COVID-19 and welfare state trajectory in South Korea: Stagnation, consolidation, or transformation?

In order to protect health and minimize financial damage to the public, South Korea responded to the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic with various social policy tools. In the first 9 months of 2020, nearly three dozen pieces of social policy legislation were passed along with four rounds of su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global social policy 2023-08, Vol.23 (2), p.352-355
1. Verfasser: Shim, Jaemin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 355
container_issue 2
container_start_page 352
container_title Global social policy
container_volume 23
creator Shim, Jaemin
description In order to protect health and minimize financial damage to the public, South Korea responded to the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic with various social policy tools. In the first 9 months of 2020, nearly three dozen pieces of social policy legislation were passed along with four rounds of supplementary budget approval, many of which explicitly focused on coping with the pandemic (Shim, 2021). Specific social policy measures adopted ranged from conventional ones such as health care and social assistance supports to more unconventional means such as tax breaks and university tuition fee reductions. In view of the speed and the level of political consensus pertinent to social policy decisions during this period, the social policy responses to the pandemic were swift and bipartisan in South Korea (Shim, 2021). Furthermore, in light of the country’s previous experiences of turning ‘a crisis’ into ‘an opportunity’ for welfare expansion, the pandemic could potentially have a significant effect on the nature of South Korea’s welfare state.More than 3 years have passed since the outbreak of the pandemic. In response to the latest call to update government’s social policy responses to the pandemic from a global perspective (Dorlach, 2023), the goal here is to track key social policy changes (or lack thereof) in South Korea and examine what effect they had on the overall structure of the welfare state. One of the key social policy initiatives proposed by the president Moon Jae-in during the pandemic was the expansion of employment and work injury insurance schemes to theretofore uncovered segments of the population. This includes various forms of self-employed or agency workers such as artists, delivery workers, door-to-door salespersons, and replacement drivers. The president’s ambition to bolster the employment security net was made clear in his ‘Korean New Deal’ road map in July 2020; a year later, the president reconfirmed his intention with the ‘Korean New Deal 2.0’ road map. Upon examining concrete legislative measures taken, the president has filled many blind spots in the employment and work injury insurance schemes. Step-by-step, employment insurance increased its scope and took legal effect, covering various types of artists (December 2020), then workers in twelve different occupation categories (July 2021), and finally, covering messenger service workers and replacement drivers (January 2022). As a result of expanded coverage, nearly a million new
doi_str_mv 10.1177/14680181231180518
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10290926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_14680181231180518</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2842374883</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b37a632bfffc567576da4a1ec695f4720916b5abba8843f2268a042b786764643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1vFDEMhiMEoqXwA7igSFw4MCVOMkmGS4W2fFRU6qHANfJkk-2sZpOSzFD135Nll_IlTknsx6_tvIQ8BXYMoPUrkMowMMAFgGEtmHvkELSEhhsm7td7zTdb4IA8KmXNGOdMqYfkQBjFeKfYIXGLiy9npw10FOOS3vgxYPa0TDh5OmVcezelfEuHSC_TPF3Rjyl7fE0vJ1xFnIYUX1KXYknjsNw_U94WxhJS3vwInTwmDwKOxT_Zn0fk87u3nxYfmvOL92eLN-eNky2fml5oVIL3IQTXKt1qtUSJ4J3q2iA1Zx2ovsW-R2OkCJwrg0zyXhullVRSHJGTne713G_80vlYBxntdR42mG9twsH-mYnDlV2lbxbqZ7COq6rwYq-Q09fZl8luhuL8OGL0aS5WMFFbK9VBRZ__ha7TnGPdz3IjudDSGFEp2FEup1KyD3fTALNbD-0_HtaaZ7-vcVfx07QKHO-Agiv_q-3_Fb8DokujPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2842374883</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COVID-19 and welfare state trajectory in South Korea: Stagnation, consolidation, or transformation?</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Shim, Jaemin</creator><creatorcontrib>Shim, Jaemin</creatorcontrib><description>In order to protect health and minimize financial damage to the public, South Korea responded to the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic with various social policy tools. In the first 9 months of 2020, nearly three dozen pieces of social policy legislation were passed along with four rounds of supplementary budget approval, many of which explicitly focused on coping with the pandemic (Shim, 2021). Specific social policy measures adopted ranged from conventional ones such as health care and social assistance supports to more unconventional means such as tax breaks and university tuition fee reductions. In view of the speed and the level of political consensus pertinent to social policy decisions during this period, the social policy responses to the pandemic were swift and bipartisan in South Korea (Shim, 2021). Furthermore, in light of the country’s previous experiences of turning ‘a crisis’ into ‘an opportunity’ for welfare expansion, the pandemic could potentially have a significant effect on the nature of South Korea’s welfare state.More than 3 years have passed since the outbreak of the pandemic. In response to the latest call to update government’s social policy responses to the pandemic from a global perspective (Dorlach, 2023), the goal here is to track key social policy changes (or lack thereof) in South Korea and examine what effect they had on the overall structure of the welfare state. One of the key social policy initiatives proposed by the president Moon Jae-in during the pandemic was the expansion of employment and work injury insurance schemes to