Does active coaching reduce actual treatment duration for frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery?

Frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) has become an effective supplement to frame-based, which is however sensitive to patient's involuntary motions and prone to prolonged treatment duration. Such delays during treatment inevitably result in patient discomfort and the inabilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT 2022, Vol.8 (4), p.291-296
Hauptverfasser: Cui, Taoran, Ginalis, Elizabeth E, Nie, Ke, Chundury, Anupama, Ohri, Nisha, Shabbar, Danish, Yue, Ning, Weiner, Joseph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 296
container_issue 4
container_start_page 291
container_title Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT
container_volume 8
creator Cui, Taoran
Ginalis, Elizabeth E
Nie, Ke
Chundury, Anupama
Ohri, Nisha
Shabbar, Danish
Yue, Ning
Weiner, Joseph
description Frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) has become an effective supplement to frame-based, which is however sensitive to patient's involuntary motions and prone to prolonged treatment duration. Such delays during treatment inevitably result in patient discomfort and the inability to complete intended treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether active coaching during frameless GKSRS can reduce actual treatment duration. Patients treated at a single institution with frameless GKSRS from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Beginning in 2019, all patients treated with frameless GKSRS were actively coached to prevent treatment interruptions. Patient characteristics and treatment plans were compared between the cohorts of patients treated with and without active coaching. Linear regressions between the planned and actual treatment duration of treatment sessions were performed on either cohort. ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analyses with a p-value less than 0.05 considered as significant. Of the total 43 patients and 105 treatment sessions identified, 27 patients underwent 51 treatment sessions of frameless GKSRS with active coaching. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and treatment plans between the two cohorts. Patients treated with active coaching underwent significantly fewer CBCTs during treatment. The median planned and actual treatment durations were 31.4 and 51.7 min for the non-coached cohort, and 38.6 and 49.8 min for the coached cohort. The results of linear regressions showed that the actual treatment duration was 1.29 and 1.56 times longer with and without active coaching, respectively, which indicated a significant reduction in the actual treatment duration with active coaching. Our results suggest that active coaching was associated with significant reductions of actual treatment duration. This simple intervention can be clinically implemented to prevent unnecessary treatment interruptions, improve patient comfort and ensure completion of treatment as prescribed during frameless GKSRS.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10322178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2835274842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1128-d04af1556f1718cd3a960160a42d673553ef9f7376845eb88c32c8e26811f8ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE9Lw0AQxYMotmi_guzRSyD7f3MqUrWKBS96DtPNbLslydbdpNBvb4u16FzeMPP4vWEusjGjUuVCCX157nk5yiYpbYpDSWFYUVxnI64FVZyV42zzGDARsL3fIbEB7Np3KxKxHiwexwM0pI8IfYtdT-ohQu9DR1yIxEVoscGUyBzaFshb5x2S1GPE0B-JlkSofUhDXGHcT2-zKwdNwslJb7LP56eP2Uu-eJ-_zh4W-ZZSZvK6EOColMpRTY2tOZSqoKoAwWqluZQcXek018oIiUtjLGfWIFOGUmfQ8Zts-sPdDssWa3s4PEJTbaNvIe6rAL76v-n8ulqFXUULzhjV5kC4PxFi-Bow9VXrk8WmgQ7DkCpmuGRaGMEO1ru_YeeU3w_zb4GSe0Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2835274842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does active coaching reduce actual treatment duration for frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery?</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Cui, Taoran ; Ginalis, Elizabeth E ; Nie, Ke ; Chundury, Anupama ; Ohri, Nisha ; Shabbar, Danish ; Yue, Ning ; Weiner, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Cui, Taoran ; Ginalis, Elizabeth E ; Nie, Ke ; Chundury, Anupama ; Ohri, Nisha ; Shabbar, Danish ; Yue, Ning ; Weiner, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) has become an effective supplement to frame-based, which is however sensitive to patient's involuntary motions and prone to prolonged treatment duration. Such delays during treatment inevitably result in patient discomfort and the inability to complete intended treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether active coaching during frameless GKSRS can reduce actual treatment duration. Patients treated at a single institution with frameless GKSRS from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Beginning in 2019, all patients treated with frameless GKSRS were actively coached to prevent treatment interruptions. Patient characteristics and treatment plans were compared between the cohorts of patients treated with and without active coaching. Linear regressions between the planned and actual treatment duration of treatment sessions were performed on either cohort. ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analyses with a p-value less than 0.05 considered as significant. Of the total 43 patients and 105 treatment sessions identified, 27 patients underwent 51 treatment sessions of frameless GKSRS with active coaching. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and treatment plans between the two cohorts. Patients treated with active coaching underwent significantly fewer CBCTs during treatment. The median planned and actual treatment durations were 31.4 and 51.7 min for the non-coached cohort, and 38.6 and 49.8 min for the coached cohort. The results of linear regressions showed that the actual treatment duration was 1.29 and 1.56 times longer with and without active coaching, respectively, which indicated a significant reduction in the actual treatment duration with active coaching. Our results suggest that active coaching was associated with significant reductions of actual treatment duration. This simple intervention can be clinically implemented to prevent unnecessary treatment interruptions, improve patient comfort and ensure completion of treatment as prescribed during frameless GKSRS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2156-4639</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-4647</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37416329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Old City Publishing, Inc</publisher><subject>Physics Investigation</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2022, Vol.8 (4), p.291-296</ispartof><rights>2023 Old City Publishing, Inc.</rights><rights>2023 Old City Publishing, Inc. 2023 Old City Publishing, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322178/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10322178/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4010,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37416329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cui, Taoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginalis, Elizabeth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chundury, Anupama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohri, Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabbar, Danish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Does active coaching reduce actual treatment duration for frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery?</title><title>Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT</title><addtitle>J Radiosurg SBRT</addtitle><description>Frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) has become an effective supplement to frame-based, which is however sensitive to patient's involuntary motions and prone to prolonged treatment duration. Such delays during treatment inevitably result in patient discomfort and the inability to complete intended treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether active coaching during frameless GKSRS can reduce actual treatment duration. Patients treated at a single institution with frameless GKSRS from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Beginning in 2019, all patients treated with frameless GKSRS were actively coached to prevent treatment interruptions. Patient characteristics and treatment plans were compared between the cohorts of patients treated with and without active coaching. Linear regressions between the planned and actual treatment duration of treatment sessions were performed on either cohort. ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analyses with a p-value less than 0.05 considered as significant. Of the total 43 patients and 105 treatment sessions identified, 27 patients underwent 51 treatment sessions of frameless GKSRS with active coaching. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and treatment plans between the two cohorts. Patients treated with active coaching underwent significantly fewer CBCTs during treatment. The median planned and actual treatment durations were 31.4 and 51.7 min for the non-coached cohort, and 38.6 and 49.8 min for the coached cohort. The results of linear regressions showed that the actual treatment duration was 1.29 and 1.56 times longer with and without active coaching, respectively, which indicated a significant reduction in the actual treatment duration with active coaching. Our results suggest that active coaching was associated with significant reductions of actual treatment duration. This simple intervention can be clinically implemented to prevent unnecessary treatment interruptions, improve patient comfort and ensure completion of treatment as prescribed during frameless GKSRS.