Influence of nonthermal argon plasma on the micro-shear bond strength between resin cement and translucent zirconia
Background: Considering the potential of translucent zirconia for application in esthetic restorations, it is necessary to find effective methods with the least adverse effects to increase its bond strength to resin cement. Aims: This study aimed to test if different conservative surface treatments...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of conservative dentistry 2023-05, Vol.26 (3), p.281-287 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 287 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 281 |
| container_title | Journal of conservative dentistry |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Salimi, Kimia Atri, Faezeh Valizadeh, Sara Sahebi, Majid Ghodsi, Safoura Manouchehri, Neshatafarin |
| description | Background: Considering the potential of translucent zirconia for application in esthetic restorations, it is necessary to find effective methods with the least adverse effects to increase its bond strength to resin cement.
Aims: This study aimed to test if different conservative surface treatments and cement types could affect the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS), failure mode, and bonding interface between resin cement and translucent zirconia.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, translucent zirconia blocks were divided into four groups based on the surface treatment they received: no treatment, argon plasma, primer (Pr), and Pr + plasma. Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on the applied cement: PANAVIA F2 and Duo-Link cement. Fourteen cement columns with a diameter of 1 mm were placed on each block (n = 14); all the specimens were immersed in 37°C water for 24 h. Afterward, μSBS was evaluated (P < 0.05), and the mode of failure was determined by a stereomicroscope (×10). The cement-zirconia interface and the surface hydrophilicity (contact angle) were also evaluated.
Statistical Analysis: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the effect of surface preparation, cement types, and incubator, simultaneously (P < 0.05). The bond strengths after incubation were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05). Failure mode, contact angle, and cement-zirconia interface were analyzed descriptively.
Results: The highest bond strength was seen in Pr surface treatment for Duo-Link cement; however, this group was not significantly different from Pr and PANAVIA F2 cement and Pr + plasma and Duo-Link cement (P = 0.075) groups. All plasma specimens in the incubator failed prematurely. The mode of failure in all specimens was adhesive. The lowest and highest contact angles were seen in Pr + plasma and the control groups, respectively.
Conclusion: The use of Pr could successfully improve the bond strength of resin cement to translucent zirconia while plasma was not an acceptable and durable substitute. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4103/jcd.jcd_41_23 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10309120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A753414579</galeid><sourcerecordid>A753414579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441c-ae9f478bddc2191d7846ba388f7a3764a119321c1fbdab84c8c21a3f77143a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEomXhyBVZQkJcstixd-2cUFUVqFSJS-_WxJlsvHXsxU5Ywa-vQ9ttF1WW5a9nxvY7b1G8Z3QpGOVftqZd5q4F0xV_UZzSWopyVVH-8t-8Kqmk8qR4k9KW0rUQNX1dnHDJa6WEOi3Spe_chN4gCR3xwY89xgEcgbgJnuwcpAFInuV9MlgTQ5l6hEia4FuSxoh-M_akwXGP6EnEZD0xOKAfCWRijOCTm8y8_mujCd7C2-JVBy7hu_txUVx_u7g-_1Fe_fx-eX52VRohmCkB605I1bStqVjNWqnEugGuVCeBy7UAxmpeMcO6poVGCaMyB7yTkgkOK74ovt6l3U3NgO38hAhO76IdIP7RAaw-PvG215vwW2dZac2yhIvi832GGH5NmEY92GTQOfAYpqQrxSslKlWvM_rxP3Qbpujz9zJVsUpKodQjtQGH2vou5IvNnFSfyRUXTKxknanlM1RuLeYKBI-dzftHAZ-eBOTyuLFPwU2jDT4dg-UdmOuYUsTuoAajeraTnq10sFPmPzyV8EA_-OdR431wI8Z046Y9Rp3ZGx_2z2fNgjD9YDt-C4xv3bk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2821277488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of nonthermal argon plasma on the micro-shear bond strength between resin cement and translucent zirconia</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Salimi, Kimia ; Atri, Faezeh ; Valizadeh, Sara ; Sahebi, Majid ; Ghodsi, Safoura ; Manouchehri, Neshatafarin</creator><creatorcontrib>Salimi, Kimia ; Atri, Faezeh ; Valizadeh, Sara ; Sahebi, Majid ; Ghodsi, Safoura ; Manouchehri, Neshatafarin</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Considering the potential of translucent zirconia for application in esthetic restorations, it is necessary to find effective methods with the least adverse effects to increase its bond strength to resin cement.