theretofore uncovered segments of the population. This includes various forms of self-employed or agency workers such as artists, delivery workers, door-to-door salespersons, and replacement drivers. The president’s ambition to bolster the employment security net was made clear in his ‘Korean New Deal’ road map in July 2020; a year later, the president reconfirmed his intention with the ‘Korean New Deal 2.0’ road map. Upon examining concrete legislative measures taken, the president has filled many blind spots in the employment and work injury insurance schemes. Step-by-step, employment insurance increased its scope and took legal effect, covering various types of artists (December 2020), then workers in twelve different occupation categories (July 2021), and finally, covering messenger service workers and replacement drivers (January 2022). As a result of expanded coverage, nearly a million new workers were newly insured (Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service, 2021). Similarly, the work injury insurance scheme also saw an increase in the number of insured by adding new occupation categories to the eligibility conditions and, simultaneously, making opting out more difficult.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-0181</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2803</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14680181231180518</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38602960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Artists ; Classification ; Consensus ; Coping ; COVID-19 ; Employment ; Health services ; Injuries ; Job security ; Legislation ; New Deal ; Occupational safety ; Occupations ; Pandemics ; Presidents ; Public finance ; Roads &amp; highways ; Social policy ; Social response ; Tuition ; Welfare services ; Welfare state ; Work ; Workers compensation</subject><ispartof>Global social policy, 2023-08, Vol.23 (2), p.352-355</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023 2023 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b37a632bfffc567576da4a1ec695f4720916b5abba8843f2268a042b786764643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14680181231180518$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14680181231180518$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21819,27866,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38602960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shim, Jaemin</creatorcontrib><title>COVID-19 and welfare state trajectory in South Korea: Stagnation, consolidation, or transformation?</title><title>Global social policy</title><addtitle>Glob Soc Policy</addtitle><description>In order to protect health and minimize financial damage to the public, South Korea responded to the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic with various social policy tools. In the first 9 months of 2020, nearly three dozen pieces of social policy legislation were passed along with four rounds of supplementary budget approval, many of which explicitly focused on coping with the pandemic (Shim, 2021). Specific social policy measures adopted ranged from conventional ones such as health care and social assistance supports to more unconventional means such as tax breaks and university tuition fee reductions. In view of the speed and the level of political consensus pertinent to social policy decisions during this period, the social policy responses to the pandemic were swift and bipartisan in South Korea (Shim, 2021). Furthermore, in light of the country’s previous experiences of turning ‘a crisis’ into ‘an opportunity’ for welfare expansion, the pandemic could potentially have a significant effect on the nature of South Korea’s welfare state.More than 3 years have passed since the outbreak of the pandemic. In response to the latest call to update government’s social policy responses to the pandemic from a global perspective (Dorlach, 2023), the goal here is to track key social policy changes (or lack thereof) in South Korea and examine what effect they had on the overall structure of the welfare state. One of the key social policy initiatives proposed by the president Moon Jae-in during the pandemic was the expansion of employment and work injury insurance schemes to theretofore uncovered segments of the population. This includes various forms of self-employed or agency workers such as artists, delivery workers, door-to-door salespersons, and replacement drivers. The president’s ambition to bolster the employment security net was made clear in his ‘Korean New Deal’ road map in July 2020; a year later, the president reconfirmed his intention with the ‘Korean New Deal 2.0’ road map. Upon examining concrete legislative measures taken, the president has filled many blind spots in the employment and work injury insurance schemes. Step-by-step, employment insurance increased its scope and took legal effect, covering various types of artists (December 2020), then workers in twelve different occupation categories (July 2021), and finally, covering messenger service workers and replacement drivers (January 2022). As a result of expanded coverage, nearly a million new workers were newly insured (Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service, 2021). Similarly, the work injury insurance scheme also saw an increase in the number of insured by adding new occupation categories to the eligibility conditions and, simultaneously, making opting out more difficult.