</description><subject>Physics Investigation</subject><issn>2156-4639</issn><issn>2156-4647</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkE9Lw0AQxYMotmi_guzRSyD7f3MqUrWKBS96DtPNbLslydbdpNBvb4u16FzeMPP4vWEusjGjUuVCCX157nk5yiYpbYpDSWFYUVxnI64FVZyV42zzGDARsL3fIbEB7Np3KxKxHiwexwM0pI8IfYtdT-ohQu9DR1yIxEVoscGUyBzaFshb5x2S1GPE0B-JlkSofUhDXGHcT2-zKwdNwslJb7LP56eP2Uu-eJ-_zh4W-ZZSZvK6EOColMpRTY2tOZSqoKoAwWqluZQcXek018oIiUtjLGfWIFOGUmfQ8Zts-sPdDssWa3s4PEJTbaNvIe6rAL76v-n8ulqFXUULzhjV5kC4PxFi-Bow9VXrk8WmgQ7DkCpmuGRaGMEO1ru_YeeU3w_zb4GSe0Y</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Cui, Taoran</creator><creator>Ginalis, Elizabeth E</creator><creator>Nie, Ke</creator><creator>Chundury, Anupama</creator><creator>Ohri, Nisha</creator><creator>Shabbar, Danish</creator><creator>Yue, Ning</creator><creator>Weiner, Joseph</creator><general>Old City Publishing, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Does active coaching reduce actual treatment duration for frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery?</title><author>Cui, Taoran ; Ginalis, Elizabeth E ; Nie, Ke ; Chundury, Anupama ; Ohri, Nisha ; Shabbar, Danish ; Yue, Ning ; Weiner, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1128-d04af1556f1718cd3a960160a42d673553ef9f7376845eb88c32c8e26811f8ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Physics Investigation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cui, Taoran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginalis, Elizabeth E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chundury, Anupama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohri, Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shabbar, Danish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yue, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiner, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cui, Taoran</au><au>Ginalis, Elizabeth E</au><au>Nie, Ke</au><au>Chundury, Anupama</au><au>Ohri, Nisha</au><au>Shabbar, Danish</au><au>Yue, Ning</au><au>Weiner, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does active coaching reduce actual treatment duration for frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiosurg SBRT</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>291-296</pages><issn>2156-4639</issn><eissn>2156-4647</eissn><abstract>Frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) has become an effective supplement to frame-based, which is however sensitive to patient's involuntary motions and prone to prolonged treatment duration. Such delays during treatment inevitably result in patient discomfort and the inability to complete intended treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether active coaching during frameless GKSRS can reduce actual treatment duration. Patients treated at a single institution with frameless GKSRS from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Beginning in 2019, all patients treated with frameless GKSRS were actively coached to prevent treatment interruptions. Patient characteristics and treatment plans were compared between the cohorts of patients treated with and without active coaching. Linear regressions between the planned and actual treatment duration of treatment sessions were performed on either cohort. ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical analyses with a p-value less than 0.05 considered as significant. Of the total 43 patients and 105 treatment sessions identified, 27 patients underwent 51 treatment sessions of frameless GKSRS with active coaching. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and treatment plans between the two cohorts. Patients treated with active coaching underwent significantly fewer CBCTs during treatment. The median planned and actual treatment durations were 31.4 and 51.7 min for the non-coached cohort, and 38.6 and 49.8 min for the coached cohort. The results of linear regressions showed that the actual treatment duration was 1.29 and 1.56 times longer with and without active coaching, respectively, which indicated a significant reduction in the actual treatment duration with active coaching. Our results suggest that active coaching was associated with significant reductions of actual treatment duration. This simple intervention can be clinically implemented to prevent unnecessary treatment interruptions, improve patient comfort and ensure completion of treatment as prescribed during frameless GKSRS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Old City Publishing, Inc</pub><pmid>37416329</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2156-4639
ispartof Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT, 2022, Vol.8 (4), p.291-296
issn 2156-4639
2156-4647
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10322178
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Physics Investigation
title Does active coaching reduce actual treatment duration for frameless Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A43%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20active%20coaching%20reduce%20actual%20treatment%20duration%20for%20frameless%20Gamma%20Knife%20stereotactic%20radiosurgery?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiosurgery%20and%20SBRT&rft.au=Cui,%20Taoran&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=291-296&rft.issn=2156-4639&rft.eissn=2156-4647&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2835274842%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2835274842&rft_id=info:pmid/37416329&rfr_iscdi=true