Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions
The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after endovenous interventions for varicose veins in the presence of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis versus mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. The VTE rate...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgery 2023-08, Vol.278 (2), p.166-171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 171 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | Annals of surgery |
container_volume | 278 |
creator | Turner, Benedict R. H. Machin, Matthew Jasionowska, Sara Salim, Safa Onida, Sarah Shalhoub, Joseph Davies, Alun H. |
description | The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after endovenous interventions for varicose veins in the presence of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis versus mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone.
The VTE rate after endovenous procedures for varicose veins is higher than other day-case procedures and could be reduced with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.
The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines with a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42021274963). Studies of endovenous intervention for superficial venous incompetence reporting the predefined outcomes with at least 30 patients were eligible. Data were pooled with a fixed effects model.
There were 221 trials included in the review (47 randomized trial arms, 105 prospective cohort studies, and 69 retrospective studies). In randomized trial arms, the rate of deep venous thrombosis with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.52% (95% CI, 0.23%-1.19%) (9 studies, 1095 patients, 2 events) versus 2.26% (95% CI, 1.81%-2.82%) (38 studies, 6951 patients, 69 events) with mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. The rate of pulmonary embolism in randomized trial arms with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.45% (95% CI, 0.09-2.35) (5 studies, 460 participants, 1 event) versus 0.23% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.52%) (28 studies, 4834 participants, 3 events) for mechanical measures alone. The rate of EHIT grade III to IV was 0.35% (95% CI, 0.09-1.40) versus 0.88% (95% CI, 0.28%-2.70%). There was 1 VTE-related mortality and 1 instance of major bleeding, with low rates of minor bleeding.
There is a significant reduction in the rate of DVT with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and routine prescription of anticoagulation after endovenous varicose vein intervention should be considered. VTE risk for individual study participants is heterogeneous and risk stratification in future randomized interventional studies is critical to establish the clinical effectiveness and safety of additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005709 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10321513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2723159442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-d8f46d223d4c07821a664401265bc595cdadfc479981dceb61098b728037e0803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUdtuEzEUtBCIhsIfIORHXrb1dS9PKFQFKgWBaOmr5dhnuwbvOrWdhPwE31xHKaXgB1uamTPH5wxCryk5oaRrTi8X8xPy6MiGdE_QjErWVpQK8hTNCsor0XF2hF6k9IMQKlrSPEdHvGZEUtbN0O_LXcow6uwM_gYbB1usJ4s_Q9aVnrTfJZdw6HEeAM-tddmFguL3MEHv8p75Oug4ahN8uHGmUFdDDOMyrGJYDTuvf5X6PkR8PtmwgSmsE77W0ZmQAF-Dm_DFlCEWZu-cXqJnvfYJXt2_x-j7h_Ors0_V4svHi7P5ojJCClHZthe1ZYxbYUjTMqrrWghCWS2XRnbSWG17I5qua6k1sKzLxtplw1rCGyDlPkbvDr6r9XKEIply1F6toht13KmgnfqXmdygbsJGUcIZlZQXh7f3DjHcriFlNbpkwHs9QRlSsYZxKjshWJGKg9TEkFKE_qEPJWqfpSpZqv-zLGVvHv_xoehPeH99t8GXHaaffr2FqAbQPg8Hv1q2FSOMl5kJqfaI4Hdyd6zb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2723159442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Turner, Benedict R. H. ; Machin, Matthew ; Jasionowska, Sara ; Salim, Safa ; Onida, Sarah ; Shalhoub, Joseph ; Davies, Alun H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, Benedict R. H. ; Machin, Matthew ; Jasionowska, Sara ; Salim, Safa ; Onida, Sarah ; Shalhoub, Joseph ; Davies, Alun H.</creatorcontrib><description>The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after endovenous interventions for varicose veins in the presence of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis versus mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone.
The VTE rate after endovenous procedures for varicose veins is higher than other day-case procedures and could be reduced with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.
The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines with a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42021274963). Studies of endovenous intervention for superficial venous incompetence reporting the predefined outcomes with at least 30 patients were eligible. Data were pooled with a fixed effects model.
There were 221 trials included in the review (47 randomized trial arms, 105 prospective cohort studies, and 69 retrospective studies). In randomized trial arms, the rate of deep venous thrombosis with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.52% (95% CI, 0.23%-1.19%) (9 studies, 1095 patients, 2 events) versus 2.26% (95% CI, 1.81%-2.82%) (38 studies, 6951 patients, 69 events) with mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. The rate of pulmonary embolism in randomized trial arms with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.45% (95% CI, 0.09-2.35) (5 studies, 460 participants, 1 event) versus 0.23% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.52%) (28 studies, 4834 participants, 3 events) for mechanical measures alone. The rate of EHIT grade III to IV was 0.35% (95% CI, 0.09-1.40) versus 0.88% (95% CI, 0.28%-2.70%). There was 1 VTE-related mortality and 1 instance of major bleeding, with low rates of minor bleeding.
There is a significant reduction in the rate of DVT with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and routine prescription of anticoagulation after endovenous varicose vein intervention should be considered. VTE risk for individual study participants is heterogeneous and risk stratification in future randomized interventional studies is critical to establish the clinical effectiveness and safety of additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005709</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36205129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Meta-Analysis ; Varicose Veins - drug therapy ; Venous Thromboembolism - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2023-08, Vol.278 (2), p.166-171</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-d8f46d223d4c07821a664401265bc595cdadfc479981dceb61098b728037e0803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-d8f46d223d4c07821a664401265bc595cdadfc479981dceb61098b728037e0803</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4804-9343</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321513/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321513/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36205129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, Benedict R. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machin, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jasionowska, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salim, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onida, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalhoub, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Alun H.</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after endovenous interventions for varicose veins in the presence of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis versus mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone.
The VTE rate after endovenous procedures for varicose veins is higher than other day-case procedures and could be reduced with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.
The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines with a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42021274963). Studies of endovenous intervention for superficial venous incompetence reporting the predefined outcomes with at least 30 patients were eligible. Data were pooled with a fixed effects model.
There were 221 trials included in the review (47 randomized trial arms, 105 prospective cohort studies, and 69 retrospective studies). In randomized trial arms, the rate of deep venous thrombosis with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.52% (95% CI, 0.23%-1.19%) (9 studies, 1095 patients, 2 events) versus 2.26% (95% CI, 1.81%-2.82%) (38 studies, 6951 patients, 69 events) with mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. The rate of pulmonary embolism in randomized trial arms with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.45% (95% CI, 0.09-2.35) (5 studies, 460 participants, 1 event) versus 0.23% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.52%) (28 studies, 4834 participants, 3 events) for mechanical measures alone. The rate of EHIT grade III to IV was 0.35% (95% CI, 0.09-1.40) versus 0.88% (95% CI, 0.28%-2.70%). There was 1 VTE-related mortality and 1 instance of major bleeding, with low rates of minor bleeding.
There is a significant reduction in the rate of DVT with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and routine prescription of anticoagulation after endovenous varicose vein intervention should be considered. VTE risk for individual study participants is heterogeneous and risk stratification in future randomized interventional studies is critical to establish the clinical effectiveness and safety of additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.</description><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Varicose Veins - drug therapy</subject><subject>Venous Thromboembolism - drug therapy</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUdtuEzEUtBCIhsIfIORHXrb1dS9PKFQFKgWBaOmr5dhnuwbvOrWdhPwE31xHKaXgB1uamTPH5wxCryk5oaRrTi8X8xPy6MiGdE_QjErWVpQK8hTNCsor0XF2hF6k9IMQKlrSPEdHvGZEUtbN0O_LXcow6uwM_gYbB1usJ4s_Q9aVnrTfJZdw6HEeAM-tddmFguL3MEHv8p75Oug4ahN8uHGmUFdDDOMyrGJYDTuvf5X6PkR8PtmwgSmsE77W0ZmQAF-Dm_DFlCEWZu-cXqJnvfYJXt2_x-j7h_Ors0_V4svHi7P5ojJCClHZthe1ZYxbYUjTMqrrWghCWS2XRnbSWG17I5qua6k1sKzLxtplw1rCGyDlPkbvDr6r9XKEIply1F6toht13KmgnfqXmdygbsJGUcIZlZQXh7f3DjHcriFlNbpkwHs9QRlSsYZxKjshWJGKg9TEkFKE_qEPJWqfpSpZqv-zLGVvHv_xoehPeH99t8GXHaaffr2FqAbQPg8Hv1q2FSOMl5kJqfaI4Hdyd6zb</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Turner, Benedict R. H.</creator><creator>Machin, Matthew</creator><creator>Jasionowska, Sara</creator><creator>Salim, Safa</creator><creator>Onida, Sarah</creator><creator>Shalhoub, Joseph</creator><creator>Davies, Alun H.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4804-9343</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions</title><author>Turner, Benedict R. H. ; Machin, Matthew ; Jasionowska, Sara ; Salim, Safa ; Onida, Sarah ; Shalhoub, Joseph ; Davies, Alun H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4544-d8f46d223d4c07821a664401265bc595cdadfc479981dceb61098b728037e0803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Varicose Veins - drug therapy</topic><topic>Venous Thromboembolism - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, Benedict R. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machin, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jasionowska, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salim, Safa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onida, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shalhoub, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, Alun H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, Benedict R. H.</au><au>Machin, Matthew</au><au>Jasionowska, Sara</au><au>Salim, Safa</au><au>Onida, Sarah</au><au>Shalhoub, Joseph</au><au>Davies, Alun H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>278</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>166-171</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><abstract>The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to elucidate the rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after endovenous interventions for varicose veins in the presence of pharmacological and mechanical thromboprophylaxis versus mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone.
The VTE rate after endovenous procedures for varicose veins is higher than other day-case procedures and could be reduced with pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.
The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines with a registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42021274963). Studies of endovenous intervention for superficial venous incompetence reporting the predefined outcomes with at least 30 patients were eligible. Data were pooled with a fixed effects model.
There were 221 trials included in the review (47 randomized trial arms, 105 prospective cohort studies, and 69 retrospective studies). In randomized trial arms, the rate of deep venous thrombosis with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.52% (95% CI, 0.23%-1.19%) (9 studies, 1095 patients, 2 events) versus 2.26% (95% CI, 1.81%-2.82%) (38 studies, 6951 patients, 69 events) with mechanical thromboprophylaxis alone. The rate of pulmonary embolism in randomized trial arms with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis was 0.45% (95% CI, 0.09-2.35) (5 studies, 460 participants, 1 event) versus 0.23% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.52%) (28 studies, 4834 participants, 3 events) for mechanical measures alone. The rate of EHIT grade III to IV was 0.35% (95% CI, 0.09-1.40) versus 0.88% (95% CI, 0.28%-2.70%). There was 1 VTE-related mortality and 1 instance of major bleeding, with low rates of minor bleeding.
There is a significant reduction in the rate of DVT with additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis and routine prescription of anticoagulation after endovenous varicose vein intervention should be considered. VTE risk for individual study participants is heterogeneous and risk stratification in future randomized interventional studies is critical to establish the clinical effectiveness and safety of additional pharmacological thromboprophylaxis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>36205129</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0000000000005709</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4804-9343</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4932 |
ispartof | Annals of surgery, 2023-08, Vol.278 (2), p.166-171 |
issn | 0003-4932 1528-1140 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10321513 |
source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Anticoagulants - therapeutic use Humans Meta-Analysis Varicose Veins - drug therapy Venous Thromboembolism - drug therapy |
title | Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Additional Benefit of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Endovenous Varicose Vein Interventions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A48%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis%20of%20the%20Additional%20Benefit%20of%20Pharmacological%20Thromboprophylaxis%20for%20Endovenous%20Varicose%20Vein%20Interventions&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Turner,%20Benedict%20R.%20H.&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=278&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=166-171&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005709&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2723159442%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2723159442&rft_id=info:pmid/36205129&rfr_iscdi=true |