Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions

The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology 2023-06, Vol.16 (6), p.44-45
Hauptverfasser: Ruiz, Jacco, Hyde, Mark, Perry, Allyson, Brouha, Brook
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 6
container_start_page 44
container_title The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology
container_volume 16
creator Ruiz, Jacco
Hyde, Mark
Perry, Allyson
Brouha, Brook
description The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged to not merit biopsy where melanoma, while very unlikely, cannot be excluded with absolute certainty. These ambiguous pigmented lesions (APLs) were often photographed and followed for clinical evolution. This article evaluates the presence of APLs and describes the use of non-invasive genomic testing to sort them. An informal survey using pictures of 10 APLs found that 6 of 8 dermatology providers were unable to identify which were melanomas. Next, our single practice chart review of 1,254 APLs evaluated by non-invasive genomic testing revealed 35 melanomas. All 1,254 were lesions that fell below our biopsy threshold. Non-invasive genomic testing can improve biopsy decisions particularly in clinically indeterminate pigmented lesions.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10286879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2830215309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-800c66eee9cfbbbb05e5818ba628f4e227f6bc6e32ab71b478e96f1234bb62063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLw0AUhQdRbKn9C5Klm8A8knmAIKXUKgR0oethZnpTRyaZmEkK_fdGrKJncxf38J177hmaUy5Vrogoz9GcqILkVEg1Q8uU3vEkJlUpiks0Y4Jxwng5R7dbaGPjXbY5mDCawcc2i3W2Dr71zoRwzFaN9fsxjil79vsG2gF2WQVpMqYrdFGbkGB5mgv0er95WT_k1dP2cb2q8o5IOuQSY8c5AChX20m4hFISaQ2nsi6AUlFz6zgwaqwgthASFK8JZYW1nGLOFujum9uNtoGdm47oTdBd7xvTH3U0Xv_ftP5N7-NBE0wll0JNhJsToY8fI6RBNz45CMG0MFXTVDJMScnwl_X6b9hvys_P2CdIzGrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2830215309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ruiz, Jacco ; Hyde, Mark ; Perry, Allyson ; Brouha, Brook</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Jacco ; Hyde, Mark ; Perry, Allyson ; Brouha, Brook</creatorcontrib><description>The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged to not merit biopsy where melanoma, while very unlikely, cannot be excluded with absolute certainty. These ambiguous pigmented lesions (APLs) were often photographed and followed for clinical evolution. This article evaluates the presence of APLs and describes the use of non-invasive genomic testing to sort them. An informal survey using pictures of 10 APLs found that 6 of 8 dermatology providers were unable to identify which were melanomas. Next, our single practice chart review of 1,254 APLs evaluated by non-invasive genomic testing revealed 35 melanomas. All 1,254 were lesions that fell below our biopsy threshold. Non-invasive genomic testing can improve biopsy decisions particularly in clinically indeterminate pigmented lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-2789</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2689-9175</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37361365</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Matrix Medical Communications</publisher><subject>Emerging Authors in Dermatology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2023-06, Vol.16 (6), p.44-45</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286879/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286879/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37361365$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Jacco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouha, Brook</creatorcontrib><title>Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions</title><title>The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology</title><addtitle>J Clin Aesthet Dermatol</addtitle><description>The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged to not merit biopsy where melanoma, while very unlikely, cannot be excluded with absolute certainty. These ambiguous pigmented lesions (APLs) were often photographed and followed for clinical evolution. This article evaluates the presence of APLs and describes the use of non-invasive genomic testing to sort them. An informal survey using pictures of 10 APLs found that 6 of 8 dermatology providers were unable to identify which were melanomas. Next, our single practice chart review of 1,254 APLs evaluated by non-invasive genomic testing revealed 35 melanomas. All 1,254 were lesions that fell below our biopsy threshold. Non-invasive genomic testing can improve biopsy decisions particularly in clinically indeterminate pigmented lesions.</description><subject>Emerging Authors in Dermatology</subject><issn>1941-2789</issn><issn>2689-9175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtLw0AUhQdRbKn9C5Klm8A8knmAIKXUKgR0oethZnpTRyaZmEkK_fdGrKJncxf38J177hmaUy5Vrogoz9GcqILkVEg1Q8uU3vEkJlUpiks0Y4Jxwng5R7dbaGPjXbY5mDCawcc2i3W2Dr71zoRwzFaN9fsxjil79vsG2gF2WQVpMqYrdFGbkGB5mgv0er95WT_k1dP2cb2q8o5IOuQSY8c5AChX20m4hFISaQ2nsi6AUlFz6zgwaqwgthASFK8JZYW1nGLOFujum9uNtoGdm47oTdBd7xvTH3U0Xv_ftP5N7-NBE0wll0JNhJsToY8fI6RBNz45CMG0MFXTVDJMScnwl_X6b9hvys_P2CdIzGrw</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Ruiz, Jacco</creator><creator>Hyde, Mark</creator><creator>Perry, Allyson</creator><creator>Brouha, Brook</creator><general>Matrix Medical Communications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions</title><author>Ruiz, Jacco ; Hyde, Mark ; Perry, Allyson ; Brouha, Brook</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p182t-800c66eee9cfbbbb05e5818ba628f4e227f6bc6e32ab71b478e96f1234bb62063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Emerging Authors in Dermatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Jacco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Allyson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brouha, Brook</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruiz, Jacco</au><au>Hyde, Mark</au><au>Perry, Allyson</au><au>Brouha, Brook</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Aesthet Dermatol</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>44-45</pages><issn>1941-2789</issn><eissn>2689-9175</eissn><abstract>The clinical evaluation of pigmented lesions represents a 'high-stakes' scenario as a missed melanoma can be fatal. Traditional clinical assessment visually sorts pigmented lesions into those that merit a biopsy and those that do not. In our practice there exists a group of lesions judged to not merit biopsy where melanoma, while very unlikely, cannot be excluded with absolute certainty. These ambiguous pigmented lesions (APLs) were often photographed and followed for clinical evolution. This article evaluates the presence of APLs and describes the use of non-invasive genomic testing to sort them. An informal survey using pictures of 10 APLs found that 6 of 8 dermatology providers were unable to identify which were melanomas. Next, our single practice chart review of 1,254 APLs evaluated by non-invasive genomic testing revealed 35 melanomas. All 1,254 were lesions that fell below our biopsy threshold. Non-invasive genomic testing can improve biopsy decisions particularly in clinically indeterminate pigmented lesions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Matrix Medical Communications</pub><pmid>37361365</pmid><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-2789
ispartof The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2023-06, Vol.16 (6), p.44-45
issn 1941-2789
2689-9175
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10286879
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Emerging Authors in Dermatology
title Genomic Evaluation of Clinically Ambiguous Pigmented Lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T02%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic%20Evaluation%20of%20Clinically%20Ambiguous%20Pigmented%20Lesions&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20clinical%20and%20aesthetic%20dermatology&rft.au=Ruiz,%20Jacco&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=44-45&rft.issn=1941-2789&rft.eissn=2689-9175&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2830215309%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2830215309&rft_id=info:pmid/37361365&rfr_iscdi=true