Psychometric evaluation of the Wound‐QoL questionnaire to assess health‐related quality of life in Chinese people with chronic wounds
Chronic wounds are very common wound types in clinics which have a prolonged and painful healing process. Chronic wounds affect health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) on patients. However, there is no specific instrument to measure the HRQoL in Chinese patients with chronic wounds. Wound‐QoL is a qu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International wound journal 2023-08, Vol.20 (6), p.1903-1910 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1910 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1903 |
container_title | International wound journal |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Wei, Min Yang, Qian Ji, Huiming Yu, Xiujuan Qiu, Yansen Ji, Yihong Yang, Dongliang |
description | Chronic wounds are very common wound types in clinics which have a prolonged and painful healing process. Chronic wounds affect health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) on patients. However, there is no specific instrument to measure the HRQoL in Chinese patients with chronic wounds. Wound‐QoL is a questionnaire targeted the experience of health‐related life to patients with chronic wounds. The study aims to translate and cross‐culturally adapt the Wound‐QoL into Chinese and to evaluate its psychometric properties (validity, reliability, floor, and ceiling effect) in a convenience sample of 203 Chinese outpatients with chronic wounds. Reliability was good, with internal consistency of 0.798–0.960 and test–retest reliability of 0.720–0.838. Criterion‐related validity was assessed by the correlation coefficient between Wound‐QoL and generic European QoL instrument‐ EQ‐5D‐5L, which was found statistically significant (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/iwj.14050 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10332997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2755575032</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-23d66e7f9ebc2e7ed39f2e3c0e4b3dcffcacd6e96ea68ebd6d71731a4b18349e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9uEzEQh1eIipbCgRdAlrjAIa3_rTc-IRQBbRUJkEDlZnm9s6wjx05tb6PcuHLjGfskdZo2AiR8saX59M14flX1guATUs6pXS9OCMc1flQdkYbTCZ-S74_3b0wOq6cpLTCmsq6bJ9UhEzUVAuOj6tfntDFDWEKO1iC41m7U2QaPQo_yAOgyjL67-fn7S5ijqxHStua1jYByQDolSAkNoF0eChTB6QxdAbWzebN1ONsDsh7NBushAVpBWDlAa5sHZIYYfOm63vZIz6qDXrsEz-_v4-rbh_dfZ2eT-aeP57N384nhnOMJZZ0Q0PQSWkOhgY7JngIzGHjLOtP3RptOgBSgxRTaTnQNaRjRvCVTxiWw4-rtzrsa2yV0BnyO2qlVtEsdNypoq_6ueDuoH-FaEcwYlbIphtf3hhjudqKWNhlwTnsIY1K0qcuaa8xoQV_9gy7CGH35n2JYYoGnVLJCvdlRJoaUIvT7aQhW24RVSVjdJVzYl3-OvycfIi3A6Q5YWweb_5vU-eXFTnkL4QW2lA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090608293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Wound‐QoL questionnaire to assess health‐related quality of life in Chinese people with chronic wounds</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wei, Min ; Yang, Qian ; Ji, Huiming ; Yu, Xiujuan ; Qiu, Yansen ; Ji, Yihong ; Yang, Dongliang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Min ; Yang, Qian ; Ji, Huiming ; Yu, Xiujuan ; Qiu, Yansen ; Ji, Yihong ; Yang, Dongliang</creatorcontrib><description>Chronic wounds are very common wound types in clinics which have a prolonged and painful healing process. Chronic wounds affect health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) on patients. However, there is no specific instrument to measure the HRQoL in Chinese patients with chronic wounds. Wound‐QoL is a questionnaire targeted the experience of health‐related life to patients with chronic wounds. The study aims to translate and cross‐culturally adapt the Wound‐QoL into Chinese and to evaluate its psychometric properties (validity, reliability, floor, and ceiling effect) in a convenience sample of 203 Chinese outpatients with chronic wounds. Reliability was good, with internal consistency of 0.798–0.960 and test–retest reliability of 0.720–0.838. Criterion‐related validity was assessed by the correlation coefficient between Wound‐QoL and generic European QoL instrument‐ EQ‐5D‐5L, which was found statistically significant (P<.001). No signs of floor or ceiling effect could be detected. Further, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to verify the reliability and validity of the instrument in this study. In conclusion, the Chinese Wound‐QoL is a valid and reliable tool for measuring HRQoL in populations with chronic wounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-4801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-481X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36526600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Bilingualism ; Chinese ; chronic wound ; Diabetes ; East Asian People - psychology ; Foot diseases ; Humans ; Leg ulcers ; Males ; Original ; Patients ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity ; Wound healing ; wound QoL ; Wounds and Injuries - psychology</subject><ispartof>International wound journal, 2023-08, Vol.20 (6), p.1903-1910</ispartof><rights>2022 Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-23d66e7f9ebc2e7ed39f2e3c0e4b3dcffcacd6e96ea68ebd6d71731a4b18349e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-23d66e7f9ebc2e7ed39f2e3c0e4b3dcffcacd6e96ea68ebd6d71731a4b18349e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2158-9953</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332997/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10332997/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Huiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xiujuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yansen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Yihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dongliang</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Wound‐QoL questionnaire to assess health‐related quality of life in Chinese people with chronic wounds</title><title>International wound journal</title><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><description>Chronic wounds are very common wound types in clinics which have a prolonged and painful healing process. Chronic wounds affect health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) on patients. However, there is no specific instrument to measure the HRQoL in Chinese patients with chronic wounds. Wound‐QoL is a questionnaire targeted the experience of health‐related life to patients with chronic wounds. The study aims to translate and cross‐culturally adapt the Wound‐QoL into Chinese and to evaluate its psychometric properties (validity, reliability, floor, and ceiling effect) in a convenience sample of 203 Chinese outpatients with chronic wounds. Reliability was good, with internal consistency of 0.798–0.960 and test–retest reliability of 0.720–0.838. Criterion‐related validity was assessed by the correlation coefficient between Wound‐QoL and generic European QoL instrument‐ EQ‐5D‐5L, which was found statistically significant (P<.001). No signs of floor or ceiling effect could be detected. Further, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to verify the reliability and validity of the instrument in this study. In conclusion, the Chinese Wound‐QoL is a valid and reliable tool for measuring HRQoL in populations with chronic wounds.