Medical management of early pregnancy loss is cost-effective compared to office uterine aspiration

Medical management of early pregnancy loss is cost-effective compared to office uterine aspiration

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2022-06, Vol.227 (5), p.737.e1-737.e11
Hauptverfasser: NAGENDRA, Divyah, GUTMAN, Sarah M., KOELPER, Nathanael C., LOZA-AVALOS, Sandra E., SONALKAR, Sarita, SCHREIBER, Courtney A., HARVIE, Heidi S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 737.e11
container_issue 5
container_start_page 737.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 227
creator NAGENDRA, Divyah
GUTMAN, Sarah M.
KOELPER, Nathanael C.
LOZA-AVALOS, Sandra E.
SONALKAR, Sarita
SCHREIBER, Courtney A.
HARVIE, Heidi S.
description
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10302401</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10302401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_103024013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljbtOxDAURC0EYsPjB6j8AwnXzm7iVBQIRLMdvXXXuQ6OEjuyvSvl7wkSDTXV6Gh0Zhh7ElAJEM3zWOEYhkqClBU0FRz2V6wQ0LVloxp1zQoAkGVXt2rH7lIaf1B28pbt6kOrQAlRsNORemdw4jN6HGgmn3mwnDBOK18iDR69WfkUUuIucRNSLslaMtldaMN5wUg9z2GzrDPEz5mi88QxLS5idsE_sBuLU6LH37xnL-9vn68f5XI-zdSb7TLipJfoZoyrDuj038a7Lz2EixZQg9yDqP-_8A2UEmbd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Medical management of early pregnancy loss is cost-effective compared to office uterine aspiration</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>NAGENDRA, Divyah ; GUTMAN, Sarah M. ; KOELPER, Nathanael C. ; LOZA-AVALOS, Sandra E. ; SONALKAR, Sarita ; SCHREIBER, Courtney A. ; HARVIE, Heidi S.</creator><creatorcontrib>NAGENDRA, Divyah ; GUTMAN, Sarah M. ; KOELPER, Nathanael C. ; LOZA-AVALOS, Sandra E. ; SONALKAR, Sarita ; SCHREIBER, Courtney A. ; HARVIE, Heidi S.</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35780811</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022-06, Vol.227 (5), p.737.e1-737.e11</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>NAGENDRA, Divyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUTMAN, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOELPER, Nathanael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOZA-AVALOS, Sandra E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONALKAR, Sarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHREIBER, Courtney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARVIE, Heidi S.</creatorcontrib><title>Medical management of early pregnancy loss is cost-effective compared to office uterine aspiration</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqljbtOxDAURC0EYsPjB6j8AwnXzm7iVBQIRLMdvXXXuQ6OEjuyvSvl7wkSDTXV6Gh0Zhh7ElAJEM3zWOEYhkqClBU0FRz2V6wQ0LVloxp1zQoAkGVXt2rH7lIaf1B28pbt6kOrQAlRsNORemdw4jN6HGgmn3mwnDBOK18iDR69WfkUUuIucRNSLslaMtldaMN5wUg9z2GzrDPEz5mi88QxLS5idsE_sBuLU6LH37xnL-9vn68f5XI-zdSb7TLipJfoZoyrDuj038a7Lz2EixZQg9yDqP-_8A2UEmbd</recordid><startdate>20220630</startdate><enddate>20220630</enddate><creator>NAGENDRA, Divyah</creator><creator>GUTMAN, Sarah M.</creator><creator>KOELPER, Nathanael C.</creator><creator>LOZA-AVALOS, Sandra E.</creator><creator>SONALKAR, Sarita</creator><creator>SCHREIBER, Courtney A.</creator><creator>HARVIE, Heidi S.</creator><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220630</creationdate><title>Medical management of early pregnancy loss is cost-effective compared to office uterine aspiration</title><author>NAGENDRA, Divyah ; GUTMAN, Sarah M. ; KOELPER, Nathanael C. ; LOZA-AVALOS, Sandra E. ; SONALKAR, Sarita ; SCHREIBER, Courtney A. ; HARVIE, Heidi S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_103024013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NAGENDRA, Divyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUTMAN, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KOELPER, Nathanael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LOZA-AVALOS, Sandra E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SONALKAR, Sarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHREIBER, Courtney A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARVIE, Heidi S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NAGENDRA, Divyah</au><au>GUTMAN, Sarah M.</au><au>KOELPER, Nathanael C.</au><au>LOZA-AVALOS, Sandra E.</au><au>SONALKAR, Sarita</au><au>SCHREIBER, Courtney A.</au><au>HARVIE, Heidi S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Medical management of early pregnancy loss is cost-effective compared to office uterine aspiration</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><date>2022-06-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>227</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>737.e1</spage><epage>737.e11</epage><pages>737.e1-737.e11</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><pmid>35780811</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.054</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022-06, Vol.227 (5), p.737.e1-737.e11
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10302401
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Medical management of early pregnancy loss is cost-effective compared to office uterine aspiration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A27%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Medical%20management%20of%20early%20pregnancy%20loss%20is%20cost-effective%20compared%20to%20office%20uterine%20aspiration&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=NAGENDRA,%20Divyah&rft.date=2022-06-30&rft.volume=227&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=737.e1&rft.epage=737.e11&rft.pages=737.e1-737.e11&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.054&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10302401%3C/pubmedcentral%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/35780811&rfr_iscdi=true