Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ta-VNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
This study explored the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in patients with epilepsy. A total of 150 patients were randomly divided into active stimulation group and control group. At baseline and 4, 12, and 20 weeks of stimulation, demographic informati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurotherapeutics 2023-04, Vol.20 (3), p.870-880 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 880 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 870 |
container_title | Neurotherapeutics |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Yang, Huajun Shi, Weixiong Fan, Jingjing Wang, Xiaoshan Song, Yijun Lian, Yajun Shan, Wei Wang, Qun |
description | This study explored the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in patients with epilepsy. A total of 150 patients were randomly divided into active stimulation group and control group. At baseline and 4, 12, and 20 weeks of stimulation, demographic information, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded; at 20 weeks, the patients underwent assessment of quality of life, Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scale, MINI suicide scale, and MoCA scale. Seizure frequency was determined according to the patient’s seizure diary. Seizure frequency reduction > 50% was considered effective. During our study, the antiepileptic drugs were maintained at a constant level in all subjects. At 20 weeks, the responder rate was significantly higher in active group than in control group. The relative reduction of seizure frequency in the active group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 20 weeks. Additionally, no significant differences were shown in QOL, HAMA, HAMD, MINI, and MoCA score at 20 weeks. The main adverse events were pain, sleep disturbance, flu-like symptoms, and local skin discomfort. No severe adverse events were reported in active and control group. There were no significant differences in adverse events and severe adverse events between the two groups. The present study showed that ta-VNS is an effective and safe therapy for epilepsy. Furthermore, the benefit in QOL, mood, and cognitive state of ta-VNS needs further validation in the future study although no significant improvement was shown in this study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13311-023-01353-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10275831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2827007352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-60065f3efe21d22284abd8b3e9662a91f7580d6af8cad7e3abd94fc0e28da5383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEojdegAWyxKZIGGyfSWx3g4ZpaZGqIrVDt5YnORlcOfFgJ5Xad-CdcUkpl0U3vv3_-ezjvyhecvaOMybfJw7AOWUCKONQAtVPim2upKJyJvXTvNYAVAoOW8VOSleMlQBaPS-2oNK6rJTYLn4so-1TPQ62xzAmMh-jq0dvI7m067w_w3iN5GJwXT4cXOjJ_mDp5dnFG9KGSJYR7dBhP5DQksM4ruk5JpcybSBHG-dxk24OyJyc274JnbvF5i05DOPKI_3oXd-QRR5dbX0mOev3imet9Qlf3M-7xddPR8vFCT39cvx5MT-l9UyWA60Yq8oWsEXBGyGEmtlVo1aAuqqE1byVpWJNZVtV20YiZFXP2pqhUI0tQcFu8WHibsZVh02dG4jWm010nY03Jlhn_lV6982sw7XhTGQ28EzYvyfE8H3ENJjOpRq9n_7RCKmFZooxna2v_7NehTH2uT8jlJA5SShFdonJVceQUsT24TWcmbu4zRS3yXGbX3GbO_Srv_t4KPmdbzbAZEhZ6tcY_9z9CPYnkcu3vg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2827007352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ta-VNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yang, Huajun ; Shi, Weixiong ; Fan, Jingjing ; Wang, Xiaoshan ; Song, Yijun ; Lian, Yajun ; Shan, Wei ; Wang, Qun</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Huajun ; Shi, Weixiong ; Fan, Jingjing ; Wang, Xiaoshan ; Song, Yijun ; Lian, Yajun ; Shan, Wei ; Wang, Qun</creatorcontrib><description>This study explored the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in patients with epilepsy. A total of 150 patients were randomly divided into active stimulation group and control group. At baseline and 4, 12, and 20 weeks of stimulation, demographic information, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded; at 20 weeks, the patients underwent assessment of quality of life, Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scale, MINI suicide scale, and MoCA scale. Seizure frequency was determined according to the patient’s seizure diary. Seizure frequency reduction > 50% was considered effective. During our study, the antiepileptic drugs were maintained at a constant level in all subjects. At 20 weeks, the responder rate was significantly higher in active group than in control group. The relative reduction of seizure frequency in the active group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 20 weeks. Additionally, no significant differences were shown in QOL, HAMA, HAMD, MINI, and MoCA score at 20 weeks. The main adverse events were pain, sleep disturbance, flu-like symptoms, and local skin discomfort. No severe adverse events were reported in active and control group. There were no significant differences in adverse events and severe adverse events between the two groups. The present study showed that ta-VNS is an effective and safe therapy for epilepsy. Furthermore, the benefit in QOL, mood, and