Inactivation of spinal cord stimulator implanted pulse generators after elective surgery: an under-recognized problem
Study design We retrospectively analyzed a database of implanted pulse generators (IPGs) for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implanted by a single surgeon (NDT). We additionally report a series of five illustrative patient cases. Objectives The electronics of SCS IPGs are susceptible to damage when im...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Spinal cord series and cases 2023-07, Vol.9 (1), p.29, Article 29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Spinal cord series and cases |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Norris, Jordan N. Esplin, Nathan Bharthi, Rosh Patterson, Michael Tomycz, Nestor D. |
description | Study design
We retrospectively analyzed a database of implanted pulse generators (IPGs) for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implanted by a single surgeon (NDT). We additionally report a series of five illustrative patient cases.
Objectives
The electronics of SCS IPGs are susceptible to damage when implanted patients undergo surgery. Some SCSs have a dedicated surgery mode, while others recommend turning the SCS off to protect it from damage. IPG inactivation may require resetting or replacement surgery. We aimed to explore the prevalence of this real-world problem which has not been studied.
Setting
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Methods
Using a single surgeon SCS database, we identified cases of IPG inactivation after a non-SCS surgery and analyzed the management. We then reviewed the charts of five illustrative cases.
Results
Among 490 SCS IPG implantations between 2016-2022, 15 (3%) of the 490 patients’ IPGs became inactivated after another non-SCS surgery. 12 (80%) required surgical IPG replacement, while 3 (20%) were able to have their IPG function restored non-operatively. In cases analyzed thus far, surgery mode was often not activated prior to surgery.
Conclusion
SCS IPG inactivation by surgery is not a rare problem and is presumably engendered by monopolar electrocautery. Premature IPG replacement surgery carries risks and reduces the cost-effectiveness of SCS. Awareness of this problem may prompt more preventative measures to be taken by surgeons, patients, and caretakers, and encourage technological advances to render IPGs less vulnerable to surgical tools. Further research is needed to determine what quality improvement measures could prevent electrical damage to IPGs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41394-023-00591-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10336009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2836292440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-b22fc27781985d799eddde5490b333a2293ee4ab4d4428dd7f2c280c004f969f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQdRbKn9Ai4k4MbN6M2fmSRuRIraQsGNrkMmufNMmUnGZKZQP715fbWtLlwlcH_n3OScpnlJ4S0Frt4VQbkWLTDeAnSatt2T5phBp9qeMvH00f2oOS3lCgBoL6mW3fPmiEvBuZT0uNkuonVruLZrSJGkkZQlRDsRl7InZQ3zNtk1ZRLmZbJxRU-WbSpIdhgx7yeF2HHFTHDCvQ-SsuUd5pv3xEayRY-5zejSLoZfe3FOw4Tzi-bZaKvN6d150nz__Onb2Xl7-fXLxdnHy9YJ1q_twNjomJSKatV5qTV677ETGgbOuWVMc0RhB-GFYMp7OTLHFDgAMepej_yk-XDwXbZhRu8wrtlOZslhtvnGJBvM35MYfphdujY1Yt4D6Orw5s4hp58bltXMoTicahiYtmKY4j3TTAio6Ot_0Ku05RrmLdX1SgCoSrED5XIqJeN4_xoK-7XKHJo1tVlz26zpqujV43_cS_70WAF-AEodxZr_w-7_2P4G0euxQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2835684008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inactivation of spinal cord stimulator implanted pulse generators after elective surgery: an under-recognized problem</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Norris, Jordan N. ; Esplin, Nathan ; Bharthi, Rosh ; Patterson, Michael ; Tomycz, Nestor D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Norris, Jordan N. ; Esplin, Nathan ; Bharthi, Rosh ; Patterson, Michael ; Tomycz, Nestor D.</creatorcontrib><description>Study design
We retrospectively analyzed a database of implanted pulse generators (IPGs) for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implanted by a single surgeon (NDT). We additionally report a series of five illustrative patient cases.
Objectives
The electronics of SCS IPGs are susceptible to damage when implanted patients undergo surgery. Some SCSs have a dedicated surgery mode, while others recommend turning the SCS off to protect it from damage. IPG inactivation may require resetting or replacement surgery. We aimed to explore the prevalence of this real-world problem which has not been studied.
Setting
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Methods
Using a single surgeon SCS database, we identified cases of IPG inactivation after a non-SCS surgery and analyzed the management. We then reviewed the charts of five illustrative cases.
