Post-SNF outcomes and cost comparison: Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare

To compare outcomes and costs following skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge for patients within a Medicare Advantage (MA) organization vs traditional Medicare (TM). Retrospective analysis of adults with a postacute SNF admission identified from MA claims (MA cohort: n = 56,228) and the Medicare...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of managed care 2021-04, Vol.27 (4), p.140-146
Hauptverfasser: Casebeer, Adrianne W, Schwartz, Richard, Patel, Harmit, Caplan, Ariel, Bhattacharya, Rituparna, Long, Charron, Sharma, Anup, Changamire, Tich, Uribe, Claudia, Stemple, Chuck, Thomas, Kali, Newsom, Mark, Painter, Phil, Shrank, William, Brown, Courtney R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 146
container_issue 4
container_start_page 140
container_title The American journal of managed care
container_volume 27
creator Casebeer, Adrianne W
Schwartz, Richard
Patel, Harmit
Caplan, Ariel
Bhattacharya, Rituparna
Long, Charron
Sharma, Anup
Changamire, Tich
Uribe, Claudia
Stemple, Chuck
Thomas, Kali
Newsom, Mark
Painter, Phil
Shrank, William
Brown, Courtney R
description To compare outcomes and costs following skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge for patients within a Medicare Advantage (MA) organization vs traditional Medicare (TM). Retrospective analysis of adults with a postacute SNF admission identified from MA claims (MA cohort: n = 56,228) and the Medicare 5% Limited Data Sets (TM cohort: n = 67,859). Outcomes included hospitalization, proportion of days at home, and total medical costs during the 180 days post SNF discharge, and successful community discharge. Regression models accounted for patient characteristics and health care utilization in the 180 days prior to the proximal hospitalization and characteristics of the proximal hospitalization using backward variable selection and fixed effects for MA enrollment. To control for observable differences between individuals who selected MA vs TM, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted. The MA cohort was younger than the TM cohort (median age, 77 vs 81 years), more likely to have qualified for Medicare based on disability (29% vs 20%), and less likely to have dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility (16% vs 23%). After adjustment, MA was associated with 22% decreased odds of hospitalization during the 180 days post SNF discharge, 19% increased odds of successful community discharge, a 4% increase in the proportion of days at home (equating to 6.7 additional days), and a 24% decrease in medical costs post SNF discharge. Results using IPTW were similar. MA was associated with better outcomes and lower costs post SNF discharge, suggesting efficiencies in care for SNF patients with MA. Further research is needed to evaluate specific MA features that may lead to better value.
doi_str_mv 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88616
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10324636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2516225200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8733330c2e904c2399b2b58029ae9ad6c9fa2a8c5cafddbffdbf5a092f904a223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctLxDAQxoMoPlbvnqTgxUvXdNKmiRdZFl_gE_UcpmmqXdpmTdoF_3uzPhZ1IJmQ_OZjJh8h-wkdszzn2THOWj0GCslYCJ7wNbKdSMZj4BLWw5kKEVOAdIvseD-jlHGR8k2yxZjIQ8A2ebi3vo8fb88jO_TatsZH2JWRDrdha-foam-7k-jGlLVGZ6JJucCuxxcTLXzUOyzrvrYdNitil2xU2Hiz951H5Pn87Gl6GV_fXVxNJ9exTiHrY5GzEFSDkTTVwKQsoMgEBYlGYsm1rBBQ6ExjVZZFVYWVIZVQBR4B2IicfunOh6I1pTZd6KZRc1e36N6VxVr9fenqV_ViFyqhDFLOeFA4-lZw9m0wvldt7bVpGuyMHbyCLOEAGYR_G5HDf-jMDi6MvaQARJrnTAaKflHaWe-dqVbdJFR9GqaWhqmlYerTsFBy8HuKVcGPQ-wDcuqS1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2522847739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Post-SNF outcomes and cost comparison: Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare</title><source>Research Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</source><source>Research Library Prep</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Casebeer, Adrianne W ; Schwartz, Richard ; Patel, Harmit ; Caplan, Ariel ; Bhattacharya, Rituparna ; Long, Charron ; Sharma, Anup ; Changamire, Tich ; Uribe, Claudia ; Stemple, Chuck ; Thomas, Kali ; Newsom, Mark ; Painter, Phil ; Shrank, William ; Brown, Courtney R</creator><creatorcontrib>Casebeer, Adrianne W ; Schwartz, Richard ; Patel, Harmit ; Caplan, Ariel ; Bhattacharya, Rituparna ; Long, Charron ; Sharma, Anup ; Changamire, Tich ; Uribe, Claudia ; Stemple, Chuck ; Thomas, Kali ; Newsom, Mark ; Painter, Phil ; Shrank, William ; Brown, Courtney R</creatorcontrib><description>To compare outcomes and costs following skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge for patients within a Medicare Advantage (MA) organization vs traditional Medicare (TM). Retrospective analysis of adults with a postacute SNF admission identified from MA claims (MA cohort: n = 56,228) and the Medicare 5% Limited Data Sets (TM cohort: n = 67,859). Outcomes included hospitalization, proportion of days at home, and total medical costs during the 180 days post SNF discharge, and successful community discharge. Regression models accounted for patient characteristics and health care utilization in the 180 days prior to the proximal hospitalization and characteristics of the proximal hospitalization using backward variable selection and fixed effects for MA enrollment. To control for observable differences between individuals who selected MA vs TM, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted. The MA cohort was younger than the TM cohort (median age, 77 vs 81 years), more likely to have qualified for Medicare based on disability (29% vs 20%), and less likely to have dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility (16% vs 23%). After adjustment, MA was associated with 22% decreased odds of hospitalization during the 180 days post SNF discharge, 19% increased odds of successful community discharge, a 4% increase in the proportion of days at home (equating to 6.7 additional days), and a 24% decrease in medical costs post SNF discharge. Results using IPTW were similar. MA was associated with better outcomes and lower costs post SNF discharge, suggesting efficiencies in care for SNF patients with MA. Further research is needed to evaluate specific MA features that may lead to better value.