Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions
The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology 2023-06, Vol.16 (6), p.44-45 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ruiz, Jacco Hyde, Mark Perry, Allyson Brouha, Brook |
description | The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged to not merit biopsy where melanoma, while very unlikely, cannot be excluded with absolute certainty. These ambiguous pigmented lesions (APLs) were often photographed and followed for clinical evolution. This article evaluates the presence of APLs and describes the use of non-invasive genomic testing to sort them. An informal survey using pictures of 10 APLs found that 6 of 8 dermatology providers were unable to identify which were melanomas. Next, our single practice chart review of 1,254 APLs evaluated by non-invasive genomic testing revealed 35 melanomas. All 1,254 were lesions that fell below our biopsy threshold. Non-invasive genomic testing can improve biopsy decisions particularly in clinically indeterminate pigmented lesions. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10286879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2830215309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-800c66eee9cfbbbb05e5818ba628f4e227f6bc6e32ab71b478e96f1234bb62063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLw0AUhQdRbKn9C5Klm8A8knmAIKXUKgR0oethZnpTRyaZmEkK_fdGrKJncxf38J177hmaUy5Vrogoz9GcqILkVEg1Q8uU3vEkJlUpiks0Y4Jxwng5R7dbaGPjXbY5mDCawcc2i3W2Dr71zoRwzFaN9fsxjil79vsG2gF2WQVpMqYrdFGbkGB5mgv0er95WT_k1dP2cb2q8o5IOuQSY8c5AChX20m4hFISaQ2nsi6AUlFz6zgwaqwgthASFK8JZYW1nGLOFujum9uNtoGdm47oTdBd7xvTH3U0Xv_ftP5N7-NBE0wll0JNhJsToY8fI6RBNz45CMG0MFXTVDJMScnwl_X6b9hvys_P2CdIzGrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2830215309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ruiz, Jacco ; Hyde, Mark ; Perry, Allyson ; Brouha, Brook</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Jacco ; Hyde, Mark ; Perry, Allyson ; Brouha, Brook</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged to not merit biopsy where melanoma, while very unlikely, cannot be excluded with absolute certainty. These ambiguous pigmented lesions (APLs) were often photographed and followed for clinical evolution. This article evaluates the presence of APLs and describes the use of non-invasive genomic testing to sort them. An informal survey using pictures of 10 APLs found that 6 of 8 dermatology providers were unable to identify which were melanomas. Next, our single practice chart review of 1,254 APLs evaluated by non-invasive genomic testing revealed 35 melanomas. All 1,254 were lesions that fell below our biopsy threshold. Non-invasive genomic testing can improve biopsy decisions particularly in clinically indeterminate pigmented lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-2789</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2689-9175</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37361365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Matrix Medical Communications</publisher><subject>Emerging Authors in Dermatology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2023-06, Vol.16 (6), p.44-45</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286879/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286879/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37361365$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Jacco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouha, Brook</creatorcontrib><title>Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions</title><title>The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology</title><addtitle>J Clin Aesthet Dermatol</addtitle><description>The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged to not merit biopsy where melanoma, while very unlikely, cannot be excluded with absolute certainty. These ambiguous pigmented lesions (APLs) were often photographed and followed for clinical evolution. This article evaluates the presence of APLs and describes the use of non-invasive genomic testing to sort them. An informal survey using pictures of 10 APLs found that 6 of 8 dermatology providers were unable to identify which were melanomas. Next, our single practice chart review of 1,254 APLs evaluated by non-invasive genomic testing revealed 35 melanomas. All 1,254 were lesions that fell below our biopsy threshold. Non-invasive genomic testing can improve biopsy decisions particularly in clinically indeterminate pigmented lesions.</description><subject>Emerging Authors in Dermatology</subject><issn>1941-2789</issn><issn>2689-9175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLw0AUhQdRbKn9C5Klm8A8knmAIKXUKgR0oethZnpTRyaZmEkK_fdGrKJncxf38J177hmaUy5Vrogoz9GcqILkVEg1Q8uU3vEkJlUpiks0Y4Jxwng5R7dbaGPjXbY5mDCawcc2i3W2Dr71zoRwzFaN9fsxjil79vsG2gF2WQVpMqYrdFGbkGB5mgv0er95WT_k1dP2cb2q8o5IOuQSY8c5AChX20m4hFISaQ2nsi6AUlFz6zgwaqwgthASFK8JZYW1nGLOFujum9uNtoGdm47oTdBd7xvTH3U0Xv_ftP5N7-NBE0wll0JNhJsToY8fI6RBNz45CMG0MFXTVDJMScnwl_X6b9hvys_P2CdIzGrw</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Ruiz, Jacco</creator><creator>Hyde, Mark</creator><creator>Perry, Allyson</creator><creator>Brouha, Brook</creator><general>Matrix Medical Communications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions</title><author>Ruiz, Jacco ; Hyde, Mark ; Perry, Allyson ; Brouha, Brook</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-800c66eee9cfbbbb05e5818ba628f4e227f6bc6e32ab71b478e96f1234bb62063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Emerging Authors in Dermatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Jacco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouha, Brook</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruiz, Jacco</au><au>Hyde, Mark</au><au>Perry, Allyson</au><au>Brouha, Brook</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Aesthet Dermatol</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>44-45</pages><issn>1941-2789</issn><eissn>2689-9175</eissn><abstract>The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged to not merit biopsy where melanoma, while very unlikely, cannot be excluded with absolute certainty. These ambiguous pigmented lesions (APLs) were often photographed and followed for clinical evolution. This article evaluates the presence of APLs and describes the use of non-invasive genomic testing to sort them. An informal survey using pictures of 10 APLs found that 6 of 8 dermatology providers were unable to identify which were melanomas. Next, our single practice chart review of 1,254 APLs evaluated by non-invasive genomic testing revealed 35 melanomas. All 1,254 were lesions that fell below our biopsy threshold. Non-invasive genomic testing can improve biopsy decisions particularly in clinically indeterminate pigmented lesions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Matrix Medical Communications</pub><pmid>37361365</pmid><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1941-2789 |
ispartof | The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2023-06, Vol.16 (6), p.44-45 |
issn | 1941-2789 2689-9175 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10286879 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Emerging Authors in Dermatology |
title | Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T02%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic%20Evaluation%20of%20Clinically%20Ambiguous%20Pigmented%20Lesions&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20aesthetic%20dermatology&rft.au=Ruiz,%20Jacco&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=44-45&rft.issn=1941-2789&rft.eissn=2689-9175&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2830215309%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2830215309&rft_id=info:pmid/37361365&rfr_iscdi=true |