</description><subject>Artists</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Job security</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>New Deal</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Roads &amp; highways</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>Social response</subject><subject>Tuition</subject><subject>Welfare services</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Workers compensation</subject><issn>1468-0181</issn><issn>1741-2803</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1vFDEMhiMEoqXwA7igSFw4MCVOMkmGS4W2fFRU6qHANfJkk-2sZpOSzFD135Nll_IlTknsx6_tvIQ8BXYMoPUrkMowMMAFgGEtmHvkELSEhhsm7td7zTdb4IA8KmXNGOdMqYfkQBjFeKfYIXGLiy9npw10FOOS3vgxYPa0TDh5OmVcezelfEuHSC_TPF3Rjyl7fE0vJ1xFnIYUX1KXYknjsNw_U94WxhJS3vwInTwmDwKOxT_Zn0fk87u3nxYfmvOL92eLN-eNky2fml5oVIL3IQTXKt1qtUSJ4J3q2iA1Zx2ovsW-R2OkCJwrg0zyXhullVRSHJGTne713G_80vlYBxntdR42mG9twsH-mYnDlV2lbxbqZ7COq6rwYq-Q09fZl8luhuL8OGL0aS5WMFFbK9VBRZ__ha7TnGPdz3IjudDSGFEp2FEup1KyD3fTALNbD-0_HtaaZ7-vcVfx07QKHO-Agiv_q-3_Fb8DokujPg</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Shim, Jaemin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>COVID-19 and welfare state trajectory in South Korea: Stagnation, consolidation, or transformation?</title><author>Shim, Jaemin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b37a632bfffc567576da4a1ec695f4720916b5abba8843f2268a042b786764643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artists</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Job security</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>New Deal</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Roads &amp; highways</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>Social response</topic><topic>Tuition</topic><topic>Welfare services</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Workers compensation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shim, Jaemin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Global social policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shim, Jaemin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COVID-19 and welfare state trajectory in South Korea: Stagnation, consolidation, or transformation?</atitle><jtitle>Global social policy</jtitle><addtitle>Glob Soc Policy</addtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>352-355</pages><issn>1468-0181</issn><eissn>1741-2803</eissn><abstract>In order to protect health and minimize financial damage to the public, South Korea responded to the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic with various social policy tools. In the first 9 months of 2020, nearly three dozen pieces of social policy legislation were passed along with four rounds of supplementary budget approval, many of which explicitly focused on coping with the pandemic (Shim, 2021). Specific social policy measures adopted ranged from conventional ones such as health care and social assistance supports to more unconventional means such as tax breaks and university tuition fee reductions. In view of the speed and the level of political consensus pertinent to social policy decisions during this period, the social policy responses to the pandemic were swift and bipartisan in South Korea (Shim, 2021). Furthermore, in light of the country’s previous experiences of turning ‘a crisis’ into ‘an opportunity’ for welfare expansion, the pandemic could potentially have a significant effect on the nature of South Korea’s welfare state.More than 3 years have passed since the outbreak of the pandemic. In response to the latest call to update government’s social policy responses to the pandemic from a global perspective (Dorlach, 2023), the goal here is to track key social policy changes (or lack thereof) in South Korea and examine what effect they had on the overall structure of the welfare state. One of the key social policy initiatives proposed by the president Moon Jae-in during the pandemic was the expansion of employment and work injury insurance schemes to theretofore uncovered segments of the population. This includes various forms of self-employed or agency workers such as artists, delivery workers, door-to-door salespersons, and replacement drivers. The president’s ambition to bolster the employment security net was made clear in his ‘Korean New Deal’ road map in July 2020; a year later, the president reconfirmed his intention with the ‘Korean New Deal 2.0’ road map. Upon examining concrete legislative measures taken, the president has filled many blind spots in the employment and work injury insurance schemes. Step-by-step, employment insurance increased its scope and took legal effect, covering various types of artists (December 2020), then workers in twelve different occupation categories (July 2021), and finally, covering messenger service workers and replacement drivers (January 2022). As a result of expanded coverage, nearly a million new workers were newly insured (Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service, 2021). Similarly, the work injury insurance scheme also saw an increase in the number of insured by adding new occupation categories to the eligibility conditions and, simultaneously, making opting out more difficult.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>38602960</pmid><doi>10.1177/14680181231180518</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1468-0181
ispartof Global social policy, 2023-08, Vol.23 (2), p.352-355
issn 1468-0181
1741-2803
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10290926
source Access via SAGE; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Artists
Classification
Consensus
Coping
COVID-19
Employment
Health services
Injuries
Job security
Legislation
New Deal
Occupational safety
Occupations
Pandemics
Presidents
Public finance
Roads & highways
Social policy
Social response
Tuition
Welfare services
Welfare state
Work
Workers compensation
title COVID-19 and welfare state trajectory in South Korea: Stagnation, consolidation, or transformation?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A15%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COVID-19%20and%20welfare%20state%20trajectory%20in%20South%20Korea:%20Stagnation,%20consolidation,%20or%20transformation?&rft.jtitle=Global%20social%20policy&rft.au=Shim,%20Jaemin&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=352-355&rft.issn=1468-0181&rft.eissn=1741-2803&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14680181231180518&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2842374883%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2842374883&rft_id=info:pmid/38602960&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14680181231180518&rfr_iscdi=true