassan, Bassem
Kakar, Sanjeev
description Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics. Methods: A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, “Intact”; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, “Fracture”; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, “Graft.” Results: The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction. Conclusions: Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/15589447211063570
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10336802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15589447211063570</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2626891913</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3060-e3ecf15d11ecb1e7ee8f82f3bd9ec9a5665b3f424ed67cca1da0aa966f7da1653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi3Uiq_yA3pBOXJZ8MSxnZwQonypqCDaiqOZdcZglI23doLg32O0dClC6sljzzvPjOdl7CvwXQCt90DKuqkqXQJwJaTmK2z95W3SVFJ-WsaVXmMbKd1zXqm6blbZmpAguK7KdXbzLVAqLmN49DPsilOc4UDFSUQ3FC7Et8xPi_O74Nviimzo0xBHO_jQ52saQqTiBw7-gYrr6NNQfPc9ZZC3af8L--ywS7T1em6y38dHvw5PJ-cXJ2eHB-cTK7jiExJkHcgWgOwUSBPVri6dmLYN2QalUnIqXFVW1CptLUKLHLFRyukWQUmxyfYX3Pk4nVFrqR8idmYe8_TxyQT05n2m93fmNjwY4EKompeZsPNKiOHPmL9lZj5Z6jrsKYzJlKpUdQMNiCyFhdTGkFIkt-wD3LxYYz5Yk2u2_x1wWfHXiyzYXQgS3pK5D2Ps88L-Q3wGStmZRA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2626891913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Burnier, Marion ; Gil, Joseph A. ; Hooke, Alexander ; Elhassan, Bassem ; Kakar, Sanjeev</creator><creatorcontrib>Burnier, Marion ; Gil, Joseph A. ; Hooke, Alexander ; Elhassan, Bassem ; Kakar, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics. Methods: A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, “Intact”; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, “Fracture”; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, “Graft.” Results: The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction. Conclusions: Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9447</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1558-9455</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15589447211063570</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35130742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Fractures, Bone ; Hamate Bone - transplantation ; Humans ; Scaphoid Bone - surgery ; Surgery ; Wrist ; Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><ispartof>Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2023-07, Vol.18 (5), p.732-739</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022 2022 American Association for Hand Surgery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3060-e3ecf15d11ecb1e7ee8f82f3bd9ec9a5665b3f424ed67cca1da0aa966f7da1653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2886-1510 ; 0000-0002-0117-1026</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336802/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336802/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burnier, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooke, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhassan, Bassem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakar, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><title>Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?</title><title>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><description>Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics. Methods: A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, “Intact”; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, “Fracture”; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, “Graft.” Results: The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction. Conclusions: Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone</subject><subject>Hamate Bone - transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Scaphoid Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><subject>Wrist Joint - surgery</subject><issn>1558-9447</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi3Uiq_yA3pBOXJZ8MSxnZwQonypqCDaiqOZdcZglI23doLg32O0dClC6sljzzvPjOdl7CvwXQCt90DKuqkqXQJwJaTmK2z95W3SVFJ-WsaVXmMbKd1zXqm6blbZmpAguK7KdXbzLVAqLmN49DPsilOc4UDFSUQ3FC7Et8xPi_O74Nviimzo0xBHO_jQ52saQqTiBw7-gYrr6NNQfPc9ZZC3af8L--ywS7T1em6y38dHvw5PJ-cXJ2eHB-cTK7jiExJkHcgWgOwUSBPVri6dmLYN2QalUnIqXFVW1CptLUKLHLFRyukWQUmxyfYX3Pk4nVFrqR8idmYe8_TxyQT05n2m93fmNjwY4EKompeZsPNKiOHPmL9lZj5Z6jrsKYzJlKpUdQMNiCyFhdTGkFIkt-wD3LxYYz5Yk2u2_x1wWfHXiyzYXQgS3pK5D2Ps88L-Q3wGStmZRA</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Burnier, Marion</creator><creator>Gil, Joseph A.</creator><creator>Hooke, Alexander</creator><creator>Elhassan, Bassem</creator><creator>Kakar, Sanjeev</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-1510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0117-1026</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?</title><author>Burnier, Marion ; Gil, Joseph A. ; Hooke, Alexander ; Elhassan, Bassem ; Kakar, Sanjeev</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3060-e3ecf15d11ecb1e7ee8f82f3bd9ec9a5665b3f424ed67cca1da0aa966f7da1653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone</topic><topic>Hamate Bone - transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Scaphoid Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><topic>Wrist Joint - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burnier, Marion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gil, Joseph A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooke, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elhassan, Bassem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakar, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burnier, Marion</au><au>Gil, Joseph A.</au><au>Hooke, Alexander</au><au>Elhassan, Bassem</au><au>Kakar, Sanjeev</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?</atitle><jtitle>Hand (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Hand (N Y)</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>732-739</pages><issn>1558-9447</issn><issn>1558-9455</issn><eissn>1558-9455</eissn><abstract>Background: The objective of this study was to determine whether reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid with a proximal hamate graft restores native carpal kinematics. Methods: A cadaveric study was designed assessing wrist kinematic after proximal hamate graft for proximal pole of the scaphoid nonunion. Wireless sensors were mounted to the carpus using a custom pin and suture anchor system to 8 cadavers. A wrist simulator was used to move the wrist through a cyclical motion about the flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. Each specimen was tested under a series of 3 conditions: (1) a native state, “Intact”; (2) fractured scaphoid proximal pole, “Fracture”; and (3) post-reconstruction of the proximal pole of the scaphoid using a proximal hamate graft, “Graft.” Results: The fracture condition resulted in a statistically significant change in scapholunate kinematics across the entire arc of motion relative to the intact condition. Reconstruction with proximal hamate grafts restored scapholunate kinematics close to the intact state in both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation axes. The lunocapitate flexion during wrist flexion was significantly different after the hamate graft reconstruction. Conclusions: Proximal hamate to scaphoid transfer resulted in restoration of near normal carpal kinematics to the intact state.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>35130742</pmid><doi>10.1177/15589447211063570</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-1510</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0117-1026</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1558-9447
ispartof Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2023-07, Vol.18 (5), p.732-739
issn 1558-9447
1558-9455
1558-9455
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10336802
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; SAGE Complete; PubMed Central
subjects Biomechanical Phenomena
Fractures, Bone
Hamate Bone - transplantation
Humans
Scaphoid Bone - surgery
Surgery
Wrist
Wrist Joint - surgery
title Does Proximal Hamate Graft for Proximal Scaphoid Reconstruction Restore Native Wrist Kinematics?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A51%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Proximal%20Hamate%20Graft%20for%20Proximal%20Scaphoid%20Reconstruction%20Restore%20Native%20Wrist%20Kinematics?&rft.jtitle=Hand%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Burnier,%20Marion&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=732-739&rft.issn=1558-9447&rft.eissn=1558-9455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15589447211063570&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2626891913%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2626891913&rft_id=info:pmid/35130742&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15589447211063570&rfr_iscdi=true