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Chinese</subject><subject>chronic wound</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>East Asian People - psychology</subject><subject>Foot diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leg ulcers</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><subject>wound QoL</subject><subject>Wounds and Injuries - psychology</subject><issn>1742-4801</issn><issn>1742-481X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9uEzEQh1eIipbCgRdAlrjAIa3_rTc-IRQBbRUJkEDlZnm9s6wjx05tb6PcuHLjGfskdZo2AiR8saX59M14flX1guATUs6pXS9OCMc1flQdkYbTCZ-S74_3b0wOq6cpLTCmsq6bJ9UhEzUVAuOj6tfntDFDWEKO1iC41m7U2QaPQo_yAOgyjL67-fn7S5ijqxHStua1jYByQDolSAkNoF0eChTB6QxdAbWzebN1ONsDsh7NBushAVpBWDlAa5sHZIYYfOm63vZIz6qDXrsEz-_v4-rbh_dfZ2eT-aeP57N384nhnOMJZZ0Q0PQSWkOhgY7JngIzGHjLOtP3RptOgBSgxRTaTnQNaRjRvCVTxiWw4-rtzrsa2yV0BnyO2qlVtEsdNypoq_6ueDuoH-FaEcwYlbIphtf3hhjudqKWNhlwTnsIY1K0qcuaa8xoQV_9gy7CGH35n2JYYoGnVLJCvdlRJoaUIvT7aQhW24RVSVjdJVzYl3-OvycfIi3A6Q5YWweb_5vU-eXFTnkL4QW2lA</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Wei, Min</creator><creator>Yang, Qian</creator><creator>Ji, Huiming</creator><creator>Yu, Xiujuan</creator><creator>Qiu, Yansen</creator><creator>Ji, Yihong</creator><creator>Yang, Dongliang</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-9953</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Wound‐QoL questionnaire to assess health‐related quality of life in Chinese people with chronic wounds</title><author>Wei, Min ; Yang, Qian ; Ji, Huiming ; Yu, Xiujuan ; Qiu, Yansen ; Ji, Yihong ; Yang, Dongliang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4440-23d66e7f9ebc2e7ed39f2e3c0e4b3dcffcacd6e96ea68ebd6d71731a4b18349e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Chinese</topic><topic>chronic wound</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>East Asian People - psychology</topic><topic>Foot diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leg ulcers</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><topic>wound QoL</topic><topic>Wounds and Injuries - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Qian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Huiming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xiujuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Yansen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Yihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dongliang</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Min</au><au>Yang, Qian</au><au>Ji, Huiming</au><au>Yu, Xiujuan</au><au>Qiu, Yansen</au><au>Ji, Yihong</au><au>Yang, Dongliang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric evaluation of the Wound‐QoL questionnaire to assess health‐related quality of life in Chinese people with chronic wounds</atitle><jtitle>International wound journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Wound J</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1903</spage><epage>1910</epage><pages>1903-1910</pages><issn>1742-4801</issn><eissn>1742-481X</eissn><abstract>Chronic wounds are very common wound types in clinics which have a prolonged and painful healing process. Chronic wounds affect health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) on patients. However, there is no specific instrument to measure the HRQoL in Chinese patients with chronic wounds. Wound‐QoL is a questionnaire targeted the experience of health‐related life to patients with chronic wounds. The study aims to translate and cross‐culturally adapt the Wound‐QoL into Chinese and to evaluate its psychometric properties (validity, reliability, floor, and ceiling effect) in a convenience sample of 203 Chinese outpatients with chronic wounds. Reliability was good, with internal consistency of 0.798–0.960 and test–retest reliability of 0.720–0.838. Criterion‐related validity was assessed by the correlation coefficient between Wound‐QoL and generic European QoL instrument‐ EQ‐5D‐5L, which was found statistically significant (P<.001). No signs of floor or ceiling effect could be detected. Further, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to verify the reliability and validity of the instrument in this study. In conclusion, the Chinese Wound‐QoL is a valid and reliable tool for measuring HRQoL in populations with chronic wounds.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36526600</pmid><doi>10.1111/iwj.14050</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2158-9953</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-4801 |
ispartof | International wound journal, 2023-08, Vol.20 (6), p.1903-1910 |
issn | 1742-4801 1742-481X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10332997 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Anxiety Bilingualism Chinese chronic wound Diabetes East Asian People - psychology Foot diseases Humans Leg ulcers Males Original Patients Psychometrics Quality of Life Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Validity Wound healing wound QoL Wounds and Injuries - psychology |
title | Psychometric evaluation of the Wound‐QoL questionnaire to assess health‐related quality of life in Chinese people with chronic wounds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Wound%E2%80%90QoL%20questionnaire%20to%20assess%20health%E2%80%90related%20quality%20of%20life%20in%20Chinese%20people%20with%20chronic%20wounds&rft.jtitle=International%20wound%20journal&rft.au=Wei,%20Min&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1903&rft.epage=1910&rft.pages=1903-1910&rft.issn=1742-4801&rft.eissn=1742-481X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iwj.14050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2755575032%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090608293&rft_id=info:pmid/36526600&rfr_iscdi=true |