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-0224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-2692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88616</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33877772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Clinical outcomes ; Costs ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Health care ; Health care expenditures ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Medicare ; Medicare Part C ; Patient Discharge ; Retrospective Studies ; Skilled Nursing Facilities ; United States</subject><ispartof>The American journal of managed care, 2021-04, Vol.27 (4), p.140-146</ispartof><rights>Copyright Intellisphere, LLC Apr 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8733330c2e904c2399b2b58029ae9ad6c9fa2a8c5cafddbffdbf5a092f904a223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,33429,33430,33721,33722,34311,34312,36242,36243</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33877772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Casebeer, Adrianne W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Harmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caplan, Ariel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Rituparna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Charron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Anup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Changamire, Tich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stemple, Chuck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Kali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newsom, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painter, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrank, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Courtney R</creatorcontrib><title>Post-SNF outcomes and cost comparison: Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare</title><title>The American journal of managed care</title><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><description>To compare outcomes and costs following skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge for patients within a Medicare Advantage (MA) organization vs traditional Medicare (TM). Retrospective analysis of adults with a postacute SNF admission identified from MA claims (MA cohort: n = 56,228) and the Medicare 5% Limited Data Sets (TM cohort: n = 67,859). Outcomes included hospitalization, proportion of days at home, and total medical costs during the 180 days post SNF discharge, and successful community discharge. Regression models accounted for patient characteristics and health care utilization in the 180 days prior to the proximal hospitalization and characteristics of the proximal hospitalization using backward variable selection and fixed effects for MA enrollment. To control for observable differences between individuals who selected MA vs TM, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted. The MA cohort was younger than the TM cohort (median age, 77 vs 81 years), more likely to have qualified for Medicare based on disability (29% vs 20%), and less likely to have dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility (16% vs 23%). After adjustment, MA was associated with 22% decreased odds of hospitalization during the 180 days post SNF discharge, 19% increased odds of successful community discharge, a 4% increase in the proportion of days at home (equating to 6.7 additional days), and a 24% decrease in medical costs post SNF discharge. Results using IPTW were similar. MA was associated with better outcomes and lower costs post SNF discharge, suggesting efficiencies in care for SNF patients with MA. Further research is needed to evaluate specific MA features that may lead to better value.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare Part C</subject><subject>Patient Discharge</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Skilled Nursing Facilities</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1088-0224</issn><issn>1936-2692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctLxDAQxoMoPlbvnqTgxUvXdNKmiRdZFl_gE_UcpmmqXdpmTdoF_3uzPhZ1IJmQ_OZjJh8h-wkdszzn2THOWj0GCslYCJ7wNbKdSMZj4BLWw5kKEVOAdIvseD-jlHGR8k2yxZjIQ8A2ebi3vo8fb88jO_TatsZH2JWRDrdha-foam-7k-jGlLVGZ6JJucCuxxcTLXzUOyzrvrYdNitil2xU2Hiz951H5Pn87Gl6GV_fXVxNJ9exTiHrY5GzEFSDkTTVwKQsoMgEBYlGYsm1rBBQ6ExjVZZFVYWVIZVQBR4B2IicfunOh6I1pTZd6KZRc1e36N6VxVr9fenqV_ViFyqhDFLOeFA4-lZw9m0wvldt7bVpGuyMHbyCLOEAGYR_G5HDf-jMDi6MvaQARJrnTAaKflHaWe-dqVbdJFR9GqaWhqmlYerTsFBy8HuKVcGPQ-wDcuqS1Q</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Casebeer, Adrianne W</creator><creator>Schwartz, Richard</creator><creator>Patel, Harmit</creator><creator>Caplan, Ariel</creator><creator>Bhattacharya, Rituparna</creator><creator>Long, Charron</creator><creator>Sharma, Anup</creator><creator>Changamire, Tich</creator><creator>Uribe, Claudia</creator><creator>Stemple, Chuck</creator><creator>Thomas, Kali</creator><creator>Newsom, Mark</creator><creator>Painter, Phil</creator><creator>Shrank, William</creator><creator>Brown, Courtney