Aims: This study aimed to test if different conservative surface treatments and cement types could affect the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS), failure mode, and bonding interface between resin cement and translucent zirconia.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, translucent zirconia blocks were divided into four groups based on the surface treatment they received: no treatment, argon plasma, primer (Pr), and Pr + plasma. Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on the applied cement: PANAVIA F2 and Duo-Link cement. Fourteen cement columns with a diameter of 1 mm were placed on each block (n = 14); all the specimens were immersed in 37°C water for 24 h. Afterward, μSBS was evaluated (P < 0.05), and the mode of failure was determined by a stereomicroscope (×10). The cement-zirconia interface and the surface hydrophilicity (contact angle) were also evaluated.
Statistical Analysis: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the effect of surface preparation, cement types, and incubator, simultaneously (P < 0.05). The bond strengths after incubation were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05). Failure mode, contact angle, and cement-zirconia interface were analyzed descriptively.
Results: The highest bond strength was seen in Pr surface treatment for Duo-Link cement; however, this group was not significantly different from Pr and PANAVIA F2 cement and Pr + plasma and Duo-Link cement (P = 0.075) groups. All plasma specimens in the incubator failed prematurely. The mode of failure in all specimens was adhesive. The lowest and highest contact angles were seen in Pr + plasma and the control groups, respectively.
Conclusion: The use of Pr could successfully improve the bond strength of resin cement to translucent zirconia while plasma was not an acceptable and durable substitute.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-0707</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-5203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_41_23</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37398848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Argon ; Bonds ; Cement ; Contact angle ; Original ; Plasma ; Statistical analysis ; Variance analysis ; Zirconia ; Zirconium oxide</subject><ispartof>Journal of conservative dentistry, 2023-05, Vol.26 (3), p.281-287</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Conservative Dentistry.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Conservative Dentistry 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441c-ae9f478bddc2191d7846ba388f7a3764a119321c1fbdab84c8c21a3f77143a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309120/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309120/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37398848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salimi, Kimia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atri, Faezeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valizadeh, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahebi, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghodsi, Safoura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manouchehri, Neshatafarin</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of nonthermal argon plasma on the micro-shear bond strength between resin cement and translucent zirconia</title><title>Journal of conservative dentistry</title><addtitle>J Conserv Dent</addtitle><description>Background: Considering the potential of translucent zirconia for application in esthetic restorations, it is necessary to find effective methods with the least adverse effects to increase its bond strength to resin cement.
Aims: This study aimed to test if different conservative surface treatments and cement types could affect the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS), failure mode, and bonding interface between resin cement and translucent zirconia.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, translucent zirconia blocks were divided into four groups based on the surface treatment they received: no treatment, argon plasma, primer (Pr), and Pr + plasma. Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on the applied cement: PANAVIA F2 and Duo-Link cement. Fourteen cement columns with a diameter of 1 mm were placed on each block (n = 14); all the specimens were immersed in 37°C water for 24 h. Afterward, μSBS was evaluated (P < 0.05), and the mode of failure was determined by a stereomicroscope (×10). The cement-zirconia interface and the surface hydrophilicity (contact angle) were also evaluated.
Statistical Analysis: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the effect of surface preparation, cement types, and incubator, simultaneously (P < 0.05). The bond strengths after incubation were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05). Failure mode, contact angle, and cement-zirconia interface were analyzed descriptively.
Results: The highest bond strength was seen in Pr surface treatment for Duo-Link cement; however, this group was not significantly different from Pr and PANAVIA F2 cement and Pr + plasma and Duo-Link cement (P = 0.075) groups. All plasma specimens in the incubator failed prematurely. The mode of failure in all specimens was adhesive. The lowest and highest contact angles were seen in Pr + plasma and the control groups, respectively.