cognitive state of ta-VNS needs further validation in the future study although no significant improvement was shown in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1933-7213</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-7479</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13311-023-01353-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36995682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adverse events ; Antiepileptic agents ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Clinical trials ; Cognitive ability ; Convulsions & seizures ; Double-blind studies ; Drug resistance ; Drug Resistant Epilepsy - therapy ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy - etiology ; Epilepsy - therapy ; Humans ; Neurobiology ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Neurosurgery ; Original ; Original Article ; Patients ; Quality of Life ; Seizures ; Suicide ; Treatment Outcome ; Vagus Nerve ; Vagus Nerve Stimulation</subject><ispartof>Neurotherapeutics, 2023-04, Vol.20 (3), p.870-880</ispartof><rights>The American Society for Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Inc. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The American Society for Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-60065f3efe21d22284abd8b3e9662a91f7580d6af8cad7e3abd94fc0e28da5383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-60065f3efe21d22284abd8b3e9662a91f7580d6af8cad7e3abd94fc0e28da5383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275831/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275831/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36995682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Huajun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Weixiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Yajun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qun</creatorcontrib><title>Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ta-VNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial</title><title>Neurotherapeutics</title><addtitle>Neurotherapeutics</addtitle><addtitle>Neurotherapeutics</addtitle><description>This study explored the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in patients with epilepsy. A total of 150 patients were randomly divided into active stimulation group and control group. At baseline and 4, 12, and 20 weeks of stimulation, demographic information, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded; at 20 weeks, the patients underwent assessment of quality of life, Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scale, MINI suicide scale, and MoCA scale. Seizure frequency was determined according to the patient’s seizure diary. Seizure frequency reduction > 50% was considered effective. During our study, the antiepileptic drugs were maintained at a constant level in all subjects. At 20 weeks, the responder rate was significantly higher in active group than in control group. The relative reduction of seizure frequency in the active group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 20 weeks. Additionally, no significant differences were shown in QOL, HAMA, HAMD, MINI, and MoCA score at 20 weeks. The main adverse events were pain, sleep disturbance, flu-like symptoms, and local skin discomfort. No severe adverse events were reported in active and control group. There were no significant differences in adverse events and severe adverse events between the two groups. The present study showed that ta-VNS is an effective and safe therapy for epilepsy. Furthermore, the benefit in QOL, mood, and cognitive state of ta-VNS needs further validation in the future study although no significant improvement was shown in this study.</description><subject>Adverse events</subject><subject>Antiepileptic agents</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Convulsions & seizures</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Drug resistance</subject><subject>Drug Resistant Epilepsy - therapy</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Epilepsy - etiology</subject><subject>Epilepsy - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neurobiology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Seizures</subject><subject>Suicide</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vagus Nerve</subject><subject>Vagus Nerve Stimulation</subject><issn>1933-7213</issn><issn>1878-7479</issn><issn>1878-7479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhiMEojdegAWyxKZIGGyfSWx3g4ZpaZGqIrVDt5YnORlcOfFgJ5Xad-CdcUkpl0U3vv3_-ezjvyhecvaOMybfJw7AOWUCKONQAtVPim2upKJyJvXTvNYAVAoOW8VOSleMlQBaPS-2oNK6rJTYLn4so-1TPQ62xzAmMh-jq0dvI7m067w_w3iN5GJwXT4cXOjJ_mDp5dnFG9KGSJYR7dBhP5DQksM4ruk5JpcybSBHG-dxk24OyJyc274JnbvF5i05DOPKI_3oXd-QRR5dbX0mOev3imet9Qlf3M-7xddPR8vFCT39cvx5MT-l9UyWA60Yq8oWsEXBGyGEmtlVo1aAuqqE1byVpWJNZVtV20YiZFXP2pqhUI0tQcFu8WHibsZVh02dG4jWm010nY03Jlhn_lV6982sw7XhTGQ28EzYvyfE8H3ENJjOpRq9n_7RCKmFZooxna2v_7NehTH2uT8jlJA5SShFdonJVceQUsT24TWcmbu4zRS3yXGbX3GbO_Srv_t4KPmdbzbAZEhZ6tcY_9z9CPYnkcu3vg</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Yang, Huajun</creator><creator>Shi, Weixiong</creator><creator>Fan, Jingjing</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaoshan</creator><creator>Song, Yijun</creator><creator>Lian, Yajun</creator><creator>Shan, Wei</creator><creator>Wang, Qun</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ta-VNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial</title><author>Yang, Huajun ; Shi, Weixiong ; Fan, Jingjing ; Wang, Xiaoshan ; Song, Yijun ; Lian, Yajun ; Shan, Wei ; Wang, Qun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-60065f3efe21d22284abd8b3e9662a91f7580d6af8cad7e3abd94fc0e28da5383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adverse events</topic><topic>Antiepileptic agents</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Convulsions & seizures</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Drug resistance</topic><topic>Drug Resistant Epilepsy - therapy</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Epilepsy - etiology</topic><topic>Epilepsy - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neurobiology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Seizures</topic><topic>Suicide</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vagus Nerve</topic><topic>Vagus Nerve Stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Huajun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Weixiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Song, Yijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Yajun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Neurotherapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Huajun</au><au>Shi, Weixiong</au><au>Fan, Jingjing</au><au>Wang, Xiaoshan</au><au>Song, Yijun</au><au>Lian, Yajun</au><au>Shan, Wei</au><au>Wang, Qun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ta-VNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>Neurotherapeutics</jtitle><stitle>Neurotherapeutics</stitle><addtitle>Neurotherapeutics</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>870</spage><epage>880</epage><pages>870-880</pages><issn>1933-7213</issn><issn>1878-7479</issn><eissn>1878-7479</eissn><abstract>This study explored the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) in patients with epilepsy. A total of 150 patients were randomly divided into active stimulation group and control group. At baseline and 4, 12, and 20 weeks of stimulation, demographic information, seizure frequency, and adverse events were recorded; at 20 weeks, the patients underwent assessment of quality of life, Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scale, MINI suicide scale, and MoCA scale. Seizure frequency was determined according to the patient’s seizure diary. Seizure frequency reduction > 50% was considered effective. During our study, the antiepileptic drugs were maintained at a constant level in all subjects. At 20 weeks, the responder rate was significantly higher in active group than in control group. The relative reduction of seizure frequency in the active group was significantly higher than that in the control group at 20 weeks. Additionally, no significant differences were shown in QOL, HAMA, HAMD, MINI, and MoCA score at 20 weeks. The main adverse events were pain, sleep disturbance, flu-like symptoms, and local skin discomfort. No severe adverse events were reported in active and control group. There were no significant differences in adverse events and severe adverse events between the two groups. The present study showed that ta-VNS is an effective and safe therapy for epilepsy. Furthermore, the benefit in QOL, mood, and cognitive state of ta-VNS needs further validation in the future study although no significant improvement was shown in this study.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>36995682</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13311-023-01353-9</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1933-7213 |
ispartof | Neurotherapeutics, 2023-04, Vol.20 (3), p.870-880 |
issn | 1933-7213 1878-7479 1878-7479 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10275831 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adverse events Antiepileptic agents Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Clinical trials Cognitive ability Convulsions & seizures Double-blind studies Drug resistance Drug Resistant Epilepsy - therapy Epilepsy Epilepsy - etiology Epilepsy - therapy Humans Neurobiology Neurology Neurosciences Neurosurgery Original Original Article Patients Quality of Life Seizures Suicide Treatment Outcome Vagus Nerve Vagus Nerve Stimulation |
title | Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (ta-VNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T14%3A05%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcutaneous%20Auricular%20Vagus%20Nerve%20Stimulation%20(ta-VNS)%20for%20Treatment%20of%20Drug-Resistant%20Epilepsy:%20A%20Randomized,%20Double-Blind%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Neurotherapeutics&rft.au=Yang,%20Huajun&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=870&rft.epage=880&rft.pages=870-880&rft.issn=1933-7213&rft.eissn=1878-7479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13311-023-01353-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2827007352%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2827007352&rft_id=info:pmid/36995682&rfr_iscdi=true |