R</creator><general>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Post-SNF outcomes and cost comparison: Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare</title><author>Casebeer, Adrianne W ; Schwartz, Richard ; Patel, Harmit ; Caplan, Ariel ; Bhattacharya, Rituparna ; Long, Charron ; Sharma, Anup ; Changamire, Tich ; Uribe, Claudia ; Stemple, Chuck ; Thomas, Kali ; Newsom, Mark ; Painter, Phil ; Shrank, William ; Brown, Courtney R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-8733330c2e904c2399b2b58029ae9ad6c9fa2a8c5cafddbffdbf5a092f904a223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare Part C</topic><topic>Patient Discharge</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Skilled Nursing Facilities</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Casebeer, Adrianne W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Harmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caplan, Ariel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhattacharya, Rituparna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Charron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Anup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Changamire, Tich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uribe, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stemple, Chuck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Kali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newsom, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Painter, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shrank, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Courtney R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Casebeer, Adrianne W</au><au>Schwartz, Richard</au><au>Patel, Harmit</au><au>Caplan, Ariel</au><au>Bhattacharya, Rituparna</au><au>Long, Charron</au><au>Sharma, Anup</au><au>Changamire, Tich</au><au>Uribe, Claudia</au><au>Stemple, Chuck</au><au>Thomas, Kali</au><au>Newsom, Mark</au><au>Painter, Phil</au><au>Shrank, William</au><au>Brown, Courtney R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Post-SNF outcomes and cost comparison: Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>140</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>140-146</pages><issn>1088-0224</issn><eissn>1936-2692</eissn><abstract>To compare outcomes and costs following skilled nursing facility (SNF) discharge for patients within a Medicare Advantage (MA) organization vs traditional Medicare (TM). Retrospective analysis of adults with a postacute SNF admission identified from MA claims (MA cohort: n = 56,228) and the Medicare 5% Limited Data Sets (TM cohort: n = 67,859). Outcomes included hospitalization, proportion of days at home, and total medical costs during the 180 days post SNF discharge, and successful community discharge. Regression models accounted for patient characteristics and health care utilization in the 180 days prior to the proximal hospitalization and characteristics of the proximal hospitalization using backward variable selection and fixed effects for MA enrollment. To control for observable differences between individuals who selected MA vs TM, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted. The MA cohort was younger than the TM cohort (median age, 77 vs 81 years), more likely to have qualified for Medicare based on disability (29% vs 20%), and less likely to have dual Medicare/Medicaid eligibility (16% vs 23%). After adjustment, MA was associated with 22% decreased odds of hospitalization during the 180 days post SNF discharge, 19% increased odds of successful community discharge, a 4% increase in the proportion of days at home (equating to 6.7 additional days), and a 24% decrease in medical costs post SNF discharge. Results using IPTW were similar. MA was associated with better outcomes and lower costs post SNF discharge, suggesting efficiencies in care for SNF patients with MA. Further research is needed to evaluate specific MA features that may lead to better value.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>MultiMedia Healthcare Inc</pub><pmid>33877772</pmid><doi>10.37765/ajmc.2021.88616</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-0224
ispartof The American journal of managed care, 2021-04, Vol.27 (4), p.140-146
issn 1088-0224
1936-2692
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10324636
source Research Library; MEDLINE; Research Library (Alumni Edition); Research Library Prep; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central
subjects Aged
Clinical outcomes
Costs
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health care
Health care expenditures
Hospitalization
Humans
Medicare
Medicare Part C
Patient Discharge
Retrospective Studies
Skilled Nursing Facilities
United States
title Post-SNF outcomes and cost comparison: Medicare Advantage vs traditional Medicare
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T12%3A56%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-SNF%20outcomes%20and%20cost%20comparison:%20Medicare%20Advantage%20vs%20traditional%20Medicare&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20managed%20care&rft.au=Casebeer,%20Adrianne%20W&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=140&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=140-146&rft.issn=1088-0224&rft.eissn=1936-2692&rft_id=info:doi/10.37765/ajmc.2021.88616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2516225200%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2522847739&rft_id=info:pmid/33877772&rfr_iscdi=true