Conclusion: The use of Pr could successfully improve the bond strength of resin cement to translucent zirconia while plasma was not an acceptable and durable substitute.</description><subject>Argon</subject><subject>Bonds</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Zirconia</subject><subject>Zirconium oxide</subject><issn>0972-0707</issn><issn>0974-5203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEomXhyBVZQkJcstixd-2cUFUVqFSJS-_WxJlsvHXsxU5Ywa-vQ9ttF1WW5a9nxvY7b1G8Z3QpGOVftqZd5q4F0xV_UZzSWopyVVH-8t-8Kqmk8qR4k9KW0rUQNX1dnHDJa6WEOi3Spe_chN4gCR3xwY89xgEcgbgJnuwcpAFInuV9MlgTQ5l6hEia4FuSxoh-M_akwXGP6EnEZD0xOKAfCWRijOCTm8y8_mujCd7C2-JVBy7hu_txUVx_u7g-_1Fe_fx-eX52VRohmCkB605I1bStqVjNWqnEugGuVCeBy7UAxmpeMcO6poVGCaMyB7yTkgkOK74ovt6l3U3NgO38hAhO76IdIP7RAaw-PvG215vwW2dZac2yhIvi832GGH5NmEY92GTQOfAYpqQrxSslKlWvM_rxP3Qbpujz9zJVsUpKodQjtQGH2vou5IvNnFSfyRUXTKxknanlM1RuLeYKBI-dzftHAZ-eBOTyuLFPwU2jDT4dg-UdmOuYUsTuoAajeraTnq10sFPmPzyV8EA_-OdR431wI8Z046Y9Rp3ZGx_2z2fNgjD9YDt-C4xv3bk</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Salimi, Kimia</creator><creator>Atri, Faezeh</creator><creator>Valizadeh, Sara</creator><creator>Sahebi, Majid</creator><creator>Ghodsi, Safoura</creator><creator>Manouchehri, Neshatafarin</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Influence of nonthermal argon plasma on the micro-shear bond strength between resin cement and translucent zirconia</title><author>Salimi, Kimia ; Atri, Faezeh ; Valizadeh, Sara ; Sahebi, Majid ; Ghodsi, Safoura ; Manouchehri, Neshatafarin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441c-ae9f478bddc2191d7846ba388f7a3764a119321c1fbdab84c8c21a3f77143a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Argon</topic><topic>Bonds</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Zirconia</topic><topic>Zirconium oxide</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salimi, Kimia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atri, Faezeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valizadeh, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahebi, Majid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghodsi, Safoura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manouchehri, Neshatafarin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of conservative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salimi, Kimia</au><au>Atri, Faezeh</au><au>Valizadeh, Sara</au><au>Sahebi, Majid</au><au>Ghodsi, Safoura</au><au>Manouchehri, Neshatafarin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of nonthermal argon plasma on the micro-shear bond strength between resin cement and translucent zirconia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of conservative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Conserv Dent</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>287</epage><pages>281-287</pages><issn>0972-0707</issn><eissn>0974-5203</eissn><abstract>Background: Considering the potential of translucent zirconia for application in esthetic restorations, it is necessary to find effective methods with the least adverse effects to increase its bond strength to resin cement.
Aims: This study aimed to test if different conservative surface treatments and cement types could affect the micro-shear bond strength (μSBS), failure mode, and bonding interface between resin cement and translucent zirconia.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, translucent zirconia blocks were divided into four groups based on the surface treatment they received: no treatment, argon plasma, primer (Pr), and Pr + plasma. Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on the applied cement: PANAVIA F2 and Duo-Link cement. Fourteen cement columns with a diameter of 1 mm were placed on each block (n = 14); all the specimens were immersed in 37°C water for 24 h. Afterward, μSBS was evaluated (P < 0.05), and the mode of failure was determined by a stereomicroscope (×10). The cement-zirconia interface and the surface hydrophilicity (contact angle) were also evaluated.
Statistical Analysis: Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate the effect of surface preparation, cement types, and incubator, simultaneously (P < 0.05). The bond strengths after incubation were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (P < 0.05). Failure mode, contact angle, and cement-zirconia interface were analyzed descriptively.
Results: The highest bond strength was seen in Pr surface treatment for Duo-Link cement; however, this group was not significantly different from Pr and PANAVIA F2 cement and Pr + plasma and Duo-Link cement (P = 0.075) groups. All plasma specimens in the incubator failed prematurely. The mode of failure in all specimens was adhesive. The lowest and highest contact angles were seen in Pr + plasma and the control groups, respectively.
Conclusion: The use of Pr could successfully improve the bond strength of resin cement to translucent zirconia while plasma was not an acceptable and durable substitute.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>37398848</pmid><doi>10.4103/jcd.jcd_41_23</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0972-0707 |
| ispartof | Journal of conservative dentistry, 2023-05, Vol.26 (3), p.281-287 |
| issn | 0972-0707 0974-5203 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10309120 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Argon Bonds Cement Contact angle Original Plasma Statistical analysis Variance analysis Zirconia Zirconium oxide |
| title | Influence of nonthermal argon plasma on the micro-shear bond strength between resin cement and translucent zirconia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A34%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20nonthermal%20argon%20plasma%20on%20the%20micro-shear%20bond%20strength%20between%20resin%20cement%20and%20translucent%20zirconia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20conservative%20dentistry&rft.au=Salimi,%20Kimia&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=287&rft.pages=281-287&rft.issn=0972-0707&rft.eissn=0974-5203&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jcd.jcd_41_23&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA753414579%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2821277488&rft_id=info:pmid/37398848&rft_galeid=A753414579&rfr_iscdi=true |