Results
Among 490 SCS IPG implantations between 2016-2022, 15 (3%) of the 490 patients’ IPGs became inactivated after another non-SCS surgery. 12 (80%) required surgical IPG replacement, while 3 (20%) were able to have their IPG function restored non-operatively. In cases analyzed thus far, surgery mode was often not activated prior to surgery.
Conclusion
SCS IPG inactivation by surgery is not a rare problem and is presumably engendered by monopolar electrocautery. Premature IPG replacement surgery carries risks and reduces the cost-effectiveness of SCS. Awareness of this problem may prompt more preventative measures to be taken by surgeons, patients, and caretakers, and encourage technological advances to render IPGs less vulnerable to surgical tools. Further research is needed to determine what quality improvement measures could prevent electrical damage to IPGs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2058-6124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2058-6124</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41394-023-00591-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37433771</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/308/409 ; 692/699/375/1692 ; Anatomy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Databases, Factual ; Human Physiology ; Humans ; Neurochemistry ; Neuropsychology ; Neurosciences ; Prostheses and Implants ; Quality Improvement ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Cord - surgery ; Surgeons ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Spinal cord series and cases, 2023-07, Vol.9 (1), p.29, Article 29</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-b22fc27781985d799eddde5490b333a2293ee4ab4d4428dd7f2c280c004f969f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1611-5964 ; 0000-0003-2388-0808</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336009/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10336009/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37433771$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Norris, Jordan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esplin, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharthi, Rosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomycz, Nestor D.</creatorcontrib><title>Inactivation of spinal cord stimulator implanted pulse generators after elective surgery: an under-recognized problem</title><title>Spinal cord series and cases</title><addtitle>Spinal Cord Ser Cases</addtitle><addtitle>Spinal Cord Ser Cases</addtitle><description>Study design
We retrospectively analyzed a database of implanted pulse generators (IPGs) for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implanted by a single surgeon (NDT). We additionally report a series of five illustrative patient cases.
Objectives
The electronics of SCS IPGs are susceptible to damage when implanted patients undergo surgery. Some SCSs have a dedicated surgery mode, while others recommend turning the SCS off to protect it from damage. IPG inactivation may require resetting or replacement surgery. We aimed to explore the prevalence of this real-world problem which has not been studied.
Setting
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Methods
Using a single surgeon SCS database, we identified cases of IPG inactivation after a non-SCS surgery and analyzed the management. We then reviewed the charts of five illustrative cases.
Results
Among 490 SCS IPG implantations between 2016-2022, 15 (3%) of the 490 patients’ IPGs became inactivated after another non-SCS surgery. 12 (80%) required surgical IPG replacement, while 3 (20%) were able to have their IPG function restored non-operatively. In cases analyzed thus far, surgery mode was often not activated prior to surgery.
Conclusion
SCS IPG inactivation by surgery is not a rare problem and is presumably engendered by monopolar electrocautery. Premature IPG replacement surgery carries risks and reduces the cost-effectiveness of SCS. Awareness of this problem may prompt more preventative measures to be taken by surgeons, patients, and caretakers, and encourage technological advances to render IPGs less vulnerable to surgical tools. Further research is needed to determine what quality improvement measures could prevent electrical damage to IPGs.</description><subject>692/308/409</subject><subject>692/699/375/1692</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neurochemistry</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Quality Improvement</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal Cord - surgery</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2058-6124</issn><issn>2058-6124</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxQdRbKn9Ai4k4MbN6M2fmSRuRIraQsGNrkMmufNMmUnGZKZQP715fbWtLlwlcH_n3OScpnlJ4S0Frt4VQbkWLTDeAnSatt2T5phBp9qeMvH00f2oOS3lCgBoL6mW3fPmiEvBuZT0uNkuonVruLZrSJGkkZQlRDsRl7InZQ3zNtk1ZRLmZbJxRU-WbSpIdhgx7yeF2HHFTHDCvQ-SsuUd5pv3xEayRY-5zejSLoZfe3FOw4Tzi-bZaKvN6d150nz__Onb2Xl7-fXLxdnHy9YJ1q_twNjomJSKatV5qTV677ETGgbOuWVMc0RhB-GFYMp7OTLHFDgAMepej_yk-XDwXbZhRu8wrtlOZslhtvnGJBvM35MYfphdujY1Yt4D6Orw5s4hp58bltXMoTicahiYtmKY4j3TTAio6Ot_0Ku05RrmLdX1SgCoSrED5XIqJeN4_xoK-7XKHJo1tVlz26zpqujV43_cS_70WAF-AEodxZr_w-7_2P4G0euxQw</recordid><startdate>20230711</startdate><enddate>20230711</enddate><creator>Norris, Jordan N.</creator><creator>Esplin, Nathan</creator><creator>Bharthi, Rosh</creator><creator>Patterson, Michael</creator><creator>Tomycz, Nestor D.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-5964</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2388-0808</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230711</creationdate><title>Inactivation of spinal cord stimulator implanted pulse generators after elective surgery: an under-recognized problem</title><author>Norris, Jordan N. ; Esplin, Nathan ; Bharthi, Rosh ; Patterson, Michael ; Tomycz, Nestor D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-b22fc27781985d799eddde5490b333a2293ee4ab4d4428dd7f2c280c004f969f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>692/308/409</topic><topic>692/699/375/1692</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neurochemistry</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Quality Improvement</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal Cord - surgery</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Norris, Jordan N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esplin, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharthi, Rosh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomycz, Nestor D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Spinal cord series and cases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Norris, Jordan N.</au><au>Esplin, Nathan</au><au>Bharthi, Rosh</au><au>Patterson, Michael</au><au>Tomycz, Nestor D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inactivation of spinal cord stimulator implanted pulse generators after elective surgery: an under-recognized problem</atitle><jtitle>Spinal cord series and cases</jtitle><stitle>Spinal Cord Ser Cases</stitle><addtitle>Spinal Cord Ser Cases</addtitle><date>2023-07-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><pages>29-</pages><artnum>29</artnum><issn>2058-6124</issn><eissn>2058-6124</eissn><abstract>Study design
We retrospectively analyzed a database of implanted pulse generators (IPGs) for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) implanted by a single surgeon (NDT). We additionally report a series of five illustrative patient cases.
Objectives
The electronics of SCS IPGs are susceptible to damage when implanted patients undergo surgery. Some SCSs have a dedicated surgery mode, while others recommend turning the SCS off to protect it from damage. IPG inactivation may require resetting or replacement surgery. We aimed to explore the prevalence of this real-world problem which has not been studied.
Setting
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Methods
Using a single surgeon SCS database, we identified cases of IPG inactivation after a non-SCS surgery and analyzed the management. We then reviewed the charts of five illustrative cases.
Results
Among 490 SCS IPG implantations between 2016-2022, 15 (3%) of the 490 patients’ IPGs became inactivated after another non-SCS surgery. 12 (80%) required surgical IPG replacement, while 3 (20%) were able to have their IPG function restored non-operatively. In cases analyzed thus far, surgery mode was often not activated prior to surgery.
Conclusion
SCS IPG inactivation by surgery is not a rare problem and is presumably engendered by monopolar electrocautery. Premature IPG replacement surgery carries risks and reduces the cost-effectiveness of SCS. Awareness of this problem may prompt more preventative measures to be taken by surgeons, patients, and caretakers, and encourage technological advances to render IPGs less vulnerable to surgical tools. Further research is needed to determine what quality improvement measures could prevent electrical damage to IPGs.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>37433771</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41394-023-00591-5</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-5964</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2388-0808</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2058-6124 |
ispartof | Spinal cord series and cases, 2023-07, Vol.9 (1), p.29, Article 29 |
issn | 2058-6124 2058-6124 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10336009 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | 692/308/409 692/699/375/1692 Anatomy Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Databases, Factual Human Physiology Humans Neurochemistry Neuropsychology Neurosciences Prostheses and Implants Quality Improvement Retrospective Studies Spinal cord Spinal Cord - surgery Surgeons Surgery |
title | Inactivation of spinal cord stimulator implanted pulse generators after elective surgery: an under-recognized problem |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A55%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inactivation%20of%20spinal%20cord%20stimulator%20implanted%20pulse%20generators%20after%20elective%20surgery:%20an%20under-recognized%20problem&rft.jtitle=Spinal%20cord%20series%20and%20cases&rft.au=Norris,%20Jordan%20N.&rft.date=2023-07-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.pages=29-&rft.artnum=29&rft.issn=2058-6124&rft.eissn=2058-6124&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41394-023-00591-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2836292440%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2835684008&rft_id=info:pmid/37433771&rfr